El día 24/03/07, Juan Carlos Fuentes M. escribió:
sera...
1. dejar de prestale atencion
2. Cambiar las reglas
¿cambiar la regla de tu culo? vaya... alguno confesó
en público:
http://juanca.wiki.mailxmail.com/PaginaInicial
http://contactos.chueca.com/mechupoelculo
Bueno, si quieres te llamo
Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez a écrit :
Hola *,
On 3/21/07, Emilio Andr�(c)s Ibáñez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Creo que ya es suficiente de todo esto del top-posting, ya el hilo no
est� aportando nada desde hace rato. Entiendo el desacuerdo de muchos,
de hecho yo no estoy de acuerdo con
On 3/22/07, Bayrouni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yo an~adiria (una regla tan importante que la del top posting:
En muchas ocasiones se deberia tambien borrar las partes del post a las
que no respondamos (damos una respuesta).
Per eso es solamente una utopia supongo yo.
No es una utopía
entrando en un oscurantismo ... que vendrá después
el pastafarirmo...
Y como un llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
No me nombres a Stallman en vano...
Tu... bonito... haz lo que te salga de los cojones
La inquisición española ha vuelto... óooo como nos afectará a los que
vivimos en sus excolonias...?
Ummmh debian está entrando en un oscurantismo ... que vendrá después
el pastafarirmo...
Y como un llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top
siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
-1 Troll
--
... may the source be with you...
la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
Escribe a las listas de correo de GNU o a las que esté subscrito
Stallman diciendo está misma gilipollez, que el top-posting es una
llamada a la libre expresión... acabaramos, mira su definición en la
wikipedia, por favor
pastafarirmo...
Y como un llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
Escribe a las listas de correo de GNU o a las que esté subscrito
Stallman diciendo está misma gilipollez, que el top-posting es una
llamada a la libre expresión
y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
Mira que lindo, el señorito se caga en las normas de la lista y lo dice
orgullosamente, tipica conducta de IDIOTA
El 16/03/07, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Buenas,
Hay que hacer algo
desatado algún flamewar (saludos a
Cristian Michel). Además apenas tengo tiempo de leer la lista.
Es verdad que es cada vez más pesado ver el spam y el HTML y el top-posting.
Posibles soluciones:
1) No responder a mensajes que no cumplan las normas
O sólo con un mensaje para (volver a ) informar
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 15:06, Horacio Castellini a écrit :
Y como un llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
Bonsoir,
tu as bien raison. Et d'ailleurs, je ne vois pas non plus pourquoi je devrais
écrire uniquement en
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 21:32, Juan Carlos Fuentes M. a écrit :
href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]debian-user-span
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /abrwith a subject of
quot;unsubscribequot;. Trouble? Contact a
href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/ab
rbr/blockquote/divbrbr clear=allno veo el objetivo
siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
¿Comparas tu ridícula y patética rebeldía con la de Stallman? serás
niñato...
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
El 21/03/07, Claude Micouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 15:06, Horacio Castellini a écrit :
Y como un llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
Bonsoir,
tu as bien raison. Et d'ailleurs, je ne vois
llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
No me nombres a Stallman en vano...
Tu... bonito... haz lo que te salga de los cojones en tu puta casa...
pero aquí... en esta lista respetas las p.. normas.. que pa eso están
en un oscurantismo ... que vendrá después
el pastafarirmo...
Y como un llamado a la libre expresión y siguiendo la filosofía
rebelde de Stallman les contesto haciendo top-posting...
No me nombres a Stallman en vano...
Tu... bonito... haz lo que te salga de los cojones en tu puta casa...
pero
El lun, 19-03-2007 a las 22:35 +0100, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, Rubén C. Díaz Alonso 'outime' escribió:
Por mí me parecen adecuadas las medidas, aunque el punto uno y dos se
contradicen:
1) No responder a mensajes que no cumplan las normas
2) Responder
El 19/03/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, Marcelo Guzman escribió:
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que reprimir?
Vale, entonces por favor no escribas en HTML ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
Juro por mis ojos que tengo quitado el texto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 19/03/07 08:31, ChEnChO escribió:
Juro por mis ojos que tengo quitado el texto enriquecido en gmail :(
Mirad el link y si veis html comentadlo y buscaré solución...
http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/6872/maillc6.png
Gracias y lamento
?
