Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

At 08:08 PM 5/21/2017, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: Maybe a re-install is in order? Dunno. I asked about it on a Eudora group, I'm not the only one who has experienced this. Working hypothesis ATM: randomly-triggered bug in the Eudora v7.1.0.9 message viewer.

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

At 09:24 PM 5/18/2017, Eric A. Meyer wrote: On 18 May 2017, at 19:26, Reese wrote: > Wow, the formatting on that got clobbered. Will probably get clobbered > on this email also. > > How long has that been happening? Hard to say. What formatting got clobbered? You initial post

Re: [css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

At 03:20 PM 5/18/2017, Reese wrote: Wow, the formatting on that got clobbered. Will probably get clobbered on this email also. How long has that been happening? Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http

[css-d] Pure CSS variables (no preprocessors)

like LESS and SASS obsolete? Are there any gotcha's? Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies --

[css-d] @media queries

I had to do something with media queries today. It has been a while and I haven't done that much with them prior, it ended up being more difficult than I think it should have been. Can anyone recommend a good media queries tutorial/refresher that is both online and free?

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

Would there be a disadvantage to just using the > >> > >>.navbar a { > >>color:white !important; > >>} > >> though? Sure would be easy. > >> > >> Thanks again! > >> > >> Theophan > &

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

Would there be a disadvantage to just using the > > > > .navbar a { > > color:white !important; > > } > > though? Sure would be easy. > > > > Thanks again! > > > > Theophan > > > > > >> On Oct 12,

Re: [css-d] Wrong Selector?

> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ -- Ryan Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-d

Re: [css-d] css validation error

css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- Ryan R

Re: [css-d] Why do I get this gap at the top of the page ?

ested in Firefox and Chrome and briefly in IE11. > > Regards, > > Tim Dawson > > > -- > Tim Dawson > Maolbhuidhe > Fionnphort > Isle of Mull PA66 6BP > > 01681 700718 > ___

Re: [css-d] Vertical & Horizontal Center ?

css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- Ryan Reese ___

Re: [css-d] Vertical & Horizontal Center ?

Display table/table-cell replicates the table counterparts. You certainly don't need to know a tables height to center it. It's no different in CSS...As my example shows. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Ryan Reese wrote: > http://codepen.io/ryanreese09/pen/NqpMYa > > On Wed,

Re: [css-d] Vertical & Horizontal Center ?

/www.dropbox.com/mailbox> > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Ryan Reese > wrote: > >> I'm confused. You say if you can't use flex, you can't do it. Then you >> acknowledge the table/table-cell approach exists. So why not use >> table/table-cel

Re: [css-d] Vertical & Horizontal Center ?

css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- Ryan Reese _

Re: [css-d] Selecting text in element

.456.4279 | medialogic.com > > > #663399 > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- ht

Re: [css-d] Set widths create different height buttons at different screen widths.

ded a min-height to the s. Quick fix. Probably a better fix out > there. > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html

Re: [css-d] footer won't stay put

www.sbctc.edu<http://www.sbctc.edu> > > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies --

Re: [css-d] FOUC on homepage

Sorry, you did a double negative. I misunderstood. AFAIK this problem no longer exists but there are still articles on this which give solutions. I suggest you google some. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, J.C. Berry wrote: > I was not aware Reese that this problem no longer exists in web

Re: [css-d] FOUC on homepage

I was not aware either. I had to remember what FOUC was since I hadn't heard of that term in years. I was sure that this issue is not around today. Granted, I couldn't get the issue to appear on my end. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, J.C. Berry wrote: > I was not aware Re

Re: [css-d] FOUC on homepage

- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- Ryan Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]

Re: [css-d] horizontally aligning icons

x27;t pertain to the OPs issues. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > On Mar 16, 2015, at 7:43 PM, John wrote: > > >> On Mar 16, 2015, at 5:41 PM, Ryan Reese > wrote: > >> > >> Text-align:center is a fine way to center list items. Noone

Re: [css-d] horizontally aligning icons

ys to center items but it just depends on your situation. You can breathe easy. Text-align:center; is the easiest way to center inline/inline-block elements. On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:38 PM, John wrote: > On Mar 16, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Ryan Reese > wrote: > > Semantics is purely in the HT

Re: [css-d] horizontally aligning icons

_ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http:/

Re: [css-d] :after not working in FF or IE but fine in Chrome and Safari

n. On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Ryan Reese wrote: > Why are you not just doing content:''; and then setting it as a background > image? > > Content is not the same as a background image. It looks like you meant > this. > .responsive-tabs-wrapper:after { > content:

Re: [css-d] :after not working in FF or IE but fine in Chrome and Safari

.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > -- Ryan Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-disc

Re: [css-d] Ready for Pre-processors?

