On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 17:09, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I don't see plugability as being a requirement. A streaming
encoder/decoder is a larger requirement as the data being encoded into a
This is ugly too and we still have not come up with the final verdict
yet but take a look here and let us know
Alex,
This looks very good. I think that a Stateful Codec with monitoring
would be a powerfull feature for multipart-codec. I'm not experienced
with NIO, IS this API restircted to working with just NIO?
-Mark
Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 17:09, Eric Dalquist wrote:
I don't see
Ooops looks like this only went out to Mark's address.
Alex
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 11:19, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 10:49, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Alex,
This looks very good.
Hey thanks Mark! But I still think we can do better I just don't know
how at this point.
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Ooops looks like this only went out to Mark's address.
Alex
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 11:19, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 10:49, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Alex,
This looks very good.
Hey thanks Mark! But I still think we can do better I just don't know
: Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:29
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
I'm wondering who I should talk about about the codex-multipart
project
in the commons sandbox. I have some changes that I really would like
to
discuss with the maintainer.
-Eric
of codec. A proposal type of thing
;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:29
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
I'm wondering who I should talk about about the codex-multipart
feature release of codec. A proposal type of thing
;-)
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:29
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
I'm wondering who I should talk about about
]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:26
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
Sorry about that last reply being to the wrong email.
Thinking more about the structure of the Encoder and Decoder
interfaces
I need to discuss what I see
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:26
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
Sorry about that last reply being to the wrong email.
Thinking more about the structure of the Encoder and Decoder
interfaces
I need to discuss what I see
-Original Message-
From: Eric Dalquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:26
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
Sorry about that last reply being to the wrong email.
Thinking more about the structure
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 14:10
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [codec-multipart] Who's In Charge
I don't see plugability as being a requirement. A streaming
encoder/decoder is a larger requirement as the data being encoded into
a
multipart message could be quite
Yes, I would say that getting some implementation in place which is
efficient and streamable is more important that working getting it to
plug into other Encoder/Decoder interfaces.
I ran out of time to push this forward. If your interested in moving it
forward, it would be helpful. I think
Sounds good. I'm working on a streamable, thread safe version right now.
If you have an instant messenger I'd like to talk with you more about
some of the APIs that needed to be created for the streamable side of it.
-Eric Dalquist
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
Yes, I would say that getting some
13 matches
Mail list logo
