address. I don't have a .courier-
default file, nor do I send emails through /usr/bin/preline in the
.courier-xxx files.
As far as the backscatter bounce is concerned, it's probably a local
delivery problem. Check your mail log prior to the entry you quote and
see if you can determine the reaso
e at all conversant in python, Gordon Messmer
has done an excellent job with this package, its API, and with the
documentation for it. I've written a couple of modules for it and
expanded on others, and it's one of the reasons I'll probably stick
with Courier as long as I run
On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 15:44 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 12/28/2016 02:07 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > This generally removes any dependency on DNS for resolving
> "localhost".
>
> Courier uses DNS for everything that comes to mind. Modifying
> /etc/hos
-
> > -
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > ___
> > courier-users mailing list
> > courier-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Unsubscribe: http
.
I also use Monit, although not to monitor the status of lo. I would
look, for the source of this phenomenon, to the configuration stanza in
/etc/monit/monitrc (or one of the config subfolders of /etc/monit).
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP
e may (probably) be faster ways to
do this using simple list index value arithmetic.
I HATE spammers!
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andreas Bogk
http://www.fmp.com|
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 10:29 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 02:11 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >
> > Gordon, take a look at this code and if you have any suggestions
> > please
> > post them.
>
> Do you have a sample of the messages this targets?
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 10:29 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/22/2016 02:11 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >
> > Gordon, take a look at this code and if you have any suggestions
> > please
> > post them.
>
> Do you have a sample of the messages this target
I've been receiving a steady stream of spam with the following body
format:
[3 centered images, referenced by URLs]
[A short line of random characters, or sometimes a
which says simply that the address is
valid, and I let my MUA do the filtering.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 |
t description of a POP or IMAP daemon,
so I changed the wording to be more specific.
Is this technically correct, and is "must" appropriate?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "We have met the enemy and he is us."
FMP Computer Services |
512-259-1190 | -- Pogo
http://www.fm
le
management utility which should make faithful reproductions of file
system structures. It doesn't know a maildir from a website or a python
library.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Behold! Our way lies through a
FMP Computer Services |dark wood whence in which
512-259-1190
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 08:47 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 08:41 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >
> > I don't think this is quite correct either. rsync operates at a file
> > level and should NOT move messages from new to cur. The distinction
On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 08:41 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I don't think this is quite correct either. rsync operates at a file
> level and should NOT move messages from new to cur. The distinction
> should specify that a "mail retrieval agent" operating directly on a
. The distinction
should specify that a "mail retrieval agent" operating directly on a
Maildir MUST (not MAY) move files from new to cur. This includes a MUA
operating on a _local_ Maildir, as well as a daemon such as impad or
pop3d, all of which provide a message level interface in the ma
agent" in that paragraph
is a link to a Wikipedia article which is pretty specific that the term
refers to an "email client" or "email reader".
I think my assumption is a safe one. Thanks.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it
er that a particular mailbox hasn't been checked since 2014, or
whenever. If management of the internal details of the maildir
structure is somehow the MUA's responsibility, then it's certainly
possible that a mailbox is in active use and is being accessed by an
ill-behaved MUA whic
ythonfilter-modules.conf file.
Caching NS lookups would definitely speed things up. How would you
suggest that this be done?
Thanks for your comments :)
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Comp
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 12:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 08:00 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > Gordon, your thoughts?
>
> The one thing that consistently seems to be missing from your analyses
> is a review of legitimate mail.
>
> name-services.com ap
ifying spam, since this seems to
be a rather limited pool of servers, probably associated with the
practice of domain name tasting.
Gordon, your thoughts?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends.&quo
it and the go-to person on issues. He's on this
list.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Never expect the people who caused a problem
FMP Computer Services | to solve it." - Albert Einstein
512-259-1190
On Sun, 2015-06-07 at 16:53 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/07/2015 11:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On 06/07/2015 10:44 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >> Does such a whitelist spec take precedence over a hit from one of the
> >> specified BLACKLISTS in the esm
recedence over a hit from one of the
specified BLACKLISTS in the esmtpd config file? If not, is there any
way to override a BLACKLIST hit for single IP addresses?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Never expect the people who caused a problem
FMP Computer Services | to solve it."