<http://blog.millermedeiros.com/the-problem-with-css-pre-processors/> If that isn't reason enough to shun them... Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/F

Re: [css-d] HTML5 Validation

t falling through to the other URL. There should be a "return false" in there somewhere to arrest processing the form if validation fails. Yours is probably a question best asked on a jquery list, there are several out there. Google is friendly. Reese __

Re: [css-d] "classes"...?

ht was "none of that helps me or anyone else to learn or apply CSS." Can we put the discussion of jargon aside and talk about CSS now? Reese __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailma

Re: [css-d] can a div be a link?

on, so: Much easier to read when reading the source code. Drop the self- closing img tag for HTML 4.01 and earlier. Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [css-d] outdenting 1st line?

At 11:10 17 12 10, Rory Bernstein wrote: Thank you Reese. This is great, I didn't know you could do it this way. Someone else sent in another solution too. I so appreciate your response. It's the same solution, just implemented in a different way. Still, you are welcome. I saw

Re: [css-d] outdenting 1st line?

it a negative value, such as: li {text-indent: -10px;} Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- ht

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: Off topic, web hosting help and OOCSS

hot though, else I would not mention it. To keep it more topical, you can gain some increases in the speed of page display by avoiding reliance on the cascade also. You should look into Object-Oriented CSS (OOCSS) as advocated by Nicole Sullivan (aka "Stubbor

Re: [css-d] Assorted CSS questions

y are /forward/ compatible. Also, I believe it is in the specification that "transitional" is for pages that must maintain support for legacy cruft, new development should be under the "strict" doctype for the reasons advanced by David. Reese __

Re: [css-d] ID vs. Class

On 19-Jul-10 23:26, Beth Lee wrote: > ...but you can use getElementsByClassName. That wasn't available in IE, the last I heard. Has that changed? Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-dis

Re: [css-d] ADMIN: Ticket troubles (followup)

On 11-May-10 16:02, Eric A. Meyer wrote: ... Thank you, Eric, for the very detailed explanation of all of that. It's likely more detail than most of us needed, but some of us do appreciate the excess. So, thank you, for all of that. ;)

Re: [css-d] Re the non-secure login code...

the list, plus I confess to assuming that Charles was referring to a PHP login script. So, I concur with Boray ERIS, javascript is inappropriate for login scripts. These sorts of data should be handled by server-side scripts such as PHP etc. We now return you to the more on-topi

Re: [css-d] A fonts, font-replacement, standards, and accessibility question

Thank you for the URLs David, Philippe, and Thierry. I'm wondering why I haven't encountered @font-face sooner. Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d Lis

Re: [css-d] A fonts, font-replacement, standards, and accessibility question

given it consideration - but I will. I think. You didn't provide a link to that implementation, can you give one? I'm a little bugged that it is Fx 3.5+ though. Still, I'll take a look. Reese __ css-discuss [cs..

[css-d] A fonts, font-replacement, standards, and accessibility question

re is something else out there, something that does not rely on sometimes blocked (javascript, Flash, etc.), sometimes inaccessible (JAWS, etc.) technologies so that it defeats both Allsopp's and my own arguments? I'd like to hear about it. Reese 1- http://webstandardsgroup.org/features/j

Re: [css-d] apply a style to specific table column

quite properly. Sorta the same way pages won't display properly for all those half-dozen-or-so users who are still using Windows 3.11 and IE3 or earlier. If they aren't spoofing that data. @@ Reese __ css-discuss [cs

Re: [css-d] Train wreck in IE6

ing: 0; margin: 0;} body {font: 1em/1.33em Arial, sans-serif;} Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http