No creo que sea muy difícil usando GMail no hacer top-posting, porque
yo lo hago y estoy suscrito a muchas listas y no me cuesta nada mover
el cursor hacia abajo; cuando lo haces un par de veces ya te has
acostumbrado, no sé a qué viene tanta queja de la gente que 'no puedo,
no puedo'.
En cuanto
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que reprimir?. Yo soy nuevo en la lista, estoy
en otras listas linux. Pienso que todos queremos aprender. Algunos de
mala forma, se sabe, pero al fin y al cabo el fin es el mismo.
Prefiero enviar un correo a alguien indicándole las reglas que dejarlo
solo en el
y lista negra, para las cuentas de correo que
incumplan las normas 3 veces seguidas?
También apoyo esta opción, pero creo que en esas 3 veces seguidas se
le debe haber dicho a la persona que no haga el top-posting, o sea si
son 3 veces cuando se le haya dicho las normas.
En fin usuarios de
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 10:17:45AM -0500, Carlos Zuniga wrote:
On 3/16/07, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buenas,
Hay que hacer algo...
Yo ya paso de estar respondiendo a cada mensaje que no cumple las normas
de la lista, porque se duplica el tráfico, es igual de molesto
molesto el mirar 10
correos y desechar 6 porque están en HTML o haciendo
Top-Posting. No deberían
llegar, sin más, no hay porqué tolerarlo sin hacer nada ni
rechistar.
2) Responder TODOS al buzón personal de la persona en
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, ChEnChO escribió:
El 19/03/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, Marcelo Guzman escribió:
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que reprimir?
Vale, entonces por favor no escribas en HTML ;)
--
Iñaki Baz
enlace a http://wiki.debian.org/NormasLista;
Qué hago, ¿le respondo? ¿le mando el enlace de las normas?
Supongo que se refiere a:
- No responder A LA LISTA a los mensajes en HTML.
- Responder al privado con las normas.
No creo que sea muy difícil usando GMail no hacer top-posting, porque
yo
El 19/03/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, ChEnChO escribió:
El 19/03/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, Marcelo Guzman escribió:
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que reprimir?
Vale,
ChEnChO escribió:
El 19/03/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, ChEnChO escribió:
El 19/03/07, Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, Marcelo Guzman escribió:
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que
parece una cantidad correcta para
que una persona medite y se de cuenta del error y la molestia que está
causando
En fin usuarios de gmail, tener un poco de consideración, yo uso gmail
en otras listas de correo y puedo perfectamente escribir en texto plano,
sin hacer top-posting y recortando los
El dom, 18-03-2007 a las 03:34 -0400, Alejandro Garrido Mota escribió:
6) ¿Des-subscripción y lista negra, para las cuentas de correo que
incumplan las normas 3 veces seguidas?
100 % de acuerdo, 3 veces seguidas me parece una cantidad correcta para
que una persona medite y se de cuenta
unas mínimas normas allá donde acuden a
pedir ayuda.
Posibles soluciones:
1) No responder a mensajes que no cumplan las normas
Ignorarlos no soluciona el problema, a mí me sigue siendo molesto el mirar 10
correos y desechar 6 porque están en HTML o haciendo Top-Posting. No deberían
llegar
porque están en HTML o haciendo Top-Posting. No
deberían
llegar, sin más, no hay porqué tolerarlo sin hacer nada ni rechistar.
2) Responder TODOS al buzón personal de la persona en cuestión, con un
mensaje con un enlace a http://wiki.debian.org/NormasLista
Podría ayudar.
3) ¿programar un robot
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que reprimir?. Yo soy nuevo en la lista, estoy en
otras listas linux. Pienso que todos queremos aprender. Algunos de mala
forma, se sabe, pero al fin y al cabo el fin es el mismo.
Prefiero enviar un correo a alguien indicándole las reglas que dejarlo solo
en el
El Lunes, 19 de Marzo de 2007, Marcelo Guzman escribió:
Sorry,
Pero no es mejor educar que reprimir?
Vale, entonces por favor no escribas en HTML ;)
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
este discurso, contestas
haciendo top-posting...
? ¿cual?
--
Christophe T
--
usuario linux #274354
normas de la lista: http://wiki.debian.org/NormasLista
, yo uso gmail
en otras listas de correo y puedo perfectamente escribir en texto plano,
sin hacer top-posting y recortando los caracteres.
Un saludo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Viernes, 16 de Marzo de 2007, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo escribió:
Buenas,
Hay que hacer algo...
