Re: cannot understand why dependency test fails

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > Hello > > In the following report: > http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2289062 > > Test fails because of a problem: > > [MSG] [Wed Sep 24 11:48:02 2008] Sending test report for 'Tree-DAG_Node-1.06' > [MSG] [Wed

Re: The CPAN Testers Nagbot is going live

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 10:17:36AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > After watching nag emails sent to me and tweaking things for the last > day or so, I fired up the nagbot for real. > > The "cooldown" period is a week -- after receiving a nag email, you > shouldn't get another one for a week. > > If

Patch to capture build, test and install output for CPAN Tester reporting

Hi, Please find attached a patch that addresses the issues raised in RT #9793 regarding the absense of build and test output in CPAN Tester reports. I test exclusively on CPANPLUS and with the wide adoption of Module::Build, I am starting to be pestered daily by CPAN authors for more informati

Somehow I don't think the dev CPANPLUS is doing the right thing

The subject line pretty much sums it up. CPANPLUS-0.85_04 I have been testing against one of Andreas' CPAN test distributions the stuff I have been doing with CPANPLUS::Dist::Build and noticed that it was generating UNKNOWNs. It only occurred me just now, that these surely should be FAILs, no.

Re: Somehow I don't think the dev CPANPLUS is doing the right thing

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:05:59PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Depends. In the dev version of CPANPLUS, Build.PL or Build failures > were changed to be UNKNOWN. Only failures during "Build test" should > be FAIL. > > That was an intentional change to help module authors distinguish > between te

Re: howto avoid CPANPLUS

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Dmitry Karasik wrote: > > Both CPAN and CPANPLUS manipulate PERL5LIB for non-install testing. > > > > So you may actually be better off just avoiding automated testing entirely: > > > > exit if $ENV{AUTOMATED_TESTING} > > That's an overkill, I think. I

Announcement: CPANPLUS-YACSmoke-0.14

Hi, CPANPLUS-YACSmoke-0.14 should be hitting the CPAN mirrors as we speak. The one major change is in CPANPLUS::Dist::YACSmoke It now filters for cases where the report is not graded as a PASS and it appears that a prereq has been excluded for whatever reason. If so the report will be discarded

For those smoking with CPANPLUS

Hi, For those amongst us who are smoke testing using CPANPLUS, I have rolled up a 'fixed' version of CPANPLUS-Dist-Build available at the following link: http://gumbynet.org.uk/smoke/CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.06_02.tar.gz This is straight from the svn repository[1] with my patch applied to resolve

Re: Devel::CheckOS support for MirOS BSD

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:35:39AM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > Before I upload it to the CPAN, could I ask if someone using MirOS BSD > could check that this release candidate detects it correctly? > > http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/private/Devel-CheckOS-1.44.tar.gz > > It should detect it a

Re: What do other cpan testers do with these testing problems?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 03:29:48PM +0100, Martin J. Evans wrote: > I've only been smoking with CPAN::Reporter::Smoker for around a week now > and I am repeatedly coming across the same problems. What do other > testers do with these issues: > > 2. Modules which prompt for things >e.g. DBD::P

Re: What do other cpan testers do with these testing problems?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:15:14PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:03:43PM +0100, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 03:29:48PM +0100, Martin J. Evans wrote: > > > 5. Loads of modules seem to use LWP but not support $u

Re: Do not test .ppm files

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:41:45AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Here's a suggested amended version, avoiding ppm and giving front and > back anchoring. Also case insensitive, just in case someone uploads a > .ZIP file or something like that. > > qr{\.(?:tar\.(?:bz2|gz|Z)|t(?:gz|bz)|(? > It a

Re: Do not test .ppm files

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 07:30:48PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:23:39PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > I get your point about the painful upgrade cycle, but the control > > point is CPAN/CPANPLUS. My view is that tools should follow whatever > > they do. Since CPAN supports b

