RE: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]

2003-08-05 Thread Maximus
Thanks Alex but when your routers are going back to back LMIs are turned off with the no keepalive command. I believe because a Frame switch is not involved in creating the PVC. In any case I updated the IOS image to 12.3.1a on both routers and the connection comes back up without any issues

RE: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869]

2003-07-23 Thread Degracia, Alex
Make sure lmi is being exchanged. Turn on keepalives for the pvc. -Original Message- From: Maximus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Frame Relay Back To Back Static PVC [7:72869] Per these instructions, I am able to bring m

Re: frame relay back-to-back [7:50215]

2002-07-31 Thread Jenny McLeod
eo wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 July 2002 07:59 pm, Dimitrije wrote: > > I would like to connect 2 routers with a back-to-back frame > relay WAN > > conection, > > but I don't have the DCE-DTE back-to-back cable. Each router > does however > > have > > T1 WICs. > > > > My question is can I connect t

Re: frame relay back-to-back [7:50215]

2002-07-30 Thread eo
On Tuesday 30 July 2002 07:59 pm, Dimitrije wrote: > I would like to connect 2 routers with a back-to-back frame relay WAN > conection, > but I don't have the DCE-DTE back-to-back cable. Each router does however > have > T1 WICs. > > My question is can I connect the routers together with a T1 cro

RE: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-23 Thread Dollard Morgan
age d'origine- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Date: lundi 22 mai 2000 18:53 > À:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet: RE: Frame relay back to back > > this means your router probably doesn't have a s0/0. go ahead and use s0 > &

RE: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-22 Thread gorer
this means your router probably doesn't have a s0/0. go ahead and use s0 -Original Message- From: Billy Monroe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 9:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Frame relay back to back I am also trying to setup using 3 routers (1 r

Re: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-22 Thread Dale Holmes
ou to use the s0/0 notation... I hope this helps! Dale [=`) >From: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Billy Monroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Frame relay back to back >Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 09:02:05 -

Re: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-22 Thread Billy Monroe
I am also trying to setup using 3 routers (1 router configured as switch). I am following the Hutnik's book. They recommend a configuration on "serial0/0"... anybody could tell me what is serial0/0 ? I can configure int s0, but not serial0/0. Thanks, Billy ""mikey"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-21 Thread pedro quezada
You you not have to map in a back to back scenarion . inverse arp should be able to do find it's way to the other int..This is point to point. My scenario is more comple than this one and i am able to ping without mapping.i am using a cisco router with four interfaces as a cloud . one would need

Re: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-20 Thread mikey
In order to do frame-relay with a back-to-back cable, one router must be configured as a switch - frame-relay switching (global-config) and the interface on the switch must be configured as a logical dce - frame-relay interf-type dce (int-config). When I have done it, i also had to map to my loca

Re: Frame relay back to back

2000-05-20 Thread Brian Lodwick
Vic, I get something similar CDC comes up then goes down -are you setting this up with 2 CSU/DSUs? or are you doing the DTE-DCE thing? >>>Brian >From: "Vic Feferberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "Vic Feferberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Frame relay back to back