Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> > Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>smth like debian & suse?
> > i think they have smth like /etc/rc.boot where let say
> > installing raidtools would drop a init script for activating the soft
> raids
> > installin
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
smth like debian & suse?
i think they have smth like /etc/rc.boot where let say
installing raidtools would drop a init script for activating the soft raids
installing lvm-tools the VG's & LV
Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:56:17AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> >Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:27:49PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> >> probably the fix is ok, but i would rather add a lvmrc script, li
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 09:56:17AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:27:49PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
probably the fix is ok, but i would rather add a lvmrc script, like
hp-ux does, rc.sysinit is too much bloated for this.
> there was a thread horrible rc.sysinit a while ago,
> but it won't change for 9.2 (and someone mentioned it would break the
> compatibility to redhat, i don't know we need it thought)
IMHO current rc.sysinit is so patched that nothing will be broken
by any change.
Quoting Luca Berra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:27:49PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >the attached diff fixes for me
> >running lvm1 format VG's/LV's with the lvm2 tools and devmapper
> >both for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
> probably the fix is ok, but i would rath
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 11:27:49PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Hi,
the attached diff fixes for me
running lvm1 format VG's/LV's with the lvm2 tools and devmapper
both for 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
probably the fix is ok, but i would rather add a lvmrc script, like
hp-ux does, rc.sysinit is too mu
