While I understand the dilemma you are in for the book very much, the two are
independent events (such is the life of an author). My personal feeling is MCF
is not a 1.0 release yet and that we should just continue on w/ the next
release being 0.3. Moreover, a 1.0 release typically means, in m
+1
On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on
> http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2.
>
> Please vote!
>
> Karl
Just to clear things up a bit for all involved.
It's pretty much standard at the ASF that votes are held open for three days to
give people across time zones, continents, etc. time to ascertain the issues
and vote.
Please see http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html for more info on the
, some of which are
> now active contributors to the projects they worked on. Let's make this a
> success again this year!
>
> On behalf of the GSoC 2011 admins,
>
> Uli
>
> [1] http://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
> [2] http:/
On Mar 1, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Karl, what do you think we can do to make it easier for people to get into
>> the code? Are other people putting up patches?
>>
>
> What's been happening is that we do indeed get code from contributors,
> but the contributors in question s
entors
> ---
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
rly critical fixes and changes have already taken place
> since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to
> release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the
> right approach?
>
> Karl
------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-148?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988899#comment-12988899
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on CONNECTORS-148:
Is there a workaround at
Is there a workaround for the issue? Can't the user create it by hand?
On Jan 31, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> You can read the details in CONNECTORS-148.
>
> I hesitate to ask this because getting the votes for RC8 just
> finished, and took the better part of a month, but should we p
and if you find it OK then vote. I've
>> completed my review of the deletion/expiration code, and although
>> there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in
>> my opinion) warrant holding the release.
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> Ka
s? The mirror folder I presumed we would be putting
> the release in is "manifoldcf".
>
> Thanks!
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Just to be clear, before anyone puts up artifacts as releases, I think there
>> are some o
keysigning party - only two
>> keys there and karls is only signed by grant.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> +1 from me.
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>>
ore votes. Who else is on the PPMC
>> for ManifoldCF? That's never been clear to me.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> Yeah, sorry. It is the holidays for me. I hope to look at it on Monday.
>>&g
s, I believe we will still need to hold a vote in the
>> incubator general list.)
>> Thanks,
>> Karl
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Dec 16, 2010, at 4:22 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Tests are now complete for the framework changes.
> Robert, Grant, please comment on CONNECTORS-128 about the future of
> the FileNet and Documentum connectors. If those connectors are deemed
> acceptable, I can generate a new release candidate.
I think if there are known vulnerabilities, we need to fix them.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> You can be serious about security without agreeing on the remediation.
> This software certainly adhered to MetaCarta standards and was
> audited by government agencies as well. I u
r or zip as
> well? or can that be left as "apache-manifoldcf-0.1"?
>
> Karl
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> FYI, I think the package name needs to have the words incubating in it too,
>> as in manifoldcf-0.1-incubating.tar.g
Does anyone want to help with (2), (3), and (8)?
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Grant,
>>>>>
brary
> tld's for the UI. These came from an Apache source, if I recall, but
> they did not have an Apache license header on them when I picked them
> up.
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 3, 201
On Dec 3, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Can you be more specific about the files that refer to metacarta? Or
> does Rat know to look for MetaCarta?
I just happened to notice them in the RAT output. It looked like properties
files.
Examples:
/Volumes/tb/grantingersoll/projects/mcf/tr
2010, at 11:11 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Great!
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> I can hook up the RAT stuff.
>>
>> On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>
>>> OK, so I will do the appropriate things
I can hook up the RAT stuff.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> OK, so I will do the appropriate things to make (1), (4), and maybe
> (5) happen. Does anyone want to help with (2), (3), and (8)?
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> For your questions (6) and (7): The json code we use comes from
> www.json.org, and there is no prebuilt jar from that source, just
> source files.
Hmmm. OK. The license on it is fine, but we should make sure it is properly
attributed. Eithe
e release is out, you add a new section at the top
for trunk again.
