[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=092 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=092 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000091]: Possible infinite loop within either POP3/IMAP code,

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=091 == Reported By:xing Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000091]: Possible infinite loop within either POP3/IMAP code,

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been CONFIRMED. == http://dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=091 == Reported By:xing Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned T

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned T

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=092 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Reply after RCPT in LMTP

2004-10-07 Thread Ilja Booij
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:13:38 -, Aaron Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been lagging terribly on getting my development system up and > running. I made a patch on another system, here it is: > > http://serendipity.cx/lmtp-reply.diff > > Please commit it to CVS for me! I've also mentione

[Dbmail-dev] Re: [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread Paul J Stevens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- ilja - 07-Oct-04 11:45 CEST -- Patch applied. HEAD doesn't compile currently. We can test this later on. Perhaps we should prep

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread Ilja Booij
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:55:18 +0200, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -- > > ilja - 07-Oct-04 11:45 CEST > > -- > > Patch

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread Paul J Stevens
Ilja Booij wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:55:18 +0200, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- ilja - 07-Oct-04 11:45 CEST --

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] Malformed headers in Outlook Express

2004-10-07 Thread Paul J Stevens
I've tracked down the problem in the old mimeparser. Straight headache stuff. A typical off-by-one error. In fact this is so arcane I don't really understand it. Maybe Ilja or Roel can shed some light on this. The patch that fixes the problem: diff -u -r1.17 dbmsgbuf.c --- dbmsgbuf.c 2004/09

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: [Dbmail] Malformed headers in Outlook Express

2004-10-07 Thread Ilja Booij
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 14:19:26 +0200, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've tracked down the problem in the old mimeparser. Straight headache stuff. > A > typical off-by-one error. That code sure is a real nightmare.. (I'm glad you're getting rid of it in your new code). > > In fact thi

[Dbmail-dev] bugs fixed: where?

2004-10-07 Thread Alessandro Magnolo
I submitted some bugs of dbmail_2_0_branch to the bug tracker (bug #97, #98, #99), and two of the have been fixed by paul. I would like to know how I can get the corrected version, or when I can expect to see the bugs fixed in 2.0. The bugs are still there in the latest dbmail_2_0_branch CVS, and t

Re: [Dbmail-dev] bugs fixed: where?

2004-10-07 Thread Paul J Stevens
Alessandro Magnolo wrote: I submitted some bugs of dbmail_2_0_branch to the bug tracker (bug #97, #98, #99), and two of the have been fixed by paul. I would like to know how I can get the corrected version, or when I can expect to see the bugs fixed in 2.0. I've fixed bug #99 in the 2.0 branch.

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=092 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Reply after RCPT in LMTP

2004-10-07 Thread Aaron Stone
Ilja Booij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 17:13:38 -, Aaron Stone wrote: > >> http://serendipity.cx/lmtp-reply.diff >> >> Please commit it to CVS for me! > > I've also mentioned this in the bugtracker-update: The patch doesn't > work because it's incomplete. There are changes

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000070]: Fails to give reponse upon completion of rcpt

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=070 == Reported By:danweber Assigned T

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=092 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

[Dbmail-dev] Re: Gerrit's Speed issue............

2004-10-07 Thread Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed now Slackware. Postgres 8.0 fresh compiled, basically I > see the same weird behaviour. There are several possibilities now: ...but the basic fact remains: something is insanely wrong in your installation. PostgreSQL is no slower than

Re: [Dbmail-dev] bugs fixed: where?

2004-10-07 Thread Alessandro Magnolo
> I've fixed bug #99 in the 2.0 branch. I'll fix #98 in for 2.0 later today or > so. thank you very much. would you be so kind to inform me when you post the fix for #98 ? > > experimental 2.1 doesn't compile. > It does if you run autoreconf -f -i in the root of your source tree. I tried and it

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=092 == Reported By:paul Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: Gerrit's Speed issue............

2004-10-07 Thread Kevin Baker
> installation. PostgreSQL is no slower than MySQL for > similar work, > and it is faster under pressure, since it scales better > with load than > MySQL does. (Same pattern, for the same reasons, as when > comparing > Oracle to MS-SQL.) I guess a bit OT for this thread, but has this been conf

Re: [Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000092]: dbmail-users shouldn't touch encryption type when not ask to

2004-10-07 Thread Aaron Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > == > Date Submitted: 16-Sep-04 19:20 CEST > Last Modified: 07-Oct-04 19:47 CEST > == > Summary:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] bugs fixed: where?

2004-10-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alessandro Magnolo wrote: I submitted some bugs of dbmail_2_0_branch to the bug tracker (bug #97, #98, #99), and two of the have been fixed by paul. I would like to know how I can get the corrected version, or when I can expect to see the bugs fixed in 2.0. The bugs are still there in the latest

Re: [Dbmail-dev] bugs fixed: where?

2004-10-07 Thread Aaron Stone
""[EMAIL PROTECTED]"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > FYI: > AFAIK _2_0_branch runs STABLE ALWAYS (to say experimental meaning > unstable IMO seems most unfair) with exception of a few hours on > September 14 which Paul fixed. > > * _2_0_branch handles a modest scale production environment just fin