[resend]
For the record (and if I wasn't clear before) I am NOT against playboy
being a mirror or Apache using the mirror (whether it is being blocked or
not). I AM against putting a link and/or image that links from Apache to
playboy.
Trust me, I've been all over playboy.com for reasons I don'
James Mitchell wrote:
[resend]
For the record (and if I wasn't clear before) I am NOT against playboy
being a mirror or Apache using the mirror (whether it is being blocked or
not). I AM against putting a link and/or image that links from Apache to
playboy.
Trust me, I've been all over playboy.co
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, James Mitchell wrote:
I am begging you!! DO NOT put their logo or link on our (yes,
OUR) web site. You can't even imagine what the media will do with this if
you do. God help us all.
You are exagerating to the extreme.
Go to google and count how many media organi
How do you propose we do that? How do you define "large segment of our
users"?
Is it:
* The people who download the software.
* The people who install the software.
* The people who make the decisions that allow us
to download and install the software.
* The people who are stupid enough to
On 25 Aug 2004, at 15:53, Sam Ruby wrote:
The closest thing I see to that in your email is a suggestion that we
let the Eclipse Foundation be the final arbiter in who the Apache
Software Foundation will allow to be listed as an official mirror.
... or that the opinions of those who don't run thei
Please stop copying board on every message.
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, James Mitchell wrote:
How do you propose we do that? How do you define "large segment of our
users"?
My email has nothing to do with your complaint. I am talking purely about
the technical issue of people being unable to download t
Right now we have no real policy with regard to Mirrors; essentially
anyone can run a mirror, tell us; we add and they get a logo if they
submit one as a small thank you.
Legally it is entireyly up to the ASF to choose whether to list a mirror
or not.
Recently Playboy.com submitted one. It was a
+1 to 'those that actually do infrastructure' for keeping our mirrors
running, including this one, if they want to (I'm for it, if that
matters, as long as it's a fast mirror). Hell, +1 for infrastructure
for having the patience for this thread!
{Exuent all remaining replies to community@ or [E
So let me put in my 5 cents into policy II:
-> Any company willing too mirror us can do so and can
have their logo+link handled.
-> Any submissions meeting the 3 mechanical goals below
will be swiftly handled and added.
Provided that
->They mirror us faithfully
> I am talking purely about the technical issue of people being
> unable to download the software from mirrors.playboy.com. I
> am not talking about the logo/link to playboyenterprises.com.
Would a mirrors.playboyenterprises.com domain be less technically
problematic? Is that also widely blocked
There has been a lot of discussion about the addition of
mirrors.playboy.com/apache to the mirrors list. Some of
the objections are related to moral issues. The line
for barring mirrors appears to be different for everyone.
Some draw the line at spammers and Indiana Jones' arch-foes,
but not at
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
> Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not
> constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation
> of the organization's business or other activities. The
> Apache Software Foundation lists all mirror sites that
>
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not
constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation
of the organization's business or other activities. The
Apache Software
--On Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:26 AM -0400 "Daniel F. Savarese"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not
constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation
of the organization's business or other activities. The
Apache Software F
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 17:26, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
> Disclaimer: The presence of a mirror on this list does not
> constitute an endorsement by the Apache Software Foundation
> of the organization's business or other activities. The
> Apache Software Foundation lists all mirror sites t
Joshua Slive wrote:
Having said that, I do believe that providing as much information
possible to our downloaders is a good thing. But lets make it less
legalistic and more informative, like:
"Apache mirrors are independently operated according to the guidelines
specified on our how to mirror
16 matches
Mail list logo