There was a Japanese man who went to America for sightseeing.
On the last day, he hailed a cab and told the driver to drive to the airport.
During the journey, a Honda drove past the taxi. Thereupon, the man leaned out of the
window excitedly and yelled, "Honda, very fast! Made in Japan!"
Afte
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Maassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ideas
> Dave, ya right, but there is still an issue within the +x model undernet
> will use, issue is a users hosts gets 'hidden' *AFT
> * Server side /JUPE
/JUPE is a new feature that can be set by operators (when a feature is
turned on)
> * Server side /GLINE
Iso means that /GLINE can now be set directly by opers instead of having
to go through a U-lined service
> * Massive engine changes, modebuf's, joinbuf's, new netwo
I thought it's probably time to write an email explaining what we're up
to in the world at the moment. So heres what we've done to 2.10.11
in 2.10.11:
* /names requires a "0" to list all names since people tend to flood
themselves off.
* Server side /JUPE
* Server side /GLINE
* Massive en
While giving Undernet helpers some sort of recognition is nice and
deserved, it would also flood help committees with wannabies who will use
their "badges" to abuse, intimidate, or flaunt their supposed leetness.
With the exception of cservice and #zt, most other help venues are open
committee
Fireball ? Helping ?
BobsKC , you really disappoint me, fireball is KNOWN for performing DDoS
attack against users and servers, the fact that you even support him is
something I do not understand knowing you a bit at all in this case. I
already have had several attacks from him against my IP's wi
> Another thing is: why do you actually use
> @.users.undernet.org and not @users.undernet.org
> ? For opers it might become @opers.undernet.org.
>
> Another stupid idea ? No, just think about it, I did, now it's your turn to
> think about it as well...
Undernet usernames are valid domain names,
> > Undernet Channel Serivce = *@.cservice.undernet.org
> > Undernet User Committee = *@.user-com.undernet.org
> > Etc...
> >
> > I think this will be cool too..it's just another idea about that.
>
> Let's not get carried away here. What we're already doing is hard
> enough; this would just mak
> No offense, but User-Com (and Doc-Com, Script-Com, and the other -Com's that
> have in the past existed) aren't in the same "official"-ness realm as opers
> and CService. So maybe it's best to limit the hostnames to opers,
> cs-helpers, cs-admins, and users. Then we eliminate that pesky "is he
> But then you have to have some kind of system to register user-com
> members apart from cservice members... and then you also have to
> consider the issue that some people work in both areas. User-com
> doesn't have any username registration systems... so that'd maybe have
> to be made just to
> Undernet Channel Serivce = *@.cservice.undernet.org
> Undernet User Committee = *@.user-com.undernet.org
> Etc...
>
> I think this will be cool too..it's just another idea about that.
Let's not get carried away here. What we're already doing is hard
enough; this would just make things orders
Well, as far as U-com, yes. But X already knows the difference between
regular users, opers, and CService helpers/admins.
X could pass an arg to the servers to change the hostname to
"*@helper.cservice.undernet.org", "*@admin.cservice", "*@oper.undernet.org",
etc, based on how X views the user's
>> > Another thing is: why do you actually use
>> > @.users.undernet.org and not
> @users.undernet.org
>> > ? For opers it might become @opers.undernet.org.
>>
>> Either way is acceptable, it's just the way that it was coded when it was
>> submitted.
> Undernet Channel Serivce = *@.cservice.under
> > Another thing is: why do you actually use
> > @.users.undernet.org and not
@users.undernet.org
> > ? For opers it might become @opers.undernet.org.
>
> Either way is acceptable, it's just the way that it was coded when it was
> submitted.
Undernet Channel Serivce = *@.cservice.undernet.org
U
> Dave, ya right, but there is still an issue within the +x model undernet
> will use, issue is a users hosts gets 'hidden' *AFTER* he successfully
> authed with X, so that system is actually kinda useless in my opinion.
Future versions of ircu will hopefully allow a user to auth at login. In
th
Dave, ya right, but there is still an issue within the +x model undernet
will use, issue is a users hosts gets 'hidden' *AFTER* he successfully
authed with X, so that system is actually kinda useless in my opinion.
Reason:
Problem is that users will still be 'nukable' since there IP does not get
16 matches
Mail list logo
