Single area with large number networks.

Hi, this question is really confuse me : What are two possible problems that can occur when a single OSPF area includes a large number of networks? a. more reachable errors b. frequent routing table recalculation c. frequent adjacencies table recalculation d. excessive link- state entries

Single area with large number networks.

Hi, this question is really confuse me : What are two possible problems that can occur when a single OSPF area includes a large number of networks? a. more reachable errors b. frequent routing table recalculation c. frequent adjacencies table recalculation d. excessive link- state entries

Re: Single area with large number networks.

Try this http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks. Hi, this question is really confuse me : What are tw

RE: Single area with large number networks.

, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks. Hi, this question is really confuse me : What are two possible problems that can occur when a single OSPF area includes a large number of networks? a. more reachable errors b. frequent routing table recalcu

Re: Single area with large number networks.

TECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks. Hi, this question is really confuse me : What are two possible problems that can occur when a single OSPF area includes a large number of networks? a. more r

Re: Single area with large number networks.

before. I also opened the CCIE : TCP/IP routing book, ACRC book .. but can't found the answer. Ibam Try this http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000

RE: Single area with large number networks.

ing is , I could be wrong either way how do you benefit from it ? - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Kane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:02 AM Subject: RE: Single area with large number net

RE: Single area with large number networks.

the answer. Ibam Try this http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks.

Re: Single area with large number networks.

D] To: "Kane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:31 AM Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. if you said refer to www.cisco.com, why everybody still need this mailing-list ? why there are many questions in this group ? Or better

RE: Single area with large number networks.

14, 2000 5:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Single area with large number networks. IMHO, B is the best answer as link failures in the area will cause recalculations. D is a possible answer; however, "excessive" is a subjective word: OSPF will generate the numb

RE: Single area with large number networks.

om: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Kane" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:02 AM Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. doesn't help. I tried before. I also opened the CCIE : TCP/IP routing book, ACRC

RE: Single area with large number networks.

Priscilla Try this http://www.cisco.com/public/pubsearch.html - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks. Hi, this question is really

RE: Single area with large number networks.

, 2000 11:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. At 09:36 PM 11/14/00, Ibrahim wrote: thanks for your response. But if some router down, the nearest one will send message to DR BDR, and DR will send multicast message (it won't be excessiv

RE: Single area with large number networks.

In defence of my earlier position that "d" is in fact the other correct answer. "Priscilla's Point: Besides, as I look more closely at the answer, I see that it says, "excessive link-state entries in the link-state table." What's a link-state table? I think the test writer put a few

RE: Single area with large number networks.

ED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA) Subject: RE: Single area with large number networks. But if the "right" answer consists of two choices... I believe we all agree that B - frequent routing recalculation - is "correct" I believe w

RE: Single area with large number networks.

and this discussion was very worthwhile. Priscilla - Original Message - From: "Ibrahim" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 11:52 PM Subject: Single area with large number networks. Hi, this qu