Yo ya paso de estar respondiendo a cada mensaje que no cumple las normas
de la lista, porque se duplica el tráfico, es igual de molesto para los
demás e incluso a veces se ha desatado algún
) ¿Des-subscripción y lista negra, para las cuentas de correo que
incumplan las normas 3 veces seguidas?
Me gusta... pero haber como se implementa ??
Lo que me asombra a mi es que tu, teniendo este discurso, contestas
haciendo top-posting...
--
Christophe T
gracias por su amable atención.
Josep - LINK BUILDING -T.+33170906629
__
Telf. 0033170906629 - LINK BUILDING COMPANY - WORKING ARROUND 41
COUNTRIES OVER THE WORLD- IF YOU WANT THE BEST RESULTS, AND BE IN THE
TOP 10 in GOOGLE---TELL US
] -
__
Telf. 0033170906629 - LINK BUILDING COMPANY - WORKING ARROUND 41
COUNTRIES OVER THE WORLD- IF YOU WANT THE BEST RESULTS, AND BE IN THE
TOP 10---TELL US and ASK FOR SPECIAL RATES.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 02:28:24 -0500
Steve C. Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Define most. In all of the email clients I have ever chosen to use not
a single one exhibits the behavior you describe. Pine, elm, mutt, PMMail/2,
PMMail2000, TheBat, Sylpheed-Claws, Thunderbird just to name most.
Kamaraju Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wow! Nice explanation. I have always liked white on black xterms and
never was able to explain why so. Glad to hear that there is a logical
reason behind all this
Yeah, it will be nice in the future when we have better display
technologies -- I
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:27:07PM -0500, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:57:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Personally, I feel this hardcoding of colors in the application is a
downside of X.
One of the few visual things I miss from OS/2. There I had my apps set to
Marcelo Laia escreveu:
Socorro!!!
Eu tenho um arquivo delimitado por tab com 13 colunas e 1958 linhas.
As primeiras 2 colunas trazem informacoes, tipo um ID e um nome. As
seis colunas seguintes trazem informacoes numericas variadas. As
ultimas 5 colunas trazem informacao de presença ou
henrique escreveu:
Em Sexta 26 Janeiro 2007 08:06, Junior Polegato escreveu:
Marcelo Laia escreveu:
Socorro!!!
Eu tenho um arquivo delimitado por tab com 13 colunas e 1958 linhas.
As primeiras 2 colunas trazem informacoes, tipo um ID e um nome. As
seis colunas seguintes trazem
Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suspect it's because Gnome and KDE seem to think that looks like
Windows is the best interface design and Windows uses black-on-white,
It does? I'm pretty sure I've only seen white-on-black command-line
windows in Windows. Can't ever remember seeing
John L Fjellstad wrote:
It does? I'm pretty sure I've only seen white-on-black command-line
windows in Windows. Can't ever remember seeing a black-on-white window.
I think he's not talking about the DOS prompt, but applications like
word processors, spreadsheets and the like.
--
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:27:07PM -0500, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:57:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Personally, I feel this hardcoding of colors in the application is a
downside of X.
One of the few visual things I miss from OS/2. There I had my apps set to
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
I wonder why gnome, kde chose to have white on black
background as defaults in konsole, gnome-terminal etc., Are those developers
so reflective than being projective? :-)
I suspect it's because Gnome and KDE seem to think
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:24:52PM -0500, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:17:17AM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
One of the reasons I prefer dark on light is the excessive use of blue
in ls output (which I tend to use a lot).
So... change it. LS_COLORS controls what colors
that they can be crammed into a four-line-by-70ish-column signature,
while those with real meat to them are too large for that.
I confess that I am rather leery of Jefferson's almost unbalanced
extremism as manifested in his over-the-top support for the French
Revolution, as in the notorious Adam and Eve
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act
and believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there
is too much bile being spewed at top posters.
So which is best, top posting or bottom posting? Who knows? Who
^%^% cares? I certainly don't. On this list however, I
Celejar writes:
I confess that I am rather leery of Jefferson's almost unbalanced
extremism as manifested in his over-the-top support for the French
Revolution, as in the notorious Adam and Eve quote [0].
Seems pretty reasonable to me, in the context of the times.
--
John Hasler
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:41:02AM -0600, John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act
and believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there
is too much bile being spewed at top posters.
So which is best, top posting or bottom posting? Who knows
John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act and
believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there is too much
bile being spewed at top posters.
