+1
On Apr 26, 2011, at 6:12 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
The RC2 of the 0.2-incubating release is now up on
http://people.apache.org/~kwright. The svn tag is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/tags/release-0.2-incubating-RC2.
Please vote!
Karl
this a
success again this year!
On behalf of the GSoC 2011 admins,
Uli
[1] http://community.apache.org/guide-to-being-a-mentor.html
[2] http://s.apache.org/gsoc2011tasks
[3] http://community.apache.org/gsoc.html
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
critical fixes and changes have already taken place
since ManifoldCF 0.1 went out. When do you think we should try to
release ManifoldCF 0.2? Or, do you think a 0.1.1 release would be the
right approach?
Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mar 1, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Karl, what do you think we can do to make it easier for people to get into
the code? Are other people putting up patches?
What's been happening is that we do indeed get code from contributors,
but the contributors in question seem like
of the deletion/expiration code, and although
there are a couple of other tickets from that review, they do not (in
my opinion) warrant holding the release.
+1 from me.
Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr
. Who else is on the PPMC
for ManifoldCF? That's never been clear to me.
Karl
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Yeah, sorry. It is the holidays for me. I hope to look at it on Monday.
For the record, we need 3 votes from the PPMC and then I
, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:54 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi Grant,
In offline conversation you clarified that for (1) you are looking for
the top level dir in the zip/tar to be named apache-manifoldcf-0.1.
You also seem
, at 11:11 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Great!
Karl
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I can hook up the RAT stuff.
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
OK, so I will do the appropriate things to make (1), (4), and maybe
(5) happen. Does
On Dec 3, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Can you be more specific about the files that refer to metacarta? Or
does Rat know to look for MetaCarta?
I just happened to notice them in the RAT output. It looked like properties
files.
Examples:
I have updated our Incubation status page to reflect ManifoldCF instead of LCF.
It should propagate through the system in the next few hours.
-Grant
, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
I've created a signing key, and checked in a KEYS file. Apache
instructions for this are actually decent, so I didn't have to make
much stuff up. Glad about that.
Yep, sorry, have been
Hmm, for some reason I can't import the KEYS file
gpg --import KEYS
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Done
Karl
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
ok - I might move it there
Karl
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing
at the top
for trunk again.
Later, as we mature, we will likely have branches, etc. for this stuff, but for
now let's just assume trunk is under code freeze and the only changes that can
be made are those related to release.
Karl
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
On Dec 2, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
For your questions (6) and (7): The json code we use comes from
www.json.org, and there is no prebuilt jar from that source, just
source files.
Hmmm. OK. The license on it is fine, but we should make sure it is properly
attributed. Either
the
candidate up there, if my network connection doesn't bounce in the
interim. Is there any other place available?
Karl
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
I've created a signing key, and checked
and then committed by a committer. Since we don't lock down
our wiki, we can't do it.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Grant Ingersoll
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:23 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release?
On Nov 10, 2010, at 1:22
, etc.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Grant Ingersoll
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:38 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Release?
Now that we have NTLM figured out and the Memex stuff behind us, how do
people feel about working towards
On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Proposal: Release to consist of two things: tar and zip of a complete
source tree, and tar and zip of the modules/dist area after the build.
The implied way people are to work with this is:
- to use just the distribution, untar or unzip the
Now that we have NTLM figured out and the Memex stuff behind us, how do people
feel about working towards a release?
-Grant
Looks like we've been given the green light for NTLM inclusion.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-80
is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache
Dashboard.
3. The mailing list names are connectors-.
4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS.
Are there any risks with changing the latter two?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache
Dashboard.
3. The mailing list names are connectors-.
4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS.
Are there any risks with changing the latter two?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
opinion of the name choice.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
News should be posted on the JIRA issue. For now, it's being handled
internally. Seems we aren't the only ones w/ the issue and apparently MINA
has been shipping
, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-80 has been created to track
the NTLM issue. Sam Ruby is working w/ the ASF attorneys on this. I don't
know how long it will take. In a separate thread, we should discuss
workarounds/fallback plans so
an actual 0.1 release could be considered.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll grant.ingers...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll grant.ingers...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:35 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Pick your preferred name
ACF passed the Incubator vote
Omni 1
Apache Acromantula 1
Apache Lukon 1
Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
things as is with the
Apache Connector Framework.
- Mark
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Apache Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
, 2010 7:50 AM
To: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Cc: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About name change
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Is it clear that ACF is dead
I
personally like (not necessarily Connecto but a more abstract name.
Such names have many advantages as people remember short names and
they are less ambiguous.
Any suggestions, thoughts?
simon
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr
at this time that no actual source code or packages be
changed. I suggest instead that the name change occur to the site materials,
documentation, and collateral materials exclusively. Any thoughts?
Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr
quite correct.)
Thanks,
Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://lucenerevolution.org Lucene/Solr Conference, Boston Oct 7-8
On Aug 23, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to suggest that we slightly alter the format of CHANGES.txt.
Most important I think is to add the names of non-committers who contribute
any patches, JIRA comments, reports of bugs on the user list, etc to the
issue.
This
I think this also underscores something we as an Incubating community should
think about in terms of process. Obviously, it is great to give credit, but
sometimes we also need to give people a chance to contribute, too. Even on
seemingly trivial things (I don't have anything specific in mind)
should
be fine. Presumably the nominal name change is contingent on its project
status as no longer incubating under Lucene?
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:19 PM
To: connectors
These questions should be asked on legal-disc...@a.o. The good/evil thing,
while clearly seeming stupid, should be reviewed by someone on the legal
committee at the ASF. I'll forward there.
On Jul 11, 2010, at 7:03 PM, karl.wri...@nokia.com karl.wri...@nokia.com
wrote:
Is the JSON license
I filled it today.
On Jun 14, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
I guess nobody took up the task of writing an LCF report for this
months board meeting [1]. I was quite busy last week so I
unfortunately didn't notice this in time. Sorry about that.
The missing report is not too
requested.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Please ping priv...@incubator.apache.org.
Also, please subscribe w/ your new address so I don't have to keep moderating
you through. By the looks of it, LCF has it's first large company user ;-)
-Grant
On Apr 16, 2010, at 3:39 PM, karl.wri...@nokia.com karl.wri...@nokia.com
wrote:
Hi
documentation, but it isn't
regularly pushing out to the site. Can you kick it (or whatever it was you
did last time)? They still haven't granted me incubator group membership, so
I'm stuck.
Karl
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene
You should also see SOLR-1834. More later.
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi,
This post pertains to the integration between Lucene Connectors Framework and
Solr.
I don't know a ton about Solr, but one of the engineers here at MetaCarta has
become quite familiar with
Just a reminder, just over one week left open on the CFP. Some great talks
entered already. Keep it up!
On Mar 24, 2010, at 8:03 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Apache Lucene EuroCon Call For Participation - Prague, Czech Republic May 20
21, 2010
All submissions must be received by Tuesday
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
From: no-re...@apache.org
Date: April 1, 2010 10:00:12 AM EDT
To: priv...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Incubator report reminders sent for April 2010
Reply-To: priv...@incubator.apache.org
The next board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 21 April 2010, 12 pm
practical
hands-on experience with Lucene Solr and the know-how to develop killer
search code.
Lastly, a reminder: the Call for Participation is still open, accepting
submissions until April 13th.
Hope to see you there!
Grant Ingersoll
Apache Lucene EuroCon Program Chair
www.lucene-eurocon.org
For Participation Open
13 April 2010: Call For Participation Closes
16 April 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection Notification
18-19 May 2010 Lucene and Solr Pre-conference Training Sessions
20-21 May 2010: Apache Lucene EuroCon
We look forward to seeing you in Prague!
Grant Ingersoll
Apache Lucene EuroCon
On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi Grant,
I think we need to figure out how we're going to tackle LCF upstream
submissions for commons-httpclient and xerces-j. The diffs in question are
in trunk
On Feb 17, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
+1 for o.a.lcf
+1
That looks pretty good. Did you see my last question about the library
dependencies? The Makefiles seem to be expecting them to be in /usr/share/...
I think we need to include the dependencies ahead of time so we can make sure
they are covered license wise.
On Feb 9, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Karl
On Feb 9, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
I'm looking at what is required for ant builds of LCF, and for this I sort of
want to understand accepted practices for Apache builds of this kind.
(1) Structure
LCF will build many distinct jars, which need to be kept distinct because
On Feb 8, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Inline
On Feb 6, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi all,
I have been thinking long and hard in terms of how, exactly, we may deliver
all of the connectors in a manner compatible with Apache principles
On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that mailing list archives linked here:
http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/mail.html are not working yet (404).
Is it that they haven't been setup yet? (I would like to go through history
of email, as of now I found
On Feb 2, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Lukáš Vlček wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that mailing list archives linked here:
http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/mail.html are not working yet (404).
Is it that they haven't been setup yet? (I would like to go through history
of email, as of now I found
the
project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
Incubator PMC
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Per the IP Clearance form (see the Incubator website) I'm filling out for
processing the Metacarta grant:
Remind active committers that they are responsible for
ensuring that a Corporate CLA is recorded if such is
required to authorize their contributions
55 matches
Mail list logo
