-Caveat Lector-
From: "nessie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm offended that someone would show so little respect for the harmonious
cohesion of this often valuable resource we share. Are you being
disruptive on purpose, or don't you realize what you're doing?
I found nothing disrespectful nor
-Caveat Lector-
If it isn't what you beleive why are you saying it?
Because it's the truth. This list is a group effort. How well it works is
determined by what we all think. I'm not offended by content like this.
I'm offended that someone would show so little respect for the harmonious
Friday, October 27, 2000 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] MP child rapist
Do not drive them away by flaunting things you know will alienate them in
in ways that deny them the choice whether to read it or not. Everyone here
values the freedom to choose, or at least their own freedom to choose.
Cho
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
why do you seem determind that there was a disruptive motive in the
sending
of the original mail?
I'm not determined, but I am suspicious. The powers that be have a long,
thick, rich history of disrupting conspiracy research. It happens a lot.
-Caveat Lector-
nessie wrote:
I'm not talking about censorship. I'm talking about manners. Look, in real
life I curse often.
snip
I haven't had time to really follow CTRL in detail lately, but I would
like to clarify a few things. First, I agree with nessie about
'manners' - manners are
-Caveat Lector-
why do you seem determind that there was a disruptive motive in the
sending
of the original mail?
I'm not determined, but I am suspicious. The powers that be have a long,
thick, rich history of disrupting conspiracy research. It happens a lot.
Sometimes it's just somebody's
-Caveat Lector-
It was pretty clever of them to arrange for this guy to molest his
students decades ago,
That's assuming he is guilty, which is far from clear as yet. seeing as
how this guy is a politico, it's just as likely he is being framed by
other politicos as it is that he's guilty.
.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] MP child rapist
. You will sit back
and pat yourselves on the back for being non-judgmental about one who
posts
child pornography on a public site such as this.
A HREF
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will not back off.
And so you, one person that you are, will continue to insist on acting as Chief Censor
of this list...
So all of you who have no problem reading a detailed description of a sexual
act with a child, what are you going to do about
-Caveat Lector-
Should I refer you to my web site and
start with the link on the left that
says Kinsey.htm
http://ThePiedPiper.tripod.com/
Laura Lee Lanning~Shipton 26Oct2000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
I will not back off. One of the major ways a culture is changed is thru
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
Those who post on these
boards and claim to be adult enough to discuss various theories in a
mature
manner should have vocabularies large enough not to need graphic detailed
descriptions of all manner of criminal behavior and sexual
-Caveat Lector-
Those who post on these
boards and claim to be adult enough to discuss various theories in a
mature
manner should have vocabularies large enough not to need graphic detailed
descriptions of all manner of criminal behavior and sexual abberations.
Personally, I wasn't offended.
]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] MP child rapist
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/25/00 6:40:40 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But someone who IS immature and views something that was described in
nothing but a cold, clinical man
-Caveat Lector-
Different people have different ideas about what abuse is.
For me to realize the extent of what that person did, did
take graphic reading. There are some kids today that
have no concept of what a 8 track is, or the concept that
children would allow things like this to happen
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/25/00 12:02:41 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as gratuitous details, I think the seriuousness of the allegations
requires them.
I agree. The events are horrible, not the matter-of-fact description of
them. The details
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Immature individuals are those who get their jollies thinking they have
slipped one past others...e.g., "I've tricked you into reading child
pornography though you would never read it otherwise."
The original poster should clean the slobber off his
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/25/00 6:40:40 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But someone who IS immature and views something that was described in
nothing but a cold, clinical manner as
'pornography' should be the one wiping slobber off of their own face, before
-Caveat Lector-
I will not back off. One of the major ways a culture is changed is thru the
desensitization process. No one leaps into degenerate behavior without being
desensitized one step at a time. People who would corrupt others are very
skilled at moving them along step by step.
So all
-Caveat Lector-
Perhaps I'm desensitised to this sort of thing, but this is exactly the sort of thing
that people like David Icke, Candy Jones, lots of fundamentalists, feminists etc. are
concerned about. Right to privacy is one thing, but remember this man was a senior
member of the
]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] MP child rapist
-Caveat Lector-
Perhaps I'm desensitised to this sort of thing, but this is exactly the sort of
thing that people like David Icke, Candy Jones, lots of fundamentalists, feminists
etc. are concerned about. Right
-Caveat Lector-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Must we get this kind of pornographic details from this list. Whether it is
written from a pervert's point of view or a reporters point of view, it is
still disgusting and very offensive.
Grow up.
If certain facts of life disturb you, I suggest you
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Johannes Schmidt III" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the benefit of hindsight, maybe I should have put a
stronger disclaimer and I apologise if anyone was upset.
This is from a major newspaper here.
No disclaimer should be necessary. Anyone who posts here rightly should
-Caveat Lector-
From: "Ole Gerstrøm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You did well in posting this information. This should be the place, where we
confront the bestiality of the
world. If we dont want to look at the dirty details, then how can we do something
about it?
In the mind control litterature
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
Right to privacy is one thing, but remember this man was a senior member
of the Government, and he was also quite powerful within the Labor party
in Queensland and nationally.
What about the children's right to privacy? Isn't that more
-Caveat Lector-
June wrote:
Same advice to those who find graphic descriptions of rape too much for their
immature systems...don't spend
so much energy looking at it then. But don't act as censors for the rest of us who
are mature enough to
handle it.
The point I was trying to make,
-Caveat Lector-
Thanks Kelly for supporting what I wrote. Mature adults know what sexual
child abuse is without watching child porn tapes. Those who post on these
boards and claim to be adult enough to discuss various theories in a mature
manner should have vocabularies large enough not to
-Caveat Lector-
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000 07:56:25 -0700 nessie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
Right to privacy is one thing, but remember this man was a senior member
of the Government, and he was also quite powerful within the Labor party
in Queensland
-Caveat Lector-
For example, a married young couple here in Canada kidnapped,
raped and tortured to death two young schoolgirls (aged 14) and
videotaped their acts. When the case came to court, the judge ordered
that only himself, the jury, the lawyers, and the accused could view the
tapes.
-Caveat Lector-
Here's one for David Icke (I know he has posted information about it in the past, this
case was a really hot political potatoe after the coverup lifted slightly a few years
back).
http://www.theage.com.au/breaking/0010/23/A2813-2000Oct23.shtml
Former MP raped girl in front of
-Caveat Lector-
Must we get this kind of pornographic details from this list. Whether it is
written from a pervert's point of view or a reporters point of view, it is
still disgusting and very offensive.
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a
-Caveat Lector-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must we get this kind of pornographic details from this list. Whether it is
written from a pervert's point of view or a reporters point of view, it is
still disgusting and very offensive.
Actually, I agree. It is a terrible article, indeed, and
31 matches
Mail list logo
