You're lying. Your social media friends say otherwise.
I'm happily married.
From: Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
On 6
...@attglobal.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 2:02 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
On 6/6/2014 12:28 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
Not true.
I'm still popular on those forums, except that I've found Jerry Stuckup
to be a very interesting
From: Raffaele Morelli raffaele.more...@gmail.com
To: Debian User debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2014 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
Unfortunately the user list it's not moderated and those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/07/2014 07:52 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
[that on 2014-06-07 at 3:38, Raffaele Morelli wrote:]
Unfortunately the user list it's not moderated and those flames
are more and more frequent.
I can tell you who started them: Jerry Stuckle
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Horatio Leragon hlera...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
From: Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
BTW, do you know the difference between a forum and a mailing list? You seem
to use forum
From: Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
LOL! Last time I was called that was in third grade or so. It shows your
How much time did you waste on creating that?
Goodbye to you too.
You'll not be missed :)
From: Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/06/2014 06:19 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
[that on 2014-06-06 at 1:51, Bob Holtzman wrote:]
BTW, do you know the difference between a forum and a mailing list?
You seem to use forum as a catchall.
A forum is a website whose members can
Ever heard of etymological fallacy? Like dilapidated means 'stone' plus
'taken apart', yet we use the term for anything that's falling apart, even
if it's not made of stone.. Maybe that widens the forum idea, maybe not,
but you need to use what todays people think of a forum to be correct..
Not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/06/2014 09:22 AM, Jack Wilborn wrote:
Ever heard of etymological fallacy?
No, but it's an idea that makes sense.
Like dilapidated means 'stone' plus 'taken apart', yet we use the
term for anything that's falling apart, even if it's not
On 6/6/2014 6:12 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
*From:* Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
*To:* debian-user@lists.debian.org
*Sent:* Thursday, June 5, 2014 10:04 PM
*Subject:* Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files
On 6/6/2014 9:22 AM, Jack Wilborn wrote:
Ever heard of etymological fallacy? Like dilapidated means 'stone' plus
'taken apart', yet we use the term for anything that's falling apart,
even if it's not made of stone.. Maybe that widens the forum idea,
maybe not, but you need to use what todays
On 6/6/2014 2:04 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Horatio Leragon hlera...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted
From: The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 9:13 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
In either case, the only thing to do would be to begin
From: Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
No, it means you are still at the same mental maturity level as a third
grader
Poor old Jerry.
He's a bitter, lonely man whose wife and kids have left him for another man.
From: Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2014 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
On 6/6/2014 2:04 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 22:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Horatio Leragon hlera...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On 6/6/2014 12:26 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
Poor old Jerry.
He's a bitter, lonely man whose wife and kids have left him for another man.
ROFLMAO! I am happily married - unlike you.
But then your personal attacks show your level of maturity.
Jerry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 6/6/2014 12:28 PM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
Not true.
I'm still popular on those forums, except that I've found Jerry Stuckup
to be a very interesting case study for students of psychology.
Then why don't you go back to them?
Oh, that's right. You were found to be a clueless troll there,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Jerry Stuckle jstuc...@attglobal.net wrote:
Oh, that's right. You were found to be a clueless troll there, also. And
you were kicked out of them. So you had to find another place to troll.
Does this discussion really need to continue?
ChrisA
--
To
Hi Horatio,
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 22:13 -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
I now understand why Ubuntu is way more popular than Debian
Opinions like that can better be discussed at the Debian off-topic list.
Ubuntu does cast a bad light on free software, regarding to the Unity
lenses spyware that
On 6/5/2014 1:13 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
*From:* Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
*To:* debian-user@lists.debian.org
*Sent:* Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:45 AM
*Subject:* Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 10:13:47PM -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
From: Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
Ralph, I
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 03:50:38PM -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
--
From: Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted
From: Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
A note to the OP. Yet you might not be able to understand the syntax
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 04:18 -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
How do I learn it?
Learning by doing ;).
$ chown --help
Usage: chown [OPTION]... [OWNER][:[GROUP]] FILE...
or: chown [OPTION]... --reference=RFILE FILE...
[snip]
Examples:
chown root /uChange the owner of /u to root.
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:16:26AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
snip
Before You Ask
Before asking a technical question by e-mail, or in a newsgroup, or on a
website chat board, do the following:
1. Try to find an answer by searching the archives of the forum you
From: Bob Holtzman hol...@cox.net
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:45 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
Ralph, I think your wasting bandwidth on this guy. He's been told this more
than once
On Du, 01 iun 14, 15:36:37, Joe wrote:
Not wishing to add confusion, but you may also find references to
'dpkg'. This is the low-level package tool that all the apt tools are
front-ends for. It does no dependency checking,
Maybe you didn't mean it this way, but dpkg does indeed do dependency
From: Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
Maybe you didn't mean it this way, but dpkg does indeed do dependency
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/03/2014 07:19 AM, Horatio Leragon wrote:
[that on 2014-06-03 at 5:08, Andrei POPESCU wrote:]
Maybe you didn't mean it this way, but dpkg does indeed do
dependency checking. When provided with a bunch of .deb files to
install it will take
From: The Wanderer wande...@fastmail.fm
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
That depends on a number of other factors.
Literally
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:08:13 +0300
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Du, 01 iun 14, 15:36:37, Joe wrote:
Not wishing to add confusion, but you may also find references to
'dpkg'. This is the low-level package tool that all the apt tools
are front-ends for. It does no
On Tue 03 Jun 2014 at 19:00:46 +0100, Joe wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:08:13 +0300
Andrei POPESCU andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Du, 01 iun 14, 15:36:37, Joe wrote:
Not wishing to add confusion, but you may also find references to
'dpkg'. This is the low-level package tool
From: Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
The advent of apt was a gigantic step forward for Debian. The interplay
between dpkg
On Tue 03 Jun 2014 at 15:50:38 -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
From: Brian a...@cityscape.co.uk
The advent of apt was a gigantic step forward for Debian. The interplay
between dpkg and apt is still (to me) quite marvellous.
Get a .deb from somewhere (Skype, for example) and
dpkg -i
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 15:50 -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
apt-get -f install
means a force install, am I correct?
No, you aren't!
-f, --fix-broken
Fix; attempt to correct a system with broken dependencies in place. -
http://manpages.debian.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=apt-get
dpkg -i doesn't
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 00:14 +0100, Brian wrote:
No. please see apt-get(8) (man apt-get)
A note to the OP. Yet you might not be able to understand the syntax of
a man(ual)page, but you need to learn it.
Btw. you could use a search engine to do research in the Internet.
https://startpage.com/
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 01:54 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
https://startpage.com/ Search term: apt-get manual First hit:
http://linux.die.net/man/8/apt-get
JFTR for the search term: apt-get man
or for: apt-get manpage
The second hit is manpages.debian.net ;).
--
To
From: Jörg-Volker Peetz jvpe...@web.de
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2014 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: Remove unwanted, orphaned files and dependencies
Thanks for your help, Jorg.
The aptitude command offers some help:
I read somewhere
On Sun 01 Jun 2014 at 05:49:24 -0700, Horatio Leragon wrote:
I read somewhere on the internet that Debian discourages its users to
use the 'aptitude' command. Debian encourages us to use the 'apt'
command. Is that correct?
No. The context you probably saw that in is important.
$ aptitude
an option.
They have their own meta-data for package status, such as which are held
back from upgrade, so mixing the tools if you are doing anything unusual
is not recommended. When you upgrade versions, for example, it is
recommended to use *both* apt-get and aptitude to remove holds and
verify
On 2014-06-01, Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote:
Other than that, it is a matter of personal preference. Aptitude has
a command-line text mode and an interactive text-graphics mode, apt-get
is older and is purely text. Aptitude merges various tools under one
command, apt-get, apt-cache and
My knowledge and experience with aptitude is much better than with
apt/apt-get/apt-cache. As the first document comparing these tools I recommend
the one in the package debian-reference-en (or another language you prefer)
which of course is also available on the debian site.
The search option of
On Sun 01 Jun 2014 at 20:05:23 +0200, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
My knowledge and experience with aptitude is much better than with
apt/apt-get/apt-cache. As the first document comparing these tools I recommend
the one in the package debian-reference-en (or another language you prefer)
which of
After installation or uninstallation of software, I am quite sure there are
unwanted files and orphaned dependencies lying around.
How do I do a spring cleaning of my OS?
apt-get autoremove --purge
This command will search and remove packages and his configuration with no
dependencies. But maybe you like/ need the package
$ deborphan
Prints (default option) a list of libraries which are unused. You can
remove these packages with
$ sudo apt-get remove --purge
The aptitude command offers some help:
$ aptitude search '~c'
searches for packages that were removed but not purged, i.e., their
configuration files are still present;
to get rid of these files order
$ aptitude purge '~c'
Next:
$ aptitude search '~g'
searches for packages not required by
the browser with a
Wikipedia or Google search using your search terms.
How do you remove Google and replace it with a search engine of your choice?
Thanks.
Doesn't on my Jessie install with Gnome 3.8.x - You sure you're using
Debian and not Ubuntu?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
.
Apparently, clicking on either of them will open the browser with a
Wikipedia or Google search using your search terms.
How do you remove Google and replace it with a search engine of your choice?
First, here's what I did to remove both of those search options entirely.
I made a backup directory
terms.
How do you remove Google and replace it with a search engine of your choice?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5366d99a.5040
-update-grub exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64.postrm line 212.
dpkg: error processing package linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 (--remove):
subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Errors were
filesystem.
run-parts: /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 1
Failed to process /etc/kernel/postrm.d at
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64.postrm line 212.
dpkg: error processing package linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 (--remove):
subprocess installed post-removal
On 13/02/14 06:04, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2014-02-12 17:25 +0100, rpr nospam wrote:
In order to uninstall all libreoffice packages I ran the following
apt-get command with a simple regular expression:
$ sudo apt-get remove 'libreoffice.*'
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
the following commands:
$ sudo apt-get remove 'libre?f?ice.*'
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'libreoffice.org-calc' for regex 'libre?f?ice.*'
Note, selecting 'libreoffice.org-writer' for regex 'libre?f?ice.*'
Package 'libreoffice.org
On an installation of Debian GNU/Linux 7.0 with subsequent updates
from testing (Linux 3.12.9-1 amd64) I noticed a strange output while
running apt-get remove or apt-get purge in order to remove/purge
libreoffice packages.
Here are the libreoffice packages:
$ dpkg-query -l 'libreoffice*' | tail
On 2014-02-12 17:25 +0100, rpr nospam wrote:
In order to uninstall all libreoffice packages I ran the following
apt-get command with a simple regular expression:
$ sudo apt-get remove 'libreoffice.*'
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Le 28.01.2014 16:41, John L. Ries a écrit :
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, lina wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:16 AM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
On Tuesday 28,January,2014 06:19 PM, darkestkhan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:16 AM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago
when I tried to mount the iphone.
Thanks ahead for your advice,
Best regards,
Seems like you don't have permissions to do this - I suspect you
are not owner of .gvfs. If so
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote:
# rm .gvfs
ERRATUM!
# rmdir .gvfs
sorry. :-( Typo, I'm afraid. The whole point was that it is difficult
to remove a directory that has things in it.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:16 PM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
From: Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com
To: Debian Lists debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 12:52
Subject: Re: how to remove ? directory
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:16 PM, lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d
Am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2014, 15:16:57 schrieb lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
tried
lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
If this is actual ls output then your filesystem is broken and you
should fsck it, possibly in single-user mode (init 1).
J.
--
I lust after strangers but only date people from the office.
lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
tried to mount the iphone
On Tuesday 28,January,2014 09:24 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
If this is actual ls output then your filesystem is broken and you
should fsck it, possibly in single-user mode (init 1).
Please don't spread
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:34:00PM +0800, lina wrote:
On Tuesday 28,January,2014 09:24 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove
? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
tried to mount the iphone.
Thanks ahead for your advice,
This is normal. GVFS is a userspace filesystem used by GNOME to mount
and present external filesystems
: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
tried to mount the iphone.
Thanks ahead for your advice,
This is normal. GVFS
Craig L. cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:00:05PM +0800, lina wrote:
It is so strange, as a user (before I didn't try as user ):
dr-x-- 2 lina lina 0 Jan 28 14:44 .gvfs
which is under my /home/lina directory.
while as a root, it shows:
Lisi writes:
The whole point was that it is difficult
to remove a directory that has things in it.
rm -rf dir
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, lina wrote:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
tried to mount the iphone.
Thanks
lina lina.lastn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 28,January,2014 09:46 PM, Craig L. wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 09:34:00PM +0800, lina wrote:
On Tuesday 28,January,2014 09:24 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
This is normal. GVFS is a userspace filesystem used by GNOME to
mount and present external
on how FUSE filesystems and
gvfs work concerning access from users other than the one owning the
FUSE process.
Grüße,
Sven.
The original request was for advice on how to remove the directory as root. I
was trying to provide that advice. I did not say this was a good thing.
And yes
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Craig L. wrote:
I think you need to (as user):
chmod 755 .gvfs
If you really want to get rid of it, you need to unmount it first. df
won't show it, but it is a mount point.
--|
John L. Ries |
Salford Systems |
Phone:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 28/01/2014 14:35, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
If this is actual ls output then your filesystem is
François Patte:
Le 28/01/2014 14:35, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
If this is actual ls output then your filesystem is broken and you
should fsck
François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
Le 28/01/2014 14:35, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
If this is actual ls output then your
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
François Patte:
Le 28/01/2014 14:35, Sven Hartge a écrit :
Jochen Spieker m...@well-adjusted.de wrote:
lina:
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
If this is actual ls output then your
mettre ses classes etc.
Mais le paquet TeXLive lui n'y déposera rien. Et bien
sûr, lors d'un remove/purge, si le répertoire est non
vide (parce que l'admin y a mis des classes), celui-ci
n'est pas supprimé afin que l'admin ne perde pas son
travail.
J'avais installé project-neon qui est crée dans opt
On 01/26/2014 09:03 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
Bonsoir,
Le 26/01/2014 10:45, maderios a écrit :
On aurait pu mettre ton paquet dans le répertoire /usr/local.
Là, je dis non. ;-)
D'après ce que j'ai compris de quelques lectures ici ou là,
aucun paquet ne doit installer quoi que ce soit dans
ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied
d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs
a# rm -rf .gvfs
rm: cannot remove `.gvfs': Is a directory
any advice, I think the .gvfs being introduced long time ago when I
tried to mount the iphone.
Thanks ahead for your advice,
Best regards
On 01/25/2014 04:43 PM, Francois Lafont wrote:
Bonjour,
Merci Stéphane pour cette réponse détaillée.
Je me permets de réagir sur un point.
Le 23/01/2014 22:13, Stéphane GARGOLY a écrit :
On aurait pu mettre ton paquet dans le répertoire /usr/local.
Là, je dis non. ;-)
D'après ce que j'ai
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:33:15 +0100
Francois Lafont mathsatta...@free.fr wrote:
Bon, après, il est indiqué qu'un paquet peut quand même créer
des répertoires vides si j'ai bien tout compris.
Non, il est indiqué qu'il est interdit de créer des DIRs
tels que: /usr/local/kékchoz, mais qu'il est
Bonjour,
Le 26/01/2014 13:24, Bzzz a écrit :
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 02:33:15 +0100
Francois Lafont mathsatta...@free.fr wrote:
Bon, après, il est indiqué qu'un paquet peut quand même créer
des répertoires vides si j'ai bien tout compris.
Non,
C'est vrai que ma lecture a été vraiment
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:22:14 +0100
Francois Lafont mathsatta...@free.fr wrote:
Ok, mais le « * » dans ton chemin doit correspondre à
un répertoire qui existe déjà sur le système (genre « bin »
par exemple) ou bien à un répertoire listé dans FHS section
4.5 (pas réussi à trouver), sans quoi,
Le 26/01/2014 15:40, Bzzz a écrit :
« However, the package may create *empty* directories
below /usr/local so that the system administrator knows where to
place site-specific files. These are not directories
in /usr/local, but are children of directories in /usr/local.
These directories
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:33:03 +0100
Francois Lafont mathsatta...@free.fr wrote:
Ok, je comprends très bien ce que tu m'expliques. C'est juste
que je ne pige pas le « empty » dans la phrase :
« However, the package may create *empty* directories ... »
Le paquet peut créer des répertoires
Bzzz vraiment je ne comprends la traduction que tu me donnes
(en revanche ton interprétation je l'ai bien comprise). Voir
ci-dessous :
Le 26/01/2014 16:45, Bzzz a écrit :
Ok, je comprends très bien ce que tu m'expliques. C'est juste
que je ne pige pas le « empty » dans la phrase :
« However,
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:02:48 +0100
Francois Lafont mathsatta...@free.fr wrote:
Toutefois, le package peut créer des répertoires vides
^
ok, ces répertoires sont vides (répertoires pas encore
super bien identifiés à ce stade, on sait
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 18:02:48 Francois Lafont a écrit :
[… blabla répertoires vides blabla …]
Les paquets Debian sont destinés à être installés dans /usr.
Un paquet qui s’installerait dans /usr/local n’a pas de sens
dans l’optique d’une distribution. (Ça en a pour un paquet qui
ne
Bonjour à tous les utilisateurs et développeurs de Debian :
Le 26/01/2014, Sylvain L. Sauvagesylvain.l.sauv...@free.fr a écrit :
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 18:02:48 Francois Lafont a écrit :
[… blabla répertoires vides blabla …]
C'est affolant qu'un répertoire vide peut amener à une si longue
rmdir: failed to remove `debian/mon-paquet/usr/local/lib/mon-paquet': Directory
not empty
dh_usrlocal: rmdir debian/mon-paquet/usr/local/lib/mon-paquet returned exit
code 1
Après, bien sûr on peut toujours faire un override de la
cible dh_usrlocal pour ne pas avoir (on n'est tjs libre
de faire ce
lui n'y déposera rien. Et bien
sûr, lors d'un remove/purge, si le répertoire est non
vide (parce que l'admin y a mis des classes), celui-ci
n'est pas supprimé afin que l'admin ne perde pas son
travail.
--
François Lafont
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http
Bonsoir,
Le 26/01/2014 10:45, maderios a écrit :
On aurait pu mettre ton paquet dans le répertoire /usr/local.
Là, je dis non. ;-)
D'après ce que j'ai compris de quelques lectures ici ou là,
aucun paquet ne doit installer quoi que ce soit dans /usr/local/,
Bonjour
Hum... C'est nouveau ?
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2014 19:50:22 Francois Lafont a écrit :
[…]
[… blabla répertoires vides blabla …]
Oui désolé si ce n'est pas passionnant, je reconnais.
Mais j'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mépris quand même derrière
ce commentaire.
Non, c’est juste une manière de résumer… un peu
501 - 600 of 3257 matches
Mail list logo
