[css-d] Site check please

Hello list, Another day another template, I'd appreciate some testing on http://ipg.sanchothefat.com Its the development copy of a simple website I've put together to try and improve their search engine rankings. I'm not really a designer so I didn't spend long on the design (its a lot bet

Re: [css-d] Site check please, esp. Mac & UNIX.

Mark Batty (Gmail) wrote: >> This is due to the overflow:hidden; I am not sure if this is a bug. I >> think Safari needs a width in #cwrap. A problem, regarding your >> em-padding on these elements. A better understanding of the bug would >> give us a better solution. > Do you think that setting

Re: [css-d] Site check please, esp. Mac & UNIX.

> This is due to the overflow:hidden; I am not sure if this is a bug. I > think Safari needs a width in #cwrap. A problem, regarding your > em-padding on these elements. A better understanding of the bug would > give us a better solution. Do you think that setting #col1 to 99.9% or hiding the ov

Re: [css-d] site check please

Erik Visser wrote: > David Laakso wrote: > >> Erik Visser wrote: >> >>> http://beta.bartbleijerveld.nl/8/site/ >> p :: ie/opera/ff/moz >> Crazy about all that white space. >> > > too much you mean? > I mean that I like all the white space. > >> Might be nice to relieve some of t

Re: [css-d] Site check please, esp. Mac & UNIX.

Mark Batty (Gmail) wrote: > In Safari, #cwrap shrinks-to-fit #col1 to a width of a word. #cwrap { overflow: hidden; ... } #col1 { width: 100%; ...} This is due to the overflow:hidden; I am not sure if this is a bug. I think Safari needs a width

Re: [css-d] site check please

David Laakso wrote: > Erik Visser wrote: >> http://beta.bartbleijerveld.nl/8/site/ >> > xp :: ie/opera/ff/moz > Crazy about all that white space. too much you mean? > Might be nice to relieve some of the starkness, though, with a touch of color > here and there. what is starkness? the simple

[css-d] Site check please, esp. Mac & UNIX.

Hi all, would you be able to check the following for me please, especially on Mac and UNIX. The portfolio link (main nav at the top) has a page to check the 'you are here' effect, all other pages don't exist yet.

Re: [css-d] site check please

Erik Visser wrote: > http://beta.bartbleijerveld.nl/8/site/ > > thanks, Erik > xp :: ie/opera/ff/moz Nice, clean , and simple site. Crazy about all that white space. Might be nice to relieve some of the starkness, though, with a touch of color here and there. I do not know exactly what is caus

[css-d] site check please

http://beta.bartbleijerveld.nl/8/site/ thanks, Erik __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discu

Re: [css-d] site check please

> .vnav li a{ > width: 100%; > } > > .vnav li a:hover { > zoom: 1; > width: 100%; > } > > www.coalcreekcollision.com is the site. Was this a typo or did you not add the zoom to the a as well? Not just the a:hover. Sorry if this isn't helping... -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist

Re: [css-d] site check please

I already had display: block defined in the main stylesheet (stylesheet.css) for both a: and a:hover. I keep all my if IE stuff in a separate stylesheet (if_ie.css), and added the following to it: .vnav li a{ width: 100%; } .vnav li a:hover { zoom: 1; width: 100%; } www.coalcreekcollision.

Re: [css-d] site check please

>Also - for IE it would be better if I could make hover work >for the entire width of the menu try adding display:block; to your a's and for IE add zoom:1; for the same a's. width:100%; on the a's might be needed as well. HTH -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph: 5

[css-d] site check please

Thanks to advice that has come through this group since the beginning of the year, this site just went live. Tips that have been particularly useful have included centering words and groups images, also some general tips on opacity and background images, alt-text. I checked on windows XP, IE

Re: [css-d] site check please (Pat)

Hi Peter I've tried out most of your suggestions and they work great. I haven't tried the one for fixing the varying column lengths yet, but will do that soon. Thank you very much for you help. Pat Peter wrote: Try adding, let'