No, it's not. It's called a convention for communicating with one
another. Do you call it religious
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:03, Steve Lamb wrote:
The fanatics insisted that the background should be black and the text
white because that was the natural way to view a computer screen. It
was the way that it would always remain. Of course, when I went to my
office supply store and
Francis Healy wrote:
I'm dodging the bile being spewed at top posters. Bottom line, top
posting is not evil. Scrool down if you want to read the original
message.
Just because you do it among your limited circle of friends and coworkers
doesn't mean it's acceptable in a public environment
On 1/24/07, John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Celejar writes:
I confess that I am rather leery of Jefferson's almost unbalanced
extremism as manifested in his over-the-top support for the French
Revolution, as in the notorious Adam and Eve quote [0].
Seems pretty reasonable to me
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 11:03:55AM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act and
believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there is too much
bile being spewed at top posters.
No, it's not. It's called
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 14:03, Steve Lamb wrote:
The fanatics insisted that the background should be black and the text
white because that was the natural way to view a computer screen. It
was the way that it
Steve Lamb wrote:
John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act and
believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there is too much
bile being spewed at top posters.
No, it's not. It's called a convention for communicating with one
another. Do you
Celejar writes:
I confess that I am rather leery of Jefferson's almost unbalanced
extremism as manifested in his over-the-top support for the French
Revolution, as in the notorious Adam and Eve quote [0].
I wrote:
Seems pretty reasonable to me, in the context of the times.
Celejar writes
John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act
and believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there
is too much bile being spewed at top posters.
So which is best, top posting or bottom posting? Who knows? Who
^%^% cares?
Anybody with a limited
in the manner that
the educated think they should - bottom posting only please.
As many of us have pointed out, bottom posting is no better than top
posting. Interleaving is the correct standard. And as I said before,
learning how to communicate is part of being educated guess what that means
when you
John C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Lamb wrote:
John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act and
believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there is too much
bile being spewed at top posters.
No, it's not. It's called a convention
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
Paper is REFLECTIVE. Monitors are PROJECTIVE. What's that mean? It means
that paper REFLECTS the light that hits it. Without an outside source of
light you wouldn't see jack on paper. However a monitor PROJECTS light.
In the absence of all other light you
On 1/24/07, Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John C wrote:
It's kinda like a religious fanaticism... everyone should act and
believe like I do. And yes, you're absolutely right - there is too much
bile being spewed at top posters.
No, it's not. It's called a convention
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:17:17AM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
Then again, contrast is higher with light-on-dark sometimes increasing
eye strain. If your whites are blinding you you might just want to
adjust your monitor brightness and/or contrast.
Which results in me constantly adjusting
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 08:57:07PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Personally, I feel this hardcoding of colors in the application is a
downside of X.
One of the few visual things I miss from OS/2. There I had my apps set to
white on black and they all behaved properly. Colors were set in the OS'
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:55:32AM -0500, celejar wrote:
On 1/22/07, Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:25:23AM -0600, John C wrote:
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much
Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
-
John C wrote:
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
- Thomas Jefferson
If you really believe this quote, why do you insist that bottom
posting is the only correct way to go?
Because the top-posters
I'm dodging the bile being spewed at top posters. Bottom line, top posting is
not evil. Scrool down if you want to read the original message.
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John C wrote:
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much Liberty
than those attending
On 1/18/07, Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts, I was
thinking if anyone has ever developed a way to fix the problem.
- ---
HEADER
BLANK_LINE
TOP_POST
BLANK_LINE
MESSAGE
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
- Thomas Jefferson
If you really believe this quote, why do you insist that bottom
posting is the only *correct* way to go?
By the way, I do love the quote. :-)
John
--
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:25:23AM -0600, John C wrote:
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
- Thomas Jefferson
If you really believe this quote, why do you insist that bottom
posting is the only *correct*
On 1/22/07, Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:25:23AM -0600, John C wrote:
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
- Thomas Jefferson
[snip]
By the way, I do love the quote.
celejar wrote:
On 1/22/07, Dave Sherohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:25:23AM -0600, John C wrote:
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much
Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
- Thomas Jefferson
[snip]
By the way, I
Kevin Mark wrote:
Now if only I would switch from mutt to gnus
That's a pretty good idea if you have more than one list/newsgroup
subscription that gets this kind of traffic. I would still give yourself a
rainy weekend to learn gnus if you're not a LISPer, though; it's got
something of a
is it that most mail clients default to a top post? When you hit
reply, There is a blank space where your cursor it, followed by .
wrote: and then the message you are replying to.