Re: Indicate taint mode in cpantester reports

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:36:53PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > One issue is that taint can be a per-test-file setting from the > shebang line in a *.t file. This is what occurred to me at four o'clock in the morning as the baby was screaming next door. It is perhaps something that Test::Harnes

My smokers are all offline

As the perl.org mx won't accept my test reports: http://use.perl.org/~BinGOs/journal/37667 all my smokers are offline. Cheers, -- Chris Williams aka BinGOs PGP ID 0x4658671F http://www.gumbynet.org.uk == pgpacqVL7UdNN.pgp Description: PGP signature

The smoking machinery is clunking again ( was: My smokers are all offline )

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:50:22PM +0100, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote: > As the perl.org mx won't accept my test reports: > > http://use.perl.org/~BinGOs/journal/37667 > > all my smokers are offline. The perl.org admins have killed my rampant stale connection

Re: Problem Smoking CPAN using CPANPLUS::YACSmoke

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 06:49:06PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm getting the following problem: > > http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/code/smoking-C-A-S-Tangram.txt > > when running > > {{{ > ~/apps/perl-5.10.0/bin/perl -MCPANPLUS::YACSmoke -e > 'CPANPLUS::YACSmoke::test("B/

Re: CPAN Testers Report Errors

On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 09:58:45AM +0100, Vincent Pit wrote: > > Since all testing is automatic, I unfortunately don't know which reports > are misformed (or else I wouldn't let them being sent). > I got the nag from Barbie too. I examined the reports and worked out it was http://search.cpan.org

Re: appropriate format for PASS/FAIL reports

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:12:48AM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:34 AM, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't forget about people who use NNTP to read 'em. If anyone does. > > The perl.org NOCwookies may be able to tell from the logfiles. > > Well, my nagbot

Re: appropriate format for PASS/FAIL reports

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 08:33:31PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The GumbyNET bot is accessing reports live from the NNTP, parsing and > > announcing them on the #cpanteste

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Report

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:10:25AM +0100, Lorenz Domke wrote: > Hello CPAN tester, > > thank you for your test report. I am not sure what causes the failure. > On other machines the module builds without problem and tests are ok. I > suppose that > the version number of the requested Tk is respon

Re: Initial setup - basically how to get started, workflows, etc.

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 06:37:30AM +0100, Ulrich Habel wrote: > Hi, Hi, Thanks for participating! I'm not that familiar with CPAN::Reporter based smoke testing ( someone else who is bound to respond soon ), but I do have a couple of hints. > > I just set up my toolchain as described in: > >

Re: Math::StochasticProcess 0.03

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 09:53:56PM -, The Abbot wrote: > Dear Oliver, David, "Bingos" and "Srezic", > > I note with interest the recent failed test reports. I would appreciate your > help in verifying the attached fix. > > http://www.cpantesters.org/show/Math-StochasticProcess.html#Math-Sto

Re: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/02/msg3204508.html - Please fix your testing setup

On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:20:08AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi! > > You recently tried to smoke Games-Solitaire-Verify: > > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/2009/02/msg3204508.html > > The problem is that: > > {{{ > [ERROR] [Wed Feb 4 22:15:10 2009] No such module 'perl' fou

Re: distroprefs, skip file -newbie questions

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:09:15AM -0800, Mike wrote: > > Thanks, this is very helpful- the default, the setting, an example file. How > does that translate for CPANPLUS? > CPANPLUS itself doesn't have the equivalent of 'distprefs'. If you use CPAN(PLUS)::YACSmoke there is a documented mechan

Re: distroprefs, skip file -newbie questions

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 01:52:15PM -0800, Mike wrote: > > I see the documented method, but what I do not see is the default location of > the INI file. In one place, it is said that CPANPLUS config is used, so I am > confused. > > Yeah, the location where CPANPLUS stores it's configuration f

