Re: [Cooker] install - no X test screen with Matrox Millenium

2001-09-20 Thread Leon Brooks
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:23, you wrote: > Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The last couple of installs I was not asked about testing my X config > > using 4.1.0 on Matrox Millenium 2MB. Is it intentional? > Yes, it has been removed due to problem with frame buffer glitches on some >

[Cooker] install - no X test screen with Matrox Millenium

2001-09-19 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
The last couple of installs I was not asked about testing my X config using 4.1.0 on Matrox Millenium 2MB. Is it intentional?

[Cooker] Konqueror test

2001-09-07 Thread guran
Hi VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se) /ChangeLog/1.569/Fri Sep 7 15:14:05 2001// Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20010907 22:32 Please do this test. You must have your box to boot into the console, to be able to read this. Install RealPlayer and add the relevant *.ram, *.rm and *.rpm. Run in Konqueror

Re: [Cooker] Test sound please

2001-09-07 Thread Joal Heagney
David Walluck wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > > > Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 10:51, Grégoire Colbert scribit : > > > I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm > > > using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and > > >

Re: [Cooker] Test sound please

2001-09-07 Thread David Walluck
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 10:51, Grégoire Colbert scribit : > > I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm > > using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and > > can hear the two files together. I d

Re: [Cooker] Test sound please

2001-09-07 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 10:51, Grégoire Colbert scribit : > I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm > using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and > can hear the two files together. I don't know what you want more. Your driver support f

Re: [Cooker] Test sound please

2001-09-07 Thread Grégoire Colbert
Joal Heagney wrote: > What would be nice is if esd and/or artsd could be set up like a > sound-tee. Artsd/esd connect to the soundcard and serve arts/esound > calls. Additionally any calls to /dev/dsp are routed automatically to a > pipe in the sound server that acts like /dev/dsp. What would be

Re: [Cooker] Test sound please

2001-09-07 Thread Joal Heagney
guran wrote: > > Hi > > VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se) > /ChangeLog/1.568/Thu Sep 6 16:33:18 2001// > Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20010906 22:17 > > I had some murky experiences of sound, in this install. No sound at the start > of KDE, but that has come back, none still in FlightGear and none in

[Cooker] Test again, don't open

2001-09-07 Thread falcaraz
Prueba de nuevo, a ver si kmail lo agarra

[Cooker] Test, don't open

2001-09-07 Thread falcaraz
Prueba desde el webmin de la universidad

[Cooker] Test sound please

2001-09-06 Thread guran
Hi VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se) /ChangeLog/1.568/Thu Sep 6 16:33:18 2001// Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20010906 22:17 I had some murky experiences of sound, in this install. No sound at the start of KDE, but that has come back, none still in FlightGear and none in RealPlayer. I went to Mdk Co

[Cooker] Printer test page

2001-09-06 Thread Atha Kouroussis
Hi all, one quick question: Since the name of the distro has changed from Linux Mandrake to Mandrake Linux and almost everything has been modified to reflect this change, shouldn't the logo on the printer test page be changed too? Just a minor detail. Cheers, Atha

[Cooker] test, don't open

2001-09-04 Thread falcaraz

[Cooker] Test, don't open

2001-09-02 Thread Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Prueba desde Outlook en el Pentiu III

[Cooker] Test, don't open

2001-09-02 Thread Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Prueba desde Outlook, pero no creo que haga nada Francisco Alcaraz Ariza Departamento de Biología Vegetal Universidad de Murcia E-30100 Murcia (España) Correo electrónico trabajo: falcaraz@.um.es Correo electrónico de casa: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Cooker] Test don't open

2001-09-02 Thread falcaraz
Prueba

[Cooker] [TEST-REQUESTED] webmin supporting Mozilla browser & using Pam authentication

2001-08-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Hi, I did a few modifications to the Webmin package. - I patched the web server so that it should now be possible to use Mozilla and Galeon browsers ; - I changed the default config so that Pam authentication is used (only with installation -- when upgrading from an older Webmin, the users

Re: [Cooker] install - "could not open default font "fixed"" during X test

2001-08-29 Thread Fernando Monera
El Mar 28 Ago 2001 16:30, escribió: > On freshly synced cooker, hd install, 32MB RAM. I remember I had this > error once already a week or so ago. > > -andrej Check if you have enough free space on /tpm.

