Deadly? They said that?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Ranbo wrote:
> Anyone see the 60 Minutes piece Sunday on the deadly computer virus
> sweeping
> the world? The story suggested that there is some reason to think it might
> be activated in millions of computers by its creator on April 1
So now the macbook pro is a 100,000 dollar studio in a 2000 dollar box? You
are smokin something totally wack in your house today. Now I know you send
out these emails on purpose, completely left the building on this one..left
the planet. You went to far now, it's clear you are doing this to egg
And you've been discussing the matter with yourself for seven emails...the
mirror analogy suddenly seems even more apropos.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Sometimes It's like some mac users look in the mirror and reflect back at
> >non mac users their own feelings. Ther
I really don't want the therapy bills that come with a life that you lead.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> That just shows how much you have been deprived. People love their Macs,
> iMacs, MacBooks, Minis, iPods, iPhones, and iTouchs. They are truly
> excited by them. They
Useful things that are not done in real time either! WooHoo!
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Actually they really don't touch on macs at all. They talk about ilife
> >sometimes...but mostly it's windows bad/mac good type adverts. Although
> >done a lot better then MS h
I already defended you on this one. Tom is too small and frail to lift 8
pounds! It's not his fault he's built weak.
(No one tell Tom that Apple sells a laptop that is only 1.2 pounds lighter)
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >She wanted a LAPTOP!!!
> >
> >Why do you rep
The neighbors see you with one of the new centurion models with the built in
guns in the forearms and they stop inviting you over to barbques..the snobs.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
> > I like toast. I have a 10 dollar toaster oven I got at a garage sale,
> looks
> > br
If it was free, the TFB would just make fun of me.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:10 AM, John Emmerling wrote:
> For free, I can get you one that toasts both sides at once!
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:57 PM, mike wrote:
>
>
> > I like toast. I have a 10 dollar toaster o
I'm not talking company, I'm talking user base.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS) <
mark.sny...@ngc.com> wrote:
> By that logic, MS would have been satisfied with their monopoly and just
> relaxed at least ten years ago.
>
> I can't think of any publicly-owned company that
Must be irritated horribly by all those Apple ads then.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Constance Warner wrote:
>
>
> I'm not irritated by her personal choice; I just don't like the deceptive
> rhetoric and the silly attitudes of the commercial.
>
> It's true, the art of the commercial is the
I don't see any advantage, but I'm no expert.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:57 AM, db wrote:
> Is CD and DVD - R or + R media advantageous for burning data on a new iMac?
>
> db
>
>
> *
> ** List info, subscription management,
It's like a bad horror movie...just when you think it's over it comes back.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Well she could have a laptop running MAC OSX for under $1K. It would of
> >course be a hackintosh. If she were happy with a netbook then she could
> >just pull i
Actually they really don't touch on macs at all. They talk about ilife
sometimes...but mostly it's windows bad/mac good type adverts. Although
done a lot better then MS has ever done.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS) <
mark.sny...@ngc.com> wrote:
> Few ads from MS come
a sticker of my toaster oven on my car. I don't have
any shirts that say 'think different-with toast'. To most windows users,
their computer is a toaster oven...it's not a badge identifying them to the
world about their life goals and statemen
He isn't a MFB, he's too intellectually honest about the computer he's on.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >The one thing other contests do test that Pwn2Own doesn't is speed. I
> >could have written my exploit in a day or a week or even a month. At other
> >contests, you h
Sometimes It's like some mac users look in the mirror and reflect back at
non mac users their own feelings. There are no WFB..they don't exist in the
same way MFB exist. The mac community was on the fighting end for so long
they are just never not fighting. It's like so many of them have little
I would be hard pressed to find a laptop that competes with Apple on the
looks of the machine. The new laptops are exceptional looking. But they
aren't 1000 dollars more exceptional looking then competing specs for me.
MS is fighting apple in the area it can...cost of hardware, Apple margins
are
Maybe she needed a laptop today, not three years from now after scrimping
and saving? Maybe she wanted one with at least some kind of warranty rather
then a 4 year old mac that has nothing but duct tape and a wing and a prayer
keeping it together.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Constance Warne
Check your outgoing about 21 hours ago where you said and I quote:
*No. So they show adds of people buying _laptops_ and showing how much
cheaper they are (with scum-sucking bottom feeder hardware).*
The implication being running any hardware with windows is scum sucking
bottom feeder hardware..