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 17:30 +0200, Szépe Viktor wrote:
> Could it be that I am looking for whitelist_block.py?
>
> 192.168.2.3 allow,BLOCK
That's what I use. Works like a champ!
Just make sure you put it ahead of other filters
in /etc/pythonfilter.conf. This is the default
efit ratio of any part of their operating paradigm goes
negative, they change it, and we'll need to put the tinker-toys together
on the filtering end in a different way.
Gordon, I have some questions about your observations and critiques of
my script but I
those
> domains it would have seen).
>
> So... are those anti-open source ninjas? ;)
> https://xkcd.com/225/
I sent an email to my Gmail account containing the forbidden .TLDs and
didn't get a warning. Maybe the list .
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly
gle has gotten a bit squirrely and less effective in
their spam rejection algorithms.
If Jon Postel were alive today he'd be turning over in his grave.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Behold! Our way lies through a
FMP Computer Services |dark wood when
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 19:32 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 15:28 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > > On 05/20/2015 11:51 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > > > Has something happened to Gordon Messmer?
> > &
andling the sale of names using these
TLDs are allowing domain tasting. Spamming operations can get them for
free, use them for a few days, and then abandon them before they have to
pay for them.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | choos
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 15:28 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/20/2015 11:51 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > Has something happened to Gordon Messmer?
>
> Nope. I'm fine, though somewhat busier than normal. And also working
> on a recent significant spike in the amo
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 16:19 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 23:01 +0200, Szépe Viktor wrote:
> > Someone could take over this pip package I've uploaded:
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/courier-pythonfilter
>
> That's perhaps premature unt
mewhere. The courier-pythonfilter package
at python.org to which you link is v1.8. Gordon's latest version, to
the best of my knowledge, is v1.10 and I have the tarball from
dragonsdawn.net here.
>
> Idézem/Quoting Lindsay Haisley :
>
> > Has something happened to Gordon Messmer? His
updates to courier-pythonfilter are, to the best of my
knowledge, only available directly from his web server.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andreas Bog
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 16:29 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 08:32 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > Gordon, there's a bug in your network-aware logic in ratelimit.py in
> > courier-pythonfilter 1.9.
> >
> > sender = sender[:sender.rindex('.&#x
nd it's proving to be VERY effective :)
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andreas Bogk
http://www.fmp.com|
If the connection count is higher than the maxConnections setting,
# return a soft failure.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Real programmers use butterflies"
FMP Computer Services |
512-259-1190 | - xkcd
http://www.fmp.com|
s; (domain-literal)
... as requrired by ratelimit.py 1.9?
It would be good to know if perhaps Gordon and I are looking at
different courier behaviors before I make further suggestions about his
code. As courier is configured here, ratelimit.py requires patching to
be network aware, but this may
On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 12:03 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I'm using pythonfilter modules whitelist_relayclients, spamassassin and
> ratelimit for a server installation of courier. If I whitelist IP
> address ranges using webadmin in Inbound ESMTP under "Manual netblock
> b
atelimiting, or do I need to tag these addresses with RELAYCLIENT as
well to exempt them?
I'd rather not do this, since there's no reason to allow them to relay
off of our server, but I want them exempted from the ratelimit and
spamassassin modules.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX
Two more bugs:
Typical returns from getSendersMta() here are:
for a v4 address:
"dns; mmjgroup.beckerhairclinic.com (mmjgroup.beckerhairclinic.com
[:::66.23.216.62])"
for a v6 address:
"dns; mitra.fmp.com ([::1])"
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 10:53 -0500, L
if _senders.has_key(now - i) and _senders[now -
i].has_key(senderID):
+connections = connections + _senders[now - i][senderID]
# If the connection count is higher than the maxConnections setting,
# return a soft failure.
--
Lindsay Haisley | &quo
entifier other than that to which the
original return from getSendersMta is assigned.
