On Tue May 28, 2002 at 07:11:55AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > Why? How many people do you think will have wu-ftpd and vsftpd
> > installed at the same time? If wu-ftpd provides /etc/ftpusers, and
> > vsftpd does, that's not a big deal...
>
> Well, how many people do you think have postfi
Yves Duret wrote on Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:08:57PM +0200 :
> >> You can count 1 here :-)
> > Yes, me too - but you and I are for sure not "normal" users, so I would
> > not say that we count.
> the alternatives trick was not made for "normal" users.
How about a gui similar to drakxservices, but
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:12:55PM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> But that doesn't mean that I should just "fix" proftpd to make it compliant
> by putting an empty file. So you'd really need to ask the LSB body to get
> this addressed.
Ohh I agree. It's not our fault that proftpd isn't LSB complia
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 06:45:38PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:11:36AM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > So proftpd is not compliant. It's up to the proftpd authors to make it
> > compliant with the LSB, but my opinion is that we should not try and introduce
> > a file which
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So sprach Borsenkow Andrej am 2002-05-28 um 09:19:54 +0400 :
>> You can count 1 here :-)
>
> Yes, me too - but you and I are for sure not "normal" users, so I would
> not say that we count.
the alternatives trick was not made for "normal" users.
norm
So sprach Borsenkow Andrej am 2002-05-28 um 09:19:54 +0400 :
> You can count 1 here :-)
Yes, me too - but you and I are for sure not "normal" users, so I would
not say that we count.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: h
> And how many actually *USE*
> update-alternatives?
>
You can count 1 here :-)
So sprach Vincent Danen am 2002-05-27 um 21:48:25 -0600 :
> On Mon May 27, 2002 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Now I don't since my customers are all running windoze and have to use WinSCP
> > (http://winscp.vse.cz/eng/) or cygwin+openssh instead. No more private ftp
> > stuff...
So sprach Vincent Danen am 2002-05-27 um 16:48:16 -0600 :
> Why? How many people do you think will have wu-ftpd and vsftpd
> installed at the same time? If wu-ftpd provides /etc/ftpusers, and
> vsftpd does, that's not a big deal...
Well, how many people do you think have postfix and another MTA
On Mon May 27, 2002 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Oden Eriksson wrote:
[...]
> > Hmmm... methinks I should look at what I can do running vsftpd under
> > tcpserver... I bet I could accomplish it that way...
> >
> > Anyways, I'll take a peek tomorrow when I'm in the office.
>
> When I run (ran) proftpd/wu
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:11:36AM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> So proftpd is not compliant. It's up to the proftpd authors to make it
> compliant with the LSB, but my opinion is that we should not try and introduce
> a file which doesn't contain anything(which does not have anything to do with
>
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 04:48:16PM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Mon May 27, 2002 at 06:30:13PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> > So sprach Yves Duret am 2002-05-27 um 18:16:23 +0200 :
> > > so let me know if i put back vsftpd to read /etc/ftpusers instead of
>/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers
> >
> >
On Mon May 27, 2002 at 06:30:13PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Yves Duret am 2002-05-27 um 18:16:23 +0200 :
> > so let me know if i put back vsftpd to read /etc/ftpusers instead of
>/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers
>
> Hm, why not make it an alternative or a symlink, just like /etc/aliases
> i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Lundi 27 Mai 2002 11:27, Alexander Skwar a écrit :
> So sprach Borsenkow Andrej am 2002-05-27 um 13:20:27 +0400 :
> > It is very unlikely. (almost all of the) contents below Mandrake-devel
> > is already compressed (and with better program actually
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Yves Duret wrote:
> Stew Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The only issue I have with moving wu-ftpd to contribs is I just added it
> > to the Requires for lsb. The LSB tests look for /etc/ftpusers, which
> > wu-ftpd provided. Does vsftpd also provide this mechan
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So sprach Yves Duret am 2002-05-27 um 18:16:23 +0200 :
>> so let me know if i put back vsftpd to read /etc/ftpusers instead of
>/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers
>
> Hm, why not make it an alternative or a symlink, just like /etc/aliases
> is a symlink to /etc/po
So sprach Yves Duret am 2002-05-27 um 18:16:23 +0200 :
> so let me know if i put back vsftpd to read /etc/ftpusers instead of
>/etc/vsftpd/ftpusers
Hm, why not make it an alternative or a symlink, just like /etc/aliases
is a symlink to /etc/postfix/aliases?
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: h
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > server, they can download the source and build it themself if they
> > > can't be bothered to use something decent (yes, I am displaying some
> > > anti-wu-ftpd sentiment here).
> > >
> > > I don't know about the .tar/.gz thing... doesn't proftpd
Stew Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The only issue I have with moving wu-ftpd to contribs is I just added it
> to the Requires for lsb. The LSB tests look for /etc/ftpusers, which
> wu-ftpd provided. Does vsftpd also provide this mechanism?
vsftpd provides this mecanism too.
(but i con
> > server, they can download the source and build it themself if they
> > can't be bothered to use something decent (yes, I am displaying some
> > anti-wu-ftpd sentiment here).
> >
> > I don't know about the .tar/.gz thing... doesn't proftpd do anything
> > like that?
> >
>
> The only issue I
>
> > The only issue I have with moving wu-ftpd to contribs is I just
added it
> > to the Requires for lsb. The LSB tests look for /etc/ftpusers,
which
> > wu-ftpd provided. Does vsftpd also provide this mechanism?
>
> Yes.
>
make /etc/ftpusers part of base filesystem then
-andrej
> The only issue I have with moving wu-ftpd to contribs is I just added it
> to the Requires for lsb. The LSB tests look for /etc/ftpusers, which
> wu-ftpd provided. Does vsftpd also provide this mechanism?
Yes.
Z.M.
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Sat May 25, 2002 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
>
> > > On Sun May 19, 2002 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
> > > I was thinking about it, yes, but discussion with others decided that
> > > two FTP servers was enough for Mandrak
So sprach Borsenkow Andrej am 2002-05-27 um 13:20:27 +0400 :
> It is very unlikely. (almost all of the) contents below Mandrake-devel
> is already compressed (and with better program actually) so you hardly
> gain anything compressing it once more.
That's right, but having it all in one huge .tar
>
> I don't like wu-ftp anymore and I solve lot of problem about virtual
hosting
> since I use proftpd, but doing a get Mandrake-devel.tar.gz is very
usefull
> on
> ftp.lip6.fr, or get Mandrake.iso.gz.
>
It is very unlikely. (almost all of the) contents below Mandrake-devel
is already compress
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Lundi 27 Mai 2002 05:58, Ben Reser a écrit :
> On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 09:09:01PM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
> > I don't know about the .tar/.gz thing... doesn't proftpd do anything
> > like that?
>
> As far as I'm aware it's not implemented but
On Monday 27 May 2002 05.10, Vincent Danen wrote:
> On Mon May 27, 2002 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
> > >> > I can see that vsftpd is becoming increasingly popular. More secure
> > >> > than wu-ftpd and ProFTPD and also very fast according to reports. I
> > >> > tried it myself, and it'
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 09:09:01PM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
> I don't know about the .tar/.gz thing... doesn't proftpd do anything
> like that?
As far as I'm aware it's not implemented but if someone really wanted
it, it wouldn't take very long to write a module that would do it.
--
Ben Res
On Mon May 27, 2002 at 09:32:06AM +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > > I could probably do something in the relatively near future and put it
> > > in contribs (unless you have a srpm already made?). Or, if that
> > > fails, at the very least put it on rpmhelp.net with qmail, djbdns, and
> > > other
On Mon May 27, 2002 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
> >> > I can see that vsftpd is becoming increasingly popular. More secure than
> >> > wu-ftpd and ProFTPD and also very fast according to reports. I tried it
> >> > myself, and it's certainly fast and easy to setup.
> >> >
> >> > Any pla
On Sat May 25, 2002 at 01:26:28PM +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > On Sun May 19, 2002 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
> > I was thinking about it, yes, but discussion with others decided that
> > two FTP servers was enough for Mandrake (I agree), and my preferred
> > solution of removing
> > I could probably do something in the relatively near future and put it
> > in contribs (unless you have a srpm already made?). Or, if that
> > fails, at the very least put it on rpmhelp.net with qmail, djbdns, and
> > others.
>
> and done. (i gave a try few weeks ago).
> http://people.mandra
Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun May 19, 2002 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
>
>> > I can see that vsftpd is becoming increasingly popular. More secure than
>> > wu-ftpd and ProFTPD and also very fast according to reports. I tried it
>> > myself, and it's certainly fast
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Samedi 25 Mai 2002 06:09, Vincent Danen a écrit :
> On Sun May 19, 2002 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
> I was thinking about it, yes, but discussion with others decided that
> two FTP servers was enough for Mandrake (I agree), and my prefe
On Sun May 19, 2002 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Yves Duret wrote:
> > I can see that vsftpd is becoming increasingly popular. More secure than
> > wu-ftpd and ProFTPD and also very fast according to reports. I tried it
> > myself, and it's certainly fast and easy to setup.
> >
> > Any plans to add vsftp
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 09:48:59PM +0200, Mattias Dahlberg wrote:
> I can see that vsftpd is becoming increasingly popular. More secure than
> wu-ftpd and ProFTPD and also very fast according to reports. I tried it
> myself, and it's certainly fast and easy to setup.
>
> Any plans to add vsftpd t
On Sun, 19 May 2002, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > Any plans to add vsftpd to Cooker? Maybe it's even a strong contender as
> > the default ftp server for the next Mandrake?
>
> Url?
http://www.google.com/search?q=vsftpd :)
http://vsftpd.beasts.org/
Regards,
Mattias
On Sundayen den 19 May 2002 21.48, Mattias Dahlberg wrote:
> Any plans to add vsftpd to Cooker? Maybe it's even a strong contender as
> the default ftp server for the next Mandrake?
Url?
--
Regards // Oden Eriksson
Mattias Dahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I can see that vsftpd is becoming increasingly popular. More secure than
> wu-ftpd and ProFTPD and also very fast according to reports. I tried it
> myself, and it's certainly fast and easy to setup.
>
> Any plans to add vsftpd to Cooker? May
39 matches
Mail list logo