That's true, MS did stack the deck to artificially exclude apple..I mean she
wanted a portable computer and Apple doesn't have one of those...she wanted
a reasonable price, and we KNOW Apple doesn't have reasonable prices. Man
how dishonest! Anyone needing a portable just buy an imac and lug that
As well as rootkit. I was using AVG free till it stopped doing full
protection for free users. Avast is a good solution for home users.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:14 PM, db wrote:
> Install the Free AVAST antivirus software (be sure to uninstall what you
> have now first). It has malware and s
Rev...they aren't *macs*, they are crap...bottom feeder hardware..oh wait I
mean scum sucking bottom feeder hardware. At least to our friends on the
other side.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall <
popoz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Constance I can go to Wal-Marts site right n
Ah, now we get to it...anyone not running Apple hardware is, let me get this
right...scum sucking bottom feeders, or is it anyone not running Apple
hardware *likes* scum sucking bottom feeder hardware? I can't tell exactly
how you were insulting anyone without macs.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:11
ch to afford a Mac. But to demand the LATEST model,
> 17" laptop, for a Wal-Mart discount price? THAT'S unrealistic.
>
> --Constance Warner
>
>
>
> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:39 AM, mike wrote:
>
> Constance, when you go shopping are you saying you have ZERO cri
Constance, when you go shopping are you saying you have ZERO criteria?
NONE? You must be unbelievably rich. For the rest of us who have normal
jobs, make normal amounts of money...money does have to come into play at
some point.
Not everyone can live with the 'money is no object' attitude some h
I think I've found Tom's problem. He needs to eat better, he is obviously
in a very weakened state and thinks 6-7 pounds is heavy. I happen to have
an HP DV series laptop...my wife uses it every day. She is able, despite
her 5'1" 120lb frame to take this laptop with ease from kitchen table to
de
Like the Apple ads? You can spot em
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Betty, do you think that the woman with the Swiffer actually cleans her
> >house with that thing? Or that it is actually her house? Or that it is a
> >house at all, not a stage set?
>
> For starters the S
And some people wonder why mac users are thought of as elitist snobs.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>
>
> Tell the truth. A real person would have bought the iMac with a much
> larger 20-inch screen and the software needed to get work done.
>
>
>
*
Yes, there is a lot of BS. BTW, MS doesn't make computers. So far I think
you've got just about everything wrong.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >A laptop (also known as a notebook) is a personal computer designed for
> >mobile use small enough to sit on one's lap.
>
> A
Hopefully she'll make enough to hire a big guy to lug that thing around for
her as well as a PSU so she can use that as a portable which is what she
wanted anyway.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>
>
> Then the kind salesperson at the Apple Store will explain to her that th
Wow you can spin stuff like nobody...
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Anyone who can read will know that I didn't suggest this. I merely pointed
> >out that your claim that all we have to go on is MS propaganda is
> ridiculous
> >because a huge number of people ARE using i
Just because you don't move your portable doesn't mean no one does. I've
got four close friends who live their lives from their laptops, 3 of them
don't even have desktop units at home, the laptop goes everywhere. Two of
those guys are mac guys.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Tom Piwowar wrot
hmmm...yes I can.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Unbiased like...you? You *are* funny.
>
> Here I sit with a Mac and a PC side by side like cats and dogs. I am
> highly proficient with both. Can you say the same?
>
>
>
Oh Betty...where were your calls for disservice during the i'm a mac/i'm a
pc ads from Apple? Please.
She is representing a person, unlike some here, who have to work with
something called a 'budget'. I know all the mac heads drive around in their
Bentley's and put their nose up at those who can
So now beta software is...the official beta, the official GM release AND the
official release with SP 1? Now finally we are out of 'beta' when we hit SP
2? And I thought MS's numbering scheme was wacko...
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Sez the man who has never touched
Unbiased like...you? You *are* funny.
Lugging around a 20" iMac would be great! Where is that handle?...
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Fine. But they still wouldn't sell her what she wanted. A laptop with a
> >17' monitor for less than $1K
>
> She could have bought a
No they go to AJ's and realize they can get the same crap for less at
Safeway.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >She wanted a Mac? In a *Microsoft* commercial? I believe the point of
> >her going to an Apple store was to show that there isn't much choice
> >there for less th
We aren't going to debate the intelligence of actors are we?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:03 PM, katan wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:09:57 -0400, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>
>
>
> She wanted a Mac? In a *Microsoft* commercial? I believe the point of
> her going to an Apple store was to show that there
Vista works better and sucks less though :)
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
>
>
>
> WinXP is really an old and tired looking OS at this point.
>>
>
> Maybe. But it actually works and it doesn't suck.
