Chuck,
If I'm the Ken you're talking about and I actually said that, then I
must really need a nap. :-)
We're a university, where Microsoft rules. :-(
I'd like to tell you how many MS-SQL servers we have, but I don't have
a clue. There are probably some running in the dorms. We have entire
sorry, Ken, I've read so much crap about saphire and 1434 the last couple of
days that I forget who said what. sorry for misrepresenting you as a result
of my frazzled brain.
given the large installation of MS SQL devices on your campus, may we blame
you and your wards for the problem? ;-
Well, um, yes. Although I removed us as part of the problem as soon as
I noticed we were. :-)
The Long and Winding Road
01/28/03 02:36PM
sorry, Ken, I've read so much crap about saphire and 1434 the last
couple of
days that I forget who said what. sorry for misrepresenting you as a
result
of
s
scary.
l0stbyte
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
d tran wrote:
You wouldn't have to fight the
ROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
d tran wrote:
You wouldn't have to fight the udp 1434 problem had you
decided to
scrap the shitty MS SQL server, running on crappy Windows
machine and
replace it
MySQL (freeware)
l0stbyte
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
d tran wrote:
You wouldn't have
)
John
Neiberger
cc:
Sent by:Subject: Re: UDP port
1434 [7:61891
machines are going to disappear.
Paul Forbes
Network Engineer
Trimble
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
Maybe this is a silly question considering where
this is
scary.
l0stbyte
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
d tran wrote:
You wouldn
d tran wrote:
You wouldn't have to fight the udp 1434 problem had you decided
to scrap the
shitty MS SQL server, running on crappy Windows machine and
replace it
MySQL (freeware) or real commercial database products like
Oracle, running on
Linux platform.
Enjoy fighting udp1434. LOL
DT
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
d tran wrote:
You wouldn't have to fight the udp 1434 problem had you decided to
scrap the shitty MS SQL server
Amen!
We are not running any Windows SQL and are only running MySQL on Linux.
Here is what we turned away at the front door in the past 12 hours on one
20MB connection:
deny udp any any eq 1434 (205647 matches)
Here is Cisco's link:
comments inline...
Anyone have a link to a good technical document
about the worm?
Thanks,
Priscilla
Below is from bugtraq:
SQL Sapphire Worm Analysis
Release Date:
1/25/03
Severity:
High
Systems Affected:
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 pre SP 2
Description:
Late Friday, January 24, 2003
It deleted my post
Here is the link again:
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Flash/AL20030125.html
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Symon Thurlow
Sent: 26 January 2003 21:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From
1434 [7:61891]
d tran wrote:
You wouldn't have to fight the udp 1434 problem had you decided to
scrap the shitty MS SQL server, running on crappy Windows machine and
replace it
MySQL (freeware) or real commercial database products like
Oracle, running on
Linux platform.
Enjoy fighting udp1434
We do have machines running flavors of MS-SQL on our network both in
production and in classrooms/labs. These are the stats from about 8
A.M. on Saturday to 3:08 P.M. on Sunday for several of our access-lists.
Keep in mind this is only from the two RSMs in one core 5500 and it's
only internal
outages? Bright idea? or disinformation on the part of BOA?
l0stbyte
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
..
P.S. There was a news clip that BofA networks were effected. this is
scary.
l0stbyte
Symon Thurlow wrote:
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 January 2003 20:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDP port 1434 [7:61891]
While trying to modify the ACL's, I had to disable two trunks into that
switch. I could telnet into the supervisor no problem. When I tried
sess 4 or sess 7 I would get a timeout.
I read reports of routers hanging under the load. This what I think
happened to BofA. The routers probably
Ken Diliberto wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
While trying to modify the ACL's, I had to disable two trunks into that
switch. I could telnet into the supervisor no problem. When I tried
sess 4 or sess 7 I would get a timeout.
I read reports of routers hanging
20 matches
Mail list logo