Re: [Cooker] install - "could not open default font "fixed"" during X test

2001-08-29 Thread François Pons
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't. It is Matrox Millenium and installer does not give me a choice > :-) It will allow soon the choice, with a new ldetect-lst package. François.

Re: [Cooker] install - "could not open default font "fixed"" duringX test

2001-08-28 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
On 28 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-1] François Pons wrote: > Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On freshly synced cooker, hd install, 32MB RAM. I remember I had this > > error once already a week or so ago. > > This seems to be a problem relative to XFree8-3.3.6, can you try (if possible)

Re: [Cooker] install - "could not open default font "fixed"" during X test

2001-08-28 Thread François Pons
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On freshly synced cooker, hd install, 32MB RAM. I remember I had this > error once already a week or so ago. This seems to be a problem relative to XFree8-3.3.6, can you try (if possible) 4.1 instead. We will try to find it out. François.

[Cooker] install - "could not open default font "fixed"" during X test

2001-08-28 Thread Borsenkow Andrej
On freshly synced cooker, hd install, 32MB RAM. I remember I had this error once already a week or so ago. -andrej

[Cooker] TEST - How often is mail returned by list?

2001-08-27 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hmm, let's see how often this mail is returned by the mailinglist. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread steve
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:18:44PM -0400, Terrible Tom wrote: > on 08/20/2001 07:54 PM, steve at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:07:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > > >> Sorry, > >> Blue-wishing emacs would leave off the excessive ccs to every address on the

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread steve
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:52:17PM -0400, Blue Lizard wrote: > Well I think the concept is rediculous. A user's own client should set > the word wrap to read at, as it is plain text. For instance, I send a > 288 char long line msg to myself. I open it in my client, where it > shows as four p

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Vox
During the bombing raid on Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:52:17 -0400, Blue Lizard was heard mumbling in fear: > Well I think the concept is rediculous. A user's own client should set > the word wrap to read at, as it is plain text. For instance, I send a Wrongso wrong that it's even part

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Blue Lizard
Well I think the concept is rediculous. A user's own client should set the word wrap to read at, as it is plain text. For instance, I send a 288 char long line msg to myself. I open it in my client, where it shows as four pretty even lines of 72 chars each. Kinda like word wrap in a sane e

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Terrible Tom
on 08/20/2001 07:54 PM, steve at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:07:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > >> Sorry, >> Blue-wishing emacs would leave off the excessive ccs to every address on the >> planet. > > > Maybe fix your word wrap to. ;) can I steal you're sig

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread steve
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 08:11:47PM -0400, Blue Lizard wrote: > steve wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:07:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>Sorry, > >>Blue-wishing emacs would leave off the excessive ccs to every address on the >planet. > >> > > > > > > Maybe fix your word

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Blue Lizard
steve wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:07:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Sorry, >>Blue-wishing emacs would leave off the excessive ccs to every address on the planet. >> > > > Maybe fix your word wrap to. ;) huh? > >

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread steve
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 07:07:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Sorry, > Blue-wishing emacs would leave off the excessive ccs to every address on the planet. Maybe fix your word wrap to. ;) -- Steve - Toronto ICQ 35454764

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread 00
Interesting. Well you are only one who has responded at all to the reports and you are quite involved in the writing of the installer or so I understand. I have not a machine to test it on but changelog has seen no fixes or changes at all in that area recently (since prob first noticed) so

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Pixel
Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hey pixy stick, before I forget, that printer config stuff screwing up > Packages db i keep attempting to tell you is NOT pack related as we all > knew it wasn't. I do believe it is something in the code there. what do you mean? as for me it's a rpmlib