>
***
Ah, right. So this was you helping Apple 'mislead' us into thinking they
actually had the hardware.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Shocking you have no proof of Apple selling their midrange line for 1k or
> >under...
>
> It's an ADVERTISEMENT. Ha ha ha!
>
>
>
Shocking you have no proof of Apple selling their midrange line for 1k or
under...
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >link?
>
> No link. The sale is over. You snooze you looze.
>
>
> *
> ** List info, s
If I have to get to work and need a car to do so, do I quit my job till I
can afford 40k car or get a car that will get me to work, work hard, get
promoted and then when I can afford it, I'll go after that 40k car.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >She didn't walk into th
Completely ignore the email to take more weird shots at your imaginary
WFB's.
One quick logic problem..well one of the logic problems...why would your
WFB's put apple software on their machines just to complain about it?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >I can see going af
link?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >You know they were running a closeout on mid/high range laptops being sold
> >for 1k or less?
>
> You didn't know? Well no wonder you are a WFB. So very, very sad.
>
>
>
No idea why PCMAG is playing the game...but HP and CNET report that laptop
came out on February 1st. Hardly old especially considering how few times
Apple refreshes their lineup.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> Those Windows haters over at PCMagazine weigh in with...
>
You know they were running a closeout on mid/high range laptops being sold
for 1k or less?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >You fanbois are seriously trying to say that the ad is deceptive on some
> >significant level because the girl may not have physically walked into the
I can see going after ms in some cases...using the monopoly power of windows
to force in IE...but unless I'm recollecting incorrectly itunes and ipods
have *always* been tied together even when they had no market share. And
since they now have more market share, has apple ever actually used this
i
So the brits stopped the Apple ads?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >It was an ADVERTISEMENT.
>
> And anything goes in the ole USA. In Britain the nasty old government
> will actually order advertisers to stop running deceptive ads. Probably
> happens in a lot of other civi
Should be real easy for the apple guys to show her the door as they are
geniuses.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >I looked at the video. Lauren didn't go into the Apple Store at all. She
> >walked to the door, turned around and walked away. Same guy is walking
> past
> >in
You said new. I took that to mean...uh...new. Not old models. Somehow I
knew you would never give up the url.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Ya got an url for those mythical beasts, cheapest mac I've seen around
> there
> >was the 599 mac mini...
>
> I assumed that say
Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:14 AM, mike wrote:
>
> > She's an actress...it's...um...fake. It's not real. It's just an advert
> > :) It's kinda like justin long isn't *really* a mac...he's actually a
> human
> > being POSING as a mac.
>
I could see maybe getting one if it was 250 or 299...
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:33 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 9:42 AM, mike wrote:
>
> > Ah, he said new...spose those are the 'new' old models.
>
>
> Well new to him. The refurbs ar
She's an actress...it's...um...fake. It's not real. It's just an advert
:) It's kinda like justin long isn't *really* a mac...he's actually a human
being POSING as a mac.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 9:45 PM, betty wrote:
>
> Looks to
Ah, he said new...spose those are the 'new' old models.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:04 AM, John Duncan Yoyo
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:02 PM, mike wrote:
>
> > Ya got an url for those mythical beasts, cheapest mac I've seen around
> > there
> > was
Ya got an url for those mythical beasts, cheapest mac I've seen around there
was the 599 mac mini...
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Hey, guys. You don't need to exaggerate to make your point. BTW, if
> >you really believe that a BASIC Mac costs 2 K, then your idea of
>
>From reports, Bill Gates was never happy about those I'm a mac/pc ads. Ever
reactionary, MS has been trying to compete with the combination of the
apparently failure of vista and OS X's increasing (although still small)
market share.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/27/microsofts-new-ad-shows-how
basic is very
> different from mine. [To be boringly factual, you can do well for a lot
> less.]
>
> --Constance Warner
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2009, at 5:11 PM, mike wrote:
>
> She might have thought that finally apple was making computers for the
>> regular person who
She might have thought that finally apple was making computers for the
regular person who can't spend two grand on a basic model. Alas, we all
can't be so cool that Jobs considers us.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Or she just figured she didn't want to spend twice as
mac and windows developer konfabulator. Not to mention the half dozen other
companies that did gagdgets on windows and linux for years.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >I have them on XP called Widgets and Yahoo does them.
>
> Yahoo bought out Mac developer Konfabulator.
Or she just figured she didn't want to spend twice as much for 'look and
feel'.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >Nice spin, but no, their primary point is having a choice. On her $1,000
> >budget she could choose between many PCs, or she could take the one Mac,
> >which di
Right president...need to get your news from somewhere other then the
obama fan brigade.
On 3/27/09, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>>WARNING: Due to a Presidential Executive Order, the National Security
>>Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant or notice.
>
> Wrong President.
>
> Letterman
It works only on intel based macs...perhaps that was the issue?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:09 AM, b_s-wilk wrote:
> The videos are up on the MS site, but they would not play on my PC. Maybe I
>> should have tried it with my Mac, but lazy me, I found it on youtube. Search
>> on Laptop Hunters.
>>
http://lifehacker.com/software/optimization/turn-off-indexing-and-speed-up-windows-xp-031440.php
That shows you how to turn off indexing, on my xp installs I didn't think
indexing was on, I had to switch it on.
Mike
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> If I understan
Right...but I still have to sort them. I want a system that can analyze
tags so when I open a folder labeled 'industrial' I get all my music that is
tagged as such no matter where it is. We spend time tagging photos, tagging
music...tagging docs and windows still does nothing with those.
On Fri,
I understood libraries couldn't do more then aggregate folders not file
types? So when I open the Pictures library, it opens all files in any of
the attached folders to the library?
I've wanted Apple's smart folders on windows since Apple put that feature in
OS X...wonderful tool for those of us w
Actually it wasn't a ripoff from Apple, gadgets/widgets whatever you want
to call them were around a long time before Apple.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:58 PM, katan wrote:
>
>
>
> I kind of like Gadgets for one reason: the analog clock. I like that
> you can set the opacity and leave it up front
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pwn2own-mac-hack,2254.html
An interview with Charlie Miller winner of this and last years pwn2own
contest. It may answer some of the questions asked here. Did he get root
access? No...but he then explains why it hardly matters. Other topics are
which is safer
Vista suffers from poor marketing, and poor development from the MS side
(being released too soon) and from the developer side (not enough
drivers/software). Those problems were sufficiently gone by SP 1. It
always made me chuckle when I hear how poor Vista is and then learn it's
being put on fiv
Why 7 and not Vista?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall <
popoz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> At present I am excited about Windows 7 and am anticipating upgrading to
> that.
>
>
*
** List info, subscr
Intuitive is just another word for, in with the new, same as the old.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Fred Holmes wrote:
> At 05:14 PM 3/25/2009, Chris Dunford wrote:
> >Do you have any data to confirm that the "public" thinks this,
> particularly
> >of Office, which is what we're talking about
You mention consensus and profits as a measure of failure...or soon to be
failure of office 2007. I'm wondering when this will start since it's now
2009 and office sales are up over previous versions? I use google docs
myself as I don't need a full office suite so I have no horse in this race.
I know from an interview I heard with one of the developers on MS office
that almost all the features MS would get requests for were already in the
product. One of the reasons for developing the ribbon was to increase the
chances of users getting more out of office. Those here notwithstanding,
mo
5 came out ten years ago...good guess.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Snyder, Mark - IdM (IS) <
mark.sny...@ngc.com> wrote:
> Marcio,
>
> It appears that version 5 is old; version 6.1 was released to be
> compatible with windows 2000 and XP (see
> http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/
And also interesting...the MS hater is again...hating MS.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>
>
> It is interesting that the cheerleaders for this latest interface
> travesty are the same two people who are always cheerleaders for whatever
> MS deigns to dish out.
>
*
Because Tom reacts before he thinks and obviously thinks everyone is a
crook.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:52 AM, David Turk wrote:
> Just so you know, this video is a film transfer from items in our
> collection, to which we own the rights (although I realize why you're
> bringing this up...)
>
>
ve anti-exploit
>> stuff built into it.
>>
>
> Do folks here know, is Miller starting as an admin user, e.g.? [I don't
> want to start any bonfires; I love my Mac, and don't plan to ditch it, but
> statements like these make me wonder how it's happening.]
>
I can't recommend a recorder, but a feature you may want to find is one that
allows the file to be broken into segments with the push of a button while
you are recording. My old sony would allow this.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >We have a group that will be doing oral
Less then 365 days it seems...since he did the same thing last year.
That said developing the code for these guys is easy, it's finding the
exploit. Apparently there are enough exploits in safari/IE/firefox that
multiple people can take multiple shots at multiple exploits they have found
studying
left standing, although
that seems to be more from lack of trying then anything. They are supposed
to take cracks at the mobile market next, that should be more interesting.
Mike
*
** List info, subscription management
I bought my wife a laptop not long, the best part is I got her 19" lcd to
match the one I already have. I use them all the time, mostly keeping
IRC/IM etc on one and everything else on the other. Also the few times I do
get to watch tv or a movie, I can keep it playing in one window and work in
t
Not just 10" lcd's, but 10" touchscreen LCD's.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall <
popoz...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
> One of my members informed me today that Apple has ordered about 1 million
> 10" LCD screens, I wonder what they plan to do with them?
