I remember reading that somewhere also so I will give a try on my next go.
Should I be using em instead of px?
>>>
>>> Site can be viewed temporarily at:
>>> http://www.sportsmanfishing.com/webdev/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> I usually develop mobile first with all my base styles for phone width.
esult in the same thing. Seems unnecessary to have
> both.
>
> On Saturday, September 13, 2014, Paul wrote:
>
>
>> Hello everyone, I am relatively new to responsive design and css with
>> media queries and have used an online tool to generate my template and
>> then cus
) and (max-width: 480px) and
(orientation: landscape){.call {display:run-in; }}
and
/* Phone Portrait (320px) */
@media only screen and (max-width: 320px) {.call {display:run-in; }}
Site can be viewed temporarily at:
http://www.sportsmanfishing.com/webdev/index.html
Any help greatly appreciated!
Paul
Isabel
Thanks for the pointer. I did get nearly to a solution with :active but
it blocked my javascript onclick function.
In the end I did as you suggested and used jQuery to assign clsHide and
clsShow. Works a treat now - cheers.
Paul W
On 26/10/2012 22:58, Isabel Santos wrote:
Paul,
if
Hi all
I have implemented a suckerfish menu with a fixed horizontal menu bar
and multi-level menus which works fine.
http://cssdesk.com/ZuBLt
However, I don't want menus to link to new pages, just onclick to
another javascript function to control an ajax action. This is
straightforward, bu
Sounds like it could be the Opera Minimum Font Size (Pixels) Setting
(Preferences -> Advanced -> Fonts).
-Paul Burney
http://www.burney.ws/
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Chetan Crasta wrote:
> OK, I understand what's happening now. Actually, it is not the width
> that is inc
quot;position: relative" rule, you should be
all set. Hope it helps.
-Paul Burney
http://www.burney.ws/
* Thanks to Peter-Paul Koch:
http://www.quirksmode.org/bugreports/archives/2004/12/table_never_rel.html
__
css-discuss
rrect, but if I recall correctly, relative
positions don't work reliably on table cells. If you find that to be
the case, you'll need to add a container div inside of the table cell,
set its width and height to 100%, and its position to relative
regardless
of window width if you declare a fixed width on
the block that contains all the columns. That
doesn't strike me as being table emulation, but was that your intention?
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http:/
icked.
someone suggested it is being forced to IE7 compatibility mode and
that's what causing the issue.
any suggestions are welcome
thanks
Paul
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/list
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/899252/can-you-target-br-with-css
You might want to look into changing the source code itself using a
perl script or a tool like BBEdit that could process those 700 pages
in a few seconds.
Hope that helps,
-Paul Burney
http://www.burney.ws/
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:
I don't see
that having the icon in the foreground is any more of an issue than,
say, having a foreground thumbnail image in a gallery be the link to
its larger counterpart. Isn't this a case where one could argue both
sides of the question, "Is it conte
between `-moz-border-radius` and `-webkit-border-radius`.
Thanks,
Paul
[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS:-moz-border-radius
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
css-discuss [cs
xt to
wrap to (say 1.5em), then give each list item a negative text-indent
of the same value (e.g. -1.5em) to reset it to where it would have
fallen naturally. The text-indent affects only the beginning of the
item's text.
Regards,
Paul
_
much better approach to the problem would be simply to
manipulate the markup coming down from the server.
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
__
css-discuss [c
display-prop
Also don't forget our beautifully recreated wiki:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/wiki/Centering_Block_Element#Vertical_Centering
and I also had this one bookmarked:
http://www.jakpsatweb.cz/css/css-vertical-center-solution.html
Regards,
Paul
___
nitions are not complete sentences, e.g.
<http://google.com/search?q=define%3Atechnician>. The OP's semantic
content is clearly that of a definition list: terms and descriptions.
What constructive goal do we achieve by attempting to constrain the
grammar (in any given human languag
ficly greatly be
appreciated! I would like to end up with the main section centered
and the same dashed border as the header.
Thanks a ton,
Paul
--
"Fishing puts me in touch with another of nature's species, in
beautiful surroundings that are as old as time. That is where I want
to be;
e to
login failures.
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/passwords.html
[I think this part of the discussion properly belongs over on WSG or
Webdesign-L...]
