That was it, thanks everyone.
On 25/09/2024 13:39, Erwan David wrote:
It should be "netmask 255.255.252.0" or (I prefer) just set
"address 192.168.4.12/22"
without netmask (man says it is deprecated)
On 24/09/2024 22:29, Dan Ritter wrote:
What does
ip route show
give you on the VM in question?
ip route show
default via 192.168.4.1 dev ens192 onlink
192.168.4.0/24 dev ens192 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.4.12
BINGO!
192.168.4.0/24 is wrong, should say 192.168.4.0/22
Do you know w
had this kind of access issue before.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Adam
Thanks for pointing that out.
I've noticed that installing sendmail package was removing postfix and
vice versa.
That made me think these two were mutually exclusive.
After reinstalling postfix, logwatch suddenly started sending emails so
everything is now working as expected.
---
Let me rephrase my question, which should be easier to answer.
What exactly shall I substitute:
mailer = "/usr/sbin/sendmail -t"
with in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/logwatch.conf
to make logwatch use postfix (already working without DNS) instead of
sendmail?
On 21/07/2024 08:08, Jeff
mc
followed by m4 sendmail.mc > sendmail.cf
- /etc/mail/mailertable
example.com esmtp:[1.2.3.4]
1. Has anybody tried and got it working?
2. What's the best way to engage with Sendmail forums / mailing list?
Both comp.mail.sendmail and newscomp.mail.sendmail usenet groups appear
to be dead.
---
Adam
Thanks for the hint Todd.
I've replaced it with:
smtp_dns_support_level = disabled
and it's still working as expected.
---
Adam
On 15/07/2024 18:49, Todd Zullinger wrote:
It's probably worth noting that `disable_dns_lookups` has
been deprecated for a long time. The postc
My intention was to send emails to a single domain with any other email
traffic being disabled.
In order to achieve this I considered smart host, dnsmasq and even bind9.
The 3-liner solution that I've found seems the simplest, least intrusive
and appears to be working fine.
On 16/07/2024 01
I'm using Postfix and this all that was needed:
/etc/hosts
1.2.3.4 example.com
/etc/postfix/main.cf
disable_dns_lookups = yes
smtp_host_lookup = native
I want to achieve the first objective and the values are static.
I just hoped there is a one liner hack (like A records in /etc/hosts) to
achieve this vs reconfiguring my MTA.
On 15/07/2024 14:33, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 14:00:03 +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
What I need
d work for sending mail.
Regards
On 2024-07-15 21:00, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
What I need to configure for my Debian 12 VM:
- no public or LAN DNS whatsoever
- ability to fetch a single MX record for a single domain
I don't think I can add MX to /etc/hosts which only works for A record
What I need to configure for my Debian 12 VM:
- no public or LAN DNS whatsoever
- ability to fetch a single MX record for a single domain
I don't think I can add MX to /etc/hosts which only works for A records.
I'm after a similarly simple, "one liner" solution.
---
Adam
Thanks everyone for useful feedback :)
On 29/01/2024 21:05, Gremlin wrote:
On 1/29/24 14:35, Michael Kjörling wrote:
On 29 Jan 2024 19:20 +, from ad...@matrixscience.com (Adam
Weremczuk):
I have 2 bare metal Debian 12.4 servers with fairly new Intel CPUs and
plenty of memory.
On both
li64 | wc -l
1349
Other than that, they seem to be running ok.
I don't see it on similar, AMD powered kits.
Somebody suggested a faulty memory module. Or software trying to access
a restricted part of the memory. I'm not convinced.
Any ideas or hints?
Cheers,
Adam
d to image the VM with
only 100 MB space assigned to /run !
Not easily changeable. Debian 10.13.
Regards,
Adam
tate.timer run with the default settings.
Regards,
Adam
er Runtime Directory
/run/user/0.
Nov 16 17:04:33 ubu20 systemd[1]: Removed slice User Slice of UID 0.
Does anybody have an idea what could have happened?
Regards,
Adam
hi, please a need help i never had this kind of error compile my own
kernel. please you can find there the version of kernel and the command
line a use for that. thanks ...
kernel version: linux-6.1.12
os type: 64-bit
processors: intel i5 .2.7
gcc version 10.2.1 20210110 (Debian 10.2.1-6)
the com
gards,
Adam
that the
WiFi automatically becomes operational every time I boot Debian live?
Regards,
Adam
Thanks David, the server runs 9.2 and clients 9.1 so hopefully it will
work ok.
Another reason I kept changing sources.list in the client was in the
aftermath of my recent attempts against apt-cacher.
In apt-cacher you change every line to point to apt-cacher:3142.