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Blue Lizard
On 20 Aug 2001 01:35:26 +0200, Pixel wrote: > I've got some new code for writing fstab. And also some code to set the > default options and set some mount point. > > Would you test it? > In that case > - first save your fstab. > - save a formatted fstab that will help

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code]

2001-08-20 Thread Rolf Pedersen
> > wizcancel at /usr/lib/libDrakX/my_gtk.pm line 540. > which button did you press for getting a cancel? ah maybe a "delete_event"... > did you alt-f4 the window? you'd better quit with "Done" button. [re-posting; other seems to have got lost] Results using "Done": *** /tmp/fstab Mon Aug 2

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Rolf Pedersen
Pixel wrote: > > I've got some new code for writing fstab. And also some code to set the > default options and set some mount point. > > Would you test it? > In that case > - first save your fstab. > - save a formatted fstab that will help comparison > % perl -

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-20 Thread Pixel
Rolf Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 0 diffs and fstab not touched. Did I not do this correctly? [...] > wizcancel at /usr/lib/libDrakX/my_gtk.pm line 540. which button did you press for getting a cancel? ah maybe a "delete_event"... did you alt-f4 the window? you'd better quit with "D

Re: [Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-19 Thread Rolf Pedersen
Pixel wrote: > > I've got some new code for writing fstab. And also some code to set the > default options and set some mount point. > > Would you test it? > In that case > - first save your fstab. > - save a formatted fstab that will help comparison > % perl -

[Cooker] please test fstab munching code

2001-08-19 Thread Pixel
I've got some new code for writing fstab. And also some code to set the default options and set some mount point. Would you test it? In that case - first save your fstab. - save a formatted fstab that will help comparison % perl -e '@l = map { [ split ] } <>; @l = sort { $a->[

[Cooker] win4lin in test kernels?

2001-07-18 Thread SI Reasoning
It would be nice to have win4lin patch pre-installed in the test kernels. It provides a good way to begin an office transition towards linux. = SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-13 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Obviously the code for new features is gonna be in debug mode for a > > > little while (ie, not aimed at efficiency) but would you care for us to > > > break with the 'only fix what you're gonna ship' policy and do some > > > profiling or other perf d

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Walluck
72mdk and 73mdk both work for me, except that the progress indications seem to be broken (see my previous e-mail about what I think of the 'Invoking rpminst' and other progress indicators in MandrakeUpdate). However, this was only after my rpm database mysteriously corrupted itself (for the 99

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Polman
quot;rpmdrake does nothing" bug. I.e. packages are now correctly installed. > At least it works on my freshly installed cooker. > > I'm aware of other bugs. For instance, I know that the 'Easy Mandrake > Update' thing isn't finished yet. > > Please t

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Mike Graham
Marcel Pol wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I've been told that I should communicate more on >> > rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate > >>aka "Software Manager", so I do. >> >> I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which >> > s

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Blue Lizard
On 12 Jul 2001 22:00:30 +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) > > > > Obviously the code for new features is gonna be in debug mode for a > > little while (ie, not aimed at efficiency) but would you care

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Blue Lizard
> P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) > Obviously the code for new features is gonna be in debug mode for a little while (ie, not aimed at efficiency) but would you care for us to break with the 'only fix what you're gonna ship' policy and do some profiling or other perf drudgery

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Marcel Pol
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been told that I should communicate more on rpmdrake/mandrakeuupdate > aka "Software Manager", so I do. > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which should fix > the "rpmdrake does nothing" b

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Walluck
Marcel Pol wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am still waiting for rhis thing to hit the mirrors. Also, some packages from yesterday are not there yet, so it looks like I may have a while to wait. While we're waiting how about a feature requ

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Marcel Pol
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:30:57 +0200 David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 05:59:45PM +0200, Marcel Pol wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:04:59 +0200 > > David Odin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I've just uploaded a new release of rpmdrake (1.3-73mdk), which > > s

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Odin
ng" bug. I.e. packages are now correctly > installed. > > At least it works on my freshly installed cooker. > > It works here too > > > I'm aware of other bugs. For instance, I know that the 'Easy > Mandrake Update' > > thing isn't finish

