On 01/02/2016 10:06 AM, Glenn English wrote:
Beats me, but it's working.
I modified the line in /etc/exports (all on one line) to:
/home/ghe/Finances
192.168.3.0/255.255.255.0(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
That isn't exactly as suggested, but there were mild complaints about
not havin
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Brandon Vincent wrote:
>
> I would return the server's idmapd.conf back to the default
> configuration (nobody:nogroup) and make sure that the idmapd service
> is running on both the server and the client. Make sure the domain
> matches in idmapd.conf on both the se
> On Jan 1, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Pier wrote:
>
> It was ages I didn't write to the list but nfs always arouse curiosity ;)
> First try to force nfsv3 to see if permissions are ok (v3 uses numeric
> uid/gid) with 'mount -o vers=3'.
> If this works and you want to use nfsv4 then make sure the config
> On Jan 2, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
>
> 1) Ditch webmin, I don't know what it is but it seems to break
> something that should be pretty simple to set up, without giving any
> feedback.
Webmin's one of those web-based GUI admin things. I use it because it usually
does well, a
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Glenn English wrote:
> Come on folks!
>
> Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
> hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
> computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
>
> OK. Leave out (date) and (%
On Friday, 1 January 2016, 21:57, Glenn English wrote:
Come on folks!
Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
OK. Leave out (date) and (% not hun
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 4:56 PM, ghe wrote:
> I changed the nobody name to myself (ghe) in /etc/idmapd.conf, and created a
> new user (gheqw). Now ls says the directory on the client is owned by
> gheqw:nogroup. That doesn't make any sense to me at all.
I would return the server's idmapd.conf bac
Come on folks!
Consider a modified Drake equation: (number on this list) * (date) * (% not
hungover) * (% who understand NFS) * (% willing to help out a bewildered
computer geek) == (surely > 0), no?
OK. Leave out (date) and (% not hungover), and tell me what I've done wrong...
> On Dec 31, 20
I'm trying to get NFS going with a Wheezy server and a Jessie client
using Webmin and vi. It connects, but mounts the directory and file with
nobody:nogroup as the user:group (and nobody isn't set to universe
read/write -- tried to do that, but NFS won't let me).
I see from the 'Net that this
Strangely, putting a dns for the local zone (and forwarder for the rest)
improves the situation.
No cannot monitor in kern.log anymore ...
De : Bob Proulx
À : debian-user@lists.debian.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 20 Septembre 2011 21h46
Objet : Re: nfs problem
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> I have messages like this in logs:
> lockd cannot monitor ip_address
> and also messages about statd
The lockd: cannot monitor messages are due to the kernel being unable
to communicate with the rpc.statd process. That usually indicates
that the rpc.statd is not runnin
Hello,
I am encountering a problem with nfs on debian squeeze.
I have messages like this in logs:
lockd cannot monitor ip_address
and also messages about statd
But client ip are present in /etc/hosts.
On the client the mount process works.
The only problem is locking (application like fi
Kurian Thayil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash
> in /etc/exports of B. It will be like,
>
> /home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash)
>
> You will be able to read-write as root if you include this
> option.
This did not really w
Hi,
If I can remember correctly. Include the option no_root_squash in
/etc/exports of B. It will be like,
/home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check,no_root_squash)
You will be able to read-write as root if you include this option.
Regards,
Kurian Mathew Thayil.
On 10/30/08, Mirco Piccin
Hi,
> Machines A and B both run Debian. There are no firewall rules
> blocking any kind of traffic A<-->B.
> I try to mount, by means of nfs, a directory of B to a mount point
> on A, read-write.
> I can read the contents of /home/storage/video on B. But I cannot
> write anything to it. I keep g
Machines A and B both run Debian. There are no firewall rules
blocking any kind of traffic A<-->B.
I try to mount, by means of nfs, a directory of B to a mount point
on A, read-write.
/etc/exports in B has:
/home/storage/video A(rw,sync,subtree_check)
/etc/fstab in A has:
B:/home/storage/video
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And thanks also to Matthew M. -- sorry Matthew.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFIkNNElNlJzOkJmTcRAi6IAJ92a316VPCAh0E47K4+J6wadeBCbgCggba9
GThDY5qkC/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Samad put me on the right track to the solution. See comments in
line below.
>> Other factors which may have a bearing on the situation: the BDS
>> computer is a P4; whereas the SOL is a dual core on a Foxconn
>> motherboard. Several other t
some thoughts inline
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Ken Heard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme
> rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that
> he (and others?)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As Matthew Moore suggested, after reading the relevant manual page to
see what command exportfs -r does, I ran on the server machine (SOL)
exportfs -rv, which returned the following:
exporting 192.168.0.0/24:/home/ken/mozilla
exporting 192.168.0.0/24:
Hello,
You might try running
$ exportfs -r
on the host computer.
MM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In response to my message of 2008-07-28 on this subject M. Preud'homme
rightly intimated that I should have provided more information so that
he (and others?) could help me. So, here is the information he asked me
for, as well as the output of the "st
Le lundi 28 juillet 2008, Ken Heard a écrit :
> I have two boxes, one normally used by user A, and the other by user
> B. I want to make it possible for user A to access his files from B's
> computer, and vice versa.
>
> So, in each computer I amended
>
> 1) file /etc/exports to export the relative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have two boxes, one normally used by user A, and the other by user B.
I want to make it possible for user A to access his files from B's
computer, and vice versa.
So, in each computer I amended
1) file /etc/exports to export the relative directori
Ding Honghui wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nfs server 192.168.110.28
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 2.2T 1.6T 473G 78% /home
/etc/exports
/home/nfs_for_217 192.168.110.27/255.255.255.255 (rw,sync,no_root_squash)
nfs clien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nfs server 192.168.110.28
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 2.2T 1.6T 473G 78% /home
/etc/exports
/home/nfs_for_217 192.168.110.27/255.255.255.255 (rw,sync,no_root_squash)
nfs client
Filesystem
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> I have noticed that my clients are not declared in
> /etc/hosts
They won't need to be if you use DNS. But it is acceptable to list
them in the local files. Local files override network DNS.
> if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis table to be useful)
> everything is f
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:47:14PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
> I have noticed that my clients are not declared in
> /etc/hosts if I put them in /etc/hosts (and in nis
> table to be useful) everything is find.
>
> Nevertheless I don t understand how the nfs can make a
> resolution via dns of
--- Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Stephane Durieux wrote:
> > client <-> server <-X-> internet
> >
> > That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being
> > clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution .
> > I have read that client and server must be able to
> > make a reverse resolut
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> client <-> server <-X-> internet
>
> That is exactly my issue . Excuse me for not being
> clear ! Anyway, has somebody a solution .
> I have read that client and server must be able to
> make a reverse resolution of the client and the
> server, but I am not sure of it a
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
> --- Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a ?crit
> > > > > > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
> > If the server has
> > > > > > not access to internet, they cannot mount
> > their directories !
> > >
> > I think wh
--- Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit
:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx
> wrote:
> > Stephane Durieux wrote:
> > > Of course the network connexion is good !
> > > I can ping the server
> >
> > But you said that the server cannot access the
> network:
> > > >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:00:19AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Stephane Durieux wrote:
> > Of course the network connexion is good !
> > I can ping the server
>
> But you said that the server cannot access the network:
> > > > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has
> > > >
Stephane Durieux wrote:
> Of course the network connexion is good !
> I can ping the server
But you said that the server cannot access the network:
> > > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations. If the server has
> > > not access to internet, they cannot mount their directories !
This is a
--- Andrew Sackville-West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane
> Durieux wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
> > If the server has not access to internet, they
> cannot
> > mount their directories !
>
> in what way
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:51:40PM +0200, Stephane Durieux wrote:
> Hello
>
> I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
> If the server has not access to internet, they cannot
> mount their directories !
in what way is network access broken?
>
> I have checked /etc/fstab
> nfs server is re
Hello
I encounter a problem whith my nfs stations.
If the server has not access to internet, they cannot
mount their directories !
I have checked /etc/fstab
nfs server is referenced by is ip
/etc/nsswitch.conf
files hosts dns nis
/etc/host.conf
order hosts, bind, nis
(I would like to know th
Have fixed the problem as NFS can't export UDF filesystems so mounted
the DVD as ISO9660 and it worked. Will keep "exportfs -a" in mind
though as sometimes it won't play back the DVD via NFS unless I play
about with exportfs a lot.
Thanks!
Cheers - Piers
Darryl Clarke wrote:
On 21/01/06, P
On 21/01/06, Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Am trying to mount a DVD drive via NFS and am having problems. For
> note, 192.168.1.2 (hostname - destiny) is the client and 192.168.1.15
> (hostname - mythtv) is the server.
>
> I have this in my /etc/exports:
>
> /media/cdrom
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:29:50 +
Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> > how can you mount a dvd over nfs if its not mounted on its local machine?
> > Do these numbers above, as they come from destiny match the numbers if they
> > are run on mythtv? IOW, are we looking at the
Andrew,
how can you mount a dvd over nfs if its not mounted on its local machine? Do these numbers above, as they come from destiny match the numbers if they are run on mythtv? IOW, are we looking at the same disk here?
This bit is just to test if I can acutally mount it, i.e. I'm running
the
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:04:25 +
Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Am trying to mount a DVD drive via NFS and am having problems. For
> note, 192.168.1.2 (hostname - destiny) is the client and 192.168.1.15
> (hostname - mythtv) is the server.
>
> I have this in my /et
Hello all,
Am trying to mount a DVD drive via NFS and am having problems. For
note, 192.168.1.2 (hostname - destiny) is the client and 192.168.1.15
(hostname - mythtv) is the server.
I have this in my /etc/exports:
/media/cdrom0 192.168.1.2(ro,sync)
and 192.168.1.2 is in the /etc/hosts.all
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Michael Gass wrote:
I am having a problem with a debian install using nfs and a floppy boot.
I am trying to install woody (bf2.4 flavor) on an old 486 with 24M ram
(Compaq Prolinea 4/66). I am using PLIP as the machine has no network
card and no cdrom.
<.>
"nfs: serve
I am having a problem with a debian install using nfs and a floppy boot.
I am trying to install woody (bf2.4 flavor) on an old 486 with 24M ram
(Compaq Prolinea 4/66). I am using PLIP as the machine has no network
card and no cdrom. This target machine is connected via PLIP to a source
machine (
I'd put this on a Perl newsgroup, but when I Googled for more info, it came up
that this is likely more of an NFS problem. I could not find anything that
could actually tell me how to fix it, though.
I have a server and a workstation. I'm using Kate (for those who don't use
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 19:52, Tim Kelley wrote:
> Have you looked at tcpdump output while this is happening? you might see some
> clues ...
I have done a TCP dump and it seems to be just fine, nothing is
different from a successful transfer then a failed transfer except at
the point it fails. The
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 08:45, Derek "The Monkey" Wueppelmann wrote:
> I know this is an old thread now, but I finally got a chance to try out
> the above. And while I was very hopeful in that it might work it still
> ended up with the same results. I don't know about everybody else but I
> am
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 07:14, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Derek "The Monkey" Wueppelmann wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting
> > issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done
> > an apt-get update/upgrade on all my
Derek "The Monkey" Wueppelmann wrote:
Hello All,
I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting
issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done
an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems) when copying or creating a
file on one of the NFS mounted direct
On Thursday 04 November 2004 02:34, Derek \"The Monkey\" Wueppelmann wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting
> issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done
> an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems) when copying or
Hello All,
I'm currently running debian 3.0 r3 and have run into an interesting
issue with my NFS mounts. On one of my debian systems (I have just done
an apt-get update/upgrade on all my systems) when copying or creating a
file on one of the NFS mounted directories I get an input/output error.
Th
Here is more info: the client reports
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>nfsstat -rc
Client rpc:
Connection oriented:
calls badcallsbadxids timeoutsnewcredsbadverfs
6838681 151128 3 297 0 0
timers cantconnnomem interrupts
0 680
NFS problem. Server is a debian Sarge/testing box (kernel
2.4.25-1-386). Client is a solaris 8 box. This afternoon I started
to see the following messages in the debian box's
/var/log/kern.log:
Apr 1 15:40:00 laurel kernel: rpc-srv/tcp: nfsd: sent only -32 bytes
of 8324 - shu
BTW, is there still a way to mount a windows dirtree via nfs ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:01:06 -0500, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I
> am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box)
> is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and
> also I can t
On Monday 27 October 2003 22:01, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other
> machine. I am getting RPC error on other machine and it says
> (Host linux box) is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux
> box from there and also I can telnet ot it.
Hi,
I am trying to mount a directory as nfs filesystem from other machine. I
am getting RPC error on other machine and it says (Host linux box)
is not responding. Though I can ping to the linux box from there and
also I can telnet ot it.
What is that I am missing. Any suggestion.
Thanks
--
Also, some more stuff I've been noticing:
1) My understanding was that /var/lib/nfs/xtab was the file actually
consulted by mountd to respond to an nfs mount request. Interestingly,
that file only contains the info on /home, but not on the /shared
export, even though /etc/exports includes both.
T
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:39:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Thanks. Does sid's 1.0.5-1 work?
Yes, seems to be working for me.
--
Dave Carrigan
Seattle, WA, USA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.rudedog.org/ | ICQ:161669680
UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 12:08, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
>
> > > Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
> > > downgrade to 1.0.3-1.
>
> > # dpkg -l | grep nfs
> > ii nfs-c
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:28:29AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> > Make sure you're running the most recent ones or else
> > downgrade to 1.0.3-1.
> # dpkg -l | grep nfs
> ii nfs-common 1.0.3-2 NFS support files common to client and serve
> i
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 07:51, Dave Carrigan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
> > Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> > mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> > receive; errno = Connection refused". An
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:31:13AM -0400, gerard wrote:
> Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> receive; errno = Connection refused". Any ideas? I havent changed
> anything either, thats why I f
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 05:31, gerard wrote:
> Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
> mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
> receive; errno = Connection refused". Any ideas? I havent changed
> anything either, thats why I find it strang
Everything was working fine with my nfs, rebooted, and now when I try to
mount an nfs drive this is the error I get "mount: RPC: Unable to
receive; errno = Connection refused". Any ideas? I havent changed
anything either, thats why I find it strange.
~gerard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Bart Lenoir wrote:
Hi,
I'm running an NFS server on Red Hat.
Connected to the Red Hat I have a Debian
which I want to use as an NFS client.
Ping, Ftp, Telnet, ... all seems fine.
Mount and Umount is working well, however
I don't have access to the selected directory.
"Permission denied". The only
Hi,
I'm running an NFS server on Red Hat.
Connected to the Red Hat I have a Debian
which I want to use as an NFS client.
Ping, Ftp, Telnet, ... all seems fine.
Mount and Umount is working well, however
I don't have access to the selected directory.
"Permission denied". The only way I can have
acc
--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:47:30PM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Furthering the subject...
>=20
> Is it possible to get the crontab to email me each time the job=20
Furthering the subject...
Is it possible to get the crontab to email me each time the job
succeeds/fails or is it better to write a shell script and get crontab
to execute the script?
Cheers - Piers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Great! Seems to be working
Cheers!
Piers
Michael Heironimus wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:24:45AM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
>
>>Bascially, I've got 2 computers, one which is my main PC (named desire),
>>and the other is a server (named destiny). I'd like the server to
>>backup the /home
Florian,
You are completely correct, and I totally agree, but the issue here is
that the hard drive in Destiny is 12Gb, and the backup is around 6GB and
so there isn't room for 2 backups.
Interestingly, when I tried to tar the files on the main PC (Desire) and
then copy it over via NFS, I alwa
Hello Paladin!
Paladin wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:03:07 +0200
> Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, you completely delete your older backup, and then you try to
>> get a new one?
>> What do you think might happen once an "error" occurs directly
>> after deleting the old ba
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:03:07 +0200
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, you completely delete your older backup, and then you try to
> get a new one?
> What do you think might happen once an "error" occurs directly
> after deleting the old backup? You will end up with _no_ backup
>
Hello Piers!
Piers Kittel wrote:
> [...Backup...]
> 00 4 * * 0 root rm -f /home/desirebackup/home_backup.tar; tar cf
> /home/desirebackup/home_backup.tar /home/desire/piers
Hmm, you completely delete your older backup, and then you try to get
a new one?
What do you think might happen once an "err
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:02:39PM -0400, MJM wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2003 22:02, Michael Heironimus wrote:
>
> > > but when I tested out the "tar cf /home/desirebackup/home_backup.tar
> > > /home/desire/piers" I get a lot of "Permissions denied" errors although
> > > some files are read OK. (
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 22:02, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> > but when I tested out the "tar cf /home/desirebackup/home_backup.tar
> > /home/desire/piers" I get a lot of "Permissions denied" errors although
> > some files are read OK. (An example is "tar: /home/desire/piers/.mcoprc:
> > Read error
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:24:45AM +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> Bascially, I've got 2 computers, one which is my main PC (named desire),
> and the other is a server (named destiny). I'd like the server to
> backup the /home/piers directory from the main PC. The server is
> accessing the main P
Hello
Bascially, I've got 2 computers, one which is my main PC (named desire),
and the other is a server (named destiny). I'd like the server to
backup the /home/piers directory from the main PC. The server is
accessing the main PC by NFS and desire:/home is moutned on
destiny:/home/desire.
Hello!
I have installed Debian Linux 3.0r1 and a
home-compiled 2.4.18 kernel (no additional patches)
with NFS-kernel-server (compiled in).
Everything seems to work, but when I change the
runlevel to 1 and to 2 after doing something or simply
typing CNTRL-D the system hangs at this point:
Starti
> > when I check to status of nfs on the server I';m trying
> to
> > setup, the rpcinfo -p command returns
> >
> > rpcinfo: can't contact portmapper RPC: remote system
> error
> > - connection refused
> >
> > the lsmod command shows nfsd, nfs and lockd. what did
> I do
> > wrong? what a
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:52:20 -0600
Dimitri Maziuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Axel Boyrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are
> > owed by nobody.nobody
> >
> > once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2
* Axel Boyrie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are owed
> by nobody.nobody
>
> once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2.20 files appear as own by
> nobody.nogroup
>
> But with kernel 2.4.17 files appear with
Hi,
I am using Woody. I mount NFS directory from Solaris 2.8 where files are owed
by nobody.nobody
once NFS mounted on Woody, with the kernel 2.2.20 files appear as own by
nobody.nogroup
But with kernel 2.4.17 files appear with a uid and gid number 4294967294 !!???
i've try to change the NFS
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:25:07PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
[...]
> A workaround for this was to increase the number of nfsd instances on
> the server, set in one of the nfs scripts in /etc/init.d. I can't
> remember what the line was, and I haven't got nfs installed anymore, but
> look for
instanced of exim in state 'D' (uninterruptible sleep,
> usually do to IO: obviously because of the NFS problem). While the trouble is
> occurring, the files in the NSF mounts still seem to be accessible to shell
> commands (unless the system has not run out of file descriptors).
&g
ed of exim in state 'D' (uninterruptible sleep,
usually do to IO: obviously because of the NFS problem). While the trouble is
occurring, the files in the NSF mounts still seem to be accessible to shell
commands (unless the system has not run out of file descriptors).
On Romana the NFS cl
Hello *,
I am having permissions problems with a NFS mount that I just can't figure out
and I'm hoping someone can help.
I am NFS mounting a USB floppy drive on machine A by using automount on
machine B. The floppy shows it is mounted rwxrwxrwx and owned root.root.
Any user can read and wri
Nicolas Lamirault said:
> hi debian users
> somebody have an idea to correct me in my config ?
> thanks
sounds like a permissions issue. what userid are you
trying to view the files as? either make sure that
that userid(the numerical id) has access to those files
or turn on the no_root_squash opt
hi debian users
i have a problem with NFS :
i have the domaine 'foo'
on B,C and D computer i would like to export a repertory to all the
domain. So on each /etc/exports file i write :
for B : /share *.foo
for C : /usr/local/share*.foo
for D : /home/divers*.fo
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> You're not running 'portmap' on the client or /etc/hosts.allow
> prevents access to it. Fix that.
oh man . . . thanks.
--
) ,_),_)
(-(__ |_ _ _ |/
) | |(_)(_ |\
( \_,
_
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stephen E. Hargrove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On the 2.2.18 kernel, mount /swlf works perfectly. I recently upgraded
>the kernal to 2.4.6, and now all of my mounts time out. The following
>appears in my /var/log/messages:
>
>Oct 24 09:10:17 calypso kernel: portma
i'm running a RedHat 6.1 box with kernel 2.2.17 with the following:
# rpc.mountd --version
Universal NFS Server 2.2beta37
# rpc.nfsd --version
Universal NFS Server 2.2beta37
# cat /etc/exports
/usr/office/clients 192.168.2.2/255.255.255.0(rw)
192.168.2.6/255.255.255.0(rw)
/usr/office/closed 192.16
On 14 Aug 2001 18:59:23 +0200, Bjoern Buerger wrote:
> Am Mon, 13 Aug 2001 schrieb Michael Heldebrant:
>
> > > > What file system is the nfs exports running on? I seem to recall some
> > > > discussion of reiserfs and nfs problems.
> > >
> > > They are running on ext2 file systems,
> > > placed
Am Mon, 13 Aug 2001 schrieb Michael Heldebrant:
> > > What file system is the nfs exports running on? I seem to recall some
> > > discussion of reiserfs and nfs problems.
> >
> > They are running on ext2 file systems,
> > placed on two RAID5 arrays.
> Thats odd. Do backups and fsck run cleanly
Am Mon, 13 Aug 2001 schrieb Michael Heldebrant:
> > Server:
> > ---
> > Debian unstable
> > Kernel 2.4.6
> > nfs-common: 1:0.3.1-1
> > nfs-user-server:2.2beta47-10
> >
> > Clients:
> >
> > Debian unstable
> > Kernel 2.4.6
> > nfs-common: 1:0.3.2-2
> >
On 12 Aug 2001 17:03:23 +0200, Bjoern Buerger wrote:
>
> Since last week I've had some really weird problems with NFS,
> but I do not know where do search for the problem. Maybe some
> of you have com across somethink like the following:
<-snip->
>
> Server:
> ---
> Debian unstable
> Kerne
Since last week I've had some really weird problems with NFS,
but I do not know where do search for the problem. Maybe some
of you have com across somethink like the following:
The problems occur on three NFS Clients (two of them diskless)
while the Server shows no problems with the same files.
Hi,
I've got a Debian 2.2 working as a nis server for a Mandrake
7.2 client.
I've installed nfs-kernel-server on the debian and configured /etc/exports
to export /home/nis (the nis users) to everybody but the Mandrake client
isn't able to mount the directory (the nis login works).
I've got a "Conn
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:05:44PM +0200, Alexander Gun uttered:
> May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-13
> May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: lockd: cannot monitor 192.168.13.100
> May 31 15:01:38 asterix kernel: lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.13.100
>
Make sure nfs-
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
