Is it popssible to use "rate-limit" command on an ATM interface?
Thanks,
Mario Puras
SoluNet Technical Support
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Direct: (321) 309-1410
888.449.5766 (USA) / 888.SOLUNET (Canada)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=74438&t=74438
-
uch.
HTH
Best regards,
Dom Stocqueler
SysDom Technologies
Visit our website - www.sysdom.org
==
Greetings,
I need some pointers with rate-limiting and hopeing you guys can help
me out. We have a DS3 ckt in one o
Greetings,
I need some pointers with rate-limiting and hopeing you guys can help
me out. We have a DS3 ckt in one of our sites and need to limit their
traffic to 8Mb to internal traffic and 2Mb if traffic destined to the
web. My concern is packet drops when the threshold reachs either the 8
So, Chuck, was the wrong bandwidth statement problem ?
Sasa Milic wrote:
>
> You have specified bandwidth 64000, shouldn't it be just 64 ?
> With 64000, router thinks that there is enough bandwidth available,
> and policy-map doesn't do anything, but drops occur later, at
> interface level buff
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> I'm thinking you'll need to do more than ping. The problem with Cisco's
ping
> is that it doesn't let you specify how much time between pings, sometimes
> called an interval. The timeout value is for unsucessful pings. But what
you
>
> Some UNIXes have a -f (floo
Hm, interesting.
I'm using rate-limit on internet routers to limit ICMP and
SYN packets, and I clearly see drops.
Also, I'm using NBAR with policy-map to block some HTTP GET
requests, and, again, I see drops. But, you are mixing these
two (policy + rate-limit inside it), and it doesnt' work.
Co
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> that's the best command to show the output
>
CL: unfortunately, as the following output indicates, even when all packets
were being dropped ( apparently ) there was no indication of this.
Router_1#sh policy int
that's the best command to show the output
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Chuck's Long Road"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Chuck's Long Road wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm putt
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Chuck's Long Road wrote:
> >
> > I'm putting in some rack time to review certain QoS features.
> > Configuration
> > is not really a problem. MQC makes this really easy :->
> >
> > However, I am attempting t
Chuck's Long Road wrote:
>
> I'm putting in some rack time to review certain QoS features.
> Configuration
> is not really a problem. MQC makes this really easy :->
>
> However, I am attempting to observe results, and I am finding
> that I am
> unable to make bad things happen, such as packet dr
I'm putting in some rack time to review certain QoS features. Configuration
is not really a problem. MQC makes this really easy :->
However, I am attempting to observe results, and I am finding that I am
unable to make bad things happen, such as packet drops.
I am pinging from three different ro
: kazaa / morpheus blocking / rate-limiting [7:34529]
Those are some bandwidth hogs. I knocked down incoming/outgoing traffic on
1214 and used a sniffer to catch the internal offenders. Keep in mind you
will probably have GNUTella running around as well which opens a port on the
PC. If you do a port
GNUTella
port open. GNUTella is a bandwidth hog too.
-Original Message-
From: bergenpeak
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2/5/02 5:13 PM
Subject: kazaa / morpheus blocking / rate-limiting [7:34529]
Hi,
Wondering if anyone has been using ACLs to block or rate-limit
Kazaa/Morpheus
traffic. I'
Hi,
Wondering if anyone has been using ACLs to block or rate-limit
Kazaa/Morpheus
traffic. I'd be interested in how well this worked.
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=34529&t=34529
--
FAQ, list archives,
Joe,
Connect a Cisco 1912XL or 1924XL to one ethernet port on your router.
Set-up one sub-interface on the ethernet port for each customer. Enable ISL
on each sub-interface. CAR each sub-interface to the rate desired.
On the switch you'll need to set-up a VLAN for each customer and ISL
trunki
Your input rate-limit is ok. I just tested it.
The problem is with your output rate-limit. You can't use a standard
access-list for output rate-limits in this situation. You want to limit the
output traffic based a destination address, which can NOT be accomplished
with a standard access-list.
iginal Message-
From: Russ Kreigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 3:23 PM
To: Cisco Group Study
Subject: Rate-limiting
Hi all I posted a question a while back asking how to limit the maximum
speed of an IP address. Well I have kinda got something working that does do
Hi all I posted a question a while back asking how to limit the maximum
speed of an IP address. Well I have kinda got something working that does do
that, but it limits everything!
access-list 5 permit 10.1.1.2
access-list 5 deny any
Ethernet 0
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 10.1.2
18 matches
Mail list logo