Re: [css-d] site check please

-Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [css-d] site check please Yes, I am pretty sure you are right aboout the overlap/gap being caused by the absolute positioning. You have the positioned absolutely relative to the , fixed 102px below the top of the page. When the header box expands with t

Re: [css-d] site check please

From: "Pat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 10:16 PM Subject: [css-d] site check please > Hello, > > Could someone have a look at a site that I've rebuilt. It is my first > attempt at a proper website since starting to learn XHTML and CSS last >

[css-d] site check please

Hello, Could someone have a look at a site that I've rebuilt. It is my first attempt at a proper website since starting to learn XHTML and CSS last year. Before that, I'd done a couple of sites using Front Pge, so it's been a great learning curve. I've put the complete site here temporarily: h

Re: [css-d] Site Check please, www.1850.co.uk

Andree Hollander wrote: > Here's a screen shot from Mac OS X 10.4, Netscape 7.2. > > Overall it looks very nice, but the last item on the left (Home Page > Featured Items) has too little room. And I think it is strange that > the tooltips on the links have the same text at the items themselves.

Re: [css-d] Site Check please, www.1850.co.uk

Thanks a bundle to everyone =] The screen shots provided by David Laasko all look good to me, there's a bit of a width issue on the product boxes in IE5.0 but it's still set out like a list so i'm going to treat that as 'acceptable' for now. I can't believe i forgot about those site map and con

Re: [css-d] Site Check please, www.1850.co.uk

On 18/05/06, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert O'Rourke wrote: > > [...I would really > > appreciate it if anyone could have a look on mac browsers and earlier IE > > versions. > > http://www.1850.co.uk/ > > Rob > > FYI here is a very useful URL: http://www.danvine.

Re: [css-d] Site Check please, www.1850.co.uk

Robert O'Rourke wrote: > [...I would really > appreciate it if anyone could have a look on mac browsers and earlier IE > versions. > http://www.1850.co.uk/ > Rob > The text-links for 'site map,' and 'skip nav' only appear at extreme font re-sizing; and, since they are white on

[css-d] Site Check please, www.1850.co.uk

Hello, I am in the process of handing over a website for an antiques company and so far I have only been able to test it under FF 1.5, IE6win, and Opera 8+. These are all fine i think but i would really appreciate it if anyone could have a look on mac browsers and earlier IE versions.

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please! - fiddler

On 06/05/03 03:52 (GMT-0400) Tom Payne apparently typed: > If anyone's got a minute, could they have a look at http:// > www.fiddlerontherails.com - it's tested in Safari, Firefox Mac and > IE6 (although there have been a few changes since then), but any > other browsers and any feedback woul

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please!

On 3 May 2006, at 08:58, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing I notice (Maxthon - IE6) is that if the font is set to > Largest, your top menu wraps the CONTACT link onto a second row. I > guess > this is due to the fixed width of your content column. Thanks James, I've

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please!

nt column. > > > Regards, > James Hebben > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Payne > Sent: 03 May 2006 08:52 > To: CSS List > Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please! > > Hi

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please!

Behalf Of Tom Payne Sent: 03 May 2006 08:52 To: CSS List Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please! Hi all, If anyone's got a minute, could they have a look at http:// www.fiddlerontherails.com - it's tested in Safari, Firefox Mac and IE6 (although there have been a few changes since then

[css-d] Site Check Please!

Hi all, If anyone's got a minute, could they have a look at http:// www.fiddlerontherails.com - it's tested in Safari, Firefox Mac and IE6 (although there have been a few changes since then), but any other browsers and any feedback would be great. Thanks in advance! Tom __

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

sites must haves. deano > -Original Message- > From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:55 AM > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com > > Hi gang: > > Please revi

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

On 4/27/06, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > only 20 percent of the viewing audience has a screen size of 800 x 600 and > that figure is dropping at a rate of 5 percent per six months (10 percent per > year). > As such, in two years, the narrow-screen user number will drop below a > detectable a

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

Felix hath said: > > Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)? > >None. Let it be whatever size it needs to be. -snip (good stuff) -- >Those adjustments may very well including permitting a reduced width, in >order to allow a squeeze in place of a scroll for viewers with

