Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel not working Juniper vs Cisco

Your output says the JNPR side is still fast/1s. I'd actually prefer to look at the LACP PDU from the wire 'monitor traffic ' Flap would be expected if CSCO sends every 30s, JNPR sends every 1s. We should expect JNPR to be happy about 3s after receiving PDU from CSCO. I thoroughly recommend

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel not working Juniper vs Cisco

Hi I've deactivated the FAST on Juniper but nothing changes... As I wrote on Cisco remains down hence you will not see any LACP while on Juniper it flaps, once I shut on cisco it stop to flap I'm not sure it is a cabling issue... we should try to setup a pure L3 p2p link and test that I guess...

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel not working Juniper vs Cisco

You've changed JNPR from 30s to 1s, but not CSCO. I'm not sure if this is the only problem, as insufficient data is shown about the state and LACP PDUs. I believe the command is 'lacp rate fast' or 'lacp period short', to reduce risk of operators getting bored, In your case, the former. On Sun,

[c-nsp] Port-channel not working Juniper vs Cisco

Dear expert we've an issue in setting up a port-channel between a Juniper EX4400 and a Cisco Nexus N9K-C93180YC-EX over an SX 1 Gbs link. We've implemented the following configuration but on Juniper side it is interface flapping while on Cisco side it remains down. Light levels seem ok. Has

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

It's N7K. Yeah, sorry I forgot to mention that. :) On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:01:07PM +0200, Andriy Bilous wrote: > > Just a follow-up. Po interface is a L3 channel with subinterface > po631.2310 > > configured,

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

Scott Granados wrote: > What you mean all hardware isn’t the same? no, there's nexus hardware and asr hardware. And catalyst too. That's about it though. Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

What you mean all hardware isn’t the same? ;) > On Aug 17, 2017, at 3:18 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:01:07PM +0200, Andriy Bilous wrote: >> Just a follow-up. Po interface is a L3 channel with subinterface po631.2310 >> configured, adding

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

Hi, On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 02:01:07PM +0200, Andriy Bilous wrote: > Just a follow-up. Po interface is a L3 channel with subinterface po631.2310 > configured, adding filter vlan 2310 solved the problem. What I find amazing in this thread that nobody bothered to actually mention what sort of

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

Just a follow-up. Po interface is a L3 channel with subinterface po631.2310 configured, adding filter vlan 2310 solved the problem. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Urmanov Maxim wrote: > Hello, try to add "switchport monitor" for span destination port, it > should work > >

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

Hello, try to add "switchport monitor" for span destination port, it should work 16 авг. 2017 г. 1:40 ПП пользователь "Andriy Bilous" < andriy.bil...@gmail.com> написал: > Hello, > > I am trying to configure SPAN session with port-channel interface as the > source > > monitor session 2 >

[c-nsp] Port-Channel interface as the source for SPAN

Hello, I am trying to configure SPAN session with port-channel interface as the source monitor session 2 source interface port-channel631 both destination interface Ethernet5/30 no shut However on the sniffer I see only locally generated frames - CDP, LLDP, UDLD and no transit traffic. Am

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

On 12/10/2016 21:51, Tom Hill wrote: On 12/10/16 18:06, David Wilkinson wrote: Should split horizon stop the loops when connecting downstream switches in a resilient configuration? It can't when you've the ability to loop a broadcast frame around via devices that aren't party to the split

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

On 12/10/16 18:06, David Wilkinson wrote: > Should split horizon stop the loops when connecting downstream switches > in a resilient configuration? It can't when you've the ability to loop a broadcast frame around via devices that aren't party to the split horizon forwarding. I'm not certain this

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

On 12/10/2016 00:12, Tom Hill wrote: I'm assuming you know what that device is that's claiming the root bridge? That's probably a good clue. The "new" root bridge mac is device which has always been the root for this VLAN, not of the other devices between these and the root logged a change.

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

On 11/10/16 12:00, David Wilkinson wrote: > 4948 log: > %SPANTREE-5-ROOTCHANGE: Root Changed for vlan 1234: New Root Port is > Port-channel2. New Root Mac Address is ..0cc0 > %SPANTREE-5-ROOTCHANGE: Root Changed for vlan 1234: New Root Port is > Port-channel2. New Root Mac Address is

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

Hi, Could you try no spanning-tree etherchannel guard misconfig on 4948. Best On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:03 PM, David Wilkinson < cisco-...@noroutetohost.net> wrote: > It doesn't do it on any topology change, Never had the this problem > between classic IOS devices. This has happened since we

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

It doesn't do it on any topology change, Never had the this problem between classic IOS devices. This has happened since we migrated some links over to ASRs, It is making me wonder if I have missed something in the ASR configuration. The logs on the other devices in the network doesn't show any

[c-nsp] Port-channel between Cisco 4948 and ASR 9k going err-disable

Hi We have a couple of port-channels between Cisco 4948 and Cisco ASR 9006 devices, periodicity we are seeing these error disable with the following. 4948 log: %SPANTREE-5-ROOTCHANGE: Root Changed for vlan 1234: New Root Port is Port-channel2. New Root Mac Address is ..0cc0

Re: [c-nsp] Port Channel Speed

i think he means the port channel is showing as 10GE, even though he's got 2x10GE interfaces in the bundle. On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015, sathish kumar Ippani wrote: Here when we checked the sh int portchannel 1. it

Re: [c-nsp] Port Channel Speed

Hi, WE have a port channel on NX 5548 connected to Cisco FI. There are two 10Gb interface are bounded to it. your bandwidth on that port-channel is 20G... but the biggest flow supported is 10G - the Physical limit. alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

Re: [c-nsp] Port Channel Speed

On Mon, 11 May 2015, sathish kumar Ippani wrote: Here when we checked the sh int portchannel 1. it shows following output. port-channel1 is up [...] Members in this channel: Eth1/1, Eth1/2 1 interface resets 30 seconds input rate 611861136 bits/sec, 64564 packets/sec 30 seconds output

[c-nsp] Port Channel Speed

Hi All, First thanks to everyone. WE have a port channel on NX 5548 connected to Cisco FI. There are two 10Gb interface are bounded to it. Here when we checked the sh int portchannel 1. it shows following output. port-channel1 is up Hardware: Port-Channel, address: 002a.6a4d.0f68 (bia

[c-nsp] port-channel standalone-disable

Hi all, We recently had a problem where a port was flapping, the port was a member of a port channel. The port was joining and leaving the port channel continuously, it caused major network problems. After speaking to TAC they said the port leaving the port channel was causing a network loop,

Re: [c-nsp] port-channel standalone-disable

On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 19:24 +, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: Anyway the recommendations are to use the command, port-channel standalone-disable. Has anyone had any experience with this command?, what are the benefits?, and how does it work?. We don't use the feature but AFAIK it should only

[c-nsp] Port-Channel physical interface members distribution

Hi all I recently had a discussion on how to connect interfaces belonging to a same port-channel I would like your opinion. On Nexus or Catalyst, I am wondering if the different interfaces of critical Port-Channel (for example, a port-Channel going from Core to Distribution switches) should

[c-nsp] Port-channel strange issue ?

Hi I've a port-channel (no LACP) config in this way on my 6509: *** interface Port-channel11 description Te1/8,2/8 switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3996,3999-4094

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel configuration stickiness...

Hi, On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:52:33PM -0500, Jeff Kell wrote: Known bug? Feature? You can alter a port-channel configuration and expect it to propagate to the members, correct? I'd share that assumption. If you alter the port-channel config and the members fall out of sync, it's a

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel configuration stickiness...

I thought I recently saw a new global command to stop you configuring the ethernet interface directly when it is in a channel-group... Unfortunately - I can't find it at the moment... On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel configuration stickiness...

Hi, Known bug? Feature? You can alter a port-channel configuration and expect it to propagate to the members, correct? yes - changes to the port-channel are propagated to the members... if you do it the other way around then the interface WONT match the port-channel and the link will go

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel configuration stickiness...

You have to keep in mind that there are some commands, mostly L1/L2 related, that apply only to individual members, so things can sometimes get more tricky. Hopefully you'll get a warning and nothing more if you try to configure them under the port-channel interface. -- Tassos

[c-nsp] Port-channel configuration stickiness...

After a few IOS updates in our maintenance window tonight, I had some port-channel trunks fail to come up *again* and this is becoming more than an occasional nuisance... perhaps others have seen this... We run a number of port-channel uplinks between Catalyst switches (3560s, 3750s, 4500s,

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

What is the flex links about? Because the traffic load-balance or not is depend on your settings, by default is source mac address, let's say if you just have one source then the traffic will just use one port-channel link, if you have two sources, then should be load-balance between the two

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:40:07, Xu Hu wrote: Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port channel What is the flex links about? Because the traffic load-balance or not is depend on your settings, by default is source mac address, let's say if you just have one source then the traffic will just use one

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

Hi Ryan, thanks for your information. Xu Hu On 24 Aug, 2012, at 20:19, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:40:07, Xu Hu wrote: Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port channel What is the flex links about? Because the traffic load-balance or not is depend on your settings

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

Depends. If you have access to the end hosts and it's a single TCP session (which can only be on 1 link) you can craft or calculate the src-port,src-ip,dst-port,dst-ip or mac (depending on the hashing algorithm you are using) to make it go down a link that you want to see it go down. -bn 0216331C

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

Just checked the flex links basic concept, is this technology same as Juniper RTG? 2012/8/24 Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 06:40:07, Xu Hu wrote: Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port channel What is the flex links about? Because the traffic load-balance or not is depend

[c-nsp] Port channel

Hi all, In a port channel can you force traffic down a particular link, don't use the hashing algorithm. Rgds Harry Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 18:08 +0100, Harry Hambi wrote: In a port channel can you force traffic down a particular link, don't use the hashing algorithm. You can shut the other interface(s). :-) I don't think there's a non-disruptive way to do it, but recovery should be quite fast if the

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

Hi, On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:08:44PM +0100, Harry Hambi wrote: Hi all, In a port channel can you force traffic down a particular link, don't use the hashing algorithm. No. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

There is the LACP 1:1 Redundancy which may be what you are looking for: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/configuration/guide/lsw_cfg_flwbal.html -- Tim On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Harry Hambi harry.ha...@bbc.co.uk wrote: Hi all, In a port channel can you force traffic down

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

You could shut the one of the links down but if you really want to do this, why use a port channel at all - spanning tree can do what you are after... Sent from a mobile device On 24/08/2012, at 3:08, Harry Hambi harry.ha...@bbc.co.uk wrote: Hi all, In a port channel can you force traffic

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel

Flex links is an option as well. Sent from handheld On Aug 23, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Andrew Miehs and...@2sheds.de wrote: You could shut the one of the links down but if you really want to do this, why use a port channel at all - spanning tree can do what you are after... Sent from a mobile

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

As I said, we TRY . The vendors will do their best to scupper us, other things will come up to b0rk it. But as a rule of thumb its a starting point (i'm more concerned that other things change such as the MIB value between different platforms) alan

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

On 08/03/12 11:32, Mark Tinka wrote: We try not to match interface numbers to VLAN ID's. That works out alright when you're starting out, but as the network grows, many face-palm and hair-pulling moments :-). Agreed. Clever numbering schemes can just be misleading when they don't line up.

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

-Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 6:33 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 10:49:50 PM

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

Hi, We try not to match interface numbers to VLAN ID's. That works out alright when you're starting out, but as the network grows, many face-palm and hair-pulling moments :-). Agreed. Clever numbering schemes can just be misleading when they don't line up. another 'agreed' - however,

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

2012/3/7 Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net On Mar 7, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 07/03/2012 14:16, chris stand wrote: thoughts/ideas/concerns This works fine until you try it on smaller boxes and you find out that they only support port-channel names up to 48 or

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

On Friday, March 09, 2012 06:52:03 AM Alan Buxey wrote: another 'agreed' - however, we do try to use standard numbers for particular types of port-channel - ie doing something like ensuring the po1 on an aggregator switch is ALWAYS the link up to the core (and not a port-channel to a stack

[c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

Hello, Anyone use clever port channel numbering schemes ? We have a number of facilities that have access closets that connect either directly to a 7K or the access closets connect to 5Ks which then connect to the 7Ks. I have co-workers who want to take a trunk that might be carrying vlan

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

On 07/03/2012 14:16, chris stand wrote: thoughts/ideas/concerns This works fine until you try it on smaller boxes and you find out that they only support port-channel names up to 48 or whatever. Then you have a moment of extreme facepalm and go back to Po1, Po2 and Po3. Nick

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

On Mar 7, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 07/03/2012 14:16, chris stand wrote: thoughts/ideas/concerns This works fine until you try it on smaller boxes and you find out that they only support port-channel names up to 48 or whatever. Then you have a moment of extreme facepalm

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

I think there's definitely value in putting some thought into any numbering/naming scheme you use anywhere, but the answer you come up with will depend on your organization and the situation. If you have excellent documentation systems which are quick and easy to use and always kept up to date,

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

+1 We don't have a formal port channel naming schema. I usually use 1-10 for things like ISLs between core and stuff and then start with 11-XXX for all the port channels to various downstream devices. That said, the interface description is still the most important part of our gear. Now on

Re: [c-nsp] port channel numbering schemes

Hi, On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:16:52AM -0600, chris stand wrote: We have a number of facilities that have access closets that connect either directly to a 7K or the access closets connect to 5Ks which then connect to the 7Ks. I have co-workers who want to take a trunk that might be carrying

Re: [c-nsp] port channel load balancing best practices?

I don't know that there is a hard and fast port-channel hashing best practice. It all depends on your traffic patters and what's best for you. I guess the most obvious question would be is your link load approx even? If not does the highest loaded one see any drops? -Ben On Mar 7, 2011, at

[c-nsp] port channel load balancing best practices?

HI So I'm seeing some weird problems with a video conf product and it definitely seems to be down to network location. Part of what I'm looking at is that we're port channeling between a 65 and a 4900. The 65 is configured to use: port-channel per-module load-balance port-channel

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Limits

On 01/11/2011 06:28 PM, Jose Madrid wrote: I need to configure a port-channel with multiple 10Gb interrfaces and am wondering if anyone knew the limit of ports I could have in the same port-channel? From what I have been able to find it appears to be 8, but I wanted to know if anyone knew of a

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Limits

Hello, On 01/12/2011 11:00 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 01/11/2011 06:28 PM, Jose Madrid wrote: I need to configure a port-channel with multiple 10Gb interrfaces and am wondering if anyone knew the limit of ports I could have in the same port-channel? From what I have been able to find it

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Limits

...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Suchy Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 3:13 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Limits Hello, On 01/12/2011 11:00 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 01/11/2011 06:28 PM, Jose Madrid wrote: I need

[c-nsp] Port-Channel Limits

I need to configure a port-channel with multiple 10Gb interrfaces and am wondering if anyone knew the limit of ports I could have in the same port-channel? From what I have been able to find it appears to be 8, but I wanted to know if anyone knew of a real-life answer. Here is the document i

[c-nsp] Port-channel weirdness VSS

Hi, We seem to have a issue with port-channel load-balancing between two of our VSS instances. On both VSS sides we configured 8 interfaces to 1 port-channel. At some point we see packetloss between servers connected to both VSS instances when we put production traffic on it. We have 4

Re: [c-nsp] Port-channel weirdness VSS

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Koen wrote: I read somewhere on the cisco site that VSS doesn't want to send traffic over the VSL link between the physical switches... This is correct - no matter what show etherc load-balance hash-result or show ip cef exact-route says, the VSS will

[c-nsp] port-channel help (warning, might be dumb)

I'm trying to configure a LACP port-channel between Cisco 6509 and Foundry FESX. Cisco config: interface Port-channel1 switchport switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,28 switchport mode trunk no ip address ! interface GigabitEthernet1/5 switchport

Re: [c-nsp] port-channel help (warning, might be dumb)

Hi, Foundry config: trunk ethe 1 to 2 trunk deploy foundry does LACP... did you do link-aggregate active on the foundry? alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel bug in SXI3 - CSCtd93384

Further follow-up on this for those running SXI3 : Turns out to be a problem with the parser cache. If you are running parser config cache interface then the real running config can get out of sync with what the box thinks is the running config. If you then do a copy run start things can

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel bug in SXI3

On Friday 18 December 2009 03:00:23 pm David Hughes wrote: This now has a bug ID associated with it. We've got the same problem on SXI2 and SXI3. For anyone interested, the Bug ID is CSCtd93384. No case notes for this bug ID, but I'm watching it. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc

Re: [c-nsp] Port channel bug in SXI3

This now has a bug ID associated with it. We've got the same problem on SXI2 and SXI3. For anyone interested, the Bug ID is CSCtd93384. David ... On 15/12/2009, at 11:59 AM, David Hughes wrote: Hi Since moving to SXI3 we've seen issues with port channels. Problems such as the

[c-nsp] Port channel bug in SXI3

Hi Since moving to SXI3 we've seen issues with port channels. Problems such as the physical interfaces and port channel config getting out of sync. A sh run int on a member of the Po will say it's shutdown but a sh run int on the Po itself shows it's up (and a sh int does too). It's not

[c-nsp] port channel overruns

hey all i have Cisco 7606 and i configured port channel consisting of 5 links now the individual ports (Gig) , do not have overruns but the port channel has even though the ports in the mentioned port channel have 8 ports spacing to overcome the issue of ASIC can anyone help ? Router#sh int

Re: [c-nsp] port channel overruns

i have Cisco 7606 and i configured port channel consisting of 5 links now the individual ports (Gig) , do not have overruns but the port channel has even though the ports in the mentioned port channel have 8 ports spacing to overcome the issue of ASIC can anyone help ? What type of card

[c-nsp] Port-Channel load-balance w/ Voice

Just wondering what the recommended load-balance state should be for a port-channel carrying voice packets? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Setup Issues

I would like to see both (physical) ports configuration , and I would also like to see a summary of your etherchannels (show etherchannel 1 summary). did you set both modes on both physical interfaces to on ? Are you doing PagP on both ? I would suggest LACP (channel-protocol lacp). I also notice

[c-nsp] Port-Channel Setup Issues

Hi All I am trying to setup a 4 port port-channel between a Cisco 7609 and a Cisco ME3400, despite various attempts to complete this I keep running into the same issue, although the physical ports come up the Port-channel wont at all, looking at the port channel itself it remains in a

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Setup Issues

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Kilian Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 12:39 PM To: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Setup Issues Hi All I am trying to setup a 4 port port-channel between a Cisco 7609

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem

resolution? - Original Message From: Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Collins, Richard (SNL US) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 7:31:17 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem I did exactly that, and managed to get it to go into LACP mode

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem

to your scenerio? Any resolution? - Original Message From: Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Collins, Richard (SNL US) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 7:31:17 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem I did exactly that, and managed to get

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem

@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 7:31:17 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem I did exactly that, and managed to get it to go into LACP mode. The Etherchannel ran for about 3 hours without a problem, then all of a sudden started losing pings all over the place. I took one channel

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem

? - Original Message From: Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Collins, Richard (SNL US) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 7:31:17 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem I did exactly that, and managed to get it to go into LACP mode

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem

(SNL US) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 7:31:17 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem I did exactly that, and managed to get it to go into LACP mode. The Etherchannel ran for about 3 hours without a problem, then all of a sudden started losing

Re: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem

2007 02:39:04 -0400 From: Dan Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [c-nsp] Port-Channel Problem To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Riddle me this. I have 1 physical link, and a port-channel interface operating