was to test you on the 2^n vs. 2^n-2, that only one
of them would be available.
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 1:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
Larry, I'm o
on Cisco eq
> for it to route/subnet properly, they just enabled it by default now...
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Larry
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
ah, but that is old world classful thinking.
as per RFC 1812, effectively there is no such thing as subnet zero
Deutschman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
>
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Thanks for all of your help. I have decided that 16 must be correct since
it
> makes perf
out subnet zero...
Thanks
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Dain Deutschman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
Hey everyone,
Thanks for all of your help. I have decided that 16 must be c
Hey everyone,
Thanks for all of your help. I have decided that 16 must be correct since it
makes perfect sense and most of you back that up as well. I think the test
question was just plain wrong. Anyway...I passed the CCNP Routing exam today
so I'm pretty happy. : ) Groupstudy is a great learnin
]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
Wow. According to my binary math, 4 bits = 16 combinations.
1 bit = 2 combinations (2^1 = 2)
2 bits = 4 combinations (2^2 = 4)
3 bits = 8 combinations (2^3 = 8)
4 bits = 16 combinations (2^4 = 16)
Now. when converting from binary to
Dain,
Just out of curiosity, who was the author of the test question? When I was
studying for my CCNP I ran into several poorly written questions and others,
like this one, that were just plain wrong.
Also, are the people that think that 2 to the power of 4 equals 8 the same
people that write to
ah come on, guys, now you're all trying to outsmart yourselves.
nothing in the RFC's regarding CIDR / summarization mentions a "subnet zero"
why should it? that would defeat the purpose of CIDR/summarization.
""Dain Deutschman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> O
Dain Deutschman wrote:
> One of the choices in the question was 16but 14 was not a
> choice. Could
> it be that since 14 was not a choice that 8 was the closest
> thing since 16
> is possibly wrong because of the 0 subnet? This seems a little
> off the wall
> to me butsometimes those cisco
I was thinking of subnetting and not summarization, it was a little late.
16, not 14, is correct.
Carl
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48405&t=48367
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstu
If the choices are either 8 or 16, I'd definitely go with 16.
192.168.0.0/20 would be (for example):
192.168.0.1 to 192.168.15.254
Which is 16 total subnets.
> One of the choices in the question was 16but 14 was not a choice.
Could
> it be that since 14 was not a choice that 8 was the clos
Behalf Of
Bob Timmons
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
Firstly, 2 to the power of 4 is 16 (2x2x2x2).
Secondly, regarding Carl's post, would the answer be 14? I'm not sure the
subnet-zero comes into play w
One of the choices in the question was 16but 14 was not a choice. Could
it be that since 14 was not a choice that 8 was the closest thing since 16
is possibly wrong because of the 0 subnet? This seems a little off the wall
to me butsometimes those cisco questions are off the wall. Dain.
"
"Bob Timmons" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Secondly, regarding Carl's post, would the answer be 14? I'm not sure the
> subnet-zero comes into play with CIDR. I was under the impression it was
> only relevant to subnetting as opposed to summarizing. Does anyon
Firstly, 2 to the power of 4 is 16 (2x2x2x2).
Secondly, regarding Carl's post, would the answer be 14? I'm not sure the
subnet-zero comes into play with CIDR. I was under the impression it was
only relevant to subnetting as opposed to summarizing. Does anyone know for
sure?
> I say 8. 2 to th
I say 8. 2 to the power of 4
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48389&t=48367
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [E
For a Cisco test the actuall answer would be 14. Unfortunately, for us, they
don't take subnet zero into consideration for tests. So, if you have that
question on the test answer 14, for the real-world it's 16. In other words,
the answer to the BSCN question is wrong.
Carl
Message Posted at:
ht
e W.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Andy Hoang
> To: Michael L. Williams ;
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 PM
> Subject: RE: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
>
>
> > I would say 8 is correct. 4 bits make 8 combinations.
> >
> > -Origi
charts and bitswapping charts instead of taking an hour and learning how
binary actually works... geez)
Mike W.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Hoang
To: Michael L. Williams ;
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:51 PM
Subject: RE: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
> I would say 8
ions.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Michael L. Williams
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
>
>
> I would say 16 as we
I would say 8 is correct. 4 bits make 8 combinations.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
I would say 16 as
Thanks...it's good to know I'm not completely losing my mind. : )
Dain
""Dain Deutschman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I came across:
>
> Your routing tables are getting very large and you need to configure r
16 is the correct answer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dain Deutschman
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 7:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Class C summarization question [7:48367]
I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I
I would say 16 as well.
Mike W.
"Dain Deutschman" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm confused about a practice question for BSCN that I came across:
>
> Your routing tables are getting very large and you need to configure route
> summarization. How many cla
25 matches
Mail list logo
