Seasons Greetings -
How best to save a listing of all installed packages?
Sebastian
Hi!
I want generate a list of all installed packages, without the dependencies of
manual installed packages and the the packages from the base system.
What i have found so far by our friend google:
aptitude search "?installed(?not(?automatic))"
But this does not what i mean, becau
I was walking my gf through an install of Debian (it didn't scare her,
and she's no techie), and everything went fine until she tried
installing some stuff.
Installing task-x-window-system basically choked, and now she is left
with a bunch of half-installed packages. I can't
I was looking at what packages I've installed over time, along with ones
installed by default, and am going to some cleaning. In doing so, I ran
across a couple that I want to ask about...
They are:
perl
perl-5.005
perl-5.005-base
perl-5.6
perl-5.6-base
perl-base
and
tcl8.0
tcl8.2
tcl8.2-de
Hello List,
what you certainly want is
dpkg --get-selections
Jerome
Baz wrote:
Seasons Greetings -
How best to save a listing of all installed packages?
Sebastian
--
Jerome BENOIT
jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 02:14:17AM -0800, Baz wrote..
> How best to save a listing of all installed packages?
dpkg-query -l | grep ii > /tmp/installed-packages
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Baz wrote:
> Seasons Greetings -
>
> How best to save a listing of all installed packages?
>
> Sebastian
>
Hi Sebastian,
$ dpkg -l
will give a list.
macondo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
Jerome BENOIT escribe:
> what you certainly want is
>
> dpkg --get-selections
You can even use the output of this command and pipe it to dpkg
--set-selections and then apt-get -f update in order to have in a
second machine a clone of the packages installed in the first one.
Cordially, Ismael
--
On (24/12/06 12:47), Luis Lima wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2006, Baz wrote:
> > How best to save a listing of all installed packages?
> $ dpkg -l
> will give a list.
Or if you want to be fancy, put this all on one line:
dpkg --get-selections \* | grep -e install -e hold | grep -v d
save a listing of all installed packages?
>>
>>
>
>dpkg-query -l | grep ii > /tmp/installed-packages
>
>
>
In <20090819090118.gb7...@borusse.tmr.net>, Alex Huth wrote:
>I want generate a list of all installed packages, without the dependencies
> of manual installed packages and the the packages from the base system.
>
>What i have found so far by our friend google:
>
>aptitude
On Wed,19.Aug.09, 10:41:27, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20090819090118.gb7...@borusse.tmr.net>, Alex Huth wrote:
> >I want generate a list of all installed packages, without the dependencies
> > of manual installed packages and the the packages from the base syste
hi there,
there are many ways to list all the packages a system has installed, but
unfortunately i cannot find how to get a list the way i want.
i would like to get a listing of all the packages i have installed, with
the branch tag beside it.
dpkg -l
seems to come closest, but lists the pack
I recently installed several packages along with their dependencies. I
have since decided that I didn't really want those packages after all
but I can't remember the names of all the installed dependencies.
Is there any way to get a list of packages installed within a certain
time frame (perha
he is left
> with a bunch of half-installed packages. I can't tinker with it myself
> since she is annoyingly located hundreds of miles away from me.
>
> What is the official correct way to deal with lots of half-installed
> packages?
>
> Also, while I'm asking, if you
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> perl
> perl-5.005
> perl-5.005-base
> perl-5.6
> perl-5.6-base
> perl-base
> Why, for example, are there two versions of perl ?? Isn't perl-5.6
> backwards-compatible with perl-5.0x ?? I do see that the perl-5.6
> package can be removed and will leave me with 'perl'.
It
On (24/12/06 15:28), John - wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: John - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Installed Packages
> Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 15:28:58 -0500
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,EMPTY_MESSAGE,
> FORGE
Hi all,
question - how can I get a list of my installed software packages showing
the full (proper) package name? This is on my server, so I do not have KDE
or Gnome, or any other GUI installed, and do everything per command line.
I've tried - 'dpkg -l' and 'apt-cache search ..' , but I cannot s
Hi, This is my first time using this mailing list, and I'm also still
pretty new to linux. I was just wondering if there was a way I could find
out every package (all the thing's I've used apt-get to install...not the
base packages) installed on my computer. I'm running slink on a
486/33 with 12mb
I keep a list of installed packages around so I can easily populate a new disk
(or repopulate a mashed-up disk) by doing something along the lines of
$ apt-get install $(cat installed-packages-list)
I use a daily cron job along the lines of
ls /var/cache/apt/archives | sed &#
Here you have the answer to your own question.
