+1.
Now is 2015 :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group
;sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFowkAquOVhS0iYdRjEzfhBOCMWGw>
On Friday, September 28, 2012 at 3:36:20 PM UTC+8, Roman Yakovlev wrote:
>
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
> get these results, at least for me
> 1. noir
> 2.
Hi John,
It's super easy to deploy Clojure web app (ring) to Amazon Beanstalk. I
think there were few blog posts about that.
Basically you just need https://github.com/weavejester/lein-beanstalk
Anton
On Friday, September 13, 2013 2:45:10 PM UTC-3, Jon Barker wrote:
>
> anybody know the easies
Well for creation itself, http://www.luminusweb.net/ represents best
practices with Ring, Compojure, and the usual attendant libraries.
For deployment, I'd say something like Fabric or Ansible is going to be the
simplest way to start.
On Friday, September 13, 2013 10:45:10 AM UTC-7, Jon Barker
anybody know the easiest way to create web applications and deploy to
amazon web services? (either EC2 or elastic beanstalk)
Thanks,
Jon
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.c
There's now an example and a tutorial for using the CHP web framework.CHP - https://github.com/runexec/chpWork with HTML, CSS, _javascript_, and SQL using Clojure.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send emai
ddleware or is there something in existence which I am not aware of?
> >
> > Thank you for any replies.
> >
> >
> > On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:36:20 AM UTC+3, Yakovlev Roman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >> So i'd like to point to
> On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:36:20 AM UTC+3, Yakovlev Roman wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
>> get these results, at least for me
>> 1. noir
>> 2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
>>
of my own with the use of noir pre-route and maybe a
middleware or is there something in existence which I am not aware of?
Thank you for any replies.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 10:36:20 AM UTC+3, Yakovlev Roman wrote:
>
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web
ee [2].
___
[0] http://todomvc.com
[1] http://todomvc.herokuapp.com
[2] https://github.com/phperret/cjone-todomvc.git
Le vendredi 28 septembre 2012 09:36:20 UTC+2, Yakovlev Roman a écrit :
>
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
> get these re
Lets not forget http://clojurescriptone.com/
Its a pretty amazing artifact, a complete app with perfect
documentation. Its also essentially a template.
If someone is totally lost on how to get started with clojure web
programming, just go to that.
In the more general case, I strongly agree that
Hi Simone,
Simone Mosciatti writes:
> Immutant ( http://immutant.org/ ) IMO is moving in a great direction,
> if I have understand is wrapping several libraries in just one
> enviroment...
Since you brought it up, I'd like to clarify terminology a bit in case
anyone thinks Immutant is a framewo
Ok that's good idea really.
As i can see you just use ring compojure korma for mysql and postgresql for
pg database.
As for me i use for my first project this config
(defproject testpro "0.1.0-SNAPSHOT"
:plugins [[lein-catnip "0.4.1"]]
:description "FIXME: write description"
:url "http://e
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:27 PM, James MacAulay wrote:
> Frameworks have benefits which can't easily be achieved with
> documentation. The most obvious to me is that a framework lets you fire up
> a complete system of carefully curated components in no time. They also let
> you defer choices unti
Frameworks have benefits which can't easily be achieved with documentation.
The most obvious to me is that a framework lets you fire up a complete
system of carefully curated components in no time. They also let you defer
choices until you actually need to care about them.
Because Clojure's lib
Immutant ( http://immutant.org/ ) IMO is moving in a great direction, if I
have understand is wrapping several libraries in just one enviroment...
And red hat is behind it I just find out, that usually means great doc...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Grou
major people ( David Nolen and
maybe Rich Hickey) what they think about that.
пятница, 28 сентября 2012 г., 11:36:20 UTC+4 пользователь goracio написал:
>
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
> get these results, at least for me
> 1
> Documentation is always an issue, few times ago I propose to organize a
> fund raiser to improve OUR project, the project of OUR community, stuff we
> should be proud of, and the improve of the doc was one of the biggest
> issue... However nobody supported me.
I think it helps when there is mo
> CFML version :)
>
> > I don't really thinks Rails-like frameworks fit with the Clojure way of
> > thinking. As Chas said, we're more inclined to combine a number of
> > libraries to help build an application than to use "frameworks". FW/1 uses
> > Ri
like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
> get these results, at least for me
> 1. noir
> 2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
> 3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
> 4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
> 5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
> So the
On Saturday, September 29, 2012 1:48:10 PM UTC+2, Anthony Grimes wrote:
I do not have access to the website in order to update it
>
Somebody (Chris Granger ???) has the access, if you are actually
maintaining it you should have the access too...
> Chris has things he wanted to see done fir
Chas said, we're more inclined to combine a number of
> libraries to help build an application than to use "frameworks". FW/1 uses
> Ring and Enlive and provides just a thin convention-based veneer over those
> to achieve most of what the CFML version has offered for three years :)
&g
issue. You can find out what libraries are most common with
simple google queries and common sense.
On Friday, September 28, 2012 2:36:20 AM UTC-5, goracio wrote:
>
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
> get these results, at least for
So we are back to the documentation reach issue again.
I think the best solution would be one (!) central community wiki and
prominent mentions of it from the clojure.org .
The wiki could contain the links to the latest tutorials and so on. It
should have quite low barrier to entry.
--
You rece
There is already a rails like Clojure web framework which has been around
for a while called Conjure: https://github.com/macourtney/Conjure
Here is the wiki to get started: https://github.com/macourtney/Conjure/wiki
The most recent release is out of date, but I have been working on an
update
. As Chas said, we're more inclined to combine a number of libraries
>> to help build an application than to use "frameworks". FW/1 uses Ring and
>> Enlive and provides just a thin convention-based veneer over those to
>> achieve most of what the CFML version has of
hose
> to achieve most of what the CFML version has offered for three years :)
>
> Sean
>
> On Friday, September 28, 2012, goracio wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
>> get these results, at least fo
ost of what the CFML version has offered for three years :)
Sean
On Friday, September 28, 2012, goracio wrote:
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
> get these results, at least for me
> 1. noir
> 2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
use Ring, Compojure, and
> Enlive.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Chas
>
> [1] http://cemerick.com/2012/07/19/2012-state-of-clojure-survey/
> [2] http://www.clojurebook.com
>
> On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:36 AM, goracio wrote:
>
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem he
se Ring, Compojure, and Enlive.
Cheers,
- Chas
[1] http://cemerick.com/2012/07/19/2012-state-of-clojure-survey/
[2] http://www.clojurebook.com
On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:36 AM, goracio wrote:
> Hi
> So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google get
> these resu
On 28 September 2012 10:22, goracio wrote:
> No i don't. Project page for now https://github.com/noir-clojure/noir and
> it's updated 3 months ago. I guess project maintained by one person
> https://github.com/Raynes and i guess he does not have much time to do the
> work. Usage info still outdate
No i don't. Project page for now https://github.com/noir-clojure/noir and
it's updated 3 months ago. I guess project maintained by one person
https://github.com/Raynes and i guess he does not have much time to do the
work. Usage info still outdated
If you want to include Noir in an already crea
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:36 AM, goracio wrote:
> So what i suggest :
> Take 1 platform for web development in Clojure (for example noir as most
> mature framework) .
> Form working core group from 5-6 people.
> Decide about name of the project ( or take Noir)
> Make good site about it
> Make a p
Hi
So i'd like to point to the problem here. Clojure web framework in google
get these results, at least for me
1. noir
2. stackoverflow question 2008 year
3. stackoverflow question 2010 year
4. joodo ( outdated thing developed by one person)
5. Compojure ( routing dsl)
So there is no po
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Martin DeMello wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Abhishek Reddy wrote:
> > More generally, the fragmented state of support -- too many separate and
> > underused mailing lists, IRC channels, websites, each for small,
> composable
> > components.
>
> This is
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Abhishek Reddy wrote:
> More generally, the fragmented state of support -- too many separate and
> underused mailing lists, IRC channels, websites, each for small, composable
> components.
This is an endemic problem, though, not one confined to clojure. I've
seen
Here are some resources to get you started with Ring/Compojure web
development.
http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/03/clojure-web-development-ring.html
http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/07/develop-deploy-clojure-web-applications.html
http://mmcgrana.github.com/2010/08/clojure-rest-api.html
http://weave
Thank you all guys, I'm really happy and proud to be around.
Shantanu,
Stuart, Abhishek and Brenton said every thing I was thinking about and
much more:
Lack of coherent design, sometimes it is really hard to get help,
documentation is rare.
I don't know even how to getting started with Compojure
> The best thing we can do for Clojure web development right now is
> start developing web applications in Clojure, find the pieces that are
> missing, and fill them in.
This is the best advise I have heard in a while. We need to just start
doing it. If something that we need is missing then there
On Sep 5, 12:25 am, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Shantanu Kumar
>
> wrote:
> > 2. Enlive, Hiccup, Gulliver, Clj-StringTemplate, Cfmljure etc for web
> > template stuff
>
> Since cfmljure got a mention...
>
> Would folks be interested in a ready-to-run Jetty-based down
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Shantanu Kumar
wrote:
> 2. Enlive, Hiccup, Gulliver, Clj-StringTemplate, Cfmljure etc for web
> template stuff
Since cfmljure got a mention...
Would folks be interested in a ready-to-run Jetty-based download that
ran CFML and Clojure out-of-the-box?
It would be
26 pm, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
> I am interested to know what deficiencies do you see in present state
> of affairs in Clojure web development space. It would be something
> useful to discuss.
I think the packages that exist are exciting and that some of them
represent a step forwards even when com
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
>
> I am interested to know what deficiencies do you see in present state
> of affairs in Clojure web development space. It would be something
> useful to discuss. There are libraries, such as:
>
> 1. Ring+Clout+Compojure, Ring+Conjure, Ring+
What's missing, frankly, is a coherent design. Lots of pieces are
there, but they don't always fit together well. As one trivial
example, we discovered this week that Sandbar's user authentication
doesn't work with Ring's keyword-parameter-names middleware. But
these problems will be ironed out o
On Sep 4, 8:51 pm, HB wrote:
> My wish is vanquished :)
> But I really wish if Relevance will work on a web framework since it
> is in a unique position to achieve this (having the brightest Clojure
> folks).
> I read that Relevance embracing the "20%" principle like Google, this
> is also will
a nice day all.
On Sep 4, 4:32 pm, Aaron Bedra wrote:
> On 9/3/10 11:45 PM, HB wrote:> Hey,
> > Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
> > working on a Clojure web framework?
> > Personally, I wish.
>
> We aren't currently work
On 9/3/10 11:45 PM, HB wrote:
Hey,
Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
working on a Clojure web framework?
Personally, I wish.
We aren't currently working on creating a new web framework, but I am
working to make the web development experience a little b
On Sep 4, 5:45 am, HB wrote:
> Hey,
> Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
> working on a Clojure web framework?
> Personally, I wish.
Its also worth looking at Conjure if you're interested in a web
framework:
http://github.com/macourtney/Conju
Hey,
Since Relevance is heavily investing in Clojure, do you think they are
working on a Clojure web framework?
Personally, I wish.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroup
I hadn't heard of Grizzly before. Thanks for the pointer (er..., reference,
or whatever we're calling them these days).
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
> I was recently thinking of adding support for
> https://grizzly.dev.java.net/ in
> http://github.com/wea
Hi Jeffrey,
I was recently thinking of adding support for https://grizzly.dev.java.net/
in http://github.com/weavejester/compojure/tree/master.
Just need some time to get my head around compojure.
Cheers,
Hubert.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Jeffrey Straszheim <
straszheimjeff...@gmail.com
On Mar 16, 11:17 pm, BerlinBrown wrote:
> After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
> I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
>
> What do you think and what you add. This is ambitious and just a
> "ideas" of what I would add. What would you want from your id
On Mar 16, 10:42 pm, Shawn Hoover wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Stuart Sierra
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 16, 7:17 pm, BerlinBrown wrote:
> > > After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
> > > I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
>
> > > Wha
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 7:17 pm, BerlinBrown wrote:
> > After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
> > I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
> >
> > What do you think and what you add. This is ambitious and just a
On Mar 16, 7:17 pm, BerlinBrown wrote:
> After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
> I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
>
> What do you think and what you add. This is ambitious and just a
> "ideas" of what I would add. What would you want from your ide
I'm mostly a front-end UI person with crazy amounts of JS experience so most
of my input will be from that stand point.
1. I agree with Sean on this one. No need to bring in middleware that can't
be expressed in 10X-20X less code in pure Clojure.
2. The framework should allow for any backend (even
Okay, if you have to work with something rpe-existing that makes more
sense. My main point is that if I were started from scratch, I'd do
it different.
On Mar 16, 8:12 pm, Berlin Brown wrote:
> On Mar 16, 7:52 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim
> wrote:
>
> > I'd love to see something built around very-hi
On Mar 16, 7:52 pm, Jeffrey Straszheim
wrote:
> I'd love to see something built around very-high scalability, using NIO and
> thread pools and such.
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Sean wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure if some of the design inputs make sense, specifically
> > Spring and Hibernat
I'd love to see something built around very-high scalability, using NIO and
thread pools and such.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Sean wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if some of the design inputs make sense, specifically
> Spring and Hibernate.
>
> Point 1 - I've found the strength of Spring to be mak
I'm not sure if some of the design inputs make sense, specifically
Spring and Hibernate.
Point 1 - I've found the strength of Spring to be making up for the
weaknesses of Java. Once you have first class functions, macros, and
multi-methods (to name a few), Spring doesn't bring much to the table
Personally, I've been noodling about what a Tapestry/Clojure hybrid
might look like.
I'd advise that you take a peek at Lift, a functional web framework
built on Scala.
I have some ideas about what a component based framework would look
like in a function world (note: this would be leaving JSPs
After many years (decade) of web development, here are the things that
I want in a framework, mostly based in clojure:
What do you think and what you add. This is ambitious and just a
"ideas" of what I would add. What would you want from your ideal
framework?
1. Based on Spring Framework for m
62 matches
Mail list logo