! Just thankful to have a job right now, though!
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Kris Keen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Champ , cheers
What Boson do you recommend? is yours
02 12:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Champ , cheers
What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them
all?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=4158
'
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
what are the other options that are as good as Boson and cheaper?
-Original Message-
From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 7:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7
]
Subject: Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Name one alternative that's cheaper AND offers the flexibility, options
(like toggling the score meter, showing answers ONLY when you're wrong
WITH references to published explanations of the answers), and quality
(not
so say I've never seen
spend $119.85 for all the Boson
CCIE Written materials or spend $29.95 with CCxx and get it all in one
package?
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Question
have written materials for CCxx Productions and am working on
stuff for Network Learning
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Williams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Stupid Question time [7:41465
don't work for Network Learning, I work for EDS.
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Everybody else is bad except Network Learning
Comments inline
Kaminski, Shawn G wrote:
I didn't just pop into the group.
I must admit that my phrasing (pop into the group) probably sounded
negative, but I can assure you that I in no way meant it to be so.
I'm just
trying to let people know that there are other alternatives
besides
source for any exam. I have heard the term, you get what
you pay for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
Everybody else is bad except Network Learning
.
-Sean
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Brian Zeitz
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
I have an un-bias opinion. For some of us who have already done a few
exams, Boson
I put together a document on RIFs that you can grab for free from
www.laganiere.net
Let me know if that helps...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: Kris Keen
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 11:47 PM
Subject: Stupid Question time [7:41465]
All, im studying for my CCIE. Can
Champ , cheers
What Boson do you recommend? is yours, #3 the best or should I get them all?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41563t=41465
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by Microsoft and nothing will get
corrupted!!!
-Serge.
Richard Tufaro wrote:
What is the proper way to shutdown a router? not reload, but
shutdown? Just flick the switch? Seems to brutal to me.
Richard
Assuming you want to save the config on there, a wr mem before the power
off may be appropriate, unless you're selling it, then maybe a wr erase.
Bri
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Mnatzakanian Serge wrote:
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately the IOS was not written by Microsoft and nothing will get
MickeySoft stabs that have no meaning other
than for slander.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Just turn them off or simply unplug them.
Fortunately
the same.
DB Server or not.
Sorry... just gotta love those MickeySoft stabs that have no meaning other
than for slander.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7
Odette II
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Reason being that NTFS is a journalled file system. Not sure on
NT 3.51's version of NTFS, but if you say so, probably true. (not meant to
be sarcastic, but sincere)
As for the SQL database, depending if it had
Most network devices are designed never to be shutdown. Take for
instance the 2900 and 3500 series switches (either plugged and running
or not). Flipping the switch is about all you've got.
All the best !!!
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
That leads me to a related question...
would it be better for my stack of 2500's and Cat switches to leave
them on, or should I shut them off when not used. This is a lab setup.
Jeff
Richard Tufaro wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
What is the proper way
Flipping the switch is it... I always think of its file system as it is
in the flash not as vulnerable as a hard drive... we just unplug
hubs/switches/routers... Thank goodness to. Can you imagine routers
getting as pissed off as NT boxes when improperly shut down... we
be going
Yep- I believe it EOL-ed the same time as the Catalyst 5000's (summer 2000).
Of course this does not mean Cisco has stopped supporting the box, just that
you will not be able to purchase it under the new product line-up. IOS
parts should exist another 3 years or so.
Phil
- Original
cc:
Subject: Re: Stupid question - E
OC/WGL@WGL,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
Yep- I believe it EOL-ed the same time as the Catalyst 5000's (summer
2000).
Of course this does not mean Cisco has stopped supporting the box, just
that
you will not be able to purchase it und
OC/WGL@WGL
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question - E
6/2001 03:23:27 PM
To: Patrick McAllister/SOC/WGL@WGL
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question - EOL? [7:793]
just end of *sales* for the older Cat 5000 *modules*, not the 5000 chassis
or the 5500's, though! And with the product line so big, it can be
EA LOUIE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question
Date: 30 Mar 2001 10:50:28 PST
"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purpose
m: EA LOUIE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: EA LOUIE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question
Date: 30 Mar 2001 10:50:28 PST
"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IP address on
a subnet.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
Subject: Re: Stupid question
This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
you are rou
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
Subject: Re: Stupid question
This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make.
If
you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own
subnet.
Otherwise routing would not work. If you'r
are guesses, however.