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
d-school it's
amazes me that people still code this way. Google separation of
development layers and progressive enhancement, please.
Croggled,
Paul
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mail
cificity that they trump all
other rules in the parent stylesheets. You could try to bludgeon your
way through that using !important but that can wreck a lot of
furniture in a roomful of nested elements.
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://junip
ackground: url(bullet.png) left 5px no-repeat;
}
.container li li
{
background-image: none;
}
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
Thanks David
That's really useful information, as well as a fix that's saved me
hours of hitting my head on the keyboard.
Paul
On 10 March 2010 18:24, David Laakso wrote:
> Paul Jinks wrote:
>> I have a two column layout with each column divided into two boxes
>> (
a solution.
Paul Jinks
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Su
or "most semantically
appropriate" ways to mark up the content, not the "simplest."
- The most practical way to present them side by side is to enclose
each head/datum pair in a wrapper or use a table. This eliminates
definition lists and leaves
t-align: center.
If you can't use inline, say because it doesn't give you enough
control over margins & padding, you can try table-cell and sacrifice
cross-browser support. (It's easy to serve separate stylesheets to
various versions of IE using conditional comments.)
Regards,
P
y the same as I had suggested on February
13th, pushing an image down the page a given amount. If you change
your browser zoom to text-only and enlarge the text, the image stays
put and the text flows below it, breaking the solution.
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
J
oom in the flow.
I hope this gives you some food for thought as you chew this one over...
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.c
gt;with that menu. The validation errors have to do with the IE6 hack.
Kym, you're making a simple typographical error in the HTML comment
syntax. Your source code reads:
..
For each list item, the first IE conditional comment should be
correctly embedded in an HTML comme
scripting to adjust all the anchor heights when
text size is changed, and fall back to different-height anchors in
user agents in which scripting is not running.
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
_
f
his longest column.
While we digress, however, the sticky footer solution I've found
works best is the one published by Cameron Adams a few years ago:
http://www.themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2005/08/29/
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper
letter-spacing: 0.01em;
Another thing to check would be whether the same fonts are being used
on the PC and the Mac.
font-family:Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
Good luck.
-Paul Burney
__
css-discuss [c
it will present the user with something akin to leaping the
>"Great Wall of China" inorder access the primary content.
Why not start out with a 'jump to main content' hyperlink, perhaps
shifted off-stage but then made visible to handhelds?
Regards,
Paul
On 18 Aug 2009, at 15:25, David Laakso wrote:
> Put it on a public server and provide a clickable link to it in your
> post to the list.
Alternatively, post your question on doctype.com :)
Paul
--
Paul Farnell
http://litmusa
that
Doctype will, in time, become a useful complement to this list.
I'd be delighted to hear any feedback or suggestions you may have. I
hope that some of you will join me over on Doctype!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Farnell
http://doctype.com
ell containing the menu, forcing the menu to wrap.
Personally I would strip the table markup out of this page and rely
on simpler markup & slightly more complicated styling to arrange
things the way you want.
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://
At 6/26/2009 11:31 AM, tedd wrote:
>with my site I have to declare the Content-Type in all my style sheets.
Could you explain that? I've never encountered that necessity before.
Paul
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-dis
e
that file in an unusual way or are you serving it with an unusual
MIME type? Firefox tells me it's saved with UTF-8 encoding. Are you
using a Mac?
I wonder if it would help if you began it with a charset declaration, e.g.
At 6/22/2009 03:12 AM, Tim Snadden wrote:
>On 22/06/2009, at 9:43 PM, Paul Novitski wrote:
>
> > 3) LI is by default a block-level element,
>
>It's probably worth mentioning that the default display property of
>'li' is list-item, not block. That's not
i a margin-bottom of 1em or whatever, then counteract that with
ul ol li {margin-bottom: 0);
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.
the content requires it.
However, make sure you specify the height in a conditional comment (or
using an IE hack), since other browsers *will* obey that rule and make
it strictly 535px high and no more.
Paul
--
Paul Farnell
http://li
Web page whichever is visually lowest."
Regards,
Paul
______
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
> Georg,
First
of all, thanks a million for your help with this. It is a wonderful
learning experience. I think it's amazing that so few little changes
can have such a great effect. I updated the css files as you told me
and now, IE 7 is looking as good as FF & IE8. Even IE 6 is starting
to shape
Hi, my name is Paul :) this is my first post -
I'm new to CSS and I'm having some Internet Explorer positioning issues, I'd
appreciate any help.
In IE7 there is unwanted space occuring in the place where my images originally
were before I positioned them. This extends the list
>> I encountered the following CSS declaration:
>> margin: 83_qem
>> Does anyone have any idea what kind of unit it is? Apparently it's
>> used in Safari's internal style sheet
>> (http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=5551), and I saw it
>> mentioned in Nokia documentation
>>
>> (http://li
Hello,
I encountered the following CSS declaration:
margin: 83_qem
Does anyone have any idea what kind of unit it is? Apparently it's
used in Safari's internal style sheet
(http://www.accessifyforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=5551), and I saw it
mentioned in Nokia documentation
(http://library.forum.no
Hello there,
I made 2 navigation menu, and wish them float to left. They do that
correctly in Firefox, but in IE, again, there is problem: the first nav menu
just doesn't floadt to left, instead, it goes to the RIGHT SIDE.
http://bratislava.chinafood.sk
thank you for your advice!
Paul
Adding style="overflow:hidden;" to the tag will get rid of the
control, but I think you'll still have the same problem w/the width.
Paul C. Wampler
Webmaster
College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (CUPA-HR)
1811 Commons Point Drive
Knoxville, TN
Georg:
Your answers is so good that I printed them great advises. I really
appreciated your help.
Thank you very much,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun"
To: "etsk jung"
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: .content problem
Add this parameter to your flash code:
That should take care of it.
__
Paul C. Wampler
College and University Professional Association for Human Resources (CUPA-HR)
1811 Commons Point Drive
Knoxville, TN 37932
(865) 637-7673 ext. 102
http://www.cupahr.org
Personally as a beginner css-er I would like to see #1 and #3.Thanks for the
vote!,
Paul
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them.
~Albert Einstein
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against.
The struggle between
Hello there,
have been working very hard to find the problem why the map of
http://www.chinafood.sk/ doesn't display correct in IE, it always sinks to
the bottom, please help!
Happy new year, css fans!
Paul
__
css-di
Georg,
Thank you very much. It is already good enough, i am satisfied with the
result. Thank you!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun"
To: "Paul Jung"
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2008 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] overflow problem in IE
s text wrapping become a drag in dreamweaver.
Thank you! Merry Christmas!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun"
To: "Paul Jung"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] overflow problem in IE
> Paul Jung wrote:
>
ctly, for example
there is a long url address
http://www.europeeurope.net/bbs/showthread.php?t=1... and it doesn't know
where to wrap the text
Thank you!
- Original Message -
From: "David Laakso"
To: "Paul Jung"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:2
Hello there,
I have a problem, it appears only in IE, here,
http://www.europeeurope.net/index.php?pageNum_Recordset2=7&totalRows_Recordset2=4919
in this page, the layout just broken, the maincontent sank to the bottom.
The codes of the second div inside the right sidebar go:
newreply {
overf
WOW! You are a magician! :)
THank you very much.
CSS is so powerful.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: JR Heard
To: Paul Jung
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 11:28 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] How not to display the a dark color frame around a pic?
.forumarrowicon
iful arrow lost its shape.
Who can give me a hand? Many thanks!
Paul from Slovakia
Merry Christmas to every CSS fan!
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FA
he #container. As well as, the #content
won't acknowledge the margin-top: 20px that I set for it. All help is kindly
appreciated!,
Paul Ravenstone
--
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them.
~Albert Einstein
If you want the truth to stand clear b
Is there a way to have a 3 column layout, where the right and left are a
fixed width, the center is fluid, and all three columns are the full length
between the header and the footer, which are set at the full length of the
screen? AND to do it all with CSS?
Thanks,
Paul
--
We can't
bytes
found are not valid values in the specified Character Encoding). Please check
both the content of the file and the character encoding indication.
The error was: utf8 "\xE4" does not map to Unicode "
Does anybody know anything about that
Hello there,
Please look at http://www.poet.sk/hidveghyova/go.php/component/id/12/
Did anybody have some experience? I got to know only yesterday when a friend
called me that he, with his IE browser, can not see this page.
I opened it in IE, and found out that the main content is after some 1000
Georg,
WOW!!! You are a genius!!! Works!!!
THANK YOU!!!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] top border of side bars
Georg
I studied your version, and changed some of the css codes, but I still can
not get where you are. In IE, the top of side bars are still lower than that
of main content. It is so ugly. I don't know what's wrong. Could you please
give me a hint?
Paul
- Original Message -
Georg,
I saw your version, it is amazing, how you managed it. I have a lot to
learn. So far, thank you again, and have a nice weekend!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent:
My goodness! 57 errors! It is really a shame of me. I have to find out where
they are, and how did I make them. THANK YOU!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, N
Gunlaug, thank you, for answering, but I am still a beginner of css, I even
have problem to underestand some of the basic terms.
I tried firefox, i found one problem, that the navigation menu doesn't
appear. Who know the reason?
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gunlaug Sørtu
Hello there,
if you open in IE 6, http://www.europeeurope.net/
you will see the top border of the left and right side bar are lower than that
of maind content.
But when i open in firefox, that is ok.
why?
And I see it in Dreamweaver design view normal.
Thank you for any help,
Paul
I have just stumbled across this list and am intrigued... I am fairly new to
css, and look forward to an arena where ideas can be shared.Paul
--
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them.
~Albert Einstein
__
so I'm crossing my fingers. When
I tried just #page-content-with-sidebar, the whole sidebar moved
off-screen, but basically making everything relative, zoom 1 put
things in the right place.
Thanks!
-Paul Burney
http://www.concord.org/
__
ed" itself it sometimes
stays that way until the computer is restarted.
Any suggestions for solutions? The easiest would be to just put it in
a two-cell table, of course, but that's cheating.
Thanks in advance,
Paul Burney
http://www.concord.org/
_
Thx, that explains the issue and removing width:auto;height:auto;
solves it so far.
Just with the backdraw that we got to add a class to other inputs for
setting the default width then.
Regards,
Paul
2008/5/14 Christian Kirchhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> search for t
, IE7, Opera work as supposed.
Issue can be seen on all input type="image" of
http://www.godita.ffdm.de/login.php (basically on all pages of the
domain).
Any hints very much appreciated :)
Paul
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
thanks in advance - I really am not worthy.
Paul Jinks
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/p
Thanks to everyone for helping out with this
Paul
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Paul Jinks wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> First the back story: I'm working at a university using a piece of web
>> authoring software called Cours
etc. I'm trying to get it to 'pop' out of the containing div.
In Firefox2 for win this works more or less as I want it to, but in IE6
the part of the image outside the containing div cannot be seen. Any
solutions?
link: http://www.pauljinks.co.uk/itc/cgex
> Based on the "Versioning and Internet Explorer Modes" whitepaper,
> making the assumption that Microsoft just kept the old IE7 Quirks
> mode, it seems like we have four modes: IE7 Quirks (versions<7), IE7
> Standards (version=7), IE8 Standards (version <=8) and Best possible
> (version=edge),
> >>IE8 cannot emulate IE6, only IE5 and 7.
>
>
> WTF?
>
> So IE=6 is actually the same as IE=5. Genius.
Yup. In fact, I argued for the inclusion of IE=6 for consistency's
sake. It pointing to IE5 is not perfect, but better than having
something really weird happen when you use that value.
> Of
> http://www.fu2k.org/alex/css/cssjunk/ie8/xua
>
> In a nutshell, IE8's emulation of IE6 and IE5 does not appear to be
> off to a flying start.
IE8 cannot emulate IE6, only IE5 and 7.
> 1. Box model not honoured when targeting IE6 and in standards mode
> 2. Parsing errors not replicated when
> So the meta-switch is able to take precedence over the doctype switch in
> any case.
Definitely! That's by design.
Doctype switching will continue to work as usual; you can choose
between Quirks (IE5.5) and Standard (IE8). However, any meta switch
will ALWAYS overrule any doctype.
> Setti
trange, eh?
Cheers
Paul
Tim Palac wrote:
> Paul,
>
> This was a frustrating one! Anyway, after much fooling I replaced the
> css for #main-top with the following:
>
> #main-top {
> height: 16px;
> width: 770px;
> background: url(...) no-repeat bottom left;
>
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Paul Jinks wrote:
>> I have a page that looks just as I want in FF but which misbehaves in
>> IE6, showing a gap between divs.
>> http://www.pauljinks.co.uk/test/contentTemplate2.html
>
> The simplest and most reliable solution is to put an
nd-repeat: no-repeat;
width: 770px;
height: 23px;
}
#container #objective {
background-image: url(...);
background-repeat: repeat-y;
width: 770px;
}
I know it's something pretty obvious, but I can't see the wood for the
wot
Can you provide a link for your page?
On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Recently, it appears that drop-down navigation in FIrefox is falling
> behind Flash movies, again, and the normal suggested fixes no longer
> work.
> Has anyone else experienced this lately?
>
> I hav
ithout the tool. Something as simple as looking at
view source HTML code from a browser from totally foreign to them. But
again they could do amazing things inside the tool.
Again, I'm not calling anyone out or maki
I stopped reading at the end of your first sentence. Read this:
http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-87939.html
Paul Hanson
Technical Writer
RoboHelp ACE - http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/robohelp.html
Quintrex Data Systems http://www.quintrex.com
email
I think http://www.mojotools.com/priv/tst/grail-a.html is the link ...
Paul Hanson
Technical Writer
RoboHelp ACE - http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/robohelp.html
Quintrex Data Systems http://www.quintrex.com
email: phanson at quintrex.com
es in your CSS file, can you send me how you did
it? I can hack it until I get what I want - I just need a baseline to
get going.
Paul Hanson
Technical Writer
RoboHelp ACE -
http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/robohelp.html
Quintrex Data Systems http://www.quintrex.com
email: phans
I don't know what this is called - or if there is a solution to what I'm
seeing.
I'm using IE 6. I close my Favorites so it doesn't display on my screen.
There is a large gap between the menu going up and down and the edge of
my browser window. If I enable my Favorites and have them displaying on
peating image, http://
staging.williscoatings.com/wp-content/themes/willis/images/quote.png
I'm not seeing a solutions but thought I would ask the group. the
client really wants the text adjacent to the double quotes not under it.
Paul
__
Hey all,
Ive ran into a slight problem regarding printing content (text) with the
background showing up. Is it possible to do so, or do I need to outright
stack layers on each other with the image laying in one and the text in the
other?
Thanks in advance.
_
n you don't expect it.
That said, I would choose method 3. Everything is together that controls
the .posts style so I don't have to go looking elsewhere. I think it is
the best way to do it.
Paul Hanson
Technical Writer
RoboHelp ACE -
http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/team_macromedi
My suggestion on the matter: stick with hex colors.
While I have yet to see a hard and or fast rule on the matter (it may be a
preference), I generally try to stick to hex colors.
Tx
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www
n achieve. I doubt that there is one,
given the variation in vision impairments, but I'll be curious to
know what others think.
I apologize if this is considered to be off-topic; it's an
accessibility point, but in my mind very pertinent to styling.
Regards,
Paul
___
> 22
>
>
>
>
>
Maybe I have stripped my example a bit too much :-)
Your solution works only with that simple example. The "real thing" has a
background image attached
to the right column.
(please look at the extended s
> 22
>
>
>
>
>
Maybe I have stripped my example a bit too much :-)
Your solution works only with that simple example. The "real thing" has a
background image attached
to the right column.
(please look at the extended sample here
http:
without tables?
11
22
You can see the test page here (shrink your browser windows to see the effect)
http://paul-sommer.de/test/tablefree.html
This example also contains a tabled layout to show the intended behaviour.
The t
can probably be corrected by
setting block heights in ems to prevent them from colliding.
Regards,
Paul
__
Paul Novitski
Juniper Webcraft Ltd.
http://juniperwebcraft.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED
o make the page line up in
a specific way and determine that you could do the page in a two column
table to get the layout you want - I think, if I understand the
pro-CSS/anti-table group correctly - that is when to think about using
CSS.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ensus was
that a calendar was a suitable 'thing' to present as a table. I pasted
your code into Dreamweaver and viewed it in IE 6. I think, in my
opinion, your code is suitable for a table as well.
Paul Hanson
Technical Writer
RoboHelp ACE -
http://www.adobe.com/support/forums/team_mac
1 - 100 of 395 matches
Mail list logo