Re: Your W3C-LinkChecker test reports

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:15:21AM +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > Hi bingos, > Howdy. > Thanks for running the CPAN automated tests. However, I have a question > regarding your numerous failure reports on W3C-LinkChecker 4.4: > > All the failure reports from you fail in the test suite with "Can

Re: did this go out to the list? http://www.mail-archive.com/cpan-testers-discuss%40perl.org/msg01131.html

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:51:48AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:27 AM, M W487 wrote: > > > Why do I have a huge PATH, that seems to grow without end if I only run the > > smoker??? (Occasionally, I go into CPAN by hand, and install a module just > > to > > clean out the

Re: did this go out to the list? http://www.mail-archive.com/cpan-testers-discuss%40perl.org/msg01131.html

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:50:00AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams > wrote: > > POE::Component::SmokeBox::Backend and > > POE::Component::SmokeBox::Backend::CPAN::Reporter > > do the heavy lifting via POE:

Re: Feedback wanted on new CPAN::Testers::Client configuration mechanism

Hi, Just some quick comments: Regarding the PoCos (namely the POE::Component::CPAN* modules and POE::Component::SmokeBox) - They don't care about the configuration data of the smoke framework that they are testing - They live in a separate perl installation to the one being tested The pocos

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Smoke In A Box

Hi, Gabor's recent question regarding testing say a system perl without having to install the smoking toolchain sent me off thinking. I had an epiphany last night. The CPANPLUS distribution comes with a tool called 'cpanp-boxed' and bundled versions of modules that it needs to boot-strap itsel

Re: Problems setting up a new smoker machine

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:48:30PM +0100, Martin J. Evans wrote: > > ### NOTE ## > > Some of these tests assume you are connected to the > internet. If you are not, or if certain protocols or hosts > are blocked and/or firewalled, these tests could

Re: FW: CPAN testers missing make test output

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:44:11AM +0100, Barbie wrote: > Matt just sent this to me, and I think it might be something to be aware > of if you use a CPANPLUS based smnoker... > > - Start forwarded message - > > Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:40:11 +0100 > From: Matt S Trout > To: Bar

Re: FW: CPAN testers missing make test output

Ah, Jos had already applied it. http://trac.dwim.org/OSS/changeset/2648 Note to self, always rebase after fetch. Cheers, -- Chris Williams aka BinGOs PGP ID 0x4658671F http://www.gumbynet.org.uk == pgpB5UHtEa5aC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Should I ignore "No requirements found"?

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:13:10PM +0200, Ingo Lantschner wrote: > Hi, > I am getting many reports about failed tests of my module Backup- > SingleFile 0.02. The test fail because the testing system could not > find SUPER.pm in @INC. Especially linux-systems fail. I also note this > part in th

Re: how do I get rid of yaml and such built up cruft, from time to time, during automated testing

On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 06:29:42AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > In your CPAN config settings, set build_cache and scan_cache. > > In CPAN::Reporter::Smoker, I flush the cache manually as well every so > many distributions. perhaps minismoke box does not? minismokebox, or rather POE::Component

Re: I see only two CPAN-Testers reports on the server from the many I have sent - what is wrong?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:56:20AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM, David Cantrell > wrote: > >> * Is there any way too access any regularly updated feed of > >> ?? tester results? > > > > There's the NNTP archive. ??Not sure if you can actually speak NNTP to it > >

Re: Missing MIME header in testers report

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:16:03PM -0800, Robert Spier wrote: > Why do you have test reports bigger than 100k? > > -R More often than not because a CPAN authors does not specify a prereq that they need and when it comes to run the test suite, perl helpfully spews out that Such and Such module ca

Re: C library installation request

On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 07:25:36PM -0800, cr...@animalhead.com wrote: > Hello CPAN testers, > Helo. > The mm library, which is a non-CPAN prerequisite for IPC::MMA, is > quite easy to download and install from http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/mm/ > Added so far to: alphaserver Debian Linux usin