Use apt-mark to mark the packages you want to keep and all "required" packages
as "manual"ly installed. Then mark all other packages as "auto".
Then let
apt-get autoremove
do its work.
After that, use e.g. aptitude to remove remaining configuration
> apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
> The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
> by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you appear to assume it does,
> that you were involved in manually selecting it for installation. It
> just mean
On Wed 30 Nov 2016 at 08:47:21 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
> > The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
> > by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you appear to assume it does,
> > that you w
On 2016-12-01, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 30 Nov 2016 at 08:47:21 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> > apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
>> > The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
>> > by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you
Curt writes:
> I think in the OP's case having asked for the whole Gnome kit and
> caboodle upon installation he's got lots of stuff he might not even be
> aware of necessarily that doesn't fall into the auto category (or the
> high priority required category either), but that he didn't expressly
don't recognize
*at all*, dig into it and find out what it does. Then consider removing
it, but be prepared to put it back if you break something.
This is how you learn.
P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
size for you. As you can see, many of us have b
Speaking of aptitude, it does remove automatically installed package if no other
package depends on it, or recommends it. This behavior can be changed by
configuration entries in /etc/apt/apt.conf, /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/*, etc.
To show any installed packages that aren't "auto"
On Thu 01 Dec 2016 at 18:38:45 +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Curt writes:
>
> > I think in the OP's case having asked for the whole Gnome kit and
> > caboodle upon installation he's got lots of stuff he might not even be
> > aware of necessarily that doesn't fall into the auto category (or the
On 11/30/16, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> apt-mark showmanual gives you the complement of apt-mark showauto.
>> The second paragraph of apt-mark's description explains what's meant
>> by "auto". So "manual" doesn't mean what you appear to assume it does,
>> that you were involved in manually selec
On 12/1/16, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 30 Nov 2016 at 08:47:21 (-0500), Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> so I'm just as confused as Rodolfo
>> and I think for good reasons.
>
> I don't know whether Rodolfo is still confused after the explanation
> I gave. AFAICT once you realise that manual means "not m
hen you
> get to one that you think is not useful, or which you don't recognize
> *at all*, dig into it and find out what it does. Then consider removing
> it, but be prepared to put it back if you break something.
>
> This is how you learn.
>
> P.S. http://wooledge.org/
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
> size for you. As you can see, many of us have been there, done that.
>
I would like to mention couple of things
1) You can do this by running dpigs i
Greg Wooledge wrote on 12/01/16 20:06:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:38:45PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
> size for you. As you can see, many of us have been there, done that.
>
Yes, e.g., aptitude can
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 12/04/16 10:40:
> Greg Wooledge wrote on 12/01/16 20:06:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:38:45PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>
>>
>> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed packages by
>> size for you. As you can see, ma
Jörg-Volker Peetz writes:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote on 12/04/16 10:40:
>> Greg Wooledge wrote on 12/01/16 20:06:
>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:38:45PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> P.S. http://wooledge.org/~greg/ds will sort the installed pac
Rodolfo Medina wrote on 12/04/16 12:54:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz writes:
>> aptitude -F '%p %I %d' --sort installsize search '~i'
>
>
> What about reverse (descending) installsize order?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodolfo
>
For that purpose, the unix command "tac" comes handy
aptitude -F '%p %I %d' --s
hi and good day everyone !!!
when installing debian2 , i chose some of the preselected packages that the
installer program suggested, now, can someone pls direct as to where i may find
a complete list of the files that has been installed to my system and where ?
also, when i use dpkg -i filen
On 08 Feb 2004, Sam Halliday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would like to get a listing of all the packages i have installed, with
> the branch tag beside it.
apt-show-versions should do the trick
--
Philipp Weis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freiburg, Germany http://pweis.com/
--
To UNSUBS
On 0, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently installed several packages along with their dependencies. I
> have since decided that I didn't really want those packages after all
> but I can't remember the names of all the installed dependencies.
>
> Is there any way to get a li
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:01:59AM -0500, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> I recently installed several packages along with their dependencies. I
> have since decided that I didn't really want those packages after all
> but I can't remember the names of all the installed dependencies.
>
> Is there any
s: Does this file exist at all (possibly using another
path)?
Or is there another preferred way of getting info concerning all
post-installed packages (without their dependencies)?
Thanks a lot for your help in advance.
Many greetings.
Rosika
It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
3) ... etc ...
Given that the output is the same:
$ diff \
<(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
<(dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { pri
Is there any way to tell apt to "hold" a particular package in a non-installed
state?