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

At 3:59 PM -0400 4/27/06, Tom Livingston wrote: >On 4/27/06, David Merchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>a max measurement: 544 for the width >> >> TTFN, >> David >> > > >8^O > >544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution? > I personally think that in trying to accommodat

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

> -Original Message- > From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:55 AM > To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com > > Hi gang: > > Please review the following site: &g

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

>8^O > >544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution? Well, I actually try to make them fluid, so for larger resolutions the sites don't look bad, but 'tis hard to make sites completely fluid (at least for me) and so at some point when reducing window down, the page isn't

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

I suspect the large font size must be due to selecting Georgia as the first choice? Just a question, as a newbie ( still! ), what does the "lge" class do; as in ...  |  ... I didn't see it defined in either style sheet? Really liked the clean design, especially after reducing the text size! J.

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

On 06/04/27 12:32 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed: > At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote: >>On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed: >>> Please review the following site: >>> http://ancientstones.com >>> Suggestions and comments welcomed. >>Nice. But, those using sidebars

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

On 4/27/06, David Merchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >a max measurement: 544 for the width > > TTFN, > David > 8^O 544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution? -- Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ___

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

>Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)? Some may disagree with this, but I try to aim at using WebTV's (MSN TV) browser's usable screen area as a max measurement: 544 for the width (I haven't succeeded with all my pages yet). As we all know, it is hard, really, to de

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

The main page title bar says "Ancient Title". Think you mean "Tile" :) On 4/27/06 5:55 AM, "tedd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi gang: > > Please review the following site: > > http://ancientstones.com > > Suggestions and comments welcomed. > > Thank you. > > tedd ___

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

At 1:23 PM -0400 4/27/06, David Laakso wrote: >>>On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed: >>Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)? >> >>Thanks. >> >>tedd >> >I prefer 780 min with 1200 max feeding same to the 'evil one' with >'ie expressions." Felix will, I

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote: >On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed: > >> Please review the following site: > >> http://ancientstones.com > >> Suggestions and comments welcomed. > >Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much. >It requires

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

At 8:20 PM +0530 4/27/06, Rahul Gonsalves wrote: >tedd wrote: >>Hi gang: >> >>Please review the following site: >> >>http://ancientstones.com >> >>Suggestions and comments welcomed. >> >>Thank you. >> >>tedd > > >Sweet! > >Has David Laakso seen this site? Interesting that you should ask -- he's p

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

Must agree with both reviewers: 1. I use a sidebar virtually 100% of the time and so I have to scroll horizontally to see all of this Web page. On the Catalog page, for instance, I do not see the Price radio buttons at all. Funny how, for many people, the eye notices a vertical scrollbar readil

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

Typo in main paige in the find "ouri" where it should be "our" On 4/27/06, Rahul Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tedd wrote: > > Hi gang: > > > > Please review the following site: > > > > http://ancientstones.com > > > > Suggestions and comments welcomed. > > > > Thank you. > > > > tedd

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

tedd wrote: > Hi gang: > > Please review the following site: > > http://ancientstones.com > > Suggestions and comments welcomed. > > Thank you. > > tedd Sweet! Has David Laakso seen this site? Nothing constructive to add, however, some of your images seem to need the background changed to

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed: > Please review the following site: > http://ancientstones.com > Suggestions and comments welcomed. Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much. It requires a lot of viewport width or a smallish default text size to

[css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com

Hi gang: Please review the following site: http://ancientstones.com Suggestions and comments welcomed. Thank you. tedd -- http://sperling.com/ _

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Brian Gottier wrote: > I'd appreciate a site check with other browser / OS configurations. > Site is http://iamsentme.com > Robert > > > It seemed fine to me, Robert-- Linux Opera, FF, and SeaMonkey. Some very /subjective/ thoughts: For those who /do not/ set their font preferences for whatever

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Hi Robert I had a look at the site and clicked around. Basically no problems that I could see. Platform: Mac OS X 10.4.6 Browsers / Test results: Safari v2.0.3 (417.9.2) / No noticeable problems Firefox v1.5.0.2 / No noticeable problems Camino 1.0 / No noticeable problems Opera 8.54 / No noti

