Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-05 Thread Bob Sinclair
Sinclair CCIE #10427, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Networking For Future, Inc. www.nffinc.com - Original Message - From: Jim Devane To: Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:49 PM Subject: Native VLAN question [7:64431] I am kinda new to VLANs and need some advice. I have a router which I

Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Jim Devane
I am kinda new to VLANs and need some advice. I have a router which I have broken an interface into FastEthernet subinterfaces. Each subinterface defines the VLAN. This has worked very well. But I am wondering if it is possible to make this port a trunk port and have other non-tagged traffic

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Bill
Hey Jim Supposing you take a new switch out of the box and don't configure any vlan's etc, all the ports will still be using a vlan. That vlan is called vlan1 and all ports are on vlan1 by default. The devices on those ports wouldn't need any router to route traffic since they all belong to the

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Jim Devane
Message - From: Bill To: Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:19 PM Subject: Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431] Hey Jim Supposing you take a new switch out of the box and don't configure any vlan's etc, all the ports will still be using a vlan. That vlan is called vlan1 and all ports

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Larry Letterman
: Native VLAN question [7:64431] Hey Jim Supposing you take a new switch out of the box and don't configure any vlan's etc, all the ports will still be using a vlan. That vlan is called vlan1 and all ports are on vlan1 by default. The devices on those ports wouldn't need any router to route

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Larry Letterman
] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:49 PM Subject: Native VLAN question [7:64431] I am kinda new to VLANs and need some advice. I have a router which I have broken an interface into FastEthernet subinterfaces. Each subinterface defines the VLAN. This has worked very well. But I am wondering

Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread maine dude
Hi, If I have two Vlans and want to route between them using an external router, but the router has only 10mb ports, how can it be done? I can't use ISL or 802.1q because it isn't supported on 10mb/s ports, correct? Does every Vlan need a separate physical connection? or do i use sub interfaces?

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Michael Witte
ISL is not supported on 10mbs interfaces. You need the ISL header so that you retain the VLAN information. If you had a 100mbs interface is would look something like this. This would set up int fa0/0 as a trunk and it would be trunking VLAN 1,2,3. int fa0/0.1 encapsulation isl 1 Ip address

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Michael Williams
Well, here's the deal. What's the reason for the VLANs? Since each of the PCs in each VLAN are on a different IP subnet, it's possible to just combine all of the PCs into a single VLAN, then setup the router interface with two IP addresses (one for each IP subnet). If your reason for the

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
=?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote: Hi, If I have two Vlans and want to route between them using an external router, but the router has only 10mb ports, how can it be done? I can't use ISL or 802.1q because it isn't supported on 10mb/s ports, correct? Does every Vlan need a separate

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Rik Guyler
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533] =?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote: Hi, If I have two Vlans and want to route between them using an external router, but the router has only 10mb ports, how can it be done? I can't use ISL or 802.1q because it isn't supported on 10mb

Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Michael Williams
Here's the deal... I have a 5500 with RSM with a few VLANs on it, each VLAN with an IP and the RSM is handling the routing for all VLANs. I've got one VLAN in particular (511) that I'm experimenting with I made the following access list: Router#(config)access-list 10 deny any log

Re: Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Jay
If 10.51.1.1 is the only IP active on that subnet, then the traffic is not being sourced from that network, thus rendering the ACL irrelevant. If, however, your host was connected to one of the ports on vlan 511, you would not be able to communicate with the RSM past the ACL. So, in other

Re: Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Michael Williams
Jay, Thanks for your input. But shouldn't ACL keep anything from other VLANs from even pinging the gateway IP of VLAN511? Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=43152t=43128 -- FAQ, list archives, and

Re: Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Jay
No, that's not the case. If you think of it visually, INTERNET-ROUTER-INTERFACE-ACL-LAN Then you will see that the internet can still access the interface, and it's address. Because really, you are pinging the router, not the interface or the LAN. On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 14:22, Michael

VLAN question [7:32626]

2002-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings all, Just for clarification purposes, are there any advantages/disadvantages or a specific purpose to change the mtu size for a vlan(Ethernet Vlans)? I looked everywhere on Cisco's page, no luck. Thanks..Nabil Message Posted at:

Re: VLAN question [7:32626]

2002-01-20 Thread George Murphy CCNP/DP
Nabil, in my opinion it would not be to any advantage. Seems like more administrative overhead to keep up with. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings all, Just for clarification purposes, are there any advantages/disadvantages or a specific purpose to change the mtu size for a

Re: VLAN question [7:32626]

2002-01-20 Thread smittyme
Unless you have a very specific need for it, I would not waste the time wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Greetings all, Just for clarification purposes, are there any advantages/disadvantages or a specific purpose to change the mtu size for a vlan(Ethernet

Vlan Question? [7:22276]

2001-10-05 Thread george gittins
Hello gang i have a question that invloves intervlan routing. let me explain what i want to accomplish and see if this is possible. this is a simple layout of my local lan one campus connected -2900 switchtransiver--fiber---fiber--cat5--35000xl--7513-. I disconnected the cat 5 that

Re: Vlan Question [7:4038]

2001-05-10 Thread simonis
Brad Shifflett wrote: The user is a very high political figure who is real cautious about security and paranoid. I like the idea of a seperate nic in the server and two subnets. The cost of switches could be a deciding factor. Thanks for the input guys! I hope he doesn't figure out that

Re: Vlan Question [7:4038]

2001-05-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Brad Shifflett wrote: The user is a very high political figure who is real cautious about security and paranoid. I like the idea of a seperate nic in the server and two subnets. The cost of switches could be a deciding factor. Thanks for the input guys! I hope he doesn't figure out

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-23 Thread The.Rock
they could restore the tape. -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlan Question At 02:01 PM 3/22/2001 -0600, you wrote: We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to thei

Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Brad Shifflett
Scenario: Got a client who has a person on the network that does not want to be on the network but wants access to the server. My thought was to install a switch, setup to Vlans, one for all the users (10 or so) and the second Vlan for the 1 user by himself. This way no one can get to his

RE: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
, 2001 9:27 AM To: Groupstudy (E-mail) Subject: Vlan Question Scenario: Got a client who has a person on the network that does not want to be on the network but wants access to the server. My thought was to install a switch, setup to Vlans, one for all the users (10 or so) and the second

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread ciscosis
the cards on the same network and don't let them forward (route) between each other. hope that's of some help - Original Message - From: "Brad Shifflett" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Groupstudy (E-mail)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 4:26 PM Subject: Vlan

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 08:26 AM 3/22/2001 -0800, you wrote: Scenario: Got a client who has a person on the network that does not want to be on the network but wants access to the server. I'm somewhat confused. First, if he is somehow hidden, how does the server send back to the client? Second, if he is on

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread The.Rock
We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to their own VLAN but have a need to update files on the server. In our case we have auditors come in from time to time and so we don't want them in with the rest of the world so we isolate them in their own VLAN and then setup an access list. They

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 02:01 PM 3/22/2001 -0600, you wrote: We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to their own VLAN but have a need to update files on the server. In our case we have auditors come in from time to time and so we don't want them in with the rest of the world so we isolate them in their own

RE: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Brad Shifflett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlan Question At 02:01 PM 3/22/2001 -0600, you wrote: We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to their own VLAN but have a need to update files on the server. In our case we have auditors

RE: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
they could restore the tape. -Original Message- From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlan Question At 02:01 PM 3/22/2001 -0600, you wrote: We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants

Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread mak
!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en" html Hi, pI cannot distinguish the situation I should use portvlancost or portvlanpri. Would someone can tell me? pThanks brnbsp; pmak/html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

AW: Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread Udo Konstantin
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Marz 2001 14:14 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Set VLAN question? !doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en" html Hi, pI cannot distinguish the situation I should use portvlancost or portvlanpri. Would someone can tell me? pTha

RE: Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread Evan Francen
be a good read. HTH, Evan -Original Message- From: mak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Set VLAN question? !doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en" html Hi, pI cannot distinguish the situation I

Re: AW: Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread mak
prungliche Nachricht- brVon: mak [a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a] brGesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Marz 2001 14:14 brAn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] brBetreff: Set VLAN question? plt;!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en" brlt;html br

Re: VLAN question

2001-02-22 Thread Bradley J. Wilson
, though. Good luck - Bradley J. Wilson CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, CNX, NNCSS, MCT, CTT - Original Message - From: Shane Stockman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: VLAN question I will just like to enquire whether it is possible to have a VLAN split over 2 lans

RE: VLAN question

2001-02-22 Thread Brant Stevens
Engineer Thrupoint, Inc. 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor New York, NY. 10017 646-562-6540 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shane Stockman Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLAN question I will just like