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Odin
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 06:01:55PM -0400, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait David Odin : > > P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) > Do you prefer "this feature doesn't work :-) ?" > Sometimes, yes! I was refering to the "search by file" and "search by description" new fea

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Marcel Pol
stalled cooker. It works here too > I'm aware of other bugs. For instance, I know that the 'Easy Mandrake Update' > thing isn't finished yet. > > Please test and report bugs. Small bug; The rpminst window says: Fetch: blah.rpm Fetching... Installing... Where th

Re: [Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ainsi parlait David Odin : > P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) Do you prefer "this feature doesn't work :-) ?" -- Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG key http://bohm.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html

[Cooker] new rpmdrake to test

2001-07-12 Thread David Odin
alled. At least it works on my freshly installed cooker. I'm aware of other bugs. For instance, I know that the 'Easy Mandrake Update' thing isn't finished yet. Please test and report bugs. Regards, DindinX P.S: "this feature is slow" isn't a bug report ;-) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Cooker] test.

2001-07-11 Thread Brook Humphrey
-- ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- ~- Brook Humphrey -- Mobile PC Medic -- Cheney, Washington (USA) -~ ~- (509) 235-9107 -- http://www.webmedic.net -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~ ~- Holiness unto the Lord. He must increase but I must decrease.-~ ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-07 Thread Juan Quintela
On Friday 06 July 2001 07:10, you wrote: > Who speaks about "stable use" of cooker? > I think I have to make my intensions somewhat more clear: I started this thread because I suspected that the Cooker-team had made a decision - only to introduce the last kernel once a week. Here is my argume

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-06 Thread guran
On Friday 06 July 2001 00:23, you wrote: > It is the kind of explanation that you wanted? Thanks, I read kernel-traffic every weak and must have missed the full implications of Alan's remark. regards guran

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-06 Thread Juan Quintela
erimental, we don't enable it in the .config except if: * there is no other driver for the thing * it don't affect the rest of the system if you don't use it. - If something don't boot in my test machines (i.e. I know it is so buggy that only will boot/support very light l

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-06 Thread guran
On Friday 06 July 2001 07:10, you wrote: > Who speaks about "stable use" of cooker? > I think I have to make my intensions somewhat more clear: I started this thread because I suspected that the Cooker-team had made a decision - only to introduce the last kernel once a week. Here is my argume

RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
> > Anyways, cooker is cooker, and it could perfectly include the -ac > kernel a few > hours after release, but then do not send any mail claiming 'my disk was > toasted by latest mdk kernel' Eh? "Do not send bug reports"? What are you talking about? Cooker i

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread J . A . Magallon
tested for inclussion in the official kernel version. An -ac series kernel can be even unable to build due to some mistake in patch merging. I usually build my own kernels, and follow lkml, and many bugs appear in the next days of a kernel pre-release. For example, the latest -ac series has been a bunch

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Randy Kramer
Guillaume, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Sorry, I owe nothing to you, please go emit a judgment on someone else. You are absolutely right. Sorry! Randy Kramer

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote: > > > Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old > > insults that you wrote beginning this thread. > > > > "Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?" > > > >

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:21, you wrote: > Frankly, I by far prefer this kind of questions rather than plain old > insults that you wrote beginning this thread. > > "Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy?" > It was not my intention, to kick on a person, I wante

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Randy Kramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume, > > I know you have a sense of humor, based on this quote: > > "If you've ever had a chance to visit Mercury or asteroid Geographos, > here you'll find them looking exactly the same way, following exactly > the same path as when you've left

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > /me also notes the strange reluctance of mdk employees (synonymous with > 'people that are paid') to publicly upload the significant changes in > drakx that will (hopefully) be polished up nice and shiny for a super > duper 8.1 stability and 9.0 a

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Blue Lizard
just had to put my nonsensical 2 cents in. /me waits for chmouel to chime in since he's been with this project as kernel maintainer for much longer than even Juan. /me also notes some significant changes in the 246pre's. /me wonders why we seem to anticipate freeze all of the sudden. /me rememb

