Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Try again.
Much better, thanks!
Karl
Please bring any issues to my attention...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-106
+1
Karl
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Hi Karl, et. al,
Has MetaCarta filled out http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt yet?
I don't see it in the usual ASF places yet, but I might have missed it. I
think you need to send it to secret...@a.o.
Thanks,
Grant
Josiah is filling that out this
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Karl Wright kwri...@metacarta.com wrote:
Once the Apache IP committee is done with the LCF grant, please note I've
entered a number of tickets for work that would need to be done immediately
after the software hits Apache's SVN.
It seems
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
BTW, I think you can start working on the build script even before the code
gets committed. That way we can do the initial commit and than almost
immediately you can add the build stuff.
I wanted to do rearrangement of source packages and structure in svn prior to
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
That looks pretty good. Did you see my last question about the library
dependencies? The Makefiles seem to be expecting them to be in /usr/share/...
I think we need to include the dependencies ahead of time so we can make sure
they are covered license wise.
I
I'm looking at what is required for ant builds of LCF, and for this I sort of want to understand accepted practices for Apache
builds of this kind.
(1) Structure
LCF will build many distinct jars, which need to be kept distinct because not all deployments can build or include all
All the straightforward connectors now have ant build scripts, so I'm starting
work on the nastier ones.
Meridio is the nastiest of the web-service-based connectors. It's nasty for
two reasons:
(a) it depends on wsdls and xsds whose rights to redistribute have been
explicitly declined by
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Karl Wright kwri...@metacarta.com wrote:
I've set it up so there's a master build script under modules, which
fires off individual module build scripts as specified. If you haven't
installed required client libraries for any given
The Meridio connector needs both of these jars to function, but they seem to be licensed by Sun as non-redistributable. For
now, I've set them up as a build requirement of the connector - if they aren't there, the connector build will be skipped. But
does anyone know an official Apache way
The complete list of stuff one needs to add to the source tree to get
*everything* to build is as follows:
kwri...@kuskokwim:~/wip/lcf/trunk/modules$ svn status
? connectors/documentum/dfc/dctm.jar
? connectors/documentum/dfc/dfcbase.jar
? connectors/documentum/dfc/dfc.jar
?
Karl Wright wrote:
Please see the response from Oleg Kalnichevski on the HttpClient team,
pertaining to my submitted NTLM patch.
Reading between the lines, it's apparently the policy of Apache Legal to
avoid any involvement that may *potentially* run afoul of commercial
IP. They don't have
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
That sounds pretty good.
-Grant
Good sounding or not, I've not received any hint from the httpclient team that they've changed their mind about accepting my
patch. However, it *does* seem like it would be reasonable to continue to include the patched httpclient
On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I'm curious why the LuceneConnector doesn't use the SolrJ API? Instead,
there's a custom HttpPoster class that does a lot of work that SolrJ already
handles internally.
Also, this probably should be called a SolrConnector instead
Lukáš Vlček wrote:
Karl,
would it be possible to write at least short info about how to implement a
new Connector? I looked at wiki pages but did not find this information (or
is it in the LaTeX user doc?)
Thanks,
Lukas
The wiki pages now include three new How to Write... pages, for output
Ralph Benjamin Ruijs wrote:
Hi Karl,
There is a copy paste problem in the framework build.xml. The line
copy todir=build/webapp/authority-service/WEB-INF/lib
copies the libs to the authority service webapp instead of the crawler-ui one.
See below:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:10 PM,
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Karl Wright wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Please add Karl Wright (kwright) to the incubator group on people. Also, I
suppose if there are any other people from the Lucene Connector Framework
Incubator project
I believe Grant said he'd do this a while ago. Please view this as a friendly
reminder. ;-)
Karl
...@incubator.apache.org
--
Karl Wright
Software Engineer
MetaCarta, Inc.
350 Massachusetts Avenue, 4th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
(617)-301-5511
www.metacarta.com http://www.metacarta.com
Where to find it.
This message may contain privileged, proprietary, and otherwise private
information
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Is there anything Tomcat-specific in the Connectors WAR files or
surrounding infrastructure? I'm wondering if perhaps it should be
renamed to web in the directories created, etc if these work with
Jetty and other containers too.
Thanks,
Erik
There's nothing that
Hi,
I've discovered where, at least, you are supposed to change the name of a
Wiki space. There's a browse project icon from the Dashboard page, and
within that there's an Advanced tab. That tab shows the Space name as
part of the Space details.
Unfortunately, I don't seem to have the ability
Vote +1 to change the root of the svn repository for Apache Connectors
Framework from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf
to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/acf
Vote will remain open until 5:00 PM Friday, August 27th, Boston time (EDT).
(I'm trying to do this right
Subject: Re: About name change
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
wrote:
On Aug 26, 2010, at 6:14 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Is it clear that ACF is dead? The concern raised was that it implied
something that connected lots of stuff together, and that's
.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:05 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
I'm not too keen on just a simple abstract name - too meaningless for me.
It works for countless Apache projects (that's really the standard) -
not really buying it would
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 3:20 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: About name change
I think we should vote directly. Perhaps we can save time by supplying
our
top three choices, in order.
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30
TrafficServer? OpenWebBeans? XMLBeans? There are actually a *lot* of names
that are multiple words. They're just mashed together. ;-)
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/30/10 1:37 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
snip - Consider using functional
- not multiple words. And if you
look, it's not even a 'lot' without the bold around it ;)
On 8/30/10 4:50 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
TrafficServer? OpenWebBeans? XMLBeans? There are actually a *lot* of
names
that are multiple words. They're just mashed together. ;-)
Karl
On Mon, Aug 30
are
gathered and distributed.
-Grant
On Aug 30, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
On 8/30/10 5:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
I'm not going to go head-to-head with you trying to split hairs. ;-)
Can we agree that something like ContentCF is a possibility under your
guidelines? (I'm
, at 5:57 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
On 8/30/10 5:20 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
I'm not going to go head-to-head with you trying to split hairs. ;-)
Can we agree that something like ContentCF is a possibility under your
guidelines? (I'm not proposing that, I'm just trying to open the field
up a
bit
Gotta do it. We've got to have a vote among the connectors developers, and
before that we need all the name candidates on the slate. At 5 PM I intend
to present the feasible candidates (I will include the current Apache
Connectors Framework), and ask everyone to rank them in order of preference.
Gotta do it. We've got to have a vote among the connectors developers, and
before that we need all the name candidates on the slate. At 5 PM I intend
to present the feasible candidates (I will include the current Apache
Connectors Framework), and ask everyone to rank them in order of preference.
Of course, it's easy to be the critic, much harder to come up with a good
suggestion.
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Ackromantyoola.
I think JK got the name from somewhere else anyhow, so there's prior art
involved. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Jack
I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list with
a selection, in order, of the top three names for the project currently
known as Apache Connectors Framework. The choices
are:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Acromantula
Apache Manifold
Apache ManifoldCF
Apache
My preferences:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Manifold
Apache Acromantula
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this is un-Apache-like, but please respond to the following list
with a selection, in order, of the top three names
Well, you've made your feelings clear. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache Connectors Framework
(sorry)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I know
and apache
http
server, i don't understand the fuss.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you've made your feelings clear. ;-)
Karl
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Apache Connectors Framework
Apache
are
connecting (to)? It's the Data(sources), no? If that's correct, Apache
Datasource Connectors may do.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Karl Wright daddy
far. I haven't decided for sure yet.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:02 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Pick your preferred name
A late entry has
of the name
2. Whether they have guidance on our repeated request about NTLM and it's
inclusion in any ACF release. I believe someone was slated to engage with
us a few months back, but I don't believe anyone has reached out to us yet.
Thoughts?
-Grant
On Sep 7, 2010, at 4:54 AM, Karl Wright
In a separate thread, we should discuss workarounds/fallback plans so
that we are prepared either way.
NTLM support of one form or another is critical for most of the
Windows-based repositories. This includes SharePoint, Meridio, and
LiveLink.
For HttpClient 4.x, they went so far as to remove
thread, we should discuss
workarounds/fallback plans so that we are prepared either way.
-Grant
On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
+1 to both.
Karl
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
+1 to both - review
aren't the only ones w/ the issue and apparently MINA
has been shipping with it.
-Grant
On Sep 15, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Any news on this?
Karl
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-80 has been
, rather than through JDBC. Still looking for a good
example from somebody who has done something similar.
Karl
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
For two of the report queries, ACF uses the following Postgresql
construct, which sadly seems to have
. Derby doesn't seem to allow any way to
declare aggregate functions either, so I couldn't declare a FIRST()
aggregate method as proposed below. Simple arithmetic functions seem
like they would work, but that's not helpful here.
Karl
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
.windowstart t1.windowstart )
WHERE
t2.primary_key IS NULL
HTH,
Alex
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
For two of the report queries, ACF uses the following Postgresql
construct, which sadly seems to have no Derby equivalent:
SELECT DISTINCT
.primary_key, windowstart, etc
FROM
table AS t1
LEFT OUTER JOIN table AS t2 ON ( t1.bucket = t2.bucket AND
t2.windowstart t1.windowstart )
WHERE
t2.primary_key IS NULL
HTH,
Alex
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
For two of the report
, t1.windowend
FROM
(xxx) t1
WHERE
t1.bytecount=( SELECT max(t2.bytecount) FROM (xxx) t2 WHERE
t2.bucket = t1.bucket )
... although I've never seen the =(SELECT...) structure before.
Karl
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you go:
// The query
Yes. This is for the Max Activity and Max Bandwidth reports.
Karl
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Alexey Serba ase...@gmail.com wrote:
And all of this is only with single table repohistory, right? Is this
some kind of complex analytics/stats?
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Karl Wright
Any news from the board?
Karl
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've been following the JIRA issue. I'm actually more curious
about the board's opinion of the name choice.
Karl
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
passed not
just here, but also up the chain, so if it goes forward, so be it.
-Grant
On Sep 20, 2010, at 6:03 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Any news from the board?
Karl
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I've been following the JIRA issue. I'm actually
Grant's feedback from the board is that ACF would likely not be
blocked, but is indeed too broad.
Based on the popularity of Apache Manifold the last time 'round, but
the concern that Manifold is indeed a registered trademark, Grant
proposes that we consider changing the name from Apache
Based on the level of controversy, and the necessity of settling this
promptly, once and for all, I vote +1.
Karl
Folks,
The ManifoldCF name possibility leads to some challenges as far as our
documentation is concerned. I thought that it might be a good idea
during the vote to explore those to see what people thought.
Here are some examples of how Apache Connectors Framework might get
used in text:
Apache
instead for Apache
Multifold or Apache Legion, if there's enough buy-in for these
possibilities.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you wish to change your vote, in that case?
Karl
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan
call an IOException a JavaException just b/c it came from Java, you give it a
name that relates to the thing that went wrong, as in something went wrong
doing IO. Give it a name that says what happened.
On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Folks,
The ManifoldCF name
to the thing that went wrong, as in
something
went wrong doing IO. Give it a name that says what happened.
On Sep 21, 2010, at 3:16 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Folks,
The ManifoldCF name possibility leads to some challenges as far as our
documentation is concerned. I thought that it might
If you are looking for non-existent words built out of parts that
nevertheless have meanings, try these:
manilink, manicon, maniweb, manisource
multicon, multiweb
heterolink, heteroweb, heterosource
Karl
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Multifold
against ACF, which is the current name as I
understand it.
Karl
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
+1
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, September 20
We're going to have another round of name selection, based on feedback
from the board. We've also pretty much decided that the last round
did not have sufficient breadth, so here's an open solicitation call
for potential names for the next round.
So hold on to your hats, and throw your
commodities futures
trading]
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:27 PM
To: connectors-dev connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Soliciting more potential names for the project
Folks,
Grant feels we would have a better chance of graduating from
incubation without changes if we adopt a new name. There will thus be
two votes. First vote is designed to arrive at a name, and the second
vote will be on whether to use that highest-point name instead of
Apache Connectors
My vote:
Maniplex
Manicon
Connex
Connie
Manilink
Conton
Contour
Multicon
Karl
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Grant feels we would have a better chance of graduating from
incubation without changes if we adopt a new name. There will thus
Folks,
My personal overall deadline for considering another name change is a
few days shy of October 15th. That's when I need to have the first
chunk of the book ACF In Action (or whatever) ready for review. So
this is a real deadline, and beyond that point name changes become
difficult to the
Vote has been extended until Tuesday at 5:00 PM.
Karl
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Vote was going to close in about 1 hour.
If you want more time, say so.
Karl
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com
Reminder: six hours to go. (Jack, I still haven't seen your vote...)
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:53 AM, George Aroush geo...@aroush.net wrote:
Ayvitraya
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:29 PM
Repositor
(In alpha order, no preference implied.)
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:03 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Select a name to possibly replace
Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:45 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Select a name to possibly replace Apache Connectors
Framework
Jack, can you put these in order
Vote +1 if you want to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Connex,
-1 if you want to keep Connectors Framework as the Apache name.
This voting opportunity will expire at the end of the working day on
Friday, EDT.
Karl
, the class name prefix would be Connex, and
the subdomain name would be http://connex.apache.org.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 5:58 PM
To: connectors-dev connectors-dev
with Jack's actual preferences and come
up with the second choice, which I hope was vetted more carefully than
this one.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
The names were supposed to have been vetted by those submitting them?
That was part
With Jack's preference order specified, these are the numbers:
Connex, 36
ManifoldCF, 23
Manicon, 19
Maniplex, 16
Contango, 12
Ayvitraya, 11
Contour, 10
Manilink, 10
Connie, 10
Ralph, 9
Recon, 7
Repositor, 6
Multicon, 3
Conton, 3
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Karl Wright daddy
So, my official vote is -1. The name shouldn't have been a candidate
from the start.
Karl
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like there is a service mark HMS Connex. That's probably
not a problem. BUT:
ConneX is a pure p2p collaboration
Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
Connex, if that wins its vote.
This vote also expires end of day on Friday.
Note: Manifold is a trademark for a GIS software product. However,
I agree with
--
From: Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:43 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
hmmm...I think I'm all voted out. Can we just call it nothing?
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl
Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Jack,
That's one of the main purposes of having
Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Jack,
That's one of the main purposes of having
with the majority.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 7:25 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
Ok, I just
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
If this is adopted, I'm thinking we could use it in the following ways:
Abbreviation: MCF
Short name: ManifoldCF
Qualified short name: Apache ManifoldCF
Fully qualified and unabbreviated name: the Apache Manifold
Connectors
post [1] - a name is
going to stay with us all for a long time!
Upayavira
[1] http://enthusiasm.cozy.org/archives/2010/09/first-time-right
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 20:08 -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
Actually, an abbreviation of AMCF is not bad either kinda like
that myself. But I'm still
on that so far (+1 and
-1)? I'll let Karl send out a proper reminder of wherever he says we are.
-- Jack Krupansky
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:08 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:01 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
We're trying for an up/down confirmation of ManifoldCF as a new name
for the project
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
On 9/28/10 6:40 PM, Karl Wright wrote:
Vote +1 to rename Apache Connectors Framework to Apache ManifoldCF.
Vote -1 to keep the project name of Connectors Framework, or to retain
Connex, if that wins its vote.
This vote also
The vote passes. Barely. Total count +1. Although I believe we
didn't hear from lots of folks that made ManifoldCF their #1 choice
last time.
So, our new name is ManifoldCF. I'm thinking this will translate to:
org.apache.mcf
MCFException
MCF abbreviation
ManifoldCF full name
webapps
This vote failed, by the way.
Karl
--
From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 9:56 AM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Rename Apache Connectors Framework to ManifoldCF
On reflection, I've actually decided to just use manifoldcf
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Technically, a database is supposed to throw a sqlexception of a
specific variety if deadlock occurs, not just hang due to thread lock.
Indeed, if this is the way hsqldb handles deadlock it is not usable,
because we *expect
The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring
to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given
that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality.
Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I?
Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to
for your attention.
Karl Wright
I've started a project under google code. The svn url is:
http://manifoldcfinaction.googlecode.com/svn/trunk
... for those who would like to review the examples.
Karl
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant advises they go into google code and then get
system, web, and SharePoint*.
* Oh... there is the issue of SharePoint 2010 or whatever the latest is, but
current MCF support should be good enough for a 0.5 release, I think.
(Got to keep up with Google Connectors!)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Karl Wright
Sent: Tuesday
off trunk and the latest
wiki/doc as well. So, some people may want the official 0.1, but others may
want to run straight from trunk/nightly build.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message- From: Karl Wright
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 1:56 PM
To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org
a pointer to a decent way of doing this under ant?
Karl
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Grant, nightly builds are unnecessary for a release process.
A reliable release ant target IS necessary, so after a short comment
period I'm happy to put
this would be a good time to make that known.
Thanks,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
What I've done here is taken all the pages that I originally put in
the Wiki, describing how to set up and run ManifoldCF, and converted
them to xdocs that are part
not know how to build or obtain.
I believe this needs to be both generated and registered. The site
also needs to refer to a download location/list of mirrors before it
could go out the door.
Help? Grant?
Karl
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hearing nothing
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
The build changes are complete. I removed the modules level from the
hierarchy because it served no useful purpose and complicated matters.
The outer level build.xml now allows you build code, docs, and run
tests separately
other place available?
Karl
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Nov 19, 2010, at 6:18 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
I've created a signing key, and checked in a KEYS file. Apache
instructions for this are actually decent, so I didn't have to make
much
The upload has failed repeatedly for me, so I'll clearly have to find
another way.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm uploading a release candidate now. But someone needs to feed the
hamsters turning the wheels or something, because the upload
23 17:57 manifoldcf-0.1.zip.md5
-rw-r--r-- 1 kwright kwright 158734230 Nov 23 17:55 manifoldcf-0.1.zip
-rw-r--r-- 1 kwright kwright 156742315 Nov 23 17:06 manifoldcf-0.1.tar.gz
[kwri...@minotaur:~]$
Please let me know what you think.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Karl Wright daddy
Uploaded RC1.
Karl
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
A problem with the FileNet connector has caused me to build an RC1.
It's uploading now.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jack Krupansky
jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
That's a great
Turkey going
on here!)
On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Karl Wright wrote:
Uploaded RC1.
Karl
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
A problem with the FileNet connector has caused me to build an RC1.
It's uploading now.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:12 PM
1 - 100 of 1851 matches
Mail list logo
