I'd have to put my vote with the mailing list not a forum.
Every group I've been with that has moved to forums or FaceBook I've just lost
interest in. There are very few forums I even bother to go to for help. Forums
can be awkward to search and FaceBook is almost impossible. With mailing lists
LOl yes, 4. Do nothing ...
On 12/24/2015, at 10:44 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I do hope you
> would consider a fourth option of just keeping it up.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailma
On 03/13/2014, at 6:30 AM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
>> 1. In this sort of situation, is the webfont unconditionally downloaded,
>> or is it ignored unless/until actually needed?
>>
> I think it is ignored. According to the spec, the fonts can be
> automatically fetched and downloaded _when_neede
On 05/08/2013, at 12:44 PM, Anna Gav wrote:
> Re: http://imageshack.us/scaled/landing/703/sdfdsf.png
> Ideally, I'd like to do this using CSS, but to be honest it looks way
> too complicated with all the sharp angles.
I wish I had time to play with it ... but you should be able to do that with
On 07/10/2012, at 8:41 AM, Greg Wilker wrote:
> Can
> anyone tell me why the headline item "Announcements
> Available" is moving down the page?
td.classAd2 {
... deleted stuff ...
vertical-align: middle; <== this is why.
}
KathyW.
__
On 02/13/2012, at 8:20 AM, Tim Dawson wrote:
> Why is it that the moment one posts something to this list the solution dawns
> ?
Because the very act of explaining a problem to someone else *so that they
understand it* often makes the problem and potential solution clearer to the
person doing
On 01/05/2012, at 9:53 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
> Am 04.01.12 23:26, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
>> On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
>>> For future projects you might also consider using a web font
>>> service such as Fontsquirrel to avoid other
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
> For future projects you might also consider using a web font service such as
> Fontsquirrel to avoid other web font-related issues.
What are the other "web font-related" issues you refer to here?
KathyW.
__
On 08/12/2011, at 8:24 AM, John wrote:
> wrangling color issues here. sometimes working in gimp, sometimes in
> photoshop. noticing colors aren't matching up tho they be picked by their
> number and not by eye.
Do you mean the image colorpicker rbg values don't match their css equivalent
rende
On 03/16/2011, at 11:53 AM, Al Sparber wrote:
> It works for IE8, too. What happened with your client is that he probably was
> using IE7. You are using IE8 and could not duplicate the problem until you
> went into Compatibility View, which essentially means that your IE8 was
> behaving like it
On 03/16/2011, at 8:47 AM, Al Sparber wrote:
> The biggest source for issues in IE9 is when users inadvertantly click the
> compatibility view icon. To prevent that, we usually recomend using this meta
> tag in your page:
>
> xhtml version:
>
>
> html version:
>
Does that trick also work fo
On 11/05/2010, at 10:53 AM, Ada Elgavish wrote:
> I do not know enough programming to understand what the errors listed by CSS
> Validator mean...; thus, I am afraid I cannot correct them...I do understand,
> though, that these are errors of syntax in both the horizontal and the
> vertical nav
On 11/05/2010, at 1:36 AM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
> Of course, we could bring it back on-topic by discussing various ways to
> employ user stylesheets to block the display of ads while avoiding (as much
> as possible) the suppression of non-ad content.
Actually, that and a comment by another p
> Hi, has anyone else experienced seeing colors somewhat differently in
> Photoshop vs. a web browser? Everything looks significantly darker in
> Photoshop. It certainly adds an unnecessary obstacle to the design
> process!
> Any tips on why this might be happening, and how to alleviate it?
A goo
On 15/05/2009, at 4:28 AM, Vincent Pollard wrote:
> I used to love using Multiples IES but I have seen several instances
> over the past two years where Multiples IEs gave us a different result
> from 'real' IE6.
I've seen 'real' IE6's on two different machines give different
results to each o
On 06/05/2009, at 12:42 AM, Reese wrote:
> Kathy Wheeler wrote:
>> I have asked for documented proofs of this before and so far have
>> received none! Not even sample URL's. I would appreciate more details
>> on those "20 instances".
>
> Here's one
On 05/05/2009, at 5:25 AM, Court Kizer wrote:
> I recommend staying away from multiple IE I can think of 20 instances
> where it will render different from a machine with the real thing.
> Virtualiin is free.
I have asked for documented proofs of this before and so far have
received none! Not
On 15/04/2009, at 8:10 AM, Brian Hazelton wrote:
> When should I use an image and when should i use it as a background
> image.
If an image is purely decorative, it makes sense to utilise css
background techniques and keep it out of the content flow. If on the
other hand it's an integral pa
On 27/03/2009, at 4:26 AM, Climis, Tim wrote:
> But there are a few things I wish for that would make even more
> semantic sense. A. lists contained in paragraphs, or B. a list
> header element (like thead or th)
Perhaps a definition list could be styled to achieve what you want?
http:/
On 19/03/2009, at 6:25 AM, rose red wrote:
>> In a sense, yes. IE6 sees all styles, so interference is guaranteed.
>>
>> 1: reverse the order of the stylesheets. Correct IE6 AFTER the main
>> stylesheet.
>>
>>
Having done battle with ie5 vs ie6 vs ie7 this week with JQuery
plugins and fallba
On 19/03/2009, at 6:11 AM, Christopher R wrote:
> Here is my Image slices problem you'll see on the page
> http://www.thecreativesheep.ca/site/imagepage3.html
> the slices are not in order on the page and they should be at the
> top within the
Check your css:
http://tinyurl.com/dz4tpy
Also im
On 13/03/2009, at 9:12 PM, david wrote:
> And who says that CNN or any other particular site is doing it
> "right"?
I'm not saying they are "doing it right", personally I think it's too
small.
What I *am* saying is:
1. that is what Joe Average user is used to seeing;
2. those who have diffic
I know the mantra: let the user decide, set font-size to 100% but ...
Looking at major general news sites, popular public blogging etc
sites, they ALL seem to have fonts set much smaller. This being the
case surely the visually impaired surfer, being otherwise perfectly
normal individuals fr
>> I bet I know what the color matching problem is. I just went
>> through a
>> BIG learning curve because of this issue. I think it's that the
>> image
>> was saved with a Color Profile attached/embedded. Almost all
>> browsers
>> ignore color profiles, but Safari pays attention to th
On 26/02/2009, at 1:24 AM, Nicky McCatty wrote:
> I want the Greek to appear on a web page.
>
> Sometimes the characters with diacritical marks change into ascii
> junk, and sometimes they don't. I am using fonts that contain a
> complete set of Greek characters, but the results are inconsistent.
On 19/02/2009, at 1:02 PM, Bill Brown wrote:
>background: rgba(153,153,153,0.5);
Ooooh ... rgba ... I like it. How well supported is the a (alpha)?
KathyW.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss
> Michael Adams wrote:
>> To bring it back on track - controlling pages using CSS; i use a well
>> known technique which makes IE5, IE5.5 and IE6 behave very similar to
>> each other. Throw them into quirks mode intentionally,
After re-reading this a couple of times ... do you mean you *only*
On 05/02/2009, at 11:49 PM, Daniel Kessler wrote:
> In another test page, I had changed it out for p tags like you but
> that hadn't helped it center. The major difference seemed to be
> width:100%. For educational reasons, why did that work?
Without the width specified the p tag block will
On 05/02/2009, at 11:39 AM, Mark Vickers wrote:
> FWIW, your solution works perfectly in Opera and Safari on XP Pro
> SP3. On
> IE, surprise surprise, it breaks: horizontal centring still works,
> but the
> slideshow is still glued to the top of the black box. Haven't
> checked any
> browser
On 05/02/2009, at 3:08 AM, Daniel Kessler wrote:
> I have a slideshow using jquery:
> http://sph.umd.edu/home/test_css2.cfm
>
> I'd like to center the images within the black box.
Looking at the JQuery docs for InnerFade you aren't limited to using
ul li constructs. Perhaps replacing the lis
On 29/01/2009, at 8:28 AM, Dylan Wilbanks wrote:
> The rule he wants to set is:
> IF an A element does NOT have a child element IMG, THEN apply this
> style.
You should be able to do it with javascript DOM manipulation, but
that's probably outside this list spec.
KathyW.
On 21/01/2009, at 5:42 PM, Michał Zieliński wrote:
Lets say that one banner is 5KB * 4 = 20KB
With sprites it will take more or less 40KB.
It`s a huge difference to achieve such effect, don`t you think?
If you use absolute positioning and a small transparent gif with a
transparent background
Thanks for the reply Kepler.
On 20/05/2008, at 11:37 AM, Kepler Gelotte wrote:
> What appears to be happening is that your second section is
> scrolling under
> your first section. It is not disappearing, just hidden.
Agreed.
> If you tab around
> the bottom half will shift as focus changes.
I am not sure if this is a css issue, html issue or browser rendering
issue (leaning towards the latter myself) but it has me stumped.
The following (Drupal generated) page validates XHTML 1.0 Strict and
with only 2 minor css issues (max-min) I'm prepared to put up with.
But when it is loade
On 06/05/2008, at 5:45 PM, Usamah al-Amin wrote:
> body {
> background: #dedede url(header.jpg) no-repeat top center;
> }
>
> It could very possibly to miss downloading the header image, but could
> it possible to miss applying the background color (#dedede) for some
> odd reason?
Check to
On 20/03/2008, at 12:13 PM, Stuart King wrote:
> http://www.adrianavargasdesign.com/indexsk.html
Sturt, my first thought was "imagemap" ... so I Googled "css
imagemap" to see what the current state-of-play is with the imagemap
concept and found this:
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/imagem
On 11/03/2008, at 12:34 PM, Michael Stevens wrote:
> WeBuilder from Bluementals
> http://www.blumentals.net/webuilder/
WeBuilder is windows only.
> -Original Message-
> Karl Jacobs
>
> I'm really ready to dump BBedit, ...
BBedit is Mac only.
Unless Kar is dumping the Mac as well, WeBui
On 09/03/2008, at 6:40 AM, Karl Hardisty wrote:
> A comparison of usage before and
> after is generally a good idea. If a site design changes, and
> suddenly a certain type of browser/platform combination drops off
> markedly, there's probably a good reason.
However it may also pay to check ove
On 07/03/2008, at 5:48 AM, Kroon.Kurtis wrote:
> He should look into iCab: it's been around since system 7, the Mac
> "Classic" version was last updated on 1 January *2008*, it runs
> quite well on older Macintosh operating systems, and it supports
> enough CSS (among Other Things) to pass A
On 06/03/2008, at 4:43 AM, Mark Slosarek wrote:
> Windows and Macs just render fonts differently: http://
> www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000884.html
And this one:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000885.html
>> I have strange Problem on Firefox (MAC) on some sites i programm.
>>
On 28/02/2008, at 10:34 AM, Rob freeman wrote:
> Hi thats fine, but i would like the comment title and field to come up
> and sit along side the name and email field. i hope this makes sense
Ahhh ... now I follow.
You've added fieldset(s) and class = left (right) but you've not
added the clas
On 28/02/2008, at 9:47 AM, Rob freeman wrote:
> Hi everyone, I was wondering how I can create a 2 columns form without
> adding extra markup. Here is the link to the form:
Add a float:left and a width to your label declaration. For eg:
label{
display:block;
float: left;
On 26/02/2008, at 1:21 AM, Mário Gamito wrote:
> Does anyone know the font name that is used in this picture ?
>
> http://www.absinto.org/einstein.010.png
>
> I'd like to use it in a site, but I can't figure out what it is.
To bring things back on topic, here's a site I find very useful for
det
On 15/02/2008, at 1:24 AM, Big Moxy wrote:
> IE runs on Mac. Have you check the MS site or Google'd for a download?
> Cynthia Villegas wrote:
>> I have no ways of testing this on IE (mac user).
ie on the Mac is pretty awful and not a good guide as to how css will
render under ie on a pc.
Cyn
On 08/02/2008, at 10:22 AM, Tim White wrote:
> You can use (whatever number you need) to start a
> list at a
> new number. Or, you can use to skip numbering within
> a list.
>
> Both attributes are deprecated, so they are only valid under HTML
> 4.01 or
> XHTML 1.0 Transitional.
I'm kinda
>>> -Original Message-
>>> David wrote:
>>>
>>> Javascript is a security threat to visitors' computers.
>>> CSS is not.
I seem to recall that at one stage certain versions of Netscape/
Mozilla would not render CSS at all if Javascript was disabled. I
have no idea whether that is still t
On 23/09/2007, at 1:59 PM, Meg Fuller wrote:
> Greetings, I Am looking for a way to take and have a links list on
> a css that I can just change the css and have our 50 + pages
> changed instead of changing each one.
[ scratches head ... ] Could you explain it a bit more clearly please
Meg
Hi Trish,
On 02/06/2007, at 5:38 AM, Trish Meyer wrote:
> In my case it was user error (I hope, waiting on confirmation from an
> IE7 user).
> http://www.vivagallery.org/exhibits/PSA_2007/index.html
Seems to work fine now - ie7, win XP home, under VirtualPC (on my Mac).
Would also appreciate he
On 16/10/2006, at 10:30 AM, michael ensor wrote:
> As someone who worked as a proof reader on a morning newspaper in the
> hot metal days, I can tell you that the "double space" after a
> period was a
> function of the typesetting machines, because the full stop slug
> and the following
> cap
49 matches
Mail list logo