>
> Stewart
>
> and t
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/15/bmw-designworksusa-designs-ultimate-gaming-rig/
Clearly this is an effort to simply see just how cool they can make a
computer housing...pretty damn cool!
*
** List info, subscription mana
Physician, heal thyself.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
>
>
>
> I am not going to contunue this off topic thread and ask others not to
> pick it up. We don't want to go there again.. My initial post was
> intended to raise a warning that you were seeding your posts with
> in
Maybe you can elaborate? Support of what? It either will play a file or
not.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
> VLC isn't as 'clean' in appearence, but offers more options and
>> supports a wide variety of codecs without the need for add ons.
>>
>
> Granted but it's freew
VLC isn't as 'clean' in appearence, but offers more options and supports a
wide variety of codecs without the need for add ons.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Eric S. Sande wrote:
> Use VLC. Dump WMP.
>>
>
> That seems a little extreme, what are the opportunity costs
> of using VLC?
>
> Admit
You are done...? Completely??
*shakes fist at rotten DSL*
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Jim wrote:
> Thanks for the the tip. Am enjoying the music.
> (And seeding, seeding, seeding)
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2009, at 11:23 AM, mike wrote:
>
> I know thi
VLC is a good choice, good support for a wide variety of codecs out of the
box. Codec/containers etc can be extremely confusing especially when you
get into subtitle support etc.
You may look at this codec to install:
http://www.free-codecs.com/download/AC3_Filter.htm
Someone else on the list ma
The topic of having their own 'fast lane'.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
> What topic exactly?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > If I'm not mistaken, google has brought this topic up before several
> > years
> > ago.
> >
> > >
> > > This explains why Google quietly cha
; spending much time going through it, I found quite a lot that was good
> > and
> > expect the same this year, so if you are into music and want to put a
> > whole
> > lot of it on your ipod at once this is a great chance to do so.
> >
> > http://sites.google.com/site/s
If I'm not mistaken, google has brought this topic up before several years
ago.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
>
> This explains why Google quietly changed their position on net neutrality
> in
> December, despite PR-numbed statements otherwise.
>
> http://online.wsj.com/art
I was looking through the apple store at the new mac towers. I was
wondering if anyone knows off hand if the motherboards on the bottom line
towers use the same motherboard as the top of the line tower?
*
** List info, subs
I know this isn't quite a computer topic but it does relate to digital music
so..
The South by Southwest music festival takes place soon and this link is to
torrents to download almost 6 gigs of music to fill up your ipod...or really
cheap player you may regret buying. I got all of it last year a
And their wifi chip to send data back even when you are offline...
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >I've read also that they have some unused space on the drives...so a 64
> gig
> >drive might actually be 70 and when certain areas wear out etc, the drive
> >shifts to these
That only works in some cases.
Usually what happens is the first result is not the result of a full site
search had you searched ON the site, but one of the results if you had
searched on the site. I need the whole set of results, not just one that
comes back of hundreds etc.
I notice it works o
I have in my plug ins drop down: google, yahoo, creative commons, isohunt,
mininova, dictionary.com, wikipedia, imdb, twitter and myrcroft project.
I use half of these most every day, the others probably once a week or more.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 6:54 AM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >I'd probably
I've read also that they have some unused space on the drives...so a 64 gig
drive might actually be 70 and when certain areas wear out etc, the drive
shifts to these areas.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >I've read that you shouldn't defrag an SSD because A) it doesn't act
I'd probably switch to chrome or safari 4 if I could just get some plug ins
for search.
Is there a way to have google search only specific sites, like search:imdb
watchmen ?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Tom Piwowar wrote:
> >generally I use opera for speed
>
> I'm taking to Chrome when I n
It looks like cricket is about to release one of the biggest advancements in
cell phone technology since the iphone. They have completely thought out of
the box on this one, putting in traditional touches with a new twist, they
expect millions in sales in the first month alone...better have deep p
http://tinyurl.com/cp75bm
These guys RAID'd 24 samsung ssd drives to get 2GB/s speed. Crazy fast.
*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at h
Well now I have to agree with Tom on this one...although I lack his hope
that any combo of letters will make it successful.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Chris Dunford wrote:
>
>
> > Meanwhile, I hear that Live Search is about to undergo another
> > name change. The hope is that the right combi
1901 - 2000 of 3472 matches
Mail list logo