Yes, quoted. What else should they do? My MUA can't read my mind
to tell which quotes are irrelevant and should
Francis Healy wrote:
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Ken Irving wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts...
Why is it that most mail clients default to a top post?
They don't. Most
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 07:43:05AM -0800, Francis Healy wrote:
Why is it that most mail clients default to a top post? When you hit
reply, There is a blank space where your cursor it, followed by .
wrote: and then the message you are replying to. If top posting is really
as bad as some
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 12:15:55PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
Granted, context is much less of a concern when reading in threaded
mode within a single mail-reading session, but some blighted souls are
still using non-threaded MUAs, memory of the thread's content fades
when you move on to
something
and forcing them to do it. My intent is to persuade, not to enforce.
Not to mention there's a huge difference between interleaving/trimming and
bottom-posting. Bottom-posting is no better than top-posting.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 07:43:05AM -0800, Francis Healy wrote:
Why is it that most mail clients default to a top post? When you hit
reply, There is a blank space where your cursor it, followed by .
wrote: and then the message you are replying to.
Yes, quoted. What else should
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:13:53PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Thanks to all those emacs folks that pointed out this function!
If I can only translate the gnus function to a mutt function...
Now if only I would switch from mutt to gnus :-)
Could you not just use emacs as the editor for mutt?
--
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:53:33AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:13:53PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Thanks to all those emacs folks that pointed out this function!
If I can only translate the gnus function to a mutt function...
Now if only I would switch from mutt to
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to all those emacs folks that pointed out this function!
If I can only translate the gnus function to a mutt function...
Now if only I would switch from mutt to gnus :-)
I only use gnus to access newsgroups (I'm reading all my mailing lists
through
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:59:52AM -0500 or thereabouts, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:53:33AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
Could you not just use emacs as the editor for mutt?
I am in the process of trying to get procmail to filter all posts
through the gnus function so that
Andy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 07:43:05AM
-0800, Francis Healy wrote:
Why is it that most mail clients default to a top post? When you hit
reply, There is a blank space where your cursor it, followed by .
wrote: and then the message you are replying to.
Yes
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 10:32:35AM -0500, Stephen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 04:59:52AM -0500 or thereabouts, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:53:33AM +, Andy Smith wrote:
Could you not just use emacs as the editor for mutt?
I am in the process of trying to get
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 07:56:23AM -0800, Francis Healy wrote:
It's not in the event. You almost always need to trim your quotes.
Although response-before-reply quoting is itself often a pain to decipher,
my biggest beef with top-posting is that top-posters almost always just
throw some text
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But so far, it has not changed an emails, at least as far as I can
tell. If anyone knows why or has a better function, let me know.
Did you try to run it on the command line, to see if it works? I don't
really know procmail enough to see what the problem
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 07:56:23AM -0800, Francis Healy wrote:
If top posting is realy the bane of everyone's existance that certian
voceriferous individuals claim it is, what is wrong with the mail
client putting the cursor at the at the botttom of the reply and
letting you move
Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 22:57 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts, I was
thinking if anyone has ever developed a way to fix the problem.
Isn't top post fixer a synonym to a LART? ;-)
I think he was looking
Ken Irving wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts, I was
thinking if anyone has ever developed a way to fix the problem.
---
HEADER
BLANK_LINE
TOP_POST
BLANK_LINE
MESSAGE
SIG
Kevin Mark wrote:
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts, I was
thinking if anyone has ever developed a way to fix the problem.
- ---
HEADER
BLANK_LINE
TOP_POST
BLANK_LINE
MESSAGE
SIG
- ---
into
- ---
HEADER
BLANK_LINE
MESSAGE
BLANK_LINE
Paul Johnson writes:
Gnus has this functionality, IIRC. The name is on the tip of my tongue,
like de-outlookify or something.
,[ C-h k W-Y-f ]
| W Y f runs the command gnus-article-outlook-deuglify-article
| which is an interactive autoloaded Lisp function in `deuglify'.
| It is bound
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Ken Irving wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts...
Why is it that most mail clients default to a top post? When you hit reply,
There is a blank space
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Francis Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Ken Irving wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 10:57:25PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts...
Why
Kevin Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi folks,
with the continual talk of the bad etiquitte of top posts, I was
thinking if anyone has ever developed a way to fix the problem.
The Gnus people already did that:
W Y c
or
Article - Washing - (Outlook) Deuglify - Rearrange Citation
--
John L
701 - 800 of 1631 matches
Mail list logo