Thanks for giving attention to the network ratelimit issue.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Comput
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:21 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:47 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >> On 03/16/2015 10:30 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >>> I whitelisted this IP
> >>> address in /etc/courier/smtpaccess/webadmin using the C
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 18:43 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > ::::::::0001 allow,BLOCK,RELAYCLIENT
>
> Are you sure about the leading ":"?
OK. I read the doc. You're right. Thanks.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is use
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:21 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 10:08 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:47 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >> On 03/16/2015 10:30 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >>> I whitelisted this IP
> >>> a
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 09:47 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/16/2015 10:30 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > I whitelisted this IP
> > address in /etc/courier/smtpaccess/webadmin using the Courier web UI,
> ...
> > Is this a bug in whitelist_relayclients?
>
> Pr
s this a bug in whitelist_relayclients? It works as expected for IPv4
addresses.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andrea
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:00 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
On line 64 of the code
> _pat6 = re.compile('((:?[0-9a-f]{0,4}:{,1}){%s})' % (range6,))
"{%s}" should probably be "{,%s}" to avoid throwing an AttributeError
exception in the case that something such as
:
[ratelimit.py]
maxConnections = 60
interval = 1
sendersPurgeInterval = 60 * 60 * 12
# Limit rate for all addresses in a /24 address group for IPv4 and a /64 group
for IPv6
use_groups = True
# If use_groups = True, ratelimit on a /48 group instead of a /64 group
v6_groupsize48 = True
I hope
p scripting I'd
done, so I switched back.
These days I'm using the Courier package distributed with Ubuntu Server,
which is built with IPv6 capabilities, although it doesn't handle any
inbound email with v6 addresses other than v4-mapped v6 addresses, as
noted in your post.
--
r
one. For a v6 addresses Gordon tells me that the standard allocation is
a /48 group, so I'll start with this.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
5
commonly used by spammers in v4 addresses to
defeat rate limiting. I would guess that it's a /64 address group, but
that's only a guess.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190
e out a /64 or even a /48 for the asking. We don't
publish any MX's tied to records so we don't see any IPv6 spam, but
I assume it exists.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190
he code would be simpler and run faster without
relying on it.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 |
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 13:12 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 03/13/2015 08:58 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >
> > I will welcome any corrections, improvements or comments on this code.
>
> 1: I'm pretty sure the patch can be made much smaller by simply changing
> &q
has_key(sender):
+connections += _senders[now - i][sender][0]
+
# If the connection count is higher than the maxConnections setting,
# return a soft failure.
if connections > maxConnections:
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-
ecedence?
We could probably do with a bit more explanation in
<https://pypi.python.org/pypi/courier-pythonfilter> (and in the package
README) regarding the necessary setup for using pythonfilter to
prefilter email using spamassassin.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it
Tor-connected browser. The same
issues apply for email, in different ways.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 |
assignment of port 465 to smtps is labeled a "legacy" assignment in some
documents, and in other places it's labeled as having been deprecated and the
port reassigned.
Any guidance will be appreciated!
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Compu
sing a bind-like zone file setup) otherwise your name server will add
the default domain after the MX target.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andreas Bogk
http://www.fmp
Does there exist a python library for parsing courier's log files?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Everything works if you let it"
FMP Computer Services |
512-259-1190 | --- The Roadie
htt
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 16:42 -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 10/24/2014 3:51 PM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > I'm dealing with some issues regarding migration of mailing lists and
> > would like to know if there's a quick way to set a custom 500 class
> > block for a s
error
after "rcpt to" something like:
550 Mailing list out of service for maintenance. Please
try again later.
