Re: [c-nsp] netflow restrictions on ASR920

Sartaj, Can you please help with the following question? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Infrastructure wa...@cisco.com

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

Agree with George. I am copying Sartaj to provide the details on the best way to achieve the solution. Sartaj, please review James question to provide the relevant solution. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

com> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 9:21 AM To: Waris Sagheer <wa...@cisco.com> Cc: "Lukasz Bromirski (lbromirs)" <lbrom...@cisco.com>, "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X On 16

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

ME-3800X Waris, Something is bad with the PDF formatting: on first page the bottom table is somehow shifted right, on the next pages the PDF doesn’t capture full table - both left and right sides seems to be ripped. — ./ On 14 Nov 2016, at 07:14, Waris Sagheer (waris) <wa...@cisco.com<mailto:wa...

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

Hi James and Patrick, Sorry about the delay. L3 load balancing algorithm document. https://cisco.box.com/s/1txh2pxev9b82xcdyliaqs7w5pqlkqy7 Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS load-balancing on ME-3800X

James, Not sure if you have got the answer. If not, let me know and I can provide you the info. Best Regards, Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.com TME Jive page:https://cisco.jiveon.com/groups/sp-tme-internal-page Phone: +1 408 853 6682

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Webinar Announcement

Thank you everyone for attending the webinar. We had more than 145 folks in total from two sessions. Feel free to reach out to us if there were any questions unanswered. You can find the slides and recording under “ASR900 Webinar” heading on the following page,

Re: [c-nsp] ASR900 Webinar Announcement

Hi, I have set up two sessions to accommodate different time zones. Webex event details are included in the email. The content will be same for both the sessions. The duration of the session will be 90 minutes. Please register for the sessions using the link "Event address for attendees" under

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 901 and net-flow

ASR901 does not support Netflow. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE -

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN Ingress Policing on ME3600

Amos, I have covered this in my ME3600X Cisco Live San Francisco session. The session deck is available at the following location. http://www.warisinfo.com/my-presentations Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical

Re: [c-nsp] The Family of ASR902 - ASR903 - ASR907

Hi, There is an error in the data sheet and in the process of getting fixed. RSP3-400 is only on ASR903 and ASR907. ASR902 will not support RSP3-400. There is another RSP3-200 in the roadmap for Q1CY16 which will support ASR902, ASR903 and ASR907. Wide RSP is for 907 only as mentioned in the

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 migration to something with more 10 gig ports

Hi Adam, ASR903 RSP2 supports mLDP MVPN in Release 3.15. The feature is also supported on ASR920, ASR902 RSP3. With ASR 903 RSP2 you can get 12x10 Gig. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr903/release/notes/asr903_3S_rel_notes/asr903_rn_intro.html#80551 ASR920 can give you 4X10Gig and

Re: [c-nsp] The Family of ASR902 - ASR903 - ASR907

Hi Aaron and team, If there is an interest in the details of ASR903 RSP3, ASR907 RSP3, ASR902 & ASR920 family, we can do a webinar on them. Let me know and I will schedule it. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical

Re: [c-nsp] The Family of ASR902 - ASR903 - ASR907

Hi James, I was not aware of the issue which you mentioned regarding 6PE. I am hoping this problem will go away with Application Engineered Routing a.k.a Segment Routing since you will be able to build IPv6 LSP without using 6PE. Best Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] erspan - me3600

That’s correct. ME3600X does not support ERSPAN. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 903 RSP2 Control Plane Traffic QOS

: Re: [c-nsp] ASR 903 RSP2 Control Plane Traffic QOS Hi Waris, Can you please let me know if this doc is specific to the ASR903 or is it common for the ASR9xx family? Thanks On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com wrote: Let me know

Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: ASR920 - ISR4431

EOL. Fredrik Vöcks CNO [http://www.bredband2.com/epost/bredband2-big-payoff.jpg] On 4 June 2015 at 05:01, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com wrote: Nick, What is your netflow requirement? As I mentioned earlier the feature is in the roadmap. I want to make sure

Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: ASR920 - ISR4431

@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net, Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam vinba...@cisco.commailto:vinba...@cisco.com Subject: RE: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: ASR920 - ISR4431 Thanks Waris. Any news on a timeframe for the netflow on the 920? From: Waris Sagheer (waris

Re: [c-nsp] Pseudowire VC Types on Cisco

James, EVC configuration default signaling is VC Type 5 regardless of rewrite is configured or not. VC type 5 does not mean that it will pop the tag. EVC will not strip the tag in the absence of rewrite. It will forward the packet as it is received. If you need to change the VC type then you

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 903 RSP2 Control Plane Traffic QOS

Let me know if the following paper answers your question. If not I’ll ask my team to send out an updated document. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Q6qCRMe89_YTlxbGNoU3l5REU/view Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical

[c-nsp] Cisco ASR920 Family

Hi, I am happy to announce a new addition to Cisco ASR920 Family, ASR-920-12SZ-IM (uPOE, IPsec, NAT/PAT GNSS Support)- Next Gen CELL SITE ROUTER, which will start shipping end of August 2015. I have tried to summarize all the details about new and shipping ASR920. Sorry about the long email

Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: ASR920 - ISR4431

: ASR920 - ISR4431 Thanks Waris. Any news on a timeframe for the netflow on the 920? From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:wa...@cisco.com] Sent: 29 July 2015 21:06 To: Fredrik Vöcks Cc: Nick Cutting; Garry; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Vinod Kumar Balasubramanyam

Re: [c-nsp] ASR 920 - H-QoS across 2+ EFP interfaces

Steve, Please refer to the QOS section in the following Cisco Live deck. ASR920 has the same behavior. It will give you an idea about the QOS architecture and how to construct your policy in Cisco ASR920.

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 migration to something with more 10 gig ports

Hi Lukas, ASR-920-24SZ-IM is 1.5 RU. You can also explore ASR903 for higher 10 gig density with RSP2 (12x10Gig) or the new higher bandwidth RSP coming by the end of this month. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Netflow is on the roadmap for ASR920. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE -

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Gustav, Have you looked at smart licensing? I am hoping that should simplify the process. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QinQ / Service Instance

The configuration in your email is for local switching. If you have a PW between the two sites, you need to add xconnect configuration. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/switches/me-3600x-series-ethernet-access-switches/products-implementation-design-guides-list.html Best Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Gert, No more “in-fight BUs” :) Now all SP products in one organization. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Routing Segment wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 EoS?

Hi Lukas, ME3600X has the capability to support AER it but due to resource allocation, the decision has been made to focus AER on ASR920. Regarding Cisco Live session, there is a session which I do every year in US on Access Products and Design. IOS XR has always been the long term plan but for

Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: ASR920 - ISR4431

Nick, What is your netflow requirement? As I mentioned earlier the feature is in the roadmap. I want to make sure it addresses your requirement. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 EoS?

ASR920 provides an evolution of ME3600X and it helps us to have a single OS across our ASR 900 family which includes ASR920 variants, ASR903 RSP2 and future platforms. ME3600X is not going end of sale but it will be in sustaining mode meaning no active development in terms of new features. We

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 EoS?

of memory please? In other words are there any plans for RSP2 to have a similar scale as the RSP1B with future SW releases please? Thank you adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: 02 June 2015 23:06

Re: [c-nsp] Maximum number MPLS labels ME3800

Rob, Depending on the license, the platform supports the numbers in the following URL. It support multiple features at the same time. For example, you can have VPNV4 routes and PW numbers at the same time.

Re: [c-nsp] ME2600X FTTH design, shaping, road map questions

I am copying Durga (ME2600X product manager) to comment on the following questions. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com

Re: [c-nsp] Me3800 EVC E-tree

You can also use split horizon for E-Tree. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

Re: [c-nsp] next-hop-self under address-family vpnv4 also?

BGP PIC Edge would be recommended but if it is not supported, use different RDs even for the same VPN. This would allow second best path to be installed for the same prefix. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical

Re: [c-nsp] I-BGP/IGP question

Adam, That’s correct RFC3107 is probably now 13+ years old. However it has provided the foundation for Unified MPLS resulting in RFC3107 support on access devices. This architecture also pushed the innovation of BGP PIC, Remote LFA, Prefix Independent Convergence and now Segment Routing. Best

Re: [c-nsp] EVCs/BDIs/SVIs

SVI - Switched Virtual Interface is defined in IOS for configuring L3 interfaces. For example in ME3600X/ME3800X/ME3600X-24CX, SVI is being configured under EVC for configuring IP/L3VPN/MPLS interfaces. BDI - It is same the thing as SVI but in IOS XE. IOS XE has the notion of BDI. For example

[c-nsp] Synchronization Timing Self-Paced Online Bootcamp (Available Now)

Synchronization has three aspects Frequency, Phase Time. The need for synchronization is becoming critical for the following industries and deployments, - Service Providers: Mobile Networks, Performance Management in Carrier Ethernet Networks - Industrial Solutions: More efficient

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS-TE on ME3600

James, MPLS TE/FRR over Etherchannel is supported since Nov 2013, 15.4(1)S. LDP over MPLS TE on L2VPN is also supported. We need to fix the documentation. Wade and Ramji, Can you please clarify the support for MPLS TE over SVI and Interarea TE support? We need to fix the CCO documentation for

Re: [c-nsp] SFP's (Third party) for ME3600

I have not heard any complains from any customer in terms of insertion/removal. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1

[c-nsp] Carrier Ethernet and Mobile Backhaul Video Tutorials

Cisco has posted Ten New video tutorials on Carrier Ethernet and Mobile Backhaul on Cisco SPAG youtube channel. Link: http://youtu.be/uKwuge9DQl8?list=PLEKSxcWxROxKDIG6U4XA0Ieq5AC8LmYoL Topics: Introduction to ELINE Services Configuring ELINE Services Configuring CFNM on ELINE Service

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 me3800 EFP limits

Brian, ME3800X has higher scale that’s why the scale numbers are different from ME3600X. ME3800X is positioned for Pre-Agg hence higher scale. ME36800X/ME3600X supports multi dimensional scale so number of Xconnect should not be impacted by the number of EFPs. EFP Maximum number is 4K however

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS to Customer (Option B) / Multiple VRFs on CPEs

Two labels QOS will work fine since bottom label EXP is copied to the top label so there should not be any issues with the QOS in this case if you are using ME family. I have put uRPF in the roadmap on ASR920 but I need customer names since it is required for feature request. I would appreciate

[c-nsp] Remote LFA Deployments on ASR9K/ME3600X/ME3800X/ASR903

Hi Folks, Can you please share your feedback on Remote LFA on ASR9K, ME3600X, ME3800X and ASR903? How many of you are using this feature and what’s your feedback? Any challenges? We have also started shipping ASR920 which is the evolution of ME3400E and ASR903 RSP2. Both the new platforms are

[c-nsp] Clocking Certification and CE2.0 Update

Hi Folks, Quick update on Timing Sync and CE2.0. Timing Sync: I am happy to announce that ASR 903 is one of the first product to complete IEEE Conformity Assessment Program (ICAP) testing for IEEE 1588™ Frequency Telecom Profile (G.8265.1) conducted by Iometrix. CE2.0 Status: Updated CE2.0

Re: [c-nsp] Remote LFA Deployments on ASR9K/ME3600X/ME3800X/ASR903

Hi Nick, Remote LFA only. Let me check on the ddts. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 BFD flapping

Jure, Do you have a class in your policy to classify prec 6 and 7 traffic and allocate 5% of bandwidth? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] OMG! ME3600 does not automatically copy DSCP into COS and also does not automatically copy EXP into COS T-T

This does not seem to be the DSCP/EXP value copy issue. Customer COS value should not be touched. Let me get back to you on this. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS to Customer (Option B) / Multiple VRFs on CPEs

James, ASR9K has mpls urpf support. We are planning to support the same on ASR920 and ASR903 RSP2. http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-3/mpls/configuration/guide/b_mpls_cg43xasr9k/b_mpls_cg43asr9k_chapter_011.html#task_19C44FE6D33F4F8BADAF64614C1DB339 MPLS uRPF

Re: [c-nsp] RPR in MetroE

G8032 will be another option for L2 with 3.3 msec CCM timers. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682

Re: [c-nsp] me3600x-cx 15.4(2)S interface description mess

Hi Adam, Let me check with the team and will get back to you. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X - VRF + VPLS Instances

That numbers in your email are correct. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!

