-Caveat Lector-
I am NOT and have never claimed to be a "Native
American." I AM a North American Native. You have
called many people Colleen. I think you and Prudy are
the same person but I do not care for you are full of
shit as both people. According to you, who seem to
make the rules now,
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Kindred Spirit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It has always been my understanding that "Caveat
> Lector" was there for a reason before each post and
> that a person could post something and not expect to
> be attacked personally because of the content of the
> post.
Then you reall
-Caveat Lector-
Nessie, June and Prudy,
It has always been my understanding that "Caveat
Lector" was there for a reason before each post and
that a person could post something and not expect to
be attacked personally because of the content of the
post. If an articel calls somebody a name that is
-Caveat Lector-
>If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called somebody a "coon"
why did no one else attack me?
I got there first. The other people were apparently polite enough not to
waste bandwidth with a bunch of dittos.
>you, NESSIE are a LIAR. I did not call anybody anything
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Kindred Spirit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If it "appars to ALL THE WORLD" that I have called
> somebody a "coon" why did no one else attack me?
Because no one wanted to grant your post any suggestion of dignity that it did not
deserve by wasting
bandwidth replying to it...
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Prudence L. Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You're absolutely right, June, and I hear they're going to do away with
> coffee breaks too. Prudy
If you truly equate coffee breaks with what Clinton and Lewinsky did, there is
obviously nothing more to
say...
Other than the rest
-Caveat Lector-
Nessie,
"FWD" just means "Forwarded" and is not a disclaimer
and is automatic on most of the software I have ever
used."FYI"has to at least be typed in. Now why would
a person type that in if it did not mean something.
It means something is just being sent along for
informational
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/23/2001 11:11:30 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< A public official, whose salary is paid for by the taxpayer, who instead
of conducting the duties of his job
during working hours engages in sexual hankypanky with an underling, such
es
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/23/2001 8:44:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< We shouldn't have to "ask around" - you made the allegations, it is
up to _you_ to provide the proof - just as you demand of the other
listmembers. >>
You must have me mixed up with so
-Caveat Lector-
>So, you don't think Clinton's wife and daughter were hurt by his
marital infidelity?
maybe, maybe not. It depends on their attitude.
>According to many religions, sex under the circumstances that Clinton
and Lewinsky engaged in it IS 'immoral'.
That doesnt make it immoral. M
-Caveat Lector-
>Most people acknowledge the "follies of youth."
By that logic, we ought to turn the Manson gang loose. After all, they
were pretty young at the time they killed those people.
>Nobody cares about Clinton's sex life!
That is patently false. He wouldnt have lied about it i
-Caveat Lector-
On 23 Jan 2001, at 10:38, Ynr Chyldz Wyld wrote:
>
> A public official, whose salary is paid for by the taxpayer, who
> instead of conducting the duties of his job during working hours
> engages in sexual hankypanky with an underling, such escapades taking
> place in a public bui
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Nessie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Apples and oranges. Bush endangered lives, maybe yours, maybe mine, and
>definitely his own. Clinton had sex. Nobody got hurt from Clinton
>having sex with Monica
So, you don't think Clinton's wife and daughter were hurt by his marital infide
-Caveat Lector-
On 23 Jan 2001, at 5:27, Prudence L. Kuhn wrote:
>
> Ask around, dear, I'm still not going to put their names on the net;
> although I got them (not from the inner circles) from the magazine
> section of my Sunday paper a couple of years ago. I had forgotten
> them. It didn't s
-Caveat Lector-
> << > They had nicknames
> >I can't recall, and I'm sure not going to put their real names
> on the net.
> >>
>
> Ask around, dear, I'm still not going to put their names on the
> net; although
> I got them (not from the inner circles) from the magazine section of my
> Sunday p
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/22/2001 10:47:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< > They had nicknames
>I can't recall, and I'm sure not going to put their real names on the net.
>>
Ask around, dear, I'm still not going to put their names on the net; although
I got
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/22/2001 7:45:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Driving while drinking at that time
was not taken as seriously as it should have been but
we should compare Clinton's youth to Bush's youth and
NOT Clinton as an adult to Bush as a yo
-0800
> Reply-to: Conspiracy Theory Research List
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Nessie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fwd: Re: [CTRL] In a First
> Act,
> Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Caveat
nt now owns the copyrights.
> -Original Message-
> From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Prudence L. Kuhn
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 8:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector-
>Yet those wanting to detract from him act as though this just happened
the way Clinton's sexcapades did.
Apples and oranges. Bush endangered lives, maybe yours, maybe mine, and
definitely his own. Clinton had sex. Nobody got hurt from Clinton
having sex with Monica till the p
ist
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: T Nohava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks
> Clinton Orders
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> >Get your priorities straight.
> I've seen your pos
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 6:37:01 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< People bitch yet everybody
wants to drive that new SUV or 4x4 that keeps sucking up all that gas. >>
I don't know who was waiting where, but my old Toyota gets 42 miles to the
gallon.
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 6:04:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Then what you're saying is you have knowledge of the hidden history of the
Whitehouse well enough to know which former Presidents indulged in the act
of Oral Sex in the Oval Office. I'm
-Caveat Lector-
> like Clinton is the only one to ever haave sex /oral in whitehouse ,
> come on...
> What You know becomes a belief as soon
> as it is expressed ...
>
Sounds like conjecture.
http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion & infor
---Original Message-
> From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Nessie
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 1:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
>
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Corr
uld name the parties involved. Could you give us a quick run
down on these people?
> -Original Message-
> From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Prudence L. Kuhn
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 3:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
In a message dated 1/21/01 3:32:49 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bravo, hollie thomas!!! I agree
I also agree wholeheartedly...good post Miss Hollie!!
Bill.
-Caveat Lector-
Bravo, hollie thomas!!! I agree
sno0wl
On 21 Jan 01, at 11:43, hollie thomas wrote:
> Sex, on the other hand, is nobodys business except for the persons
> actually involved. A case could be made that if doing it in the office
> somehow impaired Clintons ability to do his j
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 01/21/2001 7:53:22 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never brought
it
to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual escapades (legacy). I
wonder if he'll keep with recently
uary 21, 2001 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
-Caveat Lector-
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never
brought it
to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual escapades (legacy). I
wonder if he'll keep with recently c
-Caveat Lector-
Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't think he lied about it, he never
brought it
to the forefront, much like Clinton and his sexual escapades (legacy). I
wonder if he'll keep with recently created tradition in the Whitehouse
of
having dignitaries wait while he has oral sex in the most
oral sex in the most powerful office on
the planet?
> -Original Message-
> From: Conspiracy Theory Research List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Nessie
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 1:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] In a First Act, Bush Bl
-Caveat Lector-
>``Everyone who enters into public service for the United States has a
duty to the American people to maintain the highest standards of
integrity in government,'' Bush said in the memo.
This from a guy who drove drunk, got busted and lied about it.
Integrety? Gimme a break.
www
http://live.altavista.com/e?efi=467&ei=2364195&ern=y
In a First Act, Bush Blocks Clinton Orders
Deborah Charles
01/20/01
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Moving quickly upon taking office, President George
W. Bush on Sa
34 matches
Mail list logo