But ethernet interfaces cannot share a subnet.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
Subject: Re: Stupid question
This isn't a stupid q
The limit on Cisco routers is 4 Serials in the same subnet... but my
question is:
What problem does that solve? Why would I want/need to do that?
My gut tells me that this is not really a planned-for limit, and sort
of happened.
Any thoughts?
As a wild guess, it might be to allow the
This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own subnet.
Otherwise routing would not work. If you're bridging, then the bridged
interfaces are in the same subnet but you don't specifically assign an
IP
Thank you for your response. Another question is when or why would you be
required
to use set an ip address on a switch and/or hub interface?
Thx.
Wang Chia Ta
Systems Support
Mitsubishi Motors
---
""John Neiberger"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
Sorry ... the message should have read:
Thank you for your response. Another question is when or why would you be
required to set an ip address on a switch and/or hub interface?
Thx.
Wang Chia Ta
Systems Support
Mitsubishi Motors
---
""John Neiberger"" [EMAIL
The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
not applied to an actual physical port. The IP address in a switch or
hub is applied to a virtual interface so you can use IP to test
connectivity or telnet to the device for configuration purposes.
"Wang Chia Ta" [EMAIL
When you connect to a brand new router for the first time you need to use a console
connection because there isn't an IP address yet to allow you to connect via telnet.
Its the same thing with switches and hubs. If you don't have an IP address on the box,
you're reduced to using console
Yes, two or more interfaces can share the same subnet, but bridging is
involved. You just can't assign ip networks willy nilly to interfaces. :)
What you're looking for is called IRB Bridging. An example follows. The ip
address on the BVI interface is available through both ethernet
"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
not applied to an actual physical port. The IP address in a switch or
hub is applied to a virtual interface so you can use IP to test
connectivity or telnet to the device for
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question
Date: 30 Mar 2001 10:50:28 PST
"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IP address on a switch or hub is for management purposes only and is
not applied to an actual physical port. The IP address in a switch or
hub is applied to a
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 30 March, 2001 10:41
Subject: Re: Stupid question
This isn't a stupid question, it's a very important point to make. If
you are routing, each interface on the router must be in its own subnet.
Otherwise routing woul
Where I work, "Data Technician" is the entry-level title for my group, while
Network Analyst is the more senior position. The sys admin title doesn't
exist here, as system administration duties are divided among the LAN
support personnel and LAN analysts.
hmmm.. from my somewhat limited
Roman,
Just buy a cheap 5 port hub for this. That will work. PC to hub, and hub
to router. Also, you dont need a PC to check if ether will get through the
link. Just create a ping on router A, and when it asks for the source, put
the address for etherO. For example:
RouterA#ping
IP
Any 10BaseT type Ethernet connection between any two devices without the use
of a hub requires a crossover cable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Roman
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stupid question..
You must use a "straight" cable if you're connecting pc/router/etc. to a
hub/switch. And you definetely must use a "crossed-over" cable to connect a
pc/router to another pc/router and hub/switch to another hub/switch. Some
hubs/switches/routers may let you change manually the role of the port
You need a crossover to
"talk" NIC to E0. The only time you would use a patch cable, iswhen
youconnect the router/ PC to a switch/ hub. I "personally" know when
to use each cable(I even know the pinouts), but I'm not sureif I
could clearly explain to you why this is. I can promise you this,
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little experiment. You
know...fix it
up, tear it down, fix it up, tear it down - ad nauseum. Anyway - it goes
something
like this. I have a Linksys (I know...don't say it) Broadband
Router/Switch that
my internal LAN accesses the internet
The frame-relay portion is only between the two cisco routers. The linksys
router is tied to the e0 port of one of them. Actually, I have that linksys
router/switch functioning only as a gateway/switch. It does no routing per se.
Just shoves everything not local out the WAN port and that's
Did you Define sub interface function in S0,
Ade,
-Original Message-
From: Roman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid question...(no questions are stupid friend)
Ohit pings just fine. I am just trying a little
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Sadguna Kumar Dasari
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 11:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: stupid question
The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console cable" just
make a regular 8 conductor str
Yes, the console cable need to be rollover cable. Sorry for the oversight.
Sadguna Kumar Dasari
""Sadguna Kumar Dasari"" kdasari*[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8g2ll1$mjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
The above replys and if you don't have the "light blue console
51 matches
Mail list logo
