Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-11 Thread Scott Roberts
what do you mean by "bandwidth useage"? if you talking about baseband, the entire bandwidth is used. broadband of course would be calculated upon what spectrum range you're using. scott ""Robert Perez"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anyone know how the conversion techniques for conv

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-11 Thread s vermill
Amar KHELIFI wrote: > > since > 1byte=8bits > and > 1Kbits=1024bits > then > 32kbps=32768bps=4096bytes > there is no formula. Amar KHELIFI, 1kbits does not = 1024bits and 32kbps does not = 32768bps. 1kbps = 1,000bps & 32kbps = 32000bps. "k" simply means 1,000. The whole idea of 1KB (KiloByte

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-11 Thread s vermill
I should also have mentioned that the "B" is typically capitalized along side the "K" when dealing with kilobytes (KB) and the "b" is typically not capitalized when dealing with kilobits (kbps). That's probably at least, if not more, significant than the "K/k" capitalization (if, in fact, any of i

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-12 Thread Amar KHELIFI
sorry i don't agree. check the bandwidth calculator on the net, u will see that i was correct. + for the K and k and B and b, it is so obvious that an explanation is not necessary... thanx for letting my messages show up normally and then respond to them; ""s vermill"" a icri

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-12 Thread s vermill
Amar KHELIFI wrote: > > sorry i don't agree. > check the bandwidth calculator on the net, u will see that i > was correct. > + for the K and k and B and b, it is so obvious that an > explanation is not > necessary... > thanx for letting my messages show up normally and then respond > to >

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-12 Thread s vermill
Amar KHELIFI wrote: > > sorry i don't agree. > check the bandwidth calculator on the net, u will see that i > was correct. > + for the K and k and B and b, it is so obvious that an > explanation is not > necessary... > thanx for letting my messages show up normally and then respond > to >

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-12 Thread Peter van Oene
At 01:36 PM 3/12/2003 +, Amar KHELIFI wrote: >sorry i don't agree. >check the bandwidth calculator on the net, u will see that i was correct. >+ for the K and k and B and b, it is so obvious that an explanation is not >necessary... While I agree that Kb tends to refer to 1024 and kb to

Re: Bandwidth calculations [7:65008]

2003-03-13 Thread Amar KHELIFI
Peter, as you have seen i stoped responding to this post, you really don't need to start a polimique about this, because yeas indeed K and k and the rest is so obvious that it does not need an explanation, i mean you don't need to be in IT to know thta, and + the person who asked the question was n