Bug#1077635: debian-installer: RFC: provide UEFI shell under Advanced/Export options

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Followup-For: Bug #1077635 X-Debbugs-Cc: Pascal Hambourg On 31/07/2024 Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 31/07/2024 at 03:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> >> This is an RFC whether it would be possible to include UEFI shell into >>

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 02:04:26 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20210731+deb11u12 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 02:46:48 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u7 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u7.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u7.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 02:46:48 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u12.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u12.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bullseye to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 02:04:26 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:35:55 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u7 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

Processing of debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7.dsc debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7.tar.xz debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u7_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:35:55 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u7

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:14:31 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20210731+deb11u12 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bullseye to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 08:14:31 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20210731

Processing of debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12.dsc debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12.tar.gz debian-installer_20210731+deb11u12_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: Debian installation problem on Macbook pro from 2019

On Fri, 2024-08-23 at 09:24 +0200, lina wrote: > Hi, > > During the Debian (stable) installation on Macbook pro from 2019, Installation problems should generally be reported to the debian-boot list. > my internal keyboard is not recognizable even I exhausted all possible > k

RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release

[ {debian-kernel,debian-boot,debian-release}@d.o are in Bcc so they can track follow up emails at debian-arm ML if interested. ] Dear fellow developers, Debian Installer no longer produces daily builds for this platform: - https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/ Debian Linux kernel packages

Bug#1077635: debian-installer: RFC: provide UEFI shell under Advanced/Export options

On 31/07/2024 at 03:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: This is an RFC whether it would be possible to include UEFI shell into the debian installer media. I understand that it won't work with SecureBoot The menu entry can be hidden when secure boot is enabled. For example, on some of old Qua

Bug#1077635: debian-installer: RFC: provide UEFI shell under Advanced/Export options

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Severity: wishlist This is an RFC whether it would be possible to include UEFI shell into the debian installer media. I understand that it won't work with SecureBoot, however under some obscure cases UEFI shell is the only (or the easiest) w

Processed: Re: Bug#1076695: debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 initramfs-tools Bug #1076695 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough Bug reassigned from package 'src:debian-installer' to 'initramfs-tools'. No longer marked as found

Bug#1076695: debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough

Control: reassign -1 initramfs-tools Control: found -1 0.142 Pascal Hambourg wrote (Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:47:44 +0200): > On 22/07/2024 at 04:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Jonathan Kamens (2024-07-21): > >> Something changed recently in testing which caused the size of my > >> initrd to go up A

Bug#1076695: debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough

On 7/21/24 10:39 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi, Jonathan Kamens (2024-07-21): Something changed recently in testing which caused the size of my initrd to go up A Lot, e.g., on one computer from 70MB to 248MB. As a result my boot partition was no longer big enough to handle two extant kernels p

Bug#1076695: debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough

On 22/07/2024 at 04:39, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Jonathan Kamens (2024-07-21): Something changed recently in testing which caused the size of my initrd to go up A Lot, e.g., on one computer from 70MB to 248MB. (...) Have you tried comparing before/after to see where this increase comes from? Ch

Bug#1076695: debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough

Hi, Jonathan Kamens (2024-07-21): > Something changed recently in testing which caused the size of my > initrd to go up A Lot, e.g., on one computer from 70MB to 248MB. As a > result my boot partition was no longer big enough to handle two extant > kernels plus the new kernel files being built by

Bug#1076684: debian-installer: installer adds unrecognized x-initrd.attach option to /etc/crypttab

Hi, Jonathan Kamens (2024-07-21): > After installing from the most recent amd64 testing netinst, I keep > seeing complaints from cryptsetup, e.g., during boot, about ignoring > the unrecognized option "x-initrd.attach". It appears that the > installer inserted this into /etc/crypttab but cryptset

Bug#1076695: debian-installer: /boot partition created by installer isn't big enough

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Severity: important Something changed recently in testing which caused the size of my initrd to go up A Lot, e.g., on one computer from 70MB to 248MB. As a result my boot partition was no longer big enough to handle two extant kernels plus the

Bug#1076684: debian-installer: installer adds unrecognized x-initrd.attach option to /etc/crypttab

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Severity: normal After installing from the most recent amd64 testing netinst, I keep seeing complaints from cryptsetup, e.g., during boot, about ignoring the unrecognized option "x-initrd.attach". It appears that the installer inserted

Re: Bug#1076199: www.debian.org: Webpage Debian-Installer add riscv64 other images link

Colin Watson (2024-07-12): > I suspect this is mostly because debian-installer riscv64 support hasn't > been uploaded to unstable yet, so it isn't on > https://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-riscv64/ or > https://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/unstable/

Re: Bug#1076199: www.debian.org: Webpage Debian-Installer add riscv64 other images link

On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 04:22:32AM -0700, E Shattow wrote: > Please update to refer to riscv64 under the heading "other images > (netboot, USB stick, etc.)": > > https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ I suspect this is mostly because debian-installer riscv64 suppor

Bug#1076199: www.debian.org: Webpage Debian-Installer add riscv64 other images link

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, Please update to refer to riscv64 under the heading "other images (netboot, USB stick, etc.)": https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ with the link to resource:

Bug#1076099: debian-installer: LVM's activation broken for volumes with the dm-integrity feature

Hi Franco, Franco (2024-07-10): > In a VirtualBox virtual machine I've converted a LVM volume with the > following options: > > ~# lvconvert --raidintegrity y --raidintegritymode bitmap ... > > When I boot in rescue-mode that machine using the > "debian-12.5.0

Bug#1076099: debian-installer: LVM's activation broken for volumes with the dm-integrity feature

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Severity: normal Tags: d-i X-Debbugs-Cc: martelli...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, In a VirtualBox virtual machine I've converted a LVM volume with the following options: ~# lvconvert --raidintegrity y --raidintegritymode bitmap ... When I

Re: Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso

Hello Andre, Steve, On 07/07/2024 17:41, Steve McIntyre wrote: On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 12:47:28PM +0200, Andre Gompel wrote: The answer is the typical message "Verifying SBAT shim failed, etc" Let me add that with the very same hardware, and software (sha256sum validation, and very reliable

Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg

Control: tags -1 minor thanks Hi Pascal, thanks for looking into this again. I can reproduce your results. I don't know why it didn't work in the tests I did last week. On Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 10:54:39AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > So I see no need to append the interface suffix to a link-lo

Re: Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso

what you have seen here. What exact OSes have you booted on this hardware in the last 6 months or so? It's likely that one of those has revoked older versions of shim. We have a newer version of the shim-signed package coming soon, most likely in the 12.7 point reelease. >  I am not exactly a

Re: Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso

definitely no doubt that there is something wrong with the way the ISO is EFI-shim signed. (debugging this is not so easy!) I am not exactly a distro hopper, I just need Debian (I used in the past) because of some SW with Debian packages and support only (the Google Flutter Framework) I also have

Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg

On 06/07/2024 at 10:53, Marc Haber wrote: On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:09:09AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: When entering link local ipv6 addresses with interface suffixes as gateway during the network configuration in the debian installer, the installer detects the address to be malformed

Re: Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso

Hi Andre, On Fri, Jul 05, 2024 at 06:57:33PM +0200, Andre Gompel wrote: >Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso > >Hello: > the ISO file is not signed to boot with UEFI Secure Boot Enabled. > Would you  consider only putting in download UEFI signed iso files ? >

Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg

On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:09:09AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > From: Pascal Hambourg > Subject: Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg > To: Marc Haber , 875...@bugs.debian.org > Reply-To: Pascal Hambourg , 875...@bugs.debian.org > Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024

Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg

When entering link local ipv6 addresses with interface suffixes as gateway during the network configuration in the debian installer, the installer detects the address to be malformed. Why would you need to do this ? AFAICS entering the plain link-local IPv6 address without the interface suffix

Processed: Re: Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #875308 [debian-installer] linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' -- 875308: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875308 Debian Bug Tra

Bug#875308: linklocal ipv6 addresses in debian-installer netcfg

Control: severity -1 important thanks On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Michael Gebhard wrote: > When entering link local ipv6 addresses with interface suffixes > as gateway during the network configuration in the debian installer, > the installer detects the address to be

Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso

*Problem with Debian debian-live-12.6.0-amd64-mate.iso * Hello: the ISO file is not signed to boot with UEFI Secure Boot Enabled. *Would you consider only putting in download UEFI signed iso files ?* I can boot Fedora & OpenSuse, butnot this Debian I do need a Debian (or derived) dist

Bug#1075713: debian-installer: Not caused by kvm version

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Followup-For: Bug #1075713 X-Debbugs-Cc: tj.iam...@proton.me Thank-you to Philip for pointing me to the OpenQA assets and details. I had explored those pages but totally missed that those words were actually hyperlinks to additional page content

Bug#1074711: rootskel: FTBFS: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/<>/debian/rootskel//etc/mtab': No such file or directory

ing directory '/<>/src/etc' > install -d /<>/debian/rootskel//etc > install -d -m755 /<>/debian/rootskel///run > ln -fs /proc/mounts /<>/debian/rootskel//etc/mtab > install -d -m755 /<>/debian/rootskel///sys > install -d -m755 /<>/debian/rootske

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

Luca Boccassi (2024-06-28): > That's great, thank you Having just checked the MR (for the src:debian-installer package), that's only about some devel-oriented doc anyway. What matters is most likely what udebs are available in the repository, and their metadata: $ apt-cache show systemd-boot

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 at 10:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Luca Boccassi (2024-06-28): > > The package has migrated to testing and I have merged those 2 MRs. Is > > an upload of debian-installer needed for it to show up in the weekly > > builds? > > Having the branch

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

Luca Boccassi (2024-06-28): > The package has migrated to testing and I have merged those 2 MRs. Is > an upload of debian-installer needed for it to show up in the weekly > builds? Having the branch merged into master is all you need, since that's what gets built daily. Che

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

ly and upload as soon as the > > package has cleared NEW. Thanks for the reviews. > > The new source package has been accepted by the FTP team (thanks!), > and I have just uploaded again with the above issues fixed. > Unless there are any objections, after it has migrated to test

Bug#1074323: debian-installer: partman-auto limitations on number of logical volumes

Package: debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u5 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@entreparentheses.xyz Dear Maintainer, I am trying to use a preseed file to automate a partitionning. I noticed that my recipe was silently ignored by the installer. AFAIK this occurs each time I try to

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:55:23 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20210731+deb11u11 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:28:27 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u11.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u11.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731

debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bullseye to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:55:23 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source

Processing of debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u6.dsc debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u6.tar.xz debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607

debian-installer-netboot-images_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 20:28:27 +0200 Source: debian-installer-netboot-images Architecture: source Version: 20230607

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:01:08 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20210731+deb11u11 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes ACCEPTED into oldstable-proposed-updates->oldstable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bullseye to oldstable. Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:01:08 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20210731

Processing of debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes

debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11.dsc debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11.tar.gz debian-installer_20210731+deb11u11_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:54:34 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u6 Distribution: bookworm Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Mapping bookworm to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 13:54:34 +0200 Source: debian-installer Architecture: source Version: 20230607+deb12u6

Processing of debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes

debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6.dsc debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6.tar.xz debian-installer_20230607+deb12u6_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

ASE_GCC5/AARCH64/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell/DEBUG/Shell.dll > > So you can do without Windows, but they can't do without Debian :-) ;-P > > Argh, I need Windows to install Linux. That's IMHO a no-go. I do not > > buy and hardware which has Windows preinstalled /

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

ation includes this string: /mnt/c/Ubuntu/LenovoTools-GCC-BuildEnv/Scripts/Ubuntu/Build/LenovoToolsPkg/RELEASE_GCC5/AARCH64/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell/DEBUG/Shell.dll So you can do without Windows, but they can't do without Debian :-) > Argh, I need Windows to install Linux. That&#

Re: Debian on arm64 (Was: Contacting Debian Boot team)

some Lenovo representative at DebConf? For details of the work done on the kernel/installer/cd/live images: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/gb/2023/MiniDebConfCambridge/Rocca There has been some progress since Cambridge, e.g. at the MiniDebConf in Hamburg. See the debian-cd mailing list [1], wh

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

On Monday, 24 June 2024 10:18:26 CEST Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:29:18AM +0200 schrieb Emanuele Rocca: > > Trixie runs fine on it, though there are some rough edges. Full details > > on https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s > > Two things somehow would pre

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

Hi Emanuele, finally I've found some time to follow your links. Am Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:29:18AM +0200 schrieb Emanuele Rocca: > > Trixie runs fine on it, though there are some rough edges. Full details > on https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s Two things somehow would pre

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

ounds good, will push to main shortly and upload as soon as the > package has cleared NEW. Thanks for the reviews. The new source package has been accepted by the FTP team (thanks!), and I have just uploaded again with the above issues fixed. Unless there are any objections, after it has migr

Bug#1072768: debian-installer: menu item to select to install oldstable gone

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.5.0-amd64-netinst.iso I was booting in expert mode and expecting between the mirror select and the installing of the base system there to be an option to

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

from it and I can just plugin the Debian installer USB to install > Debian. Trixie runs fine on it, though there are some rough edges. Full details on https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s For details of the work done on the kernel/installer/cd/live images: https://wiki.debian

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

Hi Holger, Am Thu, May 30, 2024 at 04:48:17PM +0200 schrieb Holger Wansing: > Andreas Tille wrote (Sun, 26 May 2024 11:31:24 +0200): > > - Do you feel good when doing your work in Debian Boot team? > > While I have to admit that I'm mostly doing just the simple things :-

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

and > Holger also does _loads_ of (mostly translation related) work too. I highly appreciate all responses from Debian Boot team which are the most extensive so far. > > - Do you have some strategy to gather new contributors for your team? > > One of my intentions with the salsa/ope

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

Hi, Am Fri, May 31, 2024 at 04:54:13PM +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > > However, my question was rather whether you know some valid reasons > > why derivatives are exchanging the install method - maybe that > > question should be better asked on Debian-Boot (if so feel free

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

to sed s/nobootloader/systemd-boot-installer/ one PO file. OK, thanks for the clarification. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 20:07, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 2024-06-03 at 03:46 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > ACK on the .mrconfig part, but I think this misses an addition to > > packages/po/packages_list (to be confirmed with Holger Wansing). Might > > be best to get

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

ng kernel and initrd from the command line. Is there anything broken in nobootloader? Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 16:11, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 3. Juni 2024 11:23:57 MESZ schrieb Luca Boccassi : > >On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 02:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> Luca Boccassi (2024-06-03): > >> > >> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/merge_requests/17 > >> > >> TIL:

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

Hi, Am 3. Juni 2024 11:23:57 MESZ schrieb Luca Boccassi : >On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 at 02:47, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Luca Boccassi (2024-06-03): >> >> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/merge_requests/17 >> >> TIL: builscript. >> >> ACK on the .mrconfig part, but I think this misses an

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

eye > when I first looked into the repository. Given it's only shipping a script I thought it was supposed to be 'all', and also it would avoid the need to conditionalize dependencies. I can change it if needed, just let me know. > > A couple of PRs for mini

Processing of debian-installer-utils_1.149_source.changes

debian-installer-utils_1.149_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer-utils_1.149.dsc debian-installer-utils_1.149.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

debian-installer-utils_1.149_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 09:26:41 +0100 Source: debian-installer-utils Architecture: source Version: 1.149 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System

Re: Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-utils/-/merge_requests/12 OK, spotted the todo in the script when I spotted the upload; a versioned dependency will do the trick once the d-i-utils part is reviewed/merged/uploaded. > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/d-i/-/merge_requests/17

Adding systemd-boot support in debian-installer

Hi, I've created a udeb that adds an expert menu item to allow choosing systemd-boot (in the NEW queue): https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/systemd-boot-installer A couple of PRs for minimal support: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer-utils/-/merge_requests/12

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

orry. > However, my question was rather whether you know some valid reasons > why derivatives are exchanging the install method - maybe that > question should be better asked on Debian-Boot (if so feel free to > ignore this question). I was rather wondering about the motivation &g

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

r your extensive answer. Your personal view is really important to me. I did not (yet) received so many extensive responses to my contact mails. > ACK. TL;DR: no strong organization, mainly some coordination around > releases, but otherwise debian-boot gets to consume whatever ends up in > t

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

Hi all, Andreas Tille wrote (Sun, 26 May 2024 11:31:24 +0200): > - Do you feel good when doing your work in Debian Boot team? Yes! While I have to admit that I'm mostly doing just the simple things :-) I consider myself being only a small candle on the cake. Being not a programmer, I

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

Philip Hands writes: ... > It probably wouldn't harm to offer some funding to osuosl, because they > let us use their systems for various things and making sure that they > are sustainable would be wise. (that's who host most of what I'm running > openqa on at present, and they also host jenkins

Processed: Bug#1071873 marked as pending in debian-installer

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1071873 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Added tag(s) pending. -- 1071873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071873 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

Hi Andreas, Andreas Tille writes: ... > I have some specific questions to the Debian Boot team. > > - Do you feel good when doing your work in Debian Boot team? I'm currently rather peripheral to the team, so tend to potter around doing my own thing. This is mostly because

Re: Contacting Debian Boot team

, video conference or whatever I'm interested in joining one of > your next meetings. ACK. TL;DR: no strong organization, mainly some coordination around releases, but otherwise debian-boot gets to consume whatever ends up in testing/unstable, and has to adapt accordingly. Of course we have s

Contacting Debian Boot team

C channel if needed but please invite me in case I should be informed about some urgent discussion there since I normally do not lurk on this channel. I'd also like to inform you that I've registered a BoF for DebConf24 in Busan with the following description: This BoF is an attempt t

Processed: Re: Bug#1071873: debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch Bug #1071873 [src:debian-installer] debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies Added tag(s) patch. -- 1071873: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071873 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#1071873: debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Control: tag -1 patch Santiago Vila (2024-05-25): > Package: src:debian-installer > Version: 20230607+deb12u5 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs master is fine. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelanc

Bug#1071873: debian-installer: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

Package: src:debian-installer Version: 20230607+deb12u5 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] Install main build dependenci

Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sat, 11 May 2024 22:07:44 +0200): > You're definitely acquainted with the a bunch of things in the installer > ecosystem, you're also knowledgeable about l10n topics, and you're > definitely an excellent team player. > > As far as I'm concerned, the only bug is that yo

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Sun, 12 May 2024 08:54:11 +0200): > Keeping the whole git history of tasksel without its tag is probably > fine, in case anyone needs to dig up why this thing is done that way, > but I'm not sure we should keep tasksel entries in debian/changelog; I &g

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Hallo wieder, TL;DR = blendsel looks uploadable, even if that mail looks long and full of nitpicks, that's all they are: minor things. A bunch of them being in passing comments about tasksel itself. ;) Holger Wansing (2024-05-09): > - I adapted tasksel, to become an installer for Deb

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

Philip Hands writes: > which when tested on openQA looks like this: > > https://openqa.debian.net/tests/260723 I got bored waiting for the timeout, so sent that mail before the job had ended. The bit you want to see is: https://openqa.debian.net/tests/260723#step/grub/3 Cheers, Phil. --

Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)

On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 10:07:44PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi, > >Holger Wansing (2024-05-10): >> I know you repeatedly suggested this. Especially every time I ask for >> more packages to get dm permissions for :-)) > >Just in case that's not clear: I'm not trying to get rid of you as if >y

Re: DD application (Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer)

key is not in the right keyring! :) > So I am unsure if I can successfully go the apply-for-DD path... > I fear I lack some basic knowledge for this. > Don't want to waste my and the application manager's time and effort > for something, that does not lead to anything at the end

Re: Next attempt to add Blends to Debian installer

s required to make the salsa aptly repo visible in the target, so should not end up in a release). Having done that, one gets a mini-ISO, such as this: https://salsa.debian.org/philh/pkgsel/-/jobs/5713711/artifacts/file/debian/output/debian-202306XX+salsaci+20240511+6-amd64-gtkmini.iso

Bug#1070877: debian-installer: xfsprogs not available in the installer, but xfs fs type available, mkfs fails

Hi Witold, And thanks for your report. Witold Baryluk (2024-05-11): > Which is weird, because xfsprogs-udev is there. > > No issues with btrfs, ext2-4, fat, jfs. They are available by default. This is #1070795. Such bug reports would ideally be filed with: X-Debbugs-Cc: de

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >