Reply to: Keith Johnson
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New XBL from Spamhaus on Sunday 11:32:26 AM
http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/index.lasso
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
K> I read the following on the Register. Does anyone k
Reply to: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] X-Declude-Date in Header on Friday 7:18:53 PM
Thanks.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J> It is a temporary insertion by Declude for troubling shooting. It will b
that
this is making an appearance with no variable indicated.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail
, but only if
the whitelist filters did not engage... ;)
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Filter actions have so many nice basic functions, IGNORE, WARN,
>>DELETE, HOLD etc.
>>
>>Looking at new filters toda
Filter actions have so many nice basic functions, IGNORE, WARN,
DELETE, HOLD etc.
Looking at new filters today and observing logs, it just seems
one of these actions naturally should be WHITELIST.
Does this make sense?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
---
[This E-mail was
Reply to: John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender Spam for Valid Accounts on Thursday 11:15:50
AM
This is what I was doing but Spam Review might have 2000-10,000 of
bounced mails... too much to do in deleting them...
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
s problem, but
would like to find a more compliant solution. Does any one know how to
attack this issue in another way?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
R> Well, the real question is why do you think that you are safer by
R> rejecting those E-mails? I'm not aware o
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender on Friday 8:03:42 AM
Ah, thanks!
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Would this work if it is '<>' as it most commonly is? Then it is
>>trul
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Null Sender on Friday 7:16:33 AM
Would this work if it is '<>' as it most commonly is? Then it is
truly not blank... I think Block Null Sender covers this instance.
It would be nice to have an alternative that was RFC comp
Reply