Re: Should I be reporting some of these modules I am adding to my disabled.yml

On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:21:24PM +, Martin J. Evans wrote: > I don't know how many people do fully automated smoking (unattended, > e.g., killing off ones which prompt or loop after a time etc) but I just > use CPAN::Reporter::Smoker as I like to be able to see exactly what is > going on. My

Re: More testing of common platforms

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:10:55PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > I was thinking about Tim's email more and want to add that I think it > is worth it to have more testers submitting reports even for common > platforms. We're nowhere near having statistically valid samples on > most distributions on

LPW2009: Rough Guide to CPAN Testing slides

Hi, I finally got around to webifying my talk slides from Saturday's LPW They are online at: http://www.kidney-bingos.demon.co.uk/LPW2009/ Many thanks, -- Chris Williams aka BinGOs PGP ID 0x4658671F http://www.gumbynet.org.uk == pgpktfD8kMa2h.pgp Description: PGP sig

Re: CPANPLUS::Dist::Build 0.44 considered harmful

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:28:54PM -0700, p...@0ne.us wrote: > Hello, > >Thanks for warning us about this! I quickly looked at some of the > reports and I can tell you with confidence that a lot of my FAIL reports > is bad. I don't think it's CP:D:B's fault but the VM's fault. It seems > li

Re: What's up with "No targets specified and no makefile found"?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:15:22PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > You need to be asking on cpan-testers-discuss. Copying that list now. > > -- David > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Joshua ben Jore wrote: > > The CPAN smokers regularly spit back UNKNOWN results where the text of > > the error

Re: Unconfigured Smokers

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:36:30PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Barbie wrote: > > I just spotted this [1] for one of my distributions, and wondered > > whether there is any mileage in the smoker bots checking whether > > CPAN/CPANPLUS has been suitably configured b

Re: cpantesters should never set AUTHOR_TESTING

On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:47:07AM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > Dear fellow testers, > > please don't set environment variables that could lead to extraordinary > testing conditions. Especially vulnerable environment variables are > AUTHOR_TESTING, PERL_TEST_CRITIC, PERL_TEST_POD. > > Please

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 01:15:10PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Cantrell > wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: > >> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:02:46 +0100, j...@cpan.org (Johan Vromans) said: > >> > http://www.nntp.perl

Re: CPAN Testers Daily Summary Report

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 06:29:41AM +, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote: > > Revision history for Perl extension CPANPLUS::Dist::Build. > > 0.44 Wed Nov 18 12:37:03 GMT 2009 > - Make the prereq resolving fallback to _build/ querying > if the 'prer

Re: Mirrors not updating

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:57:06AM +, David Cantrell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:55:44PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:03 PM, David Cantrell > > wrote: > > > Is PAUSE having problems, or the fast updatey thing, or something else, > > > or am I just being Teh

Okay, what the heck is up with CPAN mirroring

The subject pretty much sums up my frustration. ftp.funet.fi: 02/23/10 03:57PM868,629 02packages.details.txt.gz cpan.cpantesters.org: 02/25/10 09:02AM868,928 02packages.details.txt.gz The latter is of course one of the 'fast sync' mirrors. The former is where every other mirror

Re: Okay, what the heck is up with CPAN mirroring

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:59:40AM +, Andy Armstrong wrote: > On 25 Feb 2010, at 10:52, Barbie wrote: > > I assume you're frustrated because the former isn't updating for some > > reason. In which case I would suggest contacting funet.fi. I have > > contacted them previously with a similar quer

Re: Testing CT2.0 with CPANPLUS

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:48:59PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > It turns out the released version of CPANPLUS doesn't *quite* support > CT2.0 yet. I've committed a patch to fix that. But until BinGOs > releases a new version, people will need to checkout and install from > the repo here: > > $

Re: Fwd: CPAN Testers Using 5.12.0?

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:36:49AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Testers, your thoughts? I know a few of us are indeed testing with perl-5.12.0-RC0 It doesn't appear to show up as that in the reports though. This bit: Characteristics of this binary (from libperl): Compile-time options: PERL_DO

Re: CT2.0 On Darwin

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 04:46:05PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > Maybe you could try fink or macports if you can't persuade stuff to > build "out of the box" - but good luck, I'm not sure how much support > there is in either of those projects for 10.1. > or pkgsrc --

CT 2.0 and metabase-relayd

I finally got around to blogging about CPAN Testers 2.0 and metabase-relayd http://blogs.perl.org/users/bingos/2010/07/cpan-testers-20-and-the-metabase-relayd.html Cheers, -- Chris Williams aka BinGOs PGP ID 0x4658671F http://www.gumbynet.org.uk == pgp6vpMRsSEdk.pgp De

Re: Submission Monitoring

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 02:47:47PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > > I note that the previous list I posted included the CPAN Upload emails, > sent from PAUSE. Andreas, do these still need to be sent to the > cpan-tester list now that we have the dedicated cpan-uploads mailing > list now? > Switching off

Re: Automated testing how to?

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote: > Getting it all working on older Perls isn't always that easy. For > example Test::Reporter::Transport::Socket won't install on 5:005:3 > because it needs warnings, which I can't get on that machine (install > warnings tries to instal

Re: CT1 => CT2 Update

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 02:31:07PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > Yesterday we saw 6025 reports posted via SMTP. Can the following testers > look to moving their CT1.0 smokers over to CT2.0 as soon as possible. > > [1725] Chris Williams (BINGOS), Similar WTF reaction to Nigel. Where the hell have these

Re: revised CT 2.0 instructions

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:41:02AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > I've tried to give some basic bootstrap instructions for > CPAN::Reporter assuming someone has never sent test reports before, > but I need someone to add the same for CPANPLUS. > The easiest way for 'casual' CPANPLUS users to set

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket 0.16 released

Hi, For all those who use Test::Reporter::Transport::Socket based smokers with a metabase-relayd aggregator to send reports to Metabase, I have released Test::Reporter::Transport::Socket version 0.16 to CPAN today. Nigel Horne raised some issues with metabase-relayd

Metabase server is not responding

I noticed that my CPAN mirroring was broken this morning. I mirror from cpan.dagolden.com. I happened to notice that metabase submissions were failing. These two events are related >:) If you happen to be running metabase-relayd then I would advise switching it to offline mode for the moment

Re: Metabase server is not responding

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:42:43AM +0100, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote: > I noticed that my CPAN mirroring was broken this morning. > > I mirror from cpan.dagolden.com. > > I happened to notice that metabase submissions were failing. > > These two events are re

Re: Broken smoker

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:17:46PM -0700, Serguei Trouchelle wrote: > Hello Jeroen, > > It seems your LWP installation is broken for some reason. > > Your smoker reports LWP::Simple to be 6.00, while libwww-perl 6.0 > definitely has HTTP::Status as a prerequisite: > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src

Re: Leaderboards by platform or perl version?

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 07:45:09AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > > It might be possible to grep for AUTOMATED_TESTING if all the current > clients are reporting that now. > > That's not ideal, but it might be sufficient. All my 'non-smoking' reports, ie. those I generate when just updating 'regul

Re: CPAN Testers Statistics update

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:28:06PM +0100, Barbie wrote: > A further update... distributions with no reports filed against them: > > http://stats.cpantesters.org/noreports.html > My explicit exclusions are: https://github.com/bingos/cpan-smoke-tools/blob/master/cpansmoke.ini I have a big load o

[WARNING] Tests added crontab entries

I happened to notice this afternoon that the Ubic distribution is adding a script to the crontab of the user that is running the smoke testing. -bash-4.1$ crontab -l * * * * * ubic-watchdog ubic.watchdog>>/dev/null 2>>/dev/null -bash-4.1$ I have found this on all my smokers so far. I am re

Re: Metabase looks to be down

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 10:25:42AM -0400, Nigel Horne wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up. > > I set offline=1 in my .metabase/relayd file, and restarted the > relay program, but I'm still seeing errors. > I have uploaded metabase-relayd version 0.28 to CPAN which resolves this issue. Thanks,

Re: Dragonfly BSD - Request for information

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 03:42:47PM +, Alberto Sim?es wrote: > Hello > > I would like to make Lingua::Identify::CLD aware of Dragonfly BSD. > For that I would need some information, like: > > uname -s > > and the output of > > gcc -E -dM - < /dev/null # or any official drangonfly cc >

Re: Dragonfly BSD - Request for information

I fired up a vm whilst I had a gap in the schedule: > > uname -s DragonFly > > and the output of > > gcc -E -dM - < /dev/null # or any official drangonfly cc #define __DBL_MIN_EXP__ (-1021) #define __FLT_MIN__ 1.17549435e-38F #define __CHAR_BIT__ 8 #define __WCHAR_MAX__ 2147483647 #def

Current CPAN indexing problems

This morning Chris Prather uploaded http://metacpan.org/release/PERIGRIN/Crixa-0.01 which had a local::lib directory which got indexed and caused this: http://pasta.test-smoke.org/205 The current state is http://pasta.test-smoke.org/207 after DOY uploaded a new release of Moose. unfortunately

Re: Current CPAN indexing problems

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:26:01PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:36:45PM +0100, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote: > > > This morning Chris Prather uploaded > > http://metacpan.org/release/PERIGRIN/Crixa-0.01 > > > > which had a lo

Re: Metabase overflow?

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 11:43:37AM +0200, Slaven Rezic wrote: > When trying to submit a test report: > > Something failed in > /home/cpansand/var/cpansmoker//process/pass.Char-EUCJP-0.81.i386-freebsd.8.0-release-p4.1338016818.20122.rpt: > Test::Reporter: error from 'Test::Reporter::Transport

Re: Metabase overflow?

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:46:50AM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Reports are flowing again. You guys fill up SimpleDB namespaces > faster than I can finish my fixes to get us off SimpleDB. :-) > > -- David Thank you, Dave, the spice is flowing once more. Just switched one of my relayd back on an

Re: Testing Tapper::MCP

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:59:25PM +0200, Steffen Schwigon wrote: > Hi! > > I am polishing our current "Tapper"[1] release 4.0 via CPAN Testers. > > As usual it's a great help. I found lots of micro issues, dependency > bugs, and platform specific gotchas. Thanks! > > One module, Tapper::MCP, is

Re: Metabase gives internal server error, can't submit reports

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:36:30AM +0200, Michiel Beijen wrote: > Hi, > > I found this on my smoker: > > (C:\smoker\sp\c\bin\dmake.exe test exited with 0) > CPAN::Reporter: Test result is 'pass', All tests successful. > CPAN::Reporter: preparing a CPAN Testers report for XML-Writer-0.615 > CPAN::

Re: Testing on IO::Prompt::Hooked

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:53:38PM -0700, David Oswald wrote: > I'm not sure if the testing infrastructure has slowed to a snail's > pace at the moment, or if IO::Prompt::Hooked has been blacklisted. > The symptom is zero smoke test reports within the first 24 hours of > being uploaded. > > If the

Re: metrics for cpan

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 08:56:05PM -0500, Kirk Kimmel wrote: > We already have all kinds of interesting data about CPAN and what it does > but I could not find something. I have been submitting cpan reports for > over a year and I just started wondering how long does it take to test all > modules o

Re: no tests for latest versions of MooX::Shadow::Attributes

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 12:10:33PM +, David Cantrell wrote: > > Looks fine to me, and I've sent reports for 0.01_04 (all PASSes). There > are many layers of Magic that reports go through before showing up on > the cpantesters.org site and on search.cpan.org, and I see that > cpantesters.org i

Re: PASS with no test output

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 03:22:18PM -0800, Nathan (Nat) Goodman wrote: > Greetings testers > > I'm a module developer, not a tester. For one of my modules, I'm seeing a > lot of PASS reports that have no test output; see example below. I'm guessing > this means the test didn't run. Any suggesti

Re: PASS with no test output

On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:59:47AM -0800, Nathan (Nat) Goodman wrote: > Thanks, Chris! I appreciate the response. > > Best, > Nat > Further to my previous message, after building a v5.16.2 perl, setting up with Test::Reporter::Transport::File and doing numerous tests I have tracked down a bug i

Re: What to do about XML::LibXML / XML::LibXSLT failures with old versions of libxml2 and libxslt?

On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:11:35AM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote: > Hi all, > > I keep getting reports of failures like this to my modules, such as: > > * http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/7d08b688-b80d-11e2-ad73-dd0a7cfad375 > > * http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/2e8c9bae-b7e6-11e2-8285-2

Re: CPANPLUS::Dist::YACSmoke and NA for missing prerequisite

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:49:15AM -0400, Chad Thomas wrote: >I merely setup my smoker following the instructions in the cpantesters >wiki for CPANPLUS-YACSmoke. The wiki also seems to indicate >that CPANPLUS-YACSmoke is the preferred choice for automated testing >versus CPAN::Repor

Re: PASS with no test output

On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:07:43PM -0700, Nathan (Nat) Goodman wrote: > Hi Chris > > I'm still seeing test reports with no output. Any chance this bug will be > fixed soon? Just wondering. > > Thanks, > Nat > > On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Chris 'BinGOs&#

Re: Metabase overflow?

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:20:17PM +0100, Slaven Rezic wrote: > Hi, > > my smoker cannot send reports to metabase anymore: > > fact submission failed: submission was not stored: Too many bytes in this > Domain. at /usr/perl5.18.2/lib/site_perl/5.18.2/Metabase/Client/Simple.pm > line 100. >

Re: Metabase overflow?

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 05:25:44PM -0500, David Golden wrote: > I've kicked it to the next SimpleDB namespace. > > Hopefully, the spice is flowing again > > The spice is indeed flowing again, young Atreides. >:) Many thanks, -- Chris Williams aka BinGOs PGP ID 0x4658671F http://www.gumbynet.

Re: Do I need something special to make the @INC of a child process in a test the same as the parent?

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:28:30PM -0400, brian d foy wrote: > I'm getting some odd test results for PerlPowerTools, my slow rollout > of an update to PPT (but spelled out for better discoverability). Some > of the programs require modules, which I've added to Makefile.PL, but > some testers seems

Re: PaxHeaders

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 08:07:06AM +0100, Andreas Koenig wrote: > Chris, > > I don't know what the PaxHeaders problem here is about, do you? > > http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/47822756 > > How invasive is that? How can it be stopped? > When I extract that dist's tarball on that NetBSD

Re: Narada

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:34:53PM -0400, Nigel Horne wrote: > Has anyone else had problems with Narada messing with crontabs and > leaving the mess behind it? > > See > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/POWERMAN/Narada-v2.2.0/t/narada-setup-cron.t > > -Nigel > What I did a while ago and is part

Re: "Module Build not found" form Build.PL even though it is in configure_requires

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 12:16:21AM -0400, Rocky Bernstein wrote: > - shipping both a Makefile.PL and a Build.PL correctly is a tough >   problem > > > Although I  that I was using the deprecated "passthrough" style, using every > combination listed in the docs a Makefile.PL was added to d

Re: is QNX relevant to Perl?

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 05:27:09PM +, Alceu R. de Freitas Jr. via cpan-testers-discuss wrote: > Hello folks, > > Is QNX relevant for Perl, considering is basically only applicable to > BlackBerry... or I'm wrong? > I'm a bit curious about the OS, and saw that the number of tests executed > u