Hi James, Is the issue resolved? I am copying my team to help with the following issue. Hi Wade and Ramji, Can you please look into this issue? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X - tunning the output queues

Hi Pshem and George, There are two ASICs in the system and each has the buffer of 22 MB. 2x10Gig are one ASIC and 24x1Gig are on the other ASIC so 10 Gig buffers are separate from 1 Gig buffer. You are experiencing microburst in your network and it happens due to speed mismatch between ingress

[c-nsp] Update on ME3600X, ME3600X, ME3600X-24CX ASR903 - March 2014

Hi Team, Quick Update on ME3800X, ME3600X, ME3600X-24CX ASR903. New Documents Posted on CCO: Best Practices Document http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/design/guide/Cisco_Service_Provider_Access_Products_Deployment_Best_Practices_v1.pdf CE2.0

Re: [c-nsp] Management VLAN and Bridge Domain on ME3600 Switch

Sikandar, Adam is right. Reason being IP needs untagged frame for processing. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408

Re: [c-nsp] understanding BFD echo mode

Martin, Do you have specific platform in mind? Hardware BFD offload implementation may be different on platforms. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x buffer calculations- revisited

. -Julie Julie Rudolph From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:wa...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:38 PM To: Julie Rudolph; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x buffer calculations- revisited Hi Julie, Replies inline [Waris] From: Julie

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x buffer calculations- revisited

: Julie Rudolph Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 4:12 PM To: 'Waris Sagheer (waris)'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600x buffer calculations- revisited Great, thanks so much. 1) Was the dynamic allocation of buffers to the queues/classes

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x buffer calculations- revisited

Hi Julie, Replies inline [Waris] From: Julie Rudolph julie.rudo...@cdw.commailto:julie.rudo...@cdw.com Date: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:17 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600x

Re: [c-nsp] Not working tLDP or PW between me3600 15.3(3)S1a

Adam, Is this ME3600X-24CX? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE - 19901

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x and ciscoEvcMIB

EVC MIB should not require MPLS license. Have you opened a TAC case? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600, 15.3(3)S1a - is it a new safe harbor?

Hi Aivars, Can you please share the bug id? I want to check if it is being fixed in 15.3(3)S2. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600, 15.3(3)S1a - is it a new safe harbor?

Hi Adam, This is a recommended release. We need more customer exposure on 15.3(3)S1a so that those issues can be fixed in S2 release. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X L3 performance

It is line rate 44 Gbps full duplex. It actually supports 65 Mpps x 2 since for full duplex. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 BFD session to A9K breaks after upgrade to 15.3(3)S1a

Hi Jason, I am working with engineering to figure out the issue. Can you please unicast me your configuration on both routers? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 BFD session to A9K breaks after upgrade to 15.3(3)S1a

Hi Adam, Does the same scenario work for you? I mean BFD between 9K and ME3600X with the same CLNS MTU. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS QOS on ME3600 not working???

Hi Adam, Did you work with TAC or BU on this issue? Can you send me your configuration so that I can take a look at it. I need to class-maps and policies as well as the interface configuration. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 logs - unimplemented function

Hi Jure, The issue is cosmetic meaning no functionality impact and will be fixed in the next release. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 logs - unimplemented function

Let me check. Is there any even which triggers these messages? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x-cx 153-3.S any major pitfalls?

There was an issue with the image file naming so it is being fixed and reposted on CCO. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group (SPAG) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

to port-channel punted to CPU” issue is persistent in 15.3(2)S2 as well. adam From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:wa...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:59 PM To: Adam Vitkovsky; 'Darren O'Connor'; 'Nick Ryce'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X A9K L2 Protocol Tunnelling support

ME3600X, ME3800X, ASR903 and ASR9K are CE2.0 certified. CE2.0 has two options for L2 control protocol, option 1 and 2. ME3600X supports both the options. ME3600X by default drop all L2 control protocols and one needs to configure l2protocol xxx command to enable the transport of control

[c-nsp] ME3600X/ME3800X/ASR903 9K Interop CCO Design Guide Announcement

Hi Team, Sometime back I had sent out an email with the subject ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback. Thank you for all your responses and feedback. Based on the feedback, I am happy to announce the following documents on Cisco.com. Please provide your

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map

simple shaping yes, but no hierarchy. I have also tried to 3 level hierarchy with grand-parent policy with just class-default where a shaped at some speed and called service policy per_customer_shape -but I hit same error. adam From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:wa...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS Hi Waris, This issue was discovered on 15.3(1)S2. The “multicast ingress to port-channel punted to CPU” issue is persistent in 15.3(2)S2 as well. adam From: Waris Sagheer (waris

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

in function of these two commands please? adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer (waris) Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:29 PM To: Chris Russell; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mostafa Mansour

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled

-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com wrote

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map

Hi Adam, ME does not support ACL match in the egress policy and there is no plan to support it. However you can use the workaround ACLs can be matched in ingress policies and set qos-group. The qos-group can be matched in egress policies. Best Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x-cx 153-3.S any major pitfalls?

: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 4:38 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x-cx 153-3.S any major pitfalls? On 02/10/2013 05:29, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: BU would also recommend 15.3(3)S1

Re: [c-nsp] me3600 Can NOT match ACL in an output policy-map

Hi Adam, Let me get back to you on this. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1 408 835 1389 CCIE -

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

Hi Mostafa, Can you help with ASR1K L2PT behavior? What is supported on ASR1K? Hi Chris, I am copying Mostafa (ASR 1K expert) to confirm the L2PT behavior on ASR1K. Just a side note from ME perspective, I would recommend using L2PT forward command rather than L2PT tunnel. Best Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] VPLS between ME3600X and Brocade XMR

Hi Darren, Is the issue still pending? let me know if you still need help to resolve it. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone:

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

Hi Adam and Darren, Which software release you are using? EFP Link Bundling QOS is on the roadmap. I'll get back to you on the exact release. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x-cx 153-3.S any major pitfalls?

BU would also recommend 15.3(3)S1 if you are planning to upgrade to 15.3(3)S code base. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone:

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled

Richard, ME3600X should come up with a single power supply. However dual supply is recommended. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x SNMP items for power supplies disappear when PSU is pulled

ME3600X does send out traps. Console Log : Mar 1 00:34:33.063: %PLATFORM_ENV-6-FRU_PS_OIR: FRU Power Supply 2 Removed ME3800X#sh env power POWER SUPPLY 1 is AC OK AC Input : OK Output: OK Fan : OK POWER SUPPLY 2 is Not Present Best Regards,

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS-TE on ME3600

MPLS TE support over SVI and Etherchannel is in the roadmap. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X buffer calculations

Darren, Which image you are using? Based on that I can send you the write up. Regards, -Waris On Jul 27, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Darren O'Connor darre...@outlook.com wrote: Hi all. I've seen that the ME3600X has 44MB of buffer space for packets. I'm trying to work out how many virtual circuits

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X buffer calculations

Sure thing. I'll post other documents too at the same location. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X buffer calculations

Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X buffer calculations Hi Waris. 15.3(2)S Mainly as reading through previous threads it was suggested to use this as it now has the queue-limit available Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie On 27 Jul 2013, at 21:30, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa

Re: [c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback

/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 09:27:45 AM Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: Hi Everyone, I have seen lot of good inputs on this mailer. I am collecting feedback for the existing deployment challenges on the following platforms so that we can address them

[c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903 Cisco Live Orlando Update

Hi, ASR903, ME800X, ME3600X, ME3600X-24CX, ME2600X ME3400E Product team will be in Cisco Live Orlando from Monday June 24th to Thursday June 27th. Below are the sessions in Cisco Live covering ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX, ASR903 ASR9K * BRKSPG-2901 Designing Pre-Aggregation Networks

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor

pim vrf neighbor On 24/05/2013 00:21, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: Is it not documented properly regarding SDM template? Nope, it's not. The ME3600 Configuring Multicast VPN web pages: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/15.2_2_S/configuration/guide

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor

@puck.nether.netmailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:26:21PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 24/05/2013 00:21, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: Is it not documented properly regarding SDM template? Also, the sdm template page: http

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor

Folks, Is it not documented properly regarding SDM template? Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service Provider Access Group wa...@cisco.commailto:wa...@cisco.com Phone: +1 408 853 6682 Mobile: +1

Re: [c-nsp] ME-3600 Can't see ip pim vrf neighbor

. But the 250 MDT routes are quite expensive since you loose 8000 ipv4 routes. Any plans to change this in the future? Regards, Fredrik Vöcks Senior IP Network Engineer [http://www.bredband2.com/epost/logo_epost.jpg] On 24 May 2013 01:21, Waris Sagheer (waris) wa...@cisco.commailto:wa

Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x L3VPN MPLS problems with 15.3.2S

Hi Jason, Leigh, Adam Aivars. These are serious issues. From the thread it seems 15.3(2)S has multiple issues, VRF ping, IPv6 enable causes L3VPN issue management issues. Any other issues seen with 15.3(2)S? Jason, you mentioned that you have seen similar issues with other releases, can you

Re: [c-nsp] Two Questions - ME3600 ERPS and MSTP

Hi Eric, Which image you are using? Are you using ME3600X or ME3600X-24CX? I am copying Wade who will help you with the following issue and EVC question. Best Regards, [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg] Waris Sagheer Technical Marketing Manager Service

  1   2   3   >