Having previously encountered problems due to having tried to dist-upgrade
across a long gap, I perform a dist-upgrade to testing on the order of weekly.
When apt-listbugs reports a bug which is important enough
Hello!
My Wheezy was installed on a very early stage any I would like to
compare packages against a fresh installation to see what is different
or changed. Probably nothing but would like to verify. Therefore I
would like to make a dependency tree (graph) on installed packages
under Wheezy for
would take hours to select them all by hand, so I'm looking for
some way to export the list of installed packages on the old server
to a file, and tell apt or dselect on the new server to install those
packages.
Thanks for any suggestions!
--
Craig McPherson
Network Admin
Baptist Student Uni
Is it possible to change the package list so that only
the packages who are currently installed on the system
are left in their state? If so how can I do that?
many thanks,
S. Massy
note: please reply directly as I'm not a member of the list.
__
Do Y
Hi,
How do I download the .debs of packages already installed in my system
without having to reinstall them first via apt?
The command I'm using right now is:
apt-get --yes --reinstall install `cat package_list.txt`
where package_list.txt contains the package names per line.
TIA
--
Rage Call
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
>Cates
>Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:35 PM
>To: Debian, User
>Subject: list of installed packages
>
>Hi all,
>
>question - how can I get a list of my installed
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 18:34:38 +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> question - how can I get a list of my installed software packages showing
> the full (proper) package name? This is on my server, so I do not have KDE
> or Gnome, or any other GUI installed, and do everything per command li
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:34:38PM +0200, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> question - how can I get a list of my installed software packages showing
> the full (proper) package name? This is on my server, so I do not have KDE
> or Gnome, or any other GUI installed, and do everything per command
Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> question - how can I get a list of my installed software packages showing
> the full (proper) package name? This is on my server, so I do not have KDE
> or Gnome, or any other GUI installed, and do everything per command line.
>
> I've tried - 'dpkg -l' and 'apt
Impressive, thats an excellent command.
On 5/19/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> question - how can I get a list of my installed software packages showing
> the full (proper) package name? This is on my server, so I do not have KDE
> or Gnome,
On Thursday 18 May 2006 02:34, Robert Cates wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> question - how can I get a list of my installed software packages showing
> the full (proper) package name? This is on my server, so I do not have KDE
> or Gnome, or any other GUI installed, and do everything per command line.
>
apt
Hello Robert,
I have attached a small Debian Package which contais
the script 'tddebidate' try and enjoy it...
Use 'tddebidate -h' or 'man tddebidate' to get help.
Note: Sources are availlable too (at request)
Oh yes, under X it can output to Xdialog...
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
--
On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 00:20 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> Note: Sources are availlable too (at request)
Cute. Sources for a shell script. I'll have to rememeber that one.
One last comment: nice script.
--
greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The technology that is
Stronger, better, faster: Linux
s
Am 2006-05-30 18:08:04, schrieb Greg Folkert:
> On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 00:20 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >
> > Note: Sources are availlable too (at request)
>
> Cute. Sources for a shell script. I'll have to rememeber that one.
>
> One last comment: nice script.
I hope it helps...
I think
don't think you can filter and show what packages were installed via what
method, the 'base' system is only 1 package though.
use dpkg -l to list all installed packages
nate
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Rob Hensley wrote:
zoid >Hi, This is my first time using this mailing list, and I
You can see all the installed packages using 'dselect'. Call it from the
shell and then select 'Select'. The installed packages are marked with an
'*'.
TroPeek
- Original Message -
From: Rob Hensley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December
Hi, This is my first time using this mailing list, and I'm also still
pretty new to linux. I was just wondering if there was a way I could find
out every package (all the thing's I've used apt-get to install...not the
base packages) installed on my computer. I'm running slink on a
486/33 with 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Hensley) wrote:
>Hi, This is my first time using this mailing list, and I'm also still
>pretty new to linux. I was just wondering if there was a way I could find
>out every package (all the thing's I've used apt-get to install...not the
>base packages) installed on my comput
On torsdag 22 september 2005, 20:57, R. Clayton wrote:
> I would be interested in hearing opinions and suggestions about a
> general approach to backing-up and reconstituting package archives,
> as well as opinions and suggestions about the particular approach
> I've outlined above.
I haven't actu
On Thursday 22 September 2005 12:57 pm, R. Clayton wrote:
> I keep a list of installed packages around so I can easily populate a new
> disk (or repopulate a mashed-up disk) by doing something along the lines of
>
> $ apt-get install $(cat installed-packages-list)
>
> I us
You should also back up /etc since this often contains any modifications you
may have made during the installation process.
I do:
Every system file (under /; don't forget, for example, /boot/grub/menu.lst)
modified is stored under RCS.
A nightly cron job e-mails me about files sti
Hello.
I am using Debian 4.0.
How do I add installed packages to the Applications menu hierarchy?
Synaptic installs then loses packages; it downloads and installs a
package and its dependencies, and then, when queried, it shows the
package and its dependancies to be installed, but it does
After the recent conversation regarding this, and since I'm a Debian-
newbie, and want to keep a history of ~when I installed packages,
I created this little bash script that I run each time I install
or remove packages:
x=`date +%y%m%d.%H%M`
COLUMNS=120 dpkg -l > ~/dpkg.installed.$x
e script). 'dpkg -l' gives you all installed packages
and 'dpkg -L packagename' gives you the files installed
by a particular package.
PS: Your long lines disrupt my quoting. Grr ;-)
--
...Unix, MS-DOS, and MS Windows (also known as the Good, the Bad,
and the Ugly).
Hello everybody,
I'd like to have a view of the installed packages - in
some kind of dependency tree. I know I can use dpkg -l
but it only lists the packages alphabetically :-/
I'm just asking out of curiosity - I'd like to be able
to have an overview :-)
Thanks for yo
I'm trying to come up with a reliable process for "replicating" the set
of installed packages from one Debian installation to another. I have
two use-cases:
1. Restoring a system from backup.
2. Maintaining a secondary server.
I currently use a combination of "dpkg --get-s
Hi all,
I know that somewhere there is a command to list all installed packages
(I even remember using it way back when...), but I can't seem to find it.
I've looked at the various apt utility man pages and have not found
anything, even for apt-cache. I'm trying to write a sc
Hello,
Is there a way to find out from which ftp/http source the package was
installed (assuming it was installed via `apt-get ...`)? Or to get the
list of packages installed from the given source?
Thanks,
Sarunas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Is there a command to verify the integrity of installed packages ? I
want something similar to the rpm --verify command (it verifies the
size, MD5 sum, permissions, type, owner and group of each file), but
couldn't find ti in the docs (and what tool to use ? dpkg, dselect,
apt-get ?).
T
//-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 72K Jun 16 16:59 status//
> //-rw--- 1 root root 1,2M Jun 16 16:59 syslog//
> //-rw--- 1 root root 41K Jun 16 16:59 Xorg.0.log/
>
> So my question is: Does this file exist at all (possibly using another
> path)?
> Or is there another preferred way of getting info concerning all
> post-installed packages (without their dependencies)?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help in advance.
>
> Many greetings.
> Rosika
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
y
default plus the packages I installed afterwards.
I was hoping for a list that provides just my post-installed packages.
But I assume that in view of the fact that the /i*nitial-status.gz
*/doesn´t seem to exist on Debian there´s no way of achieving this goal.
Never mind. Your command will c
d you provided and it seems to produce quite
> an extensive list beginning with "acl" and ending with "zlib1g:amd64".
> So it´s basically a list with all the packages which are installed by
> default plus the packages I installed afterwards.
>
> I was hoping for
On Ma, 22 iun 21, 15:30:35, Christian wrote:
>
> /comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)/
It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be and it seems
your mail program messed with line breaks.
Al
Dear Hans, 😁
thanks again for your help.
> if you can see in this file, which packages are postinstalled or
dependent [...]
Alas that doesn´t seem to be the case.
As an example I post-installed the fish-shell and the respective entry
simply is:
/fish
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:44:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 22 iun 21, 15:30:35, Christian wrote:
> >
> > /comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)/
>
> It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is
Hi Andrei,
thanks a lot for your reply. 😁
> It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be
Well, from the man pages (man comm) :
/comm [OPTION]... FILE1 FILE2//
//
//DESCRIPTION//
// Compare sorted files FILE1 and FILE2 line by line.
-1 suppress column 1 (lines unique
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Christian wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> thanks a lot for your reply. 😁
>
> > It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be
>
> Well, from the man pages (man comm) :
>
> /comm [OPTION]... FILE1 FILE2//
Your mail user agent (or your editor) appears t
On Ma, 22 iun 21, 11:25:00, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:08:35PM +0200, Christian wrote:
> > Hi Andrei,
> >
> > thanks a lot for your reply. 😁
> >
> > > It's unclear what exactly '/comm -23' is supposed to be
> >
> > Well, from the man pages (man comm) :
> >
> > /comm [OPTI
On Ma, 22 iun 21, 10:57:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 05:44:50PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 22 iun 21, 15:30:35, Christian wrote:
> > >
> > > /comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 13:52, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 22 iun 21, 10:57:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Mistery solved by looking at the html part (the '/' are meant to denote
> italic), the correct command is:
> comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> /var/log/installer/initial
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)
> Command substitution without '$'? I must be missing something and would
> appreciate
On 2021-06-23 08:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
/var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort
-u)
Command substitution without '$'? I must be mis
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:49:42AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 08:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> >Perhaps more readable in the symmetrical variant
> >
> > diff -u <(ls dir1) <(ls dir2)
> >
> >Very handy.
> >
> does not the excellent guide also say not to try to do anything with
On Mi, 23 iun 21, 09:22:24, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz | sed -n 's/^Package: //p' | sort -u)
>
> > Command substitutio
On Mi, 23 iun 21, 16:49:28, David wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 at 13:52, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 22 iun 21, 10:57:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > Mistery solved by looking at the html part (the '/' are meant to denote
> > italic), the correct command is:
> > comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanua
On Wed 23 Jun 2021 at 08:49:42 (+0100), mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-06-23 08:22, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 06:51:39AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > comm -23 <(apt-mark showmanual | sort -u) <(gzip -dc
> > > /var/log/installer/initial-status.gz |
Hi Dan.
Dan H., 10.04.2007 18:06:
> the most recent etch upgrade broke the Opera web browser (I think
> because of new X libs). Googled for a fix and found one, downloaded the
> newest debs (v9.20) from opera.org.
Which one exactly?
> Unfortunately at first the .deb wouldn't install due to an un
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:34:23 +0200
Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Dan.
>
> Dan H., 10.04.2007 18:06:
> > the most recent etch upgrade broke the Opera web browser (I think
> > because of new X libs). Googled for a fix and found one, downloaded
> > the newest debs (v9.20) from oper
Hi.
Nyizsnyik Ferenc, 10.04.2007 21:12:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:34:23 +0200
> Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan H., 10.04.2007 18:06:
>>> the most recent etch upgrade broke the Opera web browser (I think
>>> because of new X libs). Googled for a fix and found one, downloaded
>>> t
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:06:27 +0200
"Dan H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the most recent etch upgrade broke the Opera web browser (I think
> because of new X libs). Googled for a fix and found one,
> downloaded the newest debs (v9.20) from opera.org.
>
> Unfortunately at first the .de
Hello Dan.
Please reply directly to the list. Search for "Thunderbird reply to list" and
you’ll find a lot of info.
Dan H., 11.04.2007 13:46:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>
>> Which one exactly?
>
> opera_9.20-20070407.5-shared-qt_en_i386.deb
Is there a reason you don’t want the version compiled w
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Please reply directly to the list.
Sorry. I normally do. A slip. Anyway; just today Opera officially
released v. 9.20; I installed it and all is fine.
Thanks for the help,
--D.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Dan.
Dan H., 11.04.2007 15:18:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>
>> Please reply directly to the list.
>
> Sorry. I normally do. A slip.
No problem.
> Anyway; just today Opera officially
> released v. 9.20; I installed it and all is fine.
Geez, you’re even faster than my Newsfeeds; gotta get the
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:19:56 +0200
Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Nyizsnyik Ferenc, 10.04.2007 21:12:
> > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:34:23 +0200
> > Mathias Brodala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Dan H., 10.04.2007 18:06:
> >>> the most recent etch upgrade broke the Opera web b
I've been evaluating Etch for several months on a test machine, and now
I'd like to install it on a production server. What's the best way to
get the list of packages installed on the test system, and then
re-install those packages on the new system?
--John
Tino Sino writes:
> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
> 2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
> 3) ... etc ...
> Given that the output is the same:
> $ diff \
> <(dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1) \
>
?? Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:44 +0100
Tino Sino :
> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
> 2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
> 3) ... etc ...
> Given that the output is the same:
> $ diff \
> <(dpkg --get-selec
On 02/06/2014 08:17 AM, iijima yoshino wrote:
> ?? Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:06:44 +0100
> Tino Sino :
>
>> It has been asked before, but with different answers, e.g.:
>> 1) dpkg-query --list | awk '/^ii +/ { print $2; }'
>> 2) dpkg --get-selections | cut -f 1
>> 3) ... etc ...
>> Given that the out
1 - 100 of 410 matches
Mail list logo