[css-d] Site Check Please

I have checked with Firefox WinXP I have checked with IE6 WinXP I have checked with Golive's Live Rendering, which is supposed to be Opera (WinXP) I'd appreciate a site check with other browser / OS configurations. Site is http://iamsentme.com Thank you, Robert __

Re: [css-d] Site check please

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.ninaza.com > > I know I've got an issue with Opera and the Suckerfish dropdowns (I > need an explicit width on the LI's , I believe) Compared Opera 8.5 & 9tp2 to Firefox 1.5.0.1 and IE6. Couldn't see any differences regarding the menu or any other parts of

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Hi Ingo, I've already asked him to find out what the environment the "errors" are occurring in but have just had the response "PC, with Firefox, Explorer, and Navigator" which isn't very useful. I'm currently waiting on more information. He did mention a script error -I'm assuming that was one p

Re: [css-d] Site check please

Tim (The Site Doctor) wrote: > my client from last week is still > complaining about problems with his site www.avciarchitects.com. You should ask him what issues exactly he is speaking of, if he is using "the internet" or firefox, what resolution, which page ... I don't expect that the scatter

[css-d] Site check please

Hi All, Thanks for the pointers last week but my client from last week is still complaining about problems with his site www.avciarchitects.com. I think he's referring to old issues but could people please check the site for me. There is a glitch in IE Mac still where the site is aligned to the l

Re: [css-d] site check please

Stephanie Chausse wrote: > I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks > again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look..] > http://www.provlib.org/ppl/about/about.html > > Stephanie Chausse > > Uwe answered the validation questions. As far as the rest is

Re: [css-d] site check please

On 14.04.2006 17:03, Stephanie Chausse wrote: > I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks > again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look-all css is valid; > still have a few html errors and I am not sure how to fix-those are below if > anyone has any though

Re: [css-d] site check please

> From: Stephanie Chausse > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:03 AM > http://www.provlib.org/ppl/about/about.html > one I'd like comments on is the breadcrumbs-position of > them-does it make the page too cluttered up there with the > searches?-Does it > make the navigation any better? The page b

[css-d] site check please

I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look-all css is valid; still have a few html errors and I am not sure how to fix-those are below if anyone has any thought on that-I've made some changes (again much thanks to

Re: [css-d] site check please

Ryan, On Apr 12, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Ryan Brunsvold wrote: > Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old, > table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site: > > Site: > CSS: > > Having

Re: [css-d] site check please

Ryan Brunsvold wrote: > Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old, > table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site: > Site: > CSS: > > Having a few display problems in Safari. >

Re: [css-d] site check please

Ryan Brunsvold wrote: > Hi again everyone, > > Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old, > table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site: > > Site: > CSS: > > I think you'll ne

[css-d] site check please

Hi again everyone, Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old, table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site: Site: CSS: Having a few display problems in Safari, so any help on t

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

On 06/04/11 01:29 (GMT-0400) Jonathan Mao apparently typed: >>> http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ > What do you mean by "mousetype"? Mousetype is slang for any text that is significantly smaller than the user default. Opinions on the size threshhold vary, but generally begin at somewhere aro

[css-d] Site check please....

We are rapidly approaching launch and I am still awaiting content, but I do have some things working (not all links work up in the header and the search is not implemented yet). Also, I know that the site fails for character set...we will be adding this to the Apache configs. You'll need a username

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

On 11/04/2006, at 2:38 PM, ~davidLaakso wrote: > Jonathan Mao wrote: >> On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote: >> >> >>> Jonathan Mao wrote: >>> I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE 6 / Win http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ >>>

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

Jonathan Mao wrote: > On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote: > > >> Jonathan Mao wrote: >> >>> I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with >>> IE 6 / Win >>> http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ >>> >>> The layout should look like this: >>> http://www.int

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

The problem has been resolved. Thanks to David and Felix for their help. Cheers Jonno On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote: > Jonathan Mao wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... >> >> I'm having trouble with the display of the footer

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote: > Jonathan Mao wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... >> >> I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with >> IE 6 / Win >> >> http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ >> >> The l