Later, as we mature, we will likely have branches, etc. for this stuff, but for
now let's just assume trunk is under code freeze and the only changes that can
be made are those related to release.
>
> Karl
&g
hat, some other eyes on it would be good.
-Grant
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Done
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> ok - I might move it there
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Grant
Never mind.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Done
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> ok - I might move it there
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> Weird,
Hmm, for some reason I can't import the KEYS file
gpg --import KEYS
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Done
> Karl
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>> ok - I might move it there
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Thu,
e, if my network connection doesn't bounce in the
>>> interim. Is there any other place available?
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 19, 2010
I have updated our Incubation status page to reflect ManifoldCF instead of LCF.
It should propagate through the system in the next few hours.
-Grant
11:25 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The upload has failed repeatedly for me, so I'll clearly have to find
>>>> another way.
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>&
;>>> have no user content other than stuff Grant or I added, according to
>>>> their logs, so I feel that is safe to do. I've left the wiki pages
>>>> around but am thinking we'll want them to go away at some point. Not
>>>> sure exact
Is this a reasonable way to proceed? We should avoid using the wiki
>> in the future for documentation, seems to me, but otherwise I can see
>> no issues here.
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>
>>> On
then committed by a committer. Since we don't lock down our wiki, we can't do
it.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Grant Ingersoll
> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:23 AM
> To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Relea
On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Proposal: Release to consist of two things: tar and zip of a complete
> source tree, and tar and zip of the modules/dist area after the build.
> The implied way people are to work with this is:
>
> - to use just the distribution, untar or unzip t
t MCF is an available product rather than purely
>>>> development/incubation.
>>>>
>>>> Then come up with a list of issues that people strongly feel need to be
>>>> resolved before a true, squeaky-clean 1.0 release. Maybe that is the
>>>> o
Now that we have NTLM figured out and the Memex stuff behind us, how do people
feel about working towards a release?
-Grant
utting the ManifoldCF in Action example
>>> classes in an external repository, such as github or google code. I
>>> was thinking that maybe putting them directly into the ManifoldCF svn.
>>> The examples are structured to be genuinely useful, and Manning has
>>&g
Looks like we've been given the green light for NTLM inclusion.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-80
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922056#action_12922056
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on CONNECTORS-116:
In talking w/ Legal
osting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has
>>> any major objection?
>>>
>>> Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name
>>> "official":
>>>
>>> 1. The repository is still lcf.
atter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has
>>> any major objection?
>>>
>>> Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name
>>> "official":
>>>
>>> 1. The repository is
ain/java/org/apache/manifoldcf/crawler/connectors/memex/MemexConnector.java
>>>>
>> incubator/lcf/trunk/modules/connectors/memex/connector/src/main/java/org/apache/manifoldcf/crawler/connectors/memex/MemexEntity.java
>>>>
>> incubator/lcf/trunk/tests/memex-testing-package/org/apache/manifoldcf/crawler/connectors/memex/MemexSupport.java
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
; Multicon
> Multiconnect
> Multiconnex
> Ralph
> Reconto
> RepoMan
> Repositor
> Recon
> Reconex
> Reconn
> Reconnex
> Reconnx
> Reconx
>
> Let the voting begin!
> Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
g.apache.acf.core.interfaces.ACFException -> ?
> org.apache.acf.core.system.ACF -> ?
>
> ...bearing in mind that you'd better choose a consistent treatment for
> uppercase ACF in both contexts.
>
> (FWIW, my initial thought is:
>
> org.apache.acf.core.interfaces
y more curious
>> about the board's opinion of the name choice.
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll
>> wrote:
>>> News should be posted on the JIRA issue. For now, it's being handled
>>>
Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-80 has been created to track
>> the NTLM issue. Sam Ruby is working w/ the ASF attorneys on this. I don't
>> know how long it will take. In a separate thread, we should d
gt; closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
>> To:
>> Subject: Re:
NTLM issue since ACF is getting
>> closer to where an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>> From: "Grant Ingersoll"
>> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35
9
> Apache Macon 4
> Apache ManifoldCF 3
> Apache Omni 1
> Apache Acromantula 1
> Apache Lukon 1
>
> Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
kon 9
> Apache Macon 4
> Apache ManifoldCF 3
> Apache Omni 1
> Apache Acromantula 1
> Apache Lukon 1
>
> Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
Apache Omnivore
>> Apache CMCF (yes, I just invented that one ;-) )
>> Apache Multivore (yes, I just invented that one too. ;-) )
>>
>> I don't think I missed any? If I did, chastise me severely please. ;-)
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
;> Acromantula is also available and is more descriptive:
>>>
>>> http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Acromantula
>>>
>>> (if you don't mind the HP references. ;-) )
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On
ck Krupansky <
> jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com> wrote:
>
>> How about Macon... from Mac[hinery] + con[nection]. A small city, also a
>> dirigible airship.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> --
>
ovie theaters...
>
> http://mc3030.heim1.de/english.php
>
>
> Karl
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
>> Apache Manifold is growing on me. And/or Apache Manifold CF or Apache
>> Manifold Conn. Framework.
>>
>> Has a ni
'd be perfectly fine
> with something like Apache Manifold Connector Framework. But push come
> to shove I wouldn't even vote against keeping things as is with the
> Apache Connector Framework.
>
> - Mark
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
ame and stick with "Connecto", or whatever other "handle" is chosen.
>
> As I said, I will defer to the PMC (?) endorses, but I would hope that there
> is some consistency with current and traditional Apache project naming
> conventions.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
&
said, I will defer to the PMC (?) endorses, but I would hope that there
> is some consistency with current and traditional Apache project naming
> conventions.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> --
> From: "Simon Willnauer"
gt; apply to the concerns others had we should go back and discuss
>> further.
>> Some folks suggested a more abstract name like Apache Connecto which I
>> personally like (not necessarily Connecto but a more abstract name.
>> Such names have many advantages as people reme
Friday, August 27th, Boston time
>> (EDT).
>>
>> (I'm trying to do this right this time, so let me know if I still don't
>> have
>> the process quite correct.)
>> Thanks,
>> Karl
>>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
actual source code or packages be
> changed. I suggest instead that the name change occur to the site materials,
> documentation, and collateral materials exclusively. Any thoughts?
>
> Karl
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
I think this also underscores something we as an Incubating community should
think about in terms of process. Obviously, it is great to give credit, but
sometimes we also need to give people a chance to contribute, too. Even on
seemingly trivial things (I don't have anything specific in mind)
On Aug 23, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to suggest that we slightly alter the format of CHANGES.txt.
> Most important I think is to add the names of non-committers who contribute
> any patches, JIRA comments, reports of bugs on the user list, etc to the
> issue.
>
On Aug 19, 2010, at 7:44 PM,
wrote:
> Changing all the java class and package names would, at this point, seriously
> inconvenience our broader community. That's why I proposed it the way I did.
> Unless you can think of a compelling reason to do it that way, I think we're
> stuck with th
; Any "consensus" on the name change? I am okay with either name. ACF should
> be fine. Presumably the nominal name change is contingent on its project
> status as no longer incubating under Lucene?
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -
I'd leave it open for another day or two.
-Grant
On Aug 10, 2010, at 2:16 PM,
wrote:
> Shall we call a vote on the name change? Or should we leave the floor open
> for other proposals for a while?
>
> Karl
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ext Gra
On Aug 10, 2010, at 8:05 AM,
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Lucene Connectors Framework is currently an incubating subproject of Lucene.
> The PMC has indicated that it's not thrilled with the idea of LCF being a
> subproject,
Minor clarification: The PMC hasn't said no at this point, but it also ha
FYI: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#json
On Jul 11, 2010, at 7:03 PM,
wrote:
> Is the JSON license acceptable by Apache? It seems to be a variant of the
> Berkeley license:
>
>
> Copyright (c) 2002 JSON.org
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
These questions should be asked on legal-disc...@a.o. The good/evil thing,
while clearly seeming stupid, should be reviewed by someone on the legal
committee at the ASF. I'll forward there.
On Jul 11, 2010, at 7:03 PM,
wrote:
> Is the JSON license acceptable by Apache? It seems to be a v
ct
> * Make several incubating releases
> * Support at least three services on Whirr
>
> Any Issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board need to be aware of?
>
> None at this time.
>
>
> = Zeta Components =
>
> Zeta Components is a high-quality library of loosely-coupled PHP components.
> It has entered incubation on 2010-05-21. Therefore the project is still in
> ramp up phase.
>
> 3 most important issues to be tackled:
>
> * Create initial incubating infrastructure.
> * Move project and community to ASF.
> * Get developement based in ASF moving again.
>
> Mailing lists have already been created. Available are:
>
> * dev zeta-...@incubator.apache.org
> * user zeta-comm...@incubator.apache.org
> * commits zeta-us...@incubator.apache.org
> * private zeta-priv...@incubator.apache.org
>
> Website space has been reserved. Jira has been requested. All CLAs have been
> sent. Most of them have been processed and therefore most user accounts have
> been requested.
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
I filled it today.
On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess nobody took up the task of writing an LCF report for this
> months board meeting [1]. I was quite busy last week so I
> unfortunately didn't notice this in time. Sorry about that.
>
> The missing report is n
Sure, why not? The more, the merrier, IMO.
On May 10, 2010, at 1:03 PM,
wrote:
> Is there anyone who gets this list who might be interested in developing an
> eRoom connector? There have been a number of requests for this from the
> MetaCarta community, so I was wondering if there was any
+1. I've added to the wiki and signed off.
On May 3, 2010, at 8:18 AM,
wrote:
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> = Lucene Connectors Framework =
> === Description ===
> Lucene Connectors Framework is an incremental crawler framework and set of
> connectors designed to pull documents f
ntation, but it isn't
> regularly pushing out to the site. Can you kick it (or whatever it was you
> did last time)? They still haven't granted me incubator group membership, so
> I'm stuck.
>
> Karl
>
>
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://ww
Please ping priv...@incubator.apache.org.
Also, please subscribe w/ your new address so I don't have to keep moderating
you through. By the looks of it, LCF has it's first large company user ;-)
-Grant
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:39 PM,
wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> I've done a fair bit of work on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONNECTORS-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved CONNECTORS-1.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Create a Website
>
>
>
You should also see SOLR-1834. More later.
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This post pertains to the integration between Lucene Connectors Framework and
> Solr.
>
> I don't know a ton about Solr, but one of the engineers here at MetaCarta has
> become quite familiar
Just a reminder, just over one week left open on the CFP. Some great talks
entered already. Keep it up!
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation - Prague, Czech Republic May 20
> & 21, 2010
>
> All submissions mus
to pull appropriate build and execution dependencies in
> using Ivy or Maven. Javadoc is now available to people willing to build the
> project themselves. The project remains buildable and usable.
>
> Signed off by mentor:
> <<<<<<
>
> Karl
>
>
>
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: no-re...@apache.org
> Date: April 1, 2010 10:00:12 AM EDT
> To: priv...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Incubator report reminders sent for April 2010
> Reply-To: priv...@incubator.apache.org
>
> The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 April 2010, 12
gain practical
hands-on experience with Lucene & Solr and the know-how to develop killer
search code.
Lastly, a reminder: the Call for Participation is still open, accepting
submissions until April 13th.
Hope to see you there!
Grant Ingersoll
Apache Lucene EuroCon Program Chair
ww
Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation - Prague, Czech Republic May 20 &
21, 2010
All submissions must be received by Tuesday, April 13, 2010, 12 Midnight CET/6
PM US EDT
The first European conference dedicated to Lucene and Solr is coming to Prague
from May 18-21, 2010. Apache Lucene Eu
March 2010: Call For Participation Open
13 April 2010: Call For Participation Closes
16 April 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection Notification
18-19 May 2010 Lucene and Solr Pre-conference Training Sessions
20-21 May 2010: Apache Lucene EuroCon
We look forward to seeing you in Prague!
Grant In
On Mar 16, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Plural makes more sense to me.
Agreed. Anything else was likely an error on my part.
On Mar 16, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> Karl Wright wrote:
>>>> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>>> Please add Karl Wright (kwright) to the incubator group on people.
On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Karl Wright wrote:
>> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>> Please add Karl Wright (kwright) to the incubator group on people. Also, I
>>> suppose if there are any other people from the Lucene Connector Framework
>>&g
Please add Karl Wright (kwright) to the incubator group on people. Also, I
suppose if there are any other people from the Lucene Connector Framework
Incubator project that need to be added, please add them as well.
Thanks,
Grant
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Karl Wright wrote:
>> Karl Wright wrote:
>>>
>>> I was trying to chase down why our connectors site didn't get updated
>>> nightly, and it seems like it might be because the permissions on the site
>>> directories changed:
>>>
>>> [kwri...@mi
Yeah, we can on Hudson: hudson.zones.apache.org. Give me a few days.
On Mar 9, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> It would be great to have an autobuilder running on LCF, and also have some
> way of publishing the javadoc for it. Does anyone know how to do this within
> Apache?
>
>
This looks good to me.
On Mar 8, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> Here's a swag at the proposed status, in wiki form. Please let me know what
> should be added/removed/clarified, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
>
> === Description ===
> Lucene Connector Framework is an incremental crawle
FYI. Incubator Board Report due
-Grant
On Mar 4, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> Folks seem to think this page is a good way to start:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LogoContest
Do we have sponsors for such a thing?
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have ability to view the wiki source of this document,
> or I'd be happy to
A bigger question is, should LCF be responsible for this stuff or should Solr,
etc. be responsible for it? For instance, perhaps all Solr needs is to
implement a DataImportHandler processor?
On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Erik Hatcher wrote:
>> I'm curious why the LuceneConn
On Mar 2, 2010, at 5:08 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> That sounds pretty good.
>> -Grant
>
> Good sounding or not, I've not received any hint from the httpclient team
> that they've changed their mind about accepting my patch. However,
That sounds pretty good.
-Grant
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> FWIW, there may be some hope here. See attached...
>
> Karl
>
>
> From: Karl Wright
> Date: February 24, 2010 7:22:15 PM EST
> To: legal-disc...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache NTLM implementations
>
>
>
On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Karl Wright wrote:
>> Please see the response from Oleg Kalnichevski on the HttpClient team,
>> pertaining to my submitted NTLM patch.
>> Reading between the lines, it's apparently the policy of Apache Legal to
>> avoid any involvement that may
On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> Hi Grant,
>>>
>>> I think we need to figure out how we're going to tackle LCF upstream
>>> submissions for commo
On Feb 23, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
>
> Hi Grant,
>
> I think we need to figure out how we're going to tackle LCF upstream
> submissions for commons-httpclient and xerces-j. The diffs in question are
> in trunk/upstream-diffs. In both cases, the changes represent significant
>
On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:44 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> I have been working on a preliminary set of build.xml files for the various
>>> components of lcf, as per Grant's suggestion, and h
On Feb 12, 2010, at 4:44 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
> I have been working on a preliminary set of build.xml files for the various
> components of lcf, as per Grant's suggestion, and have been following
> (roughly) the packaging setup of the granted code. There is, however, a
> detail we should di
Hi Karl,
Looks like a great start. I modified one little part of it (about Postgresql).
While I share your sentiment about it's quality, we should likely support
other DBs in the long run, too, so I removed the statement so as to encourage
others who like alternatives to feel welcome.
Some q
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