At least that's what I have
Thank you Darac, that was my problem indeed!
What confused me was the fact that, despite being fundamentally
misconfigured, it appeared to be almost working. Just complaining about
one security mirror.
On 21/09/2022 15:36, Darac Marjal wrote:
I'm no expert in apt-cacher-ng, but the error here
or
503 DNS error for hostname security: No address associated with hostname.
Perhaps /etc/apt-cacher-ng/acng.conf on the server needs amending as well?
I've found a line there that reads:
Remap-debrep: file:deb_mirror*.gz /debian ; file:backends_debian #
Debian Archives
Regards,
Ad
ld imagine this is a typical scenario where you want to use apt-cacher.
Regards,
Adam
On 12/09/2022 16:42, David Wright wrote:
On Mon 12 Sep 2022 at 14:33:59 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Switching to apt-cacher-ng brings no immediate joy :(
CLIENT (192.168.100.243)
sudo apt update
Err:5 http:
le' to see them.
?
Thanks,
Adam
On 08/09/2022 19:12, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Hi David,
From SERVER:/etc/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.conf
user = www-data
group = www-data
sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/cache/apt/archives/*
Same error on the CLIENT :(
I think I'll give apt-cacher-ng
ps failing.
Regards,
Adam
On 08/09/2022 16:28, David Wright wrote:
Disclaimer: I run apt-cacher-ng, and have never looked at apt-cacher.
On Wed 07 Sep 2022 at 17:50:16 (+0100), Adam Weremczuk wrote:
SERVER
Wed Sep 7 17:06:40 2022|error [10088]: Failed to open/create
/var/cache/apt-cacher/packages
/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3_amd64.deb
ls -al /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3_amd64.deb
-rw-r--r-- 1 myuser users 75142 Nov 18 2021
/var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3_amd64.deb
All folders in both paths are 755.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Adam
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 10:22:29AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 09:19:36AM +0100, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
> > So I guess the question now is: what, if anything, can I do to get that
> > code into a build and out the door and onto the Debian package
&
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:03:01AM -0400, songbird wrote:
>
> Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>
> i've sent a private reply since i'm not sure gmane sent the
> Cc: i requested.
It didn't :(
> ...
> > Can anyone give any advice about what my next steps might be if
developer (I'm already the maintainer of a few
Cygwin packages, plus all of the other obligations of life...). I am,
however, very happy to engage with discussions about patches and
approaches.
Please keep me on the To/Cc list for any replies; I'm not currently
subscribed to this list.
Adam
-rss:0kB
On 22/03/2022 14:55, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Hi all,
I run a tiny and lightweight Debian 9.9 LXC container on Proxmox 6.2-6.
It has 512 MB of memory and 512 MB of swap assigned and typically
needs 50-100 MB to operate.
Last year I started seeing about half of swap being used with very
with
maybe 10-20% of RAM in use.
Before I had time to look into details the container crashed (powered off).
I'll probably try to get rid of swap entirely as an experiment to see
what happens.
Unless somebody has any better ideas and hints?
Regards,
Adam
On 10/09/2021 17:46, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Depends on which syslog daemon implementation you're using, I think.
My environment: Linux deb10 5.4.44-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.4.44-1 (Fri, 12
Jun 2020 08:18:46 +0200) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Pretty minimalistic set up.
Rsyslog 8.1901.0-1 out of the box, no c
On 10/09/2021 17:51, David Wright wrote:
When you commence your call, both you and the person at the other end
probably exchange some pleasantries, which confirm that you're both
who you say you are. These all get recorded too.
Ssh is no different.
Are you saying these entries could belong to a
On 10/09/2021 13:11, Greg Wooledge wrote:
Not matching what's in the file:
awk 'NR==25' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
awk 'NR==28' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
awk 'NR==29' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
# Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key
OK, so "it" is in fact "The warnings in syslog contain line n
the master host, but not!
awk 'NR==25' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
# Logging
awk 'NR==28' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
awk 'NR==29' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
# Authentication:
What's going on here? :)
Regards,
Adam
On 16/08/2021 18:27, David Wright wrote:
On Mon 16 Au
f -exec grep -l UsePrivilegeSeparation {} \;
Still puzzled...
On 16/08/2021 15:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:06:30PM +0100, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
I run openssh 7.9p1-10+deb10u2 on Debian 10.10.
Logwatch, which runs daily, occasionally (maybe 2-3 times per month) reports
the following:
So
aining and why is it getting the line numbers
wrong?
Regards,
Adam
:ERROR:gpu_channel_manager.cc(450)]
ContextResult::kFatalFailure: Failed to create shared context for
virtualization.