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

Jonathan Mao wrote: > Hi all > > I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... > > I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE > 6 / Win > > http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ > > The layout should look like this: > > http://www.intrinsicdigital.co

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

On 11/04/2006, at 2:56 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote: > Jonathan Mao wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... >> >> I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with >> IE 6 / Win >> >> http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ >> >> The la

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

Jonathan Mao wrote: > Hi all > > I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... > > I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE > 6 / Win > > http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ > > The layout should look like this: > > http://www.intrinsicdigital.co

Re: [css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

Hi again The page also seems to look weird in Opera 8.54 (Mac) I'm looking into it now... but if you have any ideas... :-) Cheers Jonno On 10/04/2006, at 9:42 PM, Jonathan Mao wrote: > Hi all > > I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... > > I'm having trouble with th

[css-d] Site check please - IE 6 / Win

Hi all I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered... I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE 6 / Win http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/ The layout should look like this: http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/screenshot.html Any suggestions

[css-d] Site check please

I just launched a site this morning - designed and built on a very rushed schedule and without time for extensive testing on a wider range of browsers (the company is in a heavily IE space). Since I'll be adding to the site later in the week (hopefully) I'll have a chance to fix other issues tha

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

Keith Kaiser wrote: > I want to send out a big "how how" to all the people who offered > advise, sent code pieces, or just looked at my site; > http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable I still have a bug or two but its > come a long way thanks to all the support out there. > > > You are looking better.

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

I want to send out a big "how how" to all the people who offered advise, sent code pieces, or just looked at my site; http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable I still have a bug or two but its come a long way thanks to all the support out there. -- YIS/YIV Keith D Kaiser -- Venturing Roundtable Commission

Re: [css-d] Site check please--K. Kaiser

~davidLaakso wrote: > Keith Kaiser wrote: >> OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on >> FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find >> a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch >> pages, a complete rewrite from a very table

Re: [css-d] Site check please--K. Kaiser

Keith Kaiser wrote: > OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on > FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find > a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch > pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page. > This

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

francky wrote: > Brian Funk wrote: > > > >> Keith Kaiser wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> OK! It's done. >>> help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback. >>> >>> http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable >>> >>> >> >> on WinXP IE6: >> >> . > > > 5. > In general, be carefull with colored w

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Brian Funk wrote: >Keith Kaiser wrote: > > >>OK! It's done. >>help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback. >> >>http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable >> >> >on WinXP IE6: > >Your menu is being obscured by the "starWrap" content below. > >

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Keith Kaiser wrote: > OK! It's done. > help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback. > > http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable > on WinXP IE6: Your menu is being obscured by the "starWrap" content below.

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Keith Kaiser wrote: >You know the problem is... the validator doesn't validate URL's >correctly and many of the errors that show up are because of this. >Also I don't know what to use in place of a less than sign (<) which >also says its wrong in a validator but ≤ doesn't seem to work in >FireFox.

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

>OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on >FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find >a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch >pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page. >This is a completely voluntee

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

Mike Davies wrote: > www.integra-server.co.uk/essie/ > > The page appears correctly in Opera 7.54 and nearly correct in > IE5.0/Windows. There are a couple of things with Firefox : Comment: those browsers are a bit old now. If Firefox is just as old then that's probably the reason for those "thi

[css-d] Site check please...

OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page. This is a completely volunteer pro

Re: [css-d] Site check please - www.fullcirqle.co.za

ian wrote: > Prezence LimitedHi all, > > I've checked this site (http://www.fullcirqle.co.za/) in Firefox 1.5 and IE6 > SP2 on Windows XP, as well as Safari 1.31 on Mac OS X - all seems OK. > > I have a strange bug on the registration form in Firefox on the Mac OS with > the tag spanning all the

Re: [css-d] Site check please - www.fullcirqle.co.za

ian wrote: > I've checked this site (http://www.fullcirqle.co.za/) in Firefox 1.5 > and IE6 SP2 on Windows XP, as well as Safari 1.31 on Mac OS X - all > seems OK. Well, on the basics: let's hope none of your visitors need, or know how, to use 'font-resizing', 'ignore font size' and/or 'minimum

