Salut,
J'ai ça dans mon sources.list :
deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
Et la dernière version est proposée :
# apt-cache policy google-chrome-unstable
google-chrome-unstable:
Installé : 15.0.865.0-r98568
Candidat : 15.0.865.0-r98568
Table de version
Bonjour,
Le Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:41:45 +0200,
Franck Delage deb...@web82.net a écrit :
Salut,
J'ai ça dans mon sources.list :
deb http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
Et la dernière version est proposée :
# apt-cache policy google-chrome-unstable
google-chrome-unstable
Bonjour,
Visiblement, depuis quelques jours, la version de Chrome unstable
dans les repositories a changé :
$ apt-cache policy google-chrome-unstable
google-chrome-unstable:
Installé : 15.0.854.0-r96901
Candidat : 9.0.576.0-r65344
Étiquette de paquet : 9.0.576.0-r65344
Table de version
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:02:45PM +0200, Bruno Voigt wrote:
Hi List,
I'm running Unstable KDE Desktop with the binary NVidia drivers.
The whole desktop brightness is changing in several visible steps
everytime I'm e.g. switching from a desktop with a web-browser
showing a web-site
Hi List,
I'm running Unstable KDE Desktop with the binary NVidia drivers.
The whole desktop brightness is changing in several visible steps
everytime I'm e.g. switching from a desktop with a web-browser
showing a web-site with a dark background
and e.g. another desktop showing an application
- Forwarded message from Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net -
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 16:55:01 +0100
From: Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net
To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Subject: /run in *unstable*: migration of /lib/init/rw, /dev/.*
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Fri, May 13
Hi all,
I wanted to announce the creation of a new IRC channel #debian-next on
irc.debian.org / irc.oftc.net. The channel is dedicated to the discussion and
(reasonable) support of testing, unstable and (if it ever sees the light of
the day) rolling.
The policy in #debian regarding testing
Hej!
On 2011-04-09 22:24, mattias wrote:
Men unstable är det efterföljaren till wheezy
Nej, inte riktigt. Efterföljaren till squeeze heter mycket riktigt
wheezy, men det är testing som heter så.
Unstable heter alltid sid.
Läs gärna mer på http://www.debian.org/releases/index.sv.html
Va heter debian unstable?
Debian 6.0 heter ju squeeze
Har hittat möjligheten att boota debian installer från usb
Men den kräver ison på usbminnet också
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-swedish-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:14 +0200, mattias wrote:
Va heter debian unstable?
Debian 6.0 heter ju squeeze
Har hittat möjligheten att boota debian installer från usb
Men den kräver ison på usbminnet också
Kodnamnet för unstable ändras inte, det är och förblir sid.
Kodnamnet för testing är
Men unstable är det efterföljaren till wheezy
-Original Message-
From: Sven Arvidsson [mailto:s...@whiz.se]
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 9:41 PM
To: debian-user-swedish@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian unstable
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 21:14 +0200, mattias wrote:
Va heter debian
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:02:57AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
Hi,
It used to be until yesterday that nouveau (controlled by KMS) was
automatically loaded by the kernel, as well as snd-hda-intel, and the
kernel hadn't
Hi,
It used to be until yesterday that nouveau (controlled by KMS) was
automatically loaded by the kernel, as well as snd-hda-intel, and the
kernel hadn't changed since (2.6.38-2-amd64), so I imagined in
yesterday's upgrade initramfs-tools changed...
Is this the default now? I added the modules
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 11:02:57AM -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
Hi,
It used to be until yesterday that nouveau (controlled by KMS) was
automatically loaded by the kernel, as well as snd-hda-intel, and the
kernel hadn't changed since (2.6.38-2-amd64), so I imagined in
yesterday's upgrade
Forwarded to the list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brad Alexander stor...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: Managing updates for a large number of hosts running
unstable/sid
To: Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com
I'm not looking to do partial
On Vi, 25 mar 11, 12:26:42, Brad Alexander wrote:
...
have run into problems with both of these solutions. Nessus only performs
local security checks against stable, and all of the hosts in question are
running a snapshot of unstable.
...
What are others using for this type of checks
sources.list, because it can
happen that a package is removed from unstable to unblock a complex
transition to testing.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital
.
