]]
Sent: Sunday, 12 January 2003 10:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
Could you change the persistence to use cookies instead of source IP address
(assuming it is a browser based connection)? That would allow you to still
load balance across the multiple app
At 11:36 PM + 1/12/03, Emilia Lambros wrote:
Basically any changes to the sticky/persistent part are not options :( the
hardware that's in and performing the load balancing won't be changed
because it works - the NAT portion just needs some ... horrible kludges? :)
But isn't NAT itself,
The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
if you have a CCO customer account, there are a lot of articles in the TAC
database
this one is a good start, I believe.
http://www.c
This does NOT match my previous experience. My experience has been that
IOS seems to use NAT (not overloaded) until all pool addresses are used
then start overloading the last one. I dont know what happens once all
when this address gets maxed out.
The only reason we noticed this was due to
Doug S wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The way PAT works when overloading multiple addresses is to overload the
first address in the pool until ALL port numbers are used up. I can't
point
you to any publicly available documentation on this, but cut and pasted
Peter Walker wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
This does NOT match my previous experience. My experience has been that
IOS seems to use NAT (not overloaded) until all pool addresses are used
then start overloading the last one. I dont know what happens once all
: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
Doug S wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The way PAT works when overloading multiple addresses is to overload the
first address in the pool until ALL port numbers are used up. I can't
point
you to any publicly available docum
I liked the comment and definitely agree that some of the authors of Cisco
training material should be named and publicly humiliated, although the
sheer volume of mistakes could make this a somewhat overwhelming task for
the public doing the humiliating. Still, I want to add my opinion that Cisco
, January 10, 2003 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
I liked the comment and definitely agree that some of the authors of Cisco
training material should be named and publicly humiliated, although the
sheer volume of mistakes could make this a somewhat overwhelming
At 10:12 PM + 1/10/03, Doug S wrote:
I liked the comment and definitely agree that some of the authors of Cisco
training material should be named and publicly humiliated, although the
sheer volume of mistakes could make this a somewhat overwhelming task for
the public doing the humiliating.
Doug,
I used the term horrible kludge several hours before I saw your post.
The multiple NAT pool kludge is horrible because it is neither scalable
nor maintenance-free, nor does it include any dynamic distribution of
load across the resultant multiple (outside local) addresses in use. It
almost
-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
if you have a CCO customer account, there are a lot of articles in the TAC
database
this one is a good start, I believe
The way PAT works when overloading multiple addresses is to overload the
first address in the pool until ALL port numbers are used up. I can't point
you to any publicly available documentation on this, but cut and pasted from
Network Academy curriculum:
However, on a Cisco IOS router, NAT will
6:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
The way PAT works when overloading multiple addresses is to overload the
first address in the pool until ALL port numbers are used up. I can't point
you to any publicly available documentation on this, but cut and pasted
if you have a CCO customer account, there are a lot of articles in the TAC
database
this one is a good start, I believe.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080093fca.shtml
watch the wrap.
HTH
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
oops - forgot where I was going
here is a jump page
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA
T
requires CCO customer login.
and this one for more detail in design and operation
http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/browse/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:NA
and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 11:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Load balancing NAT [7:60663]
if you have a CCO customer account, there are a lot of articles in the TAC
database
this one is a good start, I believe.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer
17 matches
Mail list logo