I've tried updating and reinstalling but the problem persists.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Adam
ching
anything else.
I vaguely recall using it for a similar purpose some time ago.
Thanks,
Adam
rmissions?
I.e. recursively read ACL (getfacl?) on all files and folders and write
(setacl?) to the same list of files and folders elsewhere?
Thanks,
Adam
Hi Greg,
Thank you for taking the time to point out all the shortcomings.
On 25/03/19 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:11:21PM +, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
I've found 30 entries referencing wheezy and removed them all:
sudo find /var/cache/apt-cacher/ -type f
I've found 30 entries referencing wheezy and removed them all:
sudo find /var/cache/apt-cacher/ -type f -name *wheezy* | xargs rm
which appears to have fixed the issue.
Thanks,
Adam
On 25/03/19 11:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 07:05:11AM -0400, Roberto C. Sá
I would prefer to avoid spending half a day
deciphering a chain of Perl scripts which I'm not familiar with.
2. What specifically happened last week to trigger this behavior? Was it e.g. a
permanent removal of all wheezy repos and references?
Regards,
Adam
I was working with the Gnu Image Manipulation Program yesterday when a
segmentation fault occurred. Attached is the information spit out in
association with the event. Please let me know what additional information
you need from me and I will pass it along.
- Adam Haas
```
GNU Image Manipulation
Has anybody tried: https://rclone.org ?
I still think something like this combined with 5 x G Suite Business
accounts would be the best value for money.
I.e. $50 pm for unlimited storage.
On 18/02/19 08:57, Curt wrote:
No support for standard protocols that I can see and you need to instal
I've investigated a bit more and it actually has something to with EFI
rather than Debian version.
This Debian 9 clones fine:
Model: IBM ServeRAID M5014 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 998GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size File
't require source
machine to be shut down).
If it fails I will resort to old school manual VM creation and data copying.
Thanks,
Adam
On 15/02/19 15:38, Calabaza wrote:
I convert about 17 Debian machines with Debian 8 with little or no problem.
(I understand that you need Debian 9
fast internet connection to go much faster with
any provider anyway.
On 15/02/19 09:48, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Actually even a cheaper "Business" plan offers unlimited storage for 5
or more users.
So you might spend as little as $50 per month:
https://gsuite.google.com/intl/en_us/pr
Actually even a cheaper "Business" plan offers unlimited storage for 5
or more users.
So you might spend as little as $50 per month:
https://gsuite.google.com/intl/en_us/pricing.html
My links are for UK and US.
Edit the URL to browse different regions.
On 15/02/19 09:34, Adam
it may take you many days to
complete the initial push.
Moving forward I would recommend rsync or similar for differential data
updates.
Not sure why you've posted your question to this list though?
Thanks,
Adam
Forgot to mention the source server was up and running the entire time,
no down time.
On 13/02/19 14:06, Alexandre GRIVEAUX wrote:
It's hard to beat 20-30 seconds it takes to click and type into VMware
Converter and leave it running.
It works well for Debian 7, probably 8 as well but not 9 :(
Short answer - because it will take significantly longer and potentially
lead to more errors.
Especially if I have a number of servers with different structures and
purposes.
It's hard to beat 20-30 seconds it takes to click and type into VMware
Converter and leave it running.
It works well f
migration?
Any other P2V tools you would recommend?
Thanks,
Adam
=sync
524288 bytes (524 kB, 512 KiB) copied, 25.101 s, 20.9 kB/s
---
Adam
On 02/11/18 12:40, Michael Stone wrote:
That's a uselessly small block size & count. Try again with something
more like bs=128k count=10
Note that your dd test is a write test and your testparm is a read
Forgot to mention both run Debian (7.1 and 9.5) and filesystems are ext4
on both.
On 02/11/18 11:58, Adam Weremczuk wrote:
Hi all,
Can somebody explain this huge difference between 2 (almost) identical
servers
gging with Lenovo / LSI or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Adam
only option for discontinued plugins.
Hopefully a compatible version of Lightning will be out soon.
Cheers,
Adam
On 16/10/18 09:39, Martin wrote:
Hi list members,
with the latest Thunderbird update (60.2.1) some plugins are broken. E.g. Color
Folders (last change July 2014), FireTray (last
datarecovery.net/articles/raid-level-comparison.aspx
Is there anything fundamentally wrong with my architecture?
Thanks,
Adam
On 10/10/18 16:54, Dan Ritter wrote:
Have you read
https://serverfault.com/questions/740311/drbd-terrible-sync-performance-on-10gige
and edited your drbd.conf to suit?
3.00 seconds = 699.81 MB/sec
The volumes have been zeroed and contain no live data yet.
Any idea why the sync rate is so painfully slow and how to improve it?
Regards,
Adam
A single dual port gigabit card on each server.
I'm more concerned about performance than redundancy.
The bond operates in 2 gigabit mode:
ethtool bond1
(...)
Speed: 2000Mb/s
Duplex: Full
(...)
My working config (will play with it a bit more):
auto bond1
iface bond1 inet static
sl
My config was ok and it's working like a charm after both servers have
been rebooted.
For some reason "systemctl restart networking" wasn't enough.
Yes, 192.168.200.1 and 192.168.200.2 netmask 30
All ports and cables work when tested 1-1 but not with my 2-2 bonding
config.
Looks like your LACP is correct but your IP addressing is wrong.
Do you have parentheses in it, or are you trying to suggest that
one is .1 and the other is .2?
-dsr-
with "Destination Host
Unreachable".
Own interfaces ping ok.
The same configuration works fine against managed switch ports (LACP/LAG).
So my question is why this is not working and whether it's possible at all?
Regards,
Adam
le of days again.
Cheers,
Adam
ze of /run hasn't changed.
What's the safest and quickest way to temporarily triple the size of /run ?
Thanks,
Adam
Oh nice, i'll check tomorrow or on Friday, thanks for this suggestion. Could
help a lot with third parties repo using weak timestamp also.
On June 20, 2018 7:37:19 PM GMT+02:00, Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
>> On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong
Again, this is aim to disable Release timestamp validation, not related to gpg
:/
On June 20, 2018 7:04:33 PM GMT+02:00, Curt wrote:
>On 2018-06-20, wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:27:24PM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I stil
M -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 11:12:18AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> > The output appears to be from a step in a Dockerfile.
>>
>> Then the Docker users should know how to use their stupid Dockers and
>> shouldn't require hand-holdi
On 06/20/2018 02:17 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 08:47:39AM +0200, Adam Cecile wrote:
---> Running in 2300490ebb96
You didn't show the command that you typed. That makes it harder to
give solutions.
W: GPG error: http://archive.debian.org squeeze Release: The f
On 06/20/2018 10:08 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 9:55 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 09:43 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 8:47 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think Debian should renew the
archive key, so we can still verify packages
On 06/20/2018 09:43 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/20/2018 8:47 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/20/2018 08:39 AM, john doe wrote:
On 6/19/2018 10:55 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
That's a pity, don't you think so
On 06/19/2018 10:48 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018, Adam Cecile wrote:
That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think Debian should renew the
archive key, so we can still verify packages signatures.
You can still verify them. Key expiration doesn't make existing
sig
That's a pity, don't you think so ? I think Debian should renew the archive
key, so we can still verify packages signatures.
On June 19, 2018 8:33:21 PM GMT+02:00, john doe wrote:
>On 6/19/2018 9:22 AM, Adam Cecile wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> GPG key that s
Hello,
GPG key that signed the Squeeze repo is now expired. How should I handle
this properly ? Despite the key is expired, it use to be valid and I
don't like much the idea of going for [trusted=yes] for each impacted
sources.list entry.
Thanks in advance,
Adam.
ontainer resolved fine.
Nothing helpful in logs.
Any idea why proxy fails to resolve LAN host names only in this specific
scenario?
Thanks
Adam
Quite possibly I changed it to the same password.
Not sure now as it was almost a month ago but can't find any better
explanation.
Of course hashes are meant to be irreversible.
I guess I'm trying to catch my own shadow ;)
On 13/03/18 16:19, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Still strange. Are you sure
I think it was me invoking "passwd" as root and aborting (ctrl+D)
without making any changes.
Would that be enough to update the shadow file?
On 13/03/18 15:47, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
What I don't understand is how the system changed the hashing
method without getting you involved. You don't
uch longer.
It's now prefixed with $6$ (SHA-512 algorithm) comparing with $1$ (MD5)
before the change.
My first suspect was a security patch but the system was not updated
around that time.
Has anybody seen this before and could explain?
Thanks
Adam
Thanks, a useful read.
But all it says regarding gnats is "." :)
On 2018-03-06 16:57, Reco wrote:
[1], chapter 12.1.12.1.
Reco
[1]https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch12.en.html
Hi all,
Can somebody explain why gnats user comes even with a minimalistic
netinstall Debian?
I briefly used Gnats Bug-Reporting System long time ago but AFAIR this
project died in 2005.
It just feels weird for me to see it in /etc/passwd all the time.
Thanks
Adam
Please keep me updated Dave.