You might want to add testing to your sources.list, because it can
happen that a package is removed from unstable to unblock a complex
transition to testing.
Maybe, but in this case I would:
a) install/upgrade it before it disappear from sid
b) even if package disappeared it is still installed
On Sb, 12 mar 11, 12:32:47, Aniruddha wrote:
I've collected some best practices for running Debian unstable, I'm
curious to hear what other Debian unstable users do to minimize
possible problems with running Debian unstable. My current list:
Did you consider starting a wiki page about
On Du, 13 mar 11, 13:33:40, darkestkhan wrote:
In which case I'm manually intervening, though aptitude is solving
this problem in most cases for me really gracefully. Running apt-get
dist-upgrade would cause removal of ~2GB ( latex, fonts, and few other
) of packages just to get slightly
/
experimental I never had to recover my system.
You are playing with unstable archive after it went through most of
major transition. You are lucky. In early squeeze release cycle, I was
unfortunate enough to hit few glitches in packaging bugs while using
unstable archive. GRUB and mkinitrd related
I've collected some best practices for running Debian unstable, I'm
curious to hear what other Debian unstable users do to minimize
possible problems with running Debian unstable. My current list:
* Install apt-listbugs
* Install apt-listchanges
* Check the ' Debian Weather' before dist
2011/3/12 Aniruddha mailingdotl...@gmail.com:
I've collected some best practices for running Debian unstable, I'm
curious to hear what other Debian unstable users do to minimize
possible problems with running Debian unstable. My current list:
* Install apt-listbugs
* Install apt-listchanges
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, darkestkhan darkestk...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't check Debian Weather, and I don't see a reason why should I do
dist-upgrade, after all I'm running sid constantly
There is a difference between upgrade and dist-upgrade. I prefer to do
an upgrade first followed by
darkestkhan writes:
...I don't see a reason why should I do dist-upgrade, after all I'm
running sid constantly...
Because the sort of inter-release changes dist-upgrade is intended to
handle can happen in Sid at any time.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: What are your best practices for running Debian unstable?
2011/3/12 Aniruddha mailingdotl...@gmail.com:
I've collected some best practices for running Debian unstable, I'm
curious to hear what other Debian unstable users
TOFU Corrected.
In 086801cbe0be$30b00080$92100180$@centurytel.net, mike cutie and maia
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: darkestkhan [mailto:darkestk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 6:43 AM
IMHO apt-listbugs and apt-listchanges are something that everyone should
have
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0100, Aniruddha wrote:
I've collected some best practices for running Debian unstable, I'm
curious to hear what other Debian unstable users do to minimize
possible problems with running Debian unstable. My current list:
* Install apt-listbugs
* Install
an upgrade:
apt 0.8.12
apt-utils 0.8.12
binutils 2.21.0.20110302-2
dmsetup 2:1.02.63-2
gcc-4.5-base 4.5.2-5
hostname 3.06
libcurl3 7.21.4-1
...
Package Details:
Reading changelogs...
--- Changes for apt (apt apt-utils) ---
apt (0.8.12) unstable
2011/3/12 John Hasler jhas...@debian.org:
darkestkhan writes:
...I don't see a reason why should I do dist-upgrade, after all I'm
running sid constantly...
Because the sort of inter-release changes dist-upgrade is intended to
handle can happen in Sid at any time.
I'm running sid /
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:32:47PM +0100, Aniruddha wrote:
I've collected some best practices for running Debian unstable, I'm
curious to hear what other Debian unstable users do to minimize
possible problems with running Debian unstable. My current list:
* Install apt-listbugs
* Install
darkestkhan writes:
Also frequent ( I'm doing upgrade at least 2 times a day ) upgrades
are really sorting out most of inter-release changes that may ( or may
not ) happen in Sid.
I've been running Sid ever since it was created. I just upgrade
individual packages as needed and do a
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:10:31AM +, teddi...@tmo.blackberry.net wrote:
AG said:
Actually it was deceptively simple: added a line for unstable in my
sources.list, updated, and then installed vlc. Hopefully this will not
come back to bite me, but all went very easily.
teddi
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:05:53PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
AFAIR, if you are running testing it is recommended to have testing AND
unstable repositories listed in your sources.lst.
ARRRGH, sorry. That should be:
AFAIR, if you are running unstable it is recommended to have unstable
On Lu, 28 feb 11, 23:36:30, Chris Bannister wrote:
ARRRGH, sorry. That should be:
AFAIR, if you are running unstable it is recommended to have unstable AND
testing repositories listed in your sources.lst.
Not sure it is true if you are running testing.
On occasion I had to install
Just be sure to comment the unstable repos from your sources list after the fact
AFAIR, if you are running testing it is recommended to have testing AND
unstable repositories listed in your sources.lst.
[..]
To flush the repository system, do it now so you don't forget and do an
upgrade
Bonjour a tous,
afin d acceder a certaines bibliotheques C++ recentes, j ai du migrer mon
netbook advent 4213fr sous unstable.
Xserver-xorg s est mis a jour, et du coup mon xorg.conf a sauté! ca a mis mon
clavier en vrac. Par exemple la touche windows n est plus detectee ou encore la
touche
Le 24-02-2011, à 09:24:13 +0100, Fabien LUCE (f...@lutix.org) a écrit :
D'autre part, puisque j'y suis, voici le résultat d'un petit lspci,
j'aimerais éventuellement savoir quelle est le driver xorg le plus
optimisé pour mon chipset graphique:
Pour ça, un site sympa :
Le 24/02/2011 09:24, Fabien LUCE a écrit :
Bonjour a tous,
Bonjour
afin d acceder a certaines bibliotheques C++ recentes, j ai du migrer mon
netbook advent 4213fr sous unstable.
Xserver-xorg s est mis a jour, et du coup mon xorg.conf a sauté! ca a mis mon
clavier en vrac. Par exemple
Hola,
merci pour ta réponse,
il est dit cependant que :
Cette base de données vérifie uniquement les composants PCI pour le moment.
Les pilotes X, ISA, USB, IEEE1394 ne sont pas concernés.
...
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:39:14AM +0100, steve wrote:
Le 24-02-2011, à 09:24:13 +0100, Fabien LUCE
/02/2011 09:24, Fabien LUCE a écrit :
Bonjour a tous,
Bonjour
afin d acceder a certaines bibliotheques C++ recentes, j ai du migrer mon
netbook advent 4213fr sous unstable.
Xserver-xorg s est mis a jour, et du coup mon xorg.conf a sauté! ca a mis
mon clavier en vrac. Par exemple la
Le 24-02-2011, à 09:47:51 +0100, Fabien LUCE (f...@lutix.org) a écrit :
Hola,
merci pour ta réponse, il est dit cependant que : Cette base de
données vérifie uniquement les composants PCI pour le moment. Les
pilotes X, ISA, USB, IEEE1394 ne sont pas concernés.
Au temps pour moi, répondu
From: Jim McCloskey mccl...@ucsc.edu
Sent: Mon, February 21, 2011 11:33:15 PM
Subject: Re: hardware acceleration, radeon driver 6.14 (unstable)
* Dave Witbrodt (dawit...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
| But when I run glxgears, it reports 60 frames per second, which isn't
exactly
On 02/20/2011 03:40 AM, Jim McCloskey wrote:
[...]
And it seemed to work. /var/log/Xorg.0.log reports that direct rendering and
acceleration are enabled. And glxinfo reports:
%glxinfo | grep -i opengl
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD
* Dave Witbrodt (dawit...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
| But when I run glxgears, it reports 60 frames per second, which isn't
exactly the
| level of performance that I had been hoping for. And given that, it's
hardly
| surprising that applications like Google Earth are unusable.
|
|
for this pointer, which was very useful. I learned
from
phoronix that HW acceleration for these cards should be supported in version
6.14 of
the radeon driver. And then I was very happy to notice version 6.14 appear in
the
unstable repository recently. I upgraded to that version (along
Hi,
With recent upgrade on debian unstable (x86_64) of xserver-xorg-core
to 2:1.9.4-1, which required using experimental drivers, not quiet
there in unstable yet, Xorg failed to start indicating no devices
found when usign nouveau driver as prior to the update. However using
fbdev instead worked
On 2011-02-07 19:11 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
With recent upgrade on debian unstable (x86_64) of xserver-xorg-core
to 2:1.9.4-1, which required using experimental drivers, not quiet
there in unstable yet, Xorg failed to start indicating no devices
found when usign nouveau driver as prior
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:11 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
...
Xorg failed to start indicating no devices found when usign
nouveau driver as prior to the update. However using
fbdev instead worked out.
...
You need to upgrade your
On 2011-02-07 20:24 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
I had apt-listchanges, but it's quiet overwhelming, I still have
apt-listbugs though, :-) Perhaps I should try installing it again...
I recon my bad for not having listchanges, but I'm wondering why not
having the package dependent upon kernel
Please help:debian unstable
run `aptitude dist-upgrade'
output:
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Reading extended state information...
Initializing package states...
Reading task descriptions...
The following NEW packages will be installed
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:03:06AM +0800, Qijiang Fan wrote:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
xserver-xorg-video-nv{u}
I think nv was replaced by nouveau.
--
Tarek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
In aanlktimzszvrtzjftygcxoh1g0vhawb8o1ozkkvmo...@mail.gmail.com, Qijiang Fan
wrote:
Please help:debian unstable
run `aptitude dist-upgrade'
Xorg is broken right now. Please wait for all the new video drivers that use
the new ABI to enter unstable. Also, the nv driver is deprecated, so I'm
On 2011-02-08 06:24 +0100, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In aanlktimzszvrtzjftygcxoh1g0vhawb8o1ozkkvmo...@mail.gmail.com, Qijiang
Fan
wrote:
Please help:debian unstable
run `aptitude dist-upgrade'
Xorg is broken right now. Please wait for all the new video drivers that use
the new ABI
On Ma, 21 dec 10, 10:24:47, Alexander Batischev wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:27:37AM +, r...@upp.pt wrote:
I'm searhcing for the safe way to upgrade my current debian to
testing/unstable in order to install the newset verion of OpenAFS
(1.4.12.1). I don't want to fully upgrade my
I'm searhcing for the safe way to upgrade my current debian to
testing/unstable in order to install the newset verion of OpenAFS
(1.4.12.1). I don't want to fully upgrade my system -- only the the
necessary dependencies should be used from testing/unstable repositories.
Hw can I do that?
-- Rizo
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:27:37AM +, r...@upp.pt wrote:
I'm searhcing for the safe way to upgrade my current debian to
testing/unstable in order to install the newset verion of OpenAFS
(1.4.12.1). I don't want to fully upgrade my system -- only the the
necessary dependencies should
- Forwarded message from r...@upp.pt -
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:33:53 +
From: r...@upp.pt
To: Alexander Batischev eual...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Safe and easy ipgrade to unstable/testing.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:24:47 +0200, Alexander Batischev
eual...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Dec
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:24:04AM +0200, Alexander Batischev wrote:
That's exactly what I need. Thank you!
Good. But please keep the thread in the list, don't mail me privately without a
need. ;)
--
Regards,
Alexander Batischev
1024D/69093C81
F870 A381 B5F5 D2A1 1B35 4D63 A1A7 1C77 6909
Hi, how can I install a package from unstable? (currently running testing)
For example, I know it should be something like:
# apt-get install uswsusp/unstable
However, my output is:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Release 'unstable
On Vi, 12 nov 10, 15:32:05, Matt Simmons wrote:
Hi, how can I install a package from unstable? (currently running testing)
For example, I know it should be something like:
# apt-get install uswsusp/unstable
Yes
However, my output is:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Hi, Matt:
On Friday 12 November 2010 21:32:05 Matt Simmons wrote:
Hi, how can I install a package from unstable? (currently running testing)
For example, I know it should be something like:
# apt-get install uswsusp/unstable
You need:
1) To add sources for unstable to your sources list. I.e
On Sb, 13 nov 10, 01:14:53, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
Hi, Matt:
On Friday 12 November 2010 21:32:05 Matt Simmons wrote:
Hi, how can I install a package from unstable? (currently running testing)
For example, I know it should be something like:
# apt-get install uswsusp/unstable
You need
On Ma, 31 aug 10, 17:39:39, Javier Vasquez wrote:
If anyone has faced it already, what other options are there for plain
window managers (no desktop managers)?
See if you session manager uses ~/.config/autostart/
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:48:38AM CEST, Andrei Popescu
andreimpope...@gmail.com said:
On Ma, 31 aug 10, 17:39:39, Javier Vasquez wrote:
If anyone has faced it already, what other options are there for plain
window managers (no desktop managers)?
See if you session manager uses
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:26:01 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:48:38AM CEST, Andrei Popescu
said:
On Ma, 31 aug 10, 17:39:39, Javier Vasquez wrote:
If anyone has faced it already, what other options are there for
plain window managers (no desktop managers)?
See if
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 00:39:39 Javier Vasquez wrote:
If you take a look at the debian bug 588552, you'll notice that as of
now Evolution (2.30.3-1)
I have this problem on Evolution 2.22.3.1. I haven't solved it yet. So my
rubbish bin did not get emptied this week. :-(
Lisi
--
To
OK,
I just didn't want to use any startup script such the same fluxbox
one, or ~/.xsession, or ~/.xinitrc. The reason being is that I'd
prefer anything Evolution depends upon to be called when invoking
Evolution. I don't call Evolution always that I start X, :-)
But it's good to know I can
For now created the following wrapper:
#!/bin/sh
/usr/lib/evolution/2.30/evolution-alarm-notify
exec /usr/bin/evolution
And the following fluxbox menu:
[exec] (Evolution) {~/bin/evolution_wrapper} /usr/share/pixmaps/evolution.xpm
Works, though I have to update the wrapper any time Evolution
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 08:52 -0600, Javier Vasquez wrote:
OK,
I just didn't want to use any startup script such the same fluxbox
one, or ~/.xsession, or ~/.xinitrc. The reason being is that I'd
prefer anything Evolution depends upon to be called when invoking
Evolution. I don't call
On Mi, 01 sep 10, 09:26:01, Erwan David wrote:
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:48:38AM CEST, Andrei Popescu
andreimpope...@gmail.com said:
On Ma, 31 aug 10, 17:39:39, Javier Vasquez wrote:
If anyone has faced it already, what other options are there for plain
window managers (no desktop
Hi, Javier:
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 16:52:54 Javier Vasquez wrote:
OK,
I just didn't want to use any startup script such the same fluxbox
one, or ~/.xsession, or ~/.xinitrc. The reason being is that I'd
prefer anything Evolution depends upon to be called when invoking
Evolution. I
On 9/1/10, Jesús M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net wrote:
Hi, Javier:
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 16:52:54 Javier Vasquez wrote:
OK,
I just didn't want to use any startup script such the same fluxbox
one, or ~/.xsession, or ~/.xinitrc. The reason being is that I'd
prefer anything
Hi all,
If you take a look at the debian bug 588552, you'll notice that as of
now Evolution (2.30.3-1) needs
/usr/lib/evolution/2.30/evolution-alarm-notify to be running in
order to provide events notifications and the like.
Problem is that evolution doesn't start this process, and now it
relies
The subject tells it all.
--
John Culleton
Wexford Press
Create Book Covers with Scribus
Printable E-book 38 pages $5.95
http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:16 PM, John Culleton j...@wexfordpress.comwrote:
The subject tells it all.
--
John Culleton
Wexford Press
Create Book Covers with Scribus
Printable E-book 38 pages $5.95
http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon August 30 2010, James Stuckey wrote:
From dpkg:
14:38 dpkg Ask me about squeeze udev, as you will need to upgrade to
the squeeze kernel and reboot first. Remove any APT source specific to
stable (such as volatile) or bpo, then s/lenny/squeeze/ on your
sources.list and then aptitude
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/30/2010 10:28 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
I don't quite understand that first line..:
From dpkg:
14:38 dpkg Ask me about squeeze udev
how do you ask dpkg about squeeze? ( man dpkg didn't shed alot of light...)
This refers to dpkg the
On Mon August 30 2010, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
From dpkg:
14:38 dpkg Ask me about squeeze udev
how do you ask dpkg about squeeze? ( man dpkg didn't shed alot of
light...)
This refers to dpkg the bot on the #debian IRC channels. You can ask
him about squeeze or squeeze udev using the
-gnome n'est (encore)
à jour, par
exemple.
Unstable est instable. De temps en temps des dépendances sont
cassées. Il faut savoir attendre avant de faire la mise à jours dans ces
cas là.
--
Rémi Vanicat
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr
Bonsoir,
La mise à jour d'apt casse aptitude. Est-ce qu'il y a un UI en mode
console qui va en remplacement d'aptitude ou bien est-ce la nouvelle
version d'aptitude qui tarde à arriver dans les dépôts ?
Dernière minute : mon message est encore dans le dossier d'envoi de leafnode et
la version
dossier d'envoi de leafnode
et
la version d'aptitude compatible avec apt 0.8 est sorti des presses... ça ne
semble
pas gagné pour toutes les configuration : apt-watch-gnome n'est (encore) à
jour, par
exemple.
Unstable est instable. De temps en temps des dépendances sont
cassées. Il faut
, no sé... bueno, supongo que ya me
entendéis :-)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
tengo dudas en cuál de ellas.
Entiendo que testing
van a
aplicar en la versión estable, no sé... bueno, supongo que ya me
entendéis :-)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
tengo dudas
en la versión estable, no sé... bueno, supongo que ya me
entendéis :-)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
tengo dudas en cuál
a
aplicar en la versión estable, no sé... bueno, supongo que ya me
entendéis :-)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
tengo dudas en cuál de
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:15:16 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/7/23 Camaleón
(...)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
tengo
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:27:00 +0200, fernandojoseGmail escribió:
Camaleón wrote:
(...)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
tengo
El 23/07/10 10:02, Camaleón escribió:
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:15:16 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/7/23 Camaleón
(...)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:55:21 -0300, JAP escribió:
El 23/07/10 07:58, Camaleón escribió:
(...)
Por eso he pensando en instalar en ese equipo piloto bien testing o
unstable, con la idea de mantener la instalación en un estado
permanente de testing o en un estado permanente de unestable. Pero
El día 23 de julio de 2010 10:02, Camaleón noela...@gmail.com escribió:
(...)
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es
porque que me conviene instalar la versión testing ;-)
En la web[1] de
Viendo las respuestas (todos parecéis apuntar a que sid se rompe y eso lo
doy por hecho :-)), replanteo la pregunta:
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es
porque que me conviene instalar la
El 2010-07-23 a las 10:26 -0300, David Rodriguez escribió:
(reenvío a la lista, se fue al privado)
El día 23 de julio de 2010 10:02, Camaleón escribió:
(...)
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre
Gracias a mis dedos de goma, el mensaje estaba inacabado. Este es el
quie vale
Viendo las respuestas (todos parecéis apuntar a que sid se rompe y eso lo
doy por hecho :-)), replanteo la pregunta:
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si
El 23/07/10 10:47, AngelD escribió:
Viendo las respuestas (todos parecéis apuntar a que sid se rompe y eso lo
doy por hecho :-)), replanteo la pregunta:
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es
porque
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:55:03 +0200, AngelD escribió:
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es
porque que me conviene instalar la versión testing ;-)
¿Ventaja?, últimas versiones, emociones
El día 23 de julio de 2010 10:59, JAP javier.debian.bb...@gmail.com escribió:
El 23/07/10 10:47, AngelD escribió:
Viendo las respuestas (todos parecéis apuntar a que sid se rompe y eso lo
doy por hecho :-)), replanteo la pregunta:
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina
2010/7/23 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com:
El día 23 de julio de 2010 10:02, Camaleón escribió:
(...)
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es
porque que me conviene instalar la versión testing
2010/7/23 Camaleón noela...@gmail.com
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:55:03 +0200, AngelD escribió:
¿Alguna ventaja de unstable sobre testing? ¿Qué os inclina a elegir
una u otra? Supongo que si no veo ninguna diferencia entre ambas es
porque que me conviene instalar la versión testing
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:06:34 +0200, Marc Aymerich escribió:
2010/7/23 Camaleón
El Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:55:03 +0200, AngelD escribió:
(...)
Entre utilizar Sid, y cuando haya problemas, utilizar un
[1]snapshot, o
utilizar una testing, me quedo con esta última, y si no ves la
801 - 900 of 6453 matches
Mail list logo