Re: [css-d] Train wreck in IE6

bit of a loss to see why you would consider using either of them. I'm not using either one of those, but someone noteworthy on this list is using one of them. What I'm saying is, I don't see what the difference would be at different dpi values, which

Re: [css-d] Train wreck in IE6

Clagnut/bbcnSS.html describe that method's impact. I'm at a bit of a loss, to see the difference between * {font-size: 100%;} body {font: 0.84em;} and * {font-size: 84%;} body {font: 1em;} When you start doing measurements at different dpi values,

Re: [css-d] Problems with website in IE8?

asier to debug. What he said: http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ian.thfctalk.com%2Fbridgend%2Findex.php&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0 Also, there is no tag. Use the proper self-closing /&g

Re: [css-d] float problem in IE6/7

; to id="three" with the appropriate changes to your style sheet, and then try it out to see how it works. If you have any other div ID's that start with numerals, they must also be changed to start with a letter [A-Za-z]. Se

Re: [css-d] Gap below footer

px is still fuzzy. He needs a screen reader, his eyesight is getting so bad. My point being, where is the point of diminishing returns and how do we know when we've gone too far? Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.o

Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

so I don't see that getting very far. I suppose the other option is to use images instead of text, I don't like that option. It isn't as SEO-friendly as text links and SEO-friendliness is important. Reese __ css

Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

the array of list items appears to be a nearly identical length on both the Win and Mac platforms), but Helvetica Neue gives me a serif font everywhere except in Konqueror (Fedora Core 6). I'll have to play with the letter-spacing now that I know it's the

Re: [css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

o for the version of Safari he's using. > Best bet is a clickable link to the page... Yes, but it's proprietary stuff for a client so I hoped to avoid extracting the relevant code for public viewing. Reese __ css-d

[css-d] Problem with all Mac browsers according to BrowserCam

that would explain this different handling of linked, inline list elements? I tried searching the Wiki but "mac font size" didn't bring up any results, neither did "safari font size". Reese __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] list Within list problem

particular basic. I'll have to discuss this memory lapse with the maker, if he'll return my calls. Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List w

Re: [css-d] list Within list problem

... In the end, your... Again, w/out the text: ... You should have: ... Once you get that straightened out, I'll bet your CSS starts working properly. Reese __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-di

Re: [css-d] IE 8

The point was, Multi-IE6 is not the same as IE6. Reese -- http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incu

Re: [css-d] IE 8

to provide urls for that, so I won't. It isn't necessarily a rendering difference per the description above, but it's a proof that Multi-IE6 isn't the same as IE6. It stands to reason that there will be other differences, with no reason to doubt that

Re: [css-d] Columns? A Theoretical Question

t; divs in the left column. Because, these are book descriptions, there is no standard length to correspond with a height dimension. Below, the CSS for the "booklist" and "books" divs. Reese -- HTML: http://inkworkswell.net/temp/columns.php CSS: http://inkworkswell.n

Re: [css-d] Columns? A Theoretical Question

ated "alignright" and "alignleft" divs inside the "booklist" div, then added each book-item div to those. It makes for a single-item column with another one just like it, beside it. It works, but I'm not happy with it. Reese ___

[css-d] Columns? A Theoretical Question

non-empty, etc. The goal is left-to right recursive, in rows. Below, a crude ascii graphic. I've been through the CSS so many times and changed so many things, I'm getting lost and I'd like to start over. What can I do, to make "item" elements auto-fil

[css-d] Site Check Please

also. Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http:

[css-d] firefox column shifting/jumping

No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.3/331 - Release Date: 5/3/2006 __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2

Re: [css-d] What are these weird classifiers?

did not find anything with a quick Google search before posting my query, either. Searched with the wrong terms, probably. At 16:52 20-04-06, cj wrote: >well, i can give it a shot at least! ;) You confirmed what I was concl

[css-d] What are these weird classifiers?

ome display issues between FF and IE (FF shows coding errors, text overlaps other text in places for example but in IE everything looks 'right'). There are also some "MsoNormal" tags here & there, like someone did a poor job of cleaning them out, missed a

[css-d] Safari puzzlement with divs/possibly float issues?

of the books to display for people the issues that caused. Thank you very much for your help and time. Oh, and yes, I usually use flexible font sizes but some other issues prevented me from doing so on this project :) Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- N

Re: [css-d] Browser Check: Mac especially (NTKN)

ecially since it is the same image being linked to from three separate locations. The div containing the filler image on the left was copied en toto, renamed, and the left: classifier tweaked for proper offset at center and right. Reese -- Ink Works http

[css-d] Developing for OmniWeb: what is the consensus?

issues. Is this generally correct? What can be or is normally said to clients who observe that pages which look fine in all the other browsers typically don't look quite right in OmniWeb? Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __

[css-d] Browser Check: Mac especially (NTKN)

sting/structure.css http://inkworkswell.com/clients/testing/composition.css Reese __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evol

[css-d] Fixed (was Son of Piefecta: Trouble with div height)

I delinked the attached "setHeight.js" file, the problem went away. Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ --

[css-d] Son of Piefecta: Trouble with div height

nt). CSS below, here are partial FF1.5 and IE6 screenshots: http://inkworkswell.com/temp/ff_screenshot.gif http://inkworkswell.com/temp/ie_screenshot.gif Tips & suggestions greatly appreciated. Reese -- Ink Works Publication Services, Inc. http://www.inkworkswell.com #wrapper { width:

[css-d] Alternate box model hacks?

my earlier site checks perhaps? Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by ev

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

m, sorry. What does "greek through" mean in this context? Reese __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evol

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

-menu items disappear >after i click on them. If a page is part of a subsection, then the >menu should stay open. I'll have to learn more about Javascript to make that happen. Reese __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht

[css-d] Site Check Please

We are looking for feedback on http://inkworkswell.com/clients/monroelab Especially from MacIE/Safari users. All comments on display issues welcome. Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL

[css-d] Fixed: Navlinks Vertical Alignment Issue

ther the client approves them or not. Reese At 16:01 18-11-05, Reese wrote: >A neophytish question for the esteemed scholars, gurus, and other wise >ones reported to frequent this list: > >On http://inkworkswell.net/booth/monroelab/clients/crowncork.php >the left navigation me

[css-d] Navlinks Vertical Alignment Issue / Site Check

ight navigation images not displaying quite properly in IE6 also (they are the way we want them in FF1). Tips & suggestions appreciated. Lastly, we are looking for feedback from MacIE/Safari users *crosses fingers* Reese -- Ink Works http://w

[css-d] Re: safari unordered lists--margin left

From: "webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi there Reese, I'm pretty new to CSS AND I don't have a MAC to test this on. I'll just put it out and take my lumps as they come. I put a margin-right on the feature box (the box floated left) and removed the left-m

[css-d] safari unordered lists--margin left

as/safarishot.jpg I've also tried using padding, but that didn't give me the result I seek. Any suggestions on how I might get these bullets to scooch over for Safari? Thanks much, Reese __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[css-d] list styling

. .col1, col2, .col3) floated left, she will have to manually adjust the content of each column as her number of magazine titles grow. Utilizing a list will enable her to simply add a list item and have the columns resort themselves accordingly

Re: [css-d] Specificity question - FIXED

ed, #order a:hover, #order a:active {blah} Which seems eminently intuitive, to me. I cannot foresee making that same mistake again while using this formatting tip. Reese -- http://www.inkworkswell.com 1+ 727-942-9255 __ css-discuss [E

Re: [css-d] Specificity question

} then nothing here has any effect, all the earlier styles apply themselves to the new link. A thought, I am using tags to give different bits of text in the div#order link different colors, could that be interfering with the shorthand? Reese -- http://www.inkworkswell.

[css-d] Specificity question

I didn't want to go through the several score of pages to give all the other links an ID, I am faced with abandoning the idea of a different link style. What can I do? Reese -- Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com __ css-discu

Re: [css-d] Text weirdness @ 640x480

At 00:38 16-06-05, Reese wrote: >We've recently discovered a bit of weirdness... Nevermind. I wrote that post, then stepped out to the garage to try finishing another sort of project, while I was out there my partner fixed it. A had a top border defined and at such a narrow resolution

[css-d] Text weirdness @ 640x480

80 viewers comprise < 1% of all Web surfers, per the last report we've seen. Reese - Ink Works http://www.inkworkswell.com 1+ (727) 942-9255 __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/c