Especially if you discover something big :)
I'm not desperate , happy to wait for another few weeks or so.
Thanks
Adam
On 13/02/18 13:37, Dave Sherohman wrote:
Coincidentally, earlier today I installed srvadmin-idracadm8 on stretch
from
debhttp://linux.del
Hello,
Just to let you know - the link on Debian website gives 404:
https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/openssh-server
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/o/openssh/openssh_6.0p1-4+deb7u7_changelog
I got it from the tarball so it's not critical.
Thanks
Adam
quot;end of May 2018".
I'm treating the latter as the more reliable source.
My related question:
Is it likely for this date to still be moved forward or back?
Can it happen on a short notice (say less than a month)?
Regards
Adam
Hello,
I'm referring to:
http://linux.dell.com/repo/community/debian/
Does anybody know if jessie version works well on stretch?
Or if an official release for stretch is going to be available soon?
Thanks
Adam
On 02/06/2018 02:16 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2018-02-06 at 07:52, Adam Cecile wrote:
On 02/06/2018 01:46 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
Pin: version 1.3.*, release o=packages.le-vert.net
Hello,
Thanks for the answer, sadly it's not working:
mesos:
Installed: 1.3.1-1+Debian-stretc
On 02/06/2018 01:46 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
Pin: version 1.3.*, release o=packages.le-vert.net
Hello,
Thanks for the answer, sadly it's not working:
mesos:
Installed: 1.3.1-1+Debian-stretch-9.1
Candidate: 1.4.1-1+Debian-stretch-9.1
n jessie/main amd64 Packages
1.3.0-2+Debian-stretch-9.0 1000
500 http://packages.le-vert.net/mesos/debian stretch/main amd64
Packages
1.3.0-1+Debian-stretch-9.0 1000
Thanks in advance,
Adam
he correct name.
After apt-get update, ap-get upgrade (to 9.3) and reboot things went
back to normal.
Is it a known bug?
Has anybody seen anything like this before?
Thanks
Adam
with a Stretch virtual machine, when calling
virt-builder replace debian-8 by debian-9 and that's it ;-)
Adam.
On 11/14/2017 01:18 AM, Ramon Hofer wrote:
Dear Adam,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:49:02 +0100
Adam Cécile wrote:
Here is my notes/scripts when I did that to attach an nvidia card
Hi,
Here is my notes/scripts when I did that to attach an nvidia card inside
a KVM virtual machine:
https://github.com/eLvErDe/nvidia-docker-cuda-kvm-with-passthru/blob/master/create-kvm-for-nvidia-docker.sh
Adam.
On 11/13/2017 10:37 PM, Ramon Hofer wrote:
Dear Alexander,
Thank you very
Just in case it's not a priority for you, I "up-ported" Jessie's package
to Stretch and made them available as a repo here:
http://packages.le-vert.net/nagios3/
Regards, Adam.
On 10/19/2017 11:05 PM, Fekete Tamás wrote:
I'm sad to hear that, but thank you for the in
ect heap
For the record, this problem is fixed for me in 4.9.0-4-686-pae ( =
4.9.51-1 ).
Adam
pre-up command to disable everything.
systemctl status networking was then okay, but after some time (days ?) the
IPv6 gateway is gone, again
Thanks in advance,
Adam.
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
#address 192.168.50.216
address
I ended up always using docker container running php-fpm in different versions
exported on host with different ports.
That's the only way to be able to deal with shitty PHP apps "correctly".
Regards, Adam.
De : Dave Sherohman
Envoyé : vendredi
you just need to register
to get the offer too).
Best regards, Adam.
On 08/29/2017 08:54 PM, Adam Cécile wrote:
[This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they
appear to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
Right, 1Gb and slow I/O, that's d
Right, 1Gb and slow I/O, that's definitely a block for building Java
stuff...
On 08/29/2017 06:31 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi there,
On 08/29/2017 06:07 PM, Adam Cecile wrote:
Could be an alternative indeed, but what about the speed compared to
my quad-core i5 with qemu ?
I ha
running out of ideas.
Regards, Adam.
On 08/29/2017 04:58 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi,
32bit ARM compatibility is optional according to the specification,
and if your CPU doesn't support it, you won't be able to natively
run armhf executables. This is in contrast to x86, where all[
On 08/29/2017 05:19 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
Hi,
Am 29. August 2017 17:04:29 MESZ schrieb Adam Cecile :
I was not aware of this optional 32 bit compatibility. That kinda
sucks.
Yeah, especially since you had the misfortune of getting the one chip that is
sold that doesn't suppo
1 - 100 of 4290 matches
Mail list logo