I can usually figure this stuff out but I'm strapped for time and
thought maybe Sam or someone could shoot me a quick 'n easy solution.
--
Lindsay Haisley
for 192.168.0.0/22 is going to get replicated as four entries:
> 192.168.0.*, 192.168.1.*, 192.168.2.* and 192.168.3.*.
So under what circumstances would this differ from the range definition
as definded by the CIDR notation?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it jus
Bad Idea. Redacting
the problem IP address would make more sense, IMHO.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andreas Bogk
nother?
I would assume, since the whole directory is processed into a
single .dat file with makesmtpaccess, that the same rule applies
regardless of which file a directive may be found in.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its fr
On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 20:55 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 09:00 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > > kb2...@kb2ear.net writes:
> > >
> > > > With the recent DMARC implementation from AOL and Yahoo I ha
> meant to be temporary solutions, but are probably going to stay around
> until the problem persists. Let me replay your footer.
>
> Ale
> --
> "Never expect the people who caused a problem to solve it."
> - Albert Einstein
Th
On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 11:24 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Sun 25/May/2014 02:55:45 +0200 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Lindsay Haisley writes:
> >> On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 09:00 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >>> kb2...@kb2ear.net writes:
> >>>
> &
asco.
The DMARC problem implies information loss, contrary to the spirit and
in some cases the letter of applicable mail RFCs. When and how this
information loss occurs is up to ML software designers and list
administrators.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Never expect the people who cause
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 14:51 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > So it looks as if the issue here is that courier is using only SSL/TLS
> > v2 or v3. If I spec TLS v1 to couriertls I get, with no errors:
> >
> > # TLS_VERIFYPEER=NONE TLS_
Thanks. I'm CCing this to the system administrator at nv.net.
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 20:48 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Sun, 04 May 2014 13:05:30 -0500 Lindsay Haisley
> wrote:
> > I'd like to configure courier to use TLS1 as a fallback in cases such
> > as this.
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 09:13 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > Would the verify errors be playing into this problem?
>
> No, the verify errors are to be expected.
>
> > This is beyond being a courier issue, so it's probably not appropri
rors be playing into this problem?
This is beyond being a courier issue, so it's probably not appropriate
for this list, but it is a mail issue and rather a puzzle. Thanks for
your insights.
My guess is that patches to OpenSSL which have come into play to address
the Heartbleed bug may be contr
mail to mx.nv.net from a system running OpenSSL
0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 has no problem connecting and completing an
ESMTP session with STARTTLS. The other client box doesn't have
couriertls on it so I can't try to pull the information on the cert from
there, unless there's another tool wit
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 18:11 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > Just recently, as in the past few days, I'm seeing failures from
> > Courier's outbound SMTP which report in the mail logs as:
> >
> > Ma
blem in
Courier, at the expense of email security.
Does anyone have any insight on this problem?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andrea
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 18:45 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Lindsay Haisley writes:
>
> > I've had some very strange problems related to mail and name service
> > subsequent to an update from Ubuntu's 3.2.0-58-generic x86_64 kernel to
> > the 3.2.0-59 and am try
a VPN IF and also via the localhost
IF on the box unless I had an explicit IPv4 interface ACL in the bind9
config. This was NOT an issue under previous Linux kernels.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190
ed, which is also fairly easy, in which case the black listing
disappears. I've seen this happen to some major ISPs, and it's usually
fixed within a day or so.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-
not be
your problem, but if you're not sure how TCPDOPTS is set in the esmtpd
and imapd config files it might be worth checking.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services
ake the time to go through the
proper procedure to unsubscribe from an opt-in list.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 17:58 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 28.08.13 10:52, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >None of FMP's customers have dedicated MSPs, to the best of my
> >knowledge. That's their concern. All ISPs provide SMTP service. If
> >people want
ll ISPs provide SMTP service. If
people want SMTP from FMP Computer Services then it's available, but
it's not provided by default.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends.&quo
On Mon, 2013-08-26 at 08:44 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 23.08.13 16:00, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> >As a rule, I don't provide SMTP services to any FMP customers by
> >default. Since FMP is an IPP, not an ISP, I encourage users to use the
> >SMTP servi
On Sat, 2013-08-24 at 17:06 +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Fri 23/Aug/2013 23:00:01 +0200 Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > As a rule, I don't provide SMTP services to any FMP customers by
> > default. Since FMP is an IPP, not an ISP, I encourage users to use the
> >
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 16:00 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> > Do you mean you wouldn't have conceded the relay auth flag to that user
> > of yours? Based on what, if you don't mind my asking? You may be able
> > to estimate who is more likely to catch a key-logger, bu
er limit as a backstop. It shouldn't be difficult to program at
all. If smtp.example.com gets more than X hits in a 24 hour period to
send mail, the auth_smtp flag gets set to a value which disallows SMTP
use and sends me and the account owner an email stating what happened.
When the 24 hour per
rtunately, courier logs the user IDs for authenticated SMTP access,
and places the same information in the Received header added by the SMTP
server.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Behold! Our way lies through a
FMP Computer Services |dark wood whence in which
512-259-1190 |
that ldap.h ring any bells?
>
> Nick
>
> Nick Ellson - from iPhone (forgive typos)
> CCIE #20018
> Network Hobbyist
> "Educating Layer 8, one user at a time."
>
> On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:28 AM,
me what the imapd daemon did not like? (mail.log and
> messages.log did not have it, while mail.log does have all the courier
> smtpd stuff it seems.
>
You may find some help at
<http://www.courier-mta.org/authlib/README.authdebug.html>
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UN
e misbegotten efforts to stop it), viruses and
trojans, and the incredible expansion of the Internet over the last 20
years, the fact that email services still survive at all is a tribute to
the genius and foresight of the people who developed and published the
protocols on which it's based.
--
ably
> > won't be doing this too much longer.
>
> My own folks are retired, too. They're enjoying it immensely. Mark my words,
> you'll get to enjoy it too.
These days, in the US, we can't afford to retire. FMP Computer Services
marches on!
--
Lindsay Hais
xibility and security of the old, mature mail protocols. I probably
won't be doing this too much longer.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is user-friendly, it just
FMP Computer Services | chooses its friends."
512-259-1190 | -- Andreas Bogk
http://www.fmp.co
n supporting
program structures to manage things the way I want them done.
--
Lindsay Haisley | "Never expect the people who caused a problem
FMP Computer Services | to solve it." - Albert Einstein
512-259-1190 |
http://www.fmp.com|
--
ute, where routing decisions are based on
the transport layer (TCP/UDP/ICMP) rather than the internet layer. ICMP
ping packets will take one route, whereas TCP and UDP packets will take
another, so a ping will work, but a connection using another transport
protocol will fail. This is probably temp
ut of my mind in the wake of all the
gigo traffic that goes through my brain ;)
--
Lindsay Haisley | "We have met the enemy and he is us."
FMP Computer Services |
512-259-1190 | -- Pogo
http://www.fmp.com|
--
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 14:43 -0700, Claus Assmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2013, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
>
> > .courier-abcdefines mail processing for a...@example.com
>
> > AFAIK, there is nothing special about a "." in the personal part of
> an
> > em
xample.com
.courier-a.b "RCPT TO failed: User
unknown"
.courier-foo.bar [same as previous failure]
AFAIK, there is nothing special about a "." in the personal part of an
email address, so why is Courier unable to detect it?
--
Lindsay Haisley | "UNIX is
I missing something?
The courier installation here is v0.66.1
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 13:19 -0500, Lindsay Haisley wrote:
> I have a .courier-postmaster file in the alias directory for my domain
> name which handles mail to postmaster at my domain. This works as
> expected if the .courie
1 - 100 of 369 matches
Mail list logo