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread David Odin
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:22:36PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > "Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [...] > > > Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand > > you (meaning "who ever adds stuff to cooker") blindly remove library that > >

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Randy Kramer
Guillaume, I know you have a sense of humor, based on this quote: "If you've ever had a chance to visit Mercury or asteroid Geographos, here you'll find them looking exactly the same way, following exactly the same path as when you've left them." I know it's tough to keep. Is there a web page

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
Pixel wrote: > in fact, i'd say it depends mainly on maintainer... and on the size of the > package ;pp OK - I will have to buy into reality. regards guran

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Pixel
"Andrej Borsenkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single > > > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro. > > > > > > > If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me! > > > > Nobody says cooker is bad. But it

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
Andrej Borsenkow wrote: >Either it is cooker or not. That is a policy, even I can understand - more of that! regards guran

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > In case you didn't notice, I'm not a kernel packager. Well I'll gladly admit that I am ignorant. But the policy of waiting to introduce new kernels into Cooker must mean that someone have concluded that all future problems with Cooker is not related to problems alr

RE: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Andrej Borsenkow
> > > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single > > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro. > > > > If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me! > Nobody says cooker is bad. But it is very strange to see that one one hand you (meaning "who ever ad

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single > > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro. > > > > If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me! In case you didn't notice, I'm not

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > If you're not happy with what we're doing, without knowing the single > reason, you are welcomed to choose a more friendly distro. > If I am ignorant, will you please enlighten me! regards guran

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 05 July 2001 10:37, you wrote: > > Hi > > > > According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and > > Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel? > > Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan an

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
guran wrote: > > Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200: > > > Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy? > > > > What do you mean? > > Someone at Mandrake has earlier argued that he did not want to furnish > the new k

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
Alexander Skwar wrote: > > So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200: > > Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy? > > What do you mean? Someone at Mandrake has earlier argued that he did not want to furnish the new kernel because some experimental

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach guran am Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:53:14AM +0200: > Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy? What do you mean? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com |

Re: [Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
On Thursday 05 July 2001 10:37, you wrote: > Hi > > According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and > Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel? Who is God at Mandrake to censor Linus and Alan and what is the policy? regards guran

[Cooker] No need to test on old kernel

2001-07-05 Thread guran
Hi According to alan Cox there are fs pb's in kernels lower than ac24 and Cooker is at ac18. Has anyone tested for urpmi problems on a new kernel? regards guran

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-17 Thread Yves Duret
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:20:25AM -0600, J.P.Pasnak wrote: > ls -l /dev/dvd > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 10 May 12 22:33 /dev/dvd -> /dev/cdrom > ls -l /dev/cdrom > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Apr 22 16:07 /dev/cdrom -> scd0 > ls -l /dev/scd0 > brw-rw1 pasna

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-17 Thread Arnd Bergmann
Do you have only 4MB of video memory? Your display takes up already 3145728 Bytes, which does not leave enough memory for a PAL-sized DVD overlay. Try reducing the screen resolution and/or color depth. Arnd <>< On Thu, 17 May 2001, Bruce F. Press wrote: > I get the following error with the curr

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-17 Thread J.P.Pasnak
On May 17, 2001 03:18 am, you wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:46:17PM -0600, J.P.Pasnak wrote: > > I get the following error with the mdk-build when I attempt to open a > > disc: > > > > input error: no suitable input module for `dvd:/dev/dvd' > > you need write acces to the device dor descram

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-17 Thread Bruce F. Press
I get the following error with the current 05/16/2001 Mandrake Cooker, VideoLAN Client - version 0.2.73 Ourumov - (C)1996-2001 VideoLAN module error: failed calling init in builtin module intf: interface initialized vout error: didn't find a suitable Xvideo image input port. vout error: video in

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-17 Thread Yves Duret
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:21:38AM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote: > Works OK on my system (PII-400, 380MB RAM, Matrox G400-32, CTX 17 inch > monitor). I used it from KDE and it failed because arts was running and it > was looking for esound... [..] > ###

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-17 Thread Yves Duret
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:46:17PM -0600, J.P.Pasnak wrote: > I get the following error with the mdk-build when I attempt to open a disc: > > input error: no suitable input module for `dvd:/dev/dvd' you need write acces to the device dor descrambling. can you give : ls -l /dev/dvd ls -l /dev/lin

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-16 Thread J.P.Pasnak
ss to have the deCSS working. > > I need more testing on it and on the ppc version (i can't test it), so let > me know how it works.. > yves I get the following error with the mdk-build when I attempt to open a disc: input error: no suitable input module for `dvd:/dev/dvd' It

Re: [Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Ruskin
tall vlc-css to have the deCSS working. > > I need more testing on it and on the ppc version (i can't test it), so let > me know how it works.. > yves Works OK on my system (PII-400, 380MB RAM, Matrox G400-32, CTX 17 inch monitor). I used it from KDE and it failed because arts was r

[Cooker] test videolan

2001-05-16 Thread Yves Duret
e ppc version (i can't test it), so let me know how it works.. yves -- Yves Duret [EMAIL PROTECTED] il pinge via RFC 1149. #linuxfr

Re: [Cooker] rpmlint incomplete binaries test

2001-05-16 Thread Frederic Lepied
r/games/bin (and maybe also in other directories). > > > My first spec followed the install script to put the binary in /usr/bin, > > > and rpmlint sent a warning as it was setgid. Then i moved it to > > > /usr/share/bin, and the warning disappeared... > > > > Are

Re: [Cooker] rpmlint incomplete binaries test

2001-05-16 Thread Guillaume Rousse
ed the install script to put the binary in /usr/bin, > > and rpmlint sent a warning as it was setgid. Then i moved it to > > /usr/share/bin, and the warning disappeared... > > Are you sure ? With the following spec I got the warning: > > E: test arch-dependent-file-in-usr-sh

Re: [Cooker] rpmlint incomplete binaries test

2001-05-16 Thread Frederic Lepied
llowed the install script to put the binary in /usr/bin, and > rpmlint sent a warning as it was setgid. Then i moved it to /usr/share/bin, > and the warning disappeared... Are you sure ? With the following spec I got the warning: E: test arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/bin/a.o

[Cooker] rpmlint incomplete binaries test

2001-05-16 Thread Guillaume Rousse
I just packaged dopewars, a great non-politically-correct games, and found that rpmlint make extensive check against binaries in /usr/bin, but not in /usr/games/bin (and maybe also in other directories). My first spec followed the install script to put the binary in /usr/bin, and rpmlint sent a

[Cooker] [Jeff Johnson ] Test release of rpm-4.0.3, "Maximum RPM" online

2001-04-20 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
FYI Several short notes: 1) There's a version of rpm-4.0.3 with several important fixes for 1) --relocate/--prefix relocation problems 2) parameterized macros segfault 3) db1 in rpm-4.0.2 segfaults with corrupted data. at ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/test-

[Cooker] test

2001-04-10 Thread michael
Tue Apr 10 01:38:38 2001

Re: [Cooker] test!

2001-03-24 Thread Claudio
On Saturday 24 March 2001 12:24, you wrote: > And the results -- yes I do get back copies of what I post to the list. > > Randy Kramer wrote: > > Claudio, > > > > This one did, and I'm quite certain I've seen others. > > > > Consider this my tes

Re: [Cooker] test!

2001-03-24 Thread Randy Kramer
And the results -- yes I do get back copies of what I post to the list. Randy Kramer wrote: > > Claudio, > > This one did, and I'm quite certain I've seen others. > > Consider this my test -- some of the mailing lists I work with do not > send back a copy of wha

Re: [Cooker] test!

2001-03-24 Thread Ralph
Looks Like it got here to me!!! :-) - Original Message - From: "Claudio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 4:45 PM Subject: [Cooker] test! > WHY DO MY MAILS NEVER ARRIVE TO THE MAILING LIST!?!?!?! > :°°°(

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >