Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-05 Thread Bob Sinclair
H, -Bob Sinclair CCIE #10427, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Networking For Future, Inc. www.nffinc.com - Original Message - From: "Jim Devane" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:49 PM Subject: Native VLAN question [7:64431] > I am kinda new to VLANs and need some ad

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Larry Letterman
] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:49 PM Subject: Native VLAN question [7:64431] I am kinda new to VLANs and need some advice. I have a router which I have broken an interface into FastEthernet subinterfaces. Each subinterface defines the VLAN. This has worked very well. But I am wondering

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Larry Letterman
: Native VLAN question [7:64431] Hey Jim Supposing you take a new switch out of the box and don't configure any vlan's etc, all the ports will still be using a vlan. That vlan is called vlan1 and all ports are on vlan1 by default. The devices on those ports wouldn't need any

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Jim Devane
ell. - Original Message - From: "Bill" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:19 PM Subject: Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431] > Hey Jim > Supposing you take a new switch out of the box and don't configure any > vlan's etc, all the ports will still be using

Re: Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Bill
Hey Jim Supposing you take a new switch out of the box and don't configure any vlan's etc, all the ports will still be using a vlan. That vlan is called vlan1 and all ports are on vlan1 by default. The devices on those ports wouldn't need any router to route traffic since they all belong to the sam

Native VLAN question [7:64431]

2003-03-04 Thread Jim Devane
I am kinda new to VLANs and need some advice. I have a router which I have broken an interface into FastEthernet subinterfaces. Each subinterface defines the VLAN. This has worked very well. But I am wondering if it is possible to make this port a trunk port and have other non-tagged traffic arrive

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Rik Guyler
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533] =?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote: > > Hi, > > If I have two Vlans and want to route between them using an external > router, but the router has only 10mb ports, how can it be done? I > can't use ISL or 802.1q bec

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
=?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote: > > Hi, > > If I have two Vlans and want to route between them using an > external router, > but the router has only 10mb ports, how can it be done? I can't > use ISL or 802.1q because it isn't supported on 10mb/s ports, > correct? Does every Vlan need a sepa

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Michael Williams
Well, here's the deal. What's the reason for the VLANs? Since each of the PCs in each VLAN are on a different IP subnet, it's possible to just combine all of the PCs into a single VLAN, then setup the router interface with two IP addresses (one for each IP subnet). If your reason for the VLA

RE: Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread Michael Witte
ISL is not supported on 10mbs interfaces. You need the ISL header so that you retain the VLAN information. If you had a 100mbs interface is would look something like this. This would set up int fa0/0 as a trunk and it would be trunking VLAN 1,2,3. int fa0/0.1 encapsulation isl 1 Ip address 10

Quick Vlan question [7:49533]

2002-07-24 Thread maine dude
Hi, If I have two Vlans and want to route between them using an external router, but the router has only 10mb ports, how can it be done? I can't use ISL or 802.1q because it isn't supported on 10mb/s ports, correct? Does every Vlan need a separate physical connection? or do i use sub interfaces?

Re: Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Jay
No, that's not the case. If you think of it visually, INTERNET->ROUTER->INTERFACE->ACL->LAN Then you will see that the internet can still access the interface, and it's address. Because really, you are pinging the router, not the interface or the LAN. On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 14:22, Michael Will

Re: Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Michael Williams
Jay, Thanks for your input. But shouldn't ACL keep anything from other VLANs from even pinging the gateway IP of VLAN511? Mike W. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43152&t=43128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscript

Re: Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Jay
If 10.51.1.1 is the only IP active on that subnet, then the traffic is not being sourced from that network, thus rendering the ACL irrelevant. If, however, your host was connected to one of the ports on vlan 511, you would not be able to communicate with the RSM past the ACL. So, in other words,

Stupid Access-List/VLAN question [7:43128]

2002-05-02 Thread Michael Williams
Here's the deal... I have a 5500 with RSM with a few VLANs on it, each VLAN with an IP and the RSM is handling the routing for all VLANs. I've got one VLAN in particular (511) that I'm experimenting with I made the following access list: Router#(config)access-list 10 deny any log (

Re: VLAN question [7:32626]

2002-01-20 Thread smittyme
Unless you have a very specific need for it, I would not waste the time wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Greetings all, > > Just for clarification purposes, are there any advantages/disadvantages > or a specific purpose to change the mtu size for a vlan(Ethernet V

Re: VLAN question [7:32626]

2002-01-20 Thread George Murphy CCNP/DP
Nabil, in my opinion it would not be to any advantage. Seems like more administrative overhead to keep up with. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Greetings all, > >Just for clarification purposes, are there any advantages/disadvantages >or a specific purpose to change the mtu size for a vlan(Et

VLAN question [7:32626]

2002-01-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings all, Just for clarification purposes, are there any advantages/disadvantages or a specific purpose to change the mtu size for a vlan(Ethernet Vlans)? I looked everywhere on Cisco's page, no luck. Thanks..Nabil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.p

Vlan Question? [7:22276]

2001-10-05 Thread george gittins
Hello gang i have a question that invloves intervlan routing. let me explain what i want to accomplish and see if this is possible. this is a simple layout of my local lan one campus connected -2900 switchtransiver--fiber---fiber--cat5--35000xl--7513-. I disconnected the cat 5 that w

Re: Vlan question [7:18842]

2001-09-06 Thread MADMAN
The management VLAN would be the VLAN you choose to put the switch themselves in so that you can telnet to them for example my 6509 in the lab managment VLAN is 64: C6509> (enable) sh int sl0: flags=51 slip 0.0.0.0 dest 0.0.0.0 sc0: flags=63 vlan 64 inet 172.28.64.6 netmask 255.25

Vlan question [7:18842]

2001-09-06 Thread khramov
Can someone expalin me the difference between management vlan and native vlan? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18842&t=18842 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Re: Vlan Question [7:4038]

2001-05-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Brad Shifflett wrote: >> >> The user is a very high political figure who is real cautious about >security >> and paranoid. I like the idea of a seperate nic in the server and two >> subnets. The cost of switches could be a deciding factor. Thanks for the >> input guys! > > > >I hope he doesn'

Re: Vlan Question [7:4038]

2001-05-10 Thread simonis
Brad Shifflett wrote: > > The user is a very high political figure who is real cautious about security > and paranoid. I like the idea of a seperate nic in the server and two > subnets. The cost of switches could be a deciding factor. Thanks for the > input guys! I hope he doesn't figure out t

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-23 Thread The.Rock
, yet only had one physical > server. Yes, they had a tape backup on the server. No, they had no spare > machine to which they could restore the tape. > > > >-Original Message- > >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Thursday, March 22

RE: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
e server. No, they had no spare machine to which they could restore the tape. >-Original Message- >From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:44 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Vlan Question > > >At 02:01 PM

RE: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Brad Shifflett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlan Question At 02:01 PM 3/22/2001 -0600, you wrote: >We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to their own VLAN but have >a need to update files on the server. In our case we ha

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 02:01 PM 3/22/2001 -0600, you wrote: >We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to their own VLAN but have >a need to update files on the server. In our case we have auditors come in >from time to time and so we don't want them in with the rest of the world so >we isolate them in their o

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread The.Rock
We'll he could be wanting to isolate consultants to their own VLAN but have a need to update files on the server. In our case we have auditors come in from time to time and so we don't want them in with the rest of the world so we isolate them in their own VLAN and then setup an access list. They

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 08:26 AM 3/22/2001 -0800, you wrote: >Scenario: > Got a client who has a person on the network that does not want to >be on the network but wants access to the server. I'm somewhat confused. First, if he is somehow hidden, how does the server send back to the client? Second, if he is

Re: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread ciscosis
27;t allow the cards on the same network and don't let them forward (route) between each other. hope that's of some help - Original Message - From: "Brad Shifflett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Groupstudy (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu

RE: Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm
ifflett > Sent: March 22, 2001 9:27 AM > To: Groupstudy (E-mail) > Subject: Vlan Question > > > Scenario: > Got a client who has a person on the network that does not want to > be on the network but wants access to the server. My thought was to install > a switch, s

Vlan Question

2001-03-22 Thread Brad Shifflett
Scenario: Got a client who has a person on the network that does not want to be on the network but wants access to the server. My thought was to install a switch, setup to Vlans, one for all the users (10 or so) and the second Vlan for the 1 user by himself. This way no one can get to his

Re: AW: Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread mak
och, 14. Marz 2001 14:14 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Set VLAN question? <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> Hi, <p>I cannot distinguish the situation I should use portvlancost or portvlanpri. Would someone can t

RE: Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread Evan Francen
good read. HTH, Evan -Original Message- From: mak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Set VLAN question? Hi, I cannot distinguish the situation I should use portvlancost or portvlanpri. Would someone can tell me? Thanks   mak

AW: Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread Udo Konstantin
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Marz 2001 14:14 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Set VLAN question? Hi, I cannot distinguish the situation I should use portvlancost or portvlanpri. Would someone can tell me? Thanks   mak _ FAQ, list archives, and

Set VLAN question?

2001-03-14 Thread mak
Hi, I cannot distinguish the situation I should use portvlancost or portvlanpri. Would someone can tell me? Thanks   mak _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAI

RE: VLAN question

2001-02-22 Thread Brant Stevens
tions Engineer Thrupoint, Inc. 545 Fifth Avenue, 14th Floor New York, NY. 10017 646-562-6540 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shane Stockman Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 7:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VLAN question I will just li

Re: VLAN question

2001-02-22 Thread Bradley J. Wilson
link, though. Good luck - Bradley J. Wilson CCNP, CCDA, MCSE, CNX, NNCSS, MCT, CTT - Original Message - From: Shane Stockman To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 12:22 PM Subject: VLAN question I will just like to enquire whether it is possible to have a VLAN split over 2

VLAN question

2001-02-22 Thread Shane Stockman
I will just like to enquire whether it is possible to have a VLAN split over 2 lans divided by a point-to-point Frame-relay wan. VV LL AA N 4MEG WAN N 50 50 At both LA