[css-d] Site check please - www.fullcirqle.co.za

Prezence LimitedHi all, I've checked this site (http://www.fullcirqle.co.za/) in Firefox 1.5 and IE6 SP2 on Windows XP, as well as Safari 1.31 on Mac OS X - all seems OK. I have a strange bug on the registration form in Firefox on the Mac OS with the tag spanning all the way across the form. I

Re: [css-d] site check please

At 04:15 PM 3/9/2006 , Michael Clayton wrote: >>Menu DIV needs to be the length of the number of thumbs or to the bottom >>border. >>ht >>tp://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/equalheight >>should have the

Re: [css-d] site check please

> > Menu DIV needs to be the length of the number of thumbs or to the bottom > border. http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/equalheightshould have the information you're looking for. Skip to "How?" if you aren't interested in a brief history of equal height columns. Long m

[css-d] site check please

Greetings, I would appreciate some help and comments on this page: http://mbreiding.us/2006/menu_new/menu.html http://mbreiding.us/2006/menu_new/index.css Issues: Menu DIV needs to be the length of the number of thumbs or to the bottom border. Long menu items ( Shark Valley - Everglades NP)

[css-d] Site check please,fat paw design site redesign

2006/02/20 Hello, All: I'd appreciate a site check of the redesign of my website, fat paw design. http://www.fatpawdesign.com/index.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/fpdbaseformatcss.css http://www.fatpawdesign.com/fpdpagecss.css I am particulalry interested in how resizing the view-port, text s

[css-d] Site Check Please

Hi all. I'm wrapping up my internal testing on http://test.cubiclearmy.com/ I'm using the basic skidoo-too layout from http://webhost.bridgew.edu/etribou/layouts/skidoo_too/ Thanks for the time anybody who looks at this site. Issues I'm aware of: 1. the page doesn't validate CSS. 2. The hatched

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

On 2/2/06, Oliver Saager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I just created a website for an art gallery. May I kindly ask you to check > the website for any CSS improvements? (Of course your opinion on style or > general points is also highly appreciated.) > > You'll find the website

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

Oliver Saager wrote: > Hello everybody! > > I just created a website for an art gallery. May I kindly ask you to check > the website for any CSS improvements? (Of course your opinion on style or > general points is also highly appreciated.) > > You'll find the website at: http://www.saager.info > >

[css-d] Site Check please

Hello everybody! I just created a website for an art gallery. May I kindly ask you to check the website for any CSS improvements? (Of course your opinion on style or general points is also highly appreciated.) You'll find the website at: http://www.saager.info Many thanks in advance! Oliver ___

Re: [css-d] site check PLEASE

Nice and clean overall. Just some point you might want to consider: - the CSS validator objects to an empty color: rule for .proprieta at line 398. AFAIK you're not using it anywhere, so you might just cull it - text sized in pixels can't be resized in IE. Might try to use ems, percents or keyw

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - udrise.udayton.edu

David Laakso wrote: > Joe Otten wrote: > > >> I saw the page viewed in FF 1.0 and it had some serious layout issues. I >> was wondering if others could spot any issues with code, layout, etc. >> Site: http://udrise.udayton.edu/index.asp >> > > Joe, in Debian FF1.0.7 @1400 the 3 sets of nav

Re: [css-d] site check PLEASE

Augusto Murri wrote: >Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix >them.. :| > >http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI > >tnx to all! > Augusto, It is fine on my end @1400 in Debian FF1.07 and Konqueror 3.3. A little more contrast for the text knocked out of p

Re: [css-d] site check PLEASE

6:10 AM To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Subject: [css-d] site check PLEASE Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix them.. :| http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI tnx to all! __ c

Re: [css-d] site check PLEASE

On 1/26/06, Augusto Murri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Check my site.. i think there are some problems but i don't know how to fix > them.. :| > > http://www.augustomurri.it/workBoard/MUSEI > > tnx to all! I don't see any problems. Did you manage to fix them all? -- -- Christian Montoya christia

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >