Re: Policy (Was: Playboy mirror logo?)

2004-08-25 Thread Sam Ruby
James Mitchell wrote: [resend] For the record (and if I wasn't clear before) I am NOT against playboy being a mirror or Apache using the mirror (whether it is being blocked or not). I AM against putting a link and/or image that links from Apache to playboy. Trust me, I've been all over

Re: Policy (Was: Playboy mirror logo?)

2004-08-25 Thread Joshua Slive
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, James Mitchell wrote: I am begging you!! DO NOT put their logo or link on our (yes, OUR) web site. You can't even imagine what the media will do with this if you do. God help us all. You are exagerating to the extreme. Go to google and count how many media

Re: Playboy mirror logo?

2004-08-25 Thread James Mitchell
How do you propose we do that? How do you define large segment of our users? Is it: * The people who download the software. * The people who install the software. * The people who make the decisions that allow us to download and install the software. * The people who are stupid enough to

Re: Policy (Was: Playboy mirror logo?)

2004-08-25 Thread Steven Noels
On 25 Aug 2004, at 15:53, Sam Ruby wrote: The closest thing I see to that in your email is a suggestion that we let the Eclipse Foundation be the final arbiter in who the Apache Software Foundation will allow to be listed as an official mirror. ... or that the opinions of those who don't run

Re: Playboy mirror logo?

2004-08-25 Thread Joshua Slive
Please stop copying board on every message. On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, James Mitchell wrote: How do you propose we do that? How do you define large segment of our users? My email has nothing to do with your complaint. I am talking purely about the technical issue of people being unable to download

Re: Policy (Was: Playboy mirror logo?)

2004-08-25 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Right now we have no real policy with regard to Mirrors; essentially anyone can run a mirror, tell us; we add and they get a logo if they submit one as a small thank you. Legally it is entireyly up to the ASF to choose whether to list a mirror or not. Recently Playboy.com submitted one. It was

Re: Policy (Was: Playboy mirror logo?)

2004-08-25 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
So let me put in my 5 cents into policy II: - Any company willing too mirror us can do so and can have their logo+link handled. - Any submissions meeting the 3 mechanical goals below will be swiftly handled and added. Provided that -They mirror us faithfully

proposed ammendment to mirroring policy

2004-08-25 Thread Daniel F. Savarese
There has been a lot of discussion about the addition of mirrors.playboy.com/apache to the mirrors list. Some of the objections are related to moral issues. The line for barring mirrors appears to be different for everyone. Some draw the line at spammers and Indiana Jones' arch-foes, but not at

Re: proposed ammendment to mirroring policy

2004-08-25 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:26 AM -0400 Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation of the organization's business or other activities. The Apache Software

Re: proposed ammendment to mirroring policy

2004-08-25 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 17:26, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation of the organization's business or other activities. The Apache Software Foundation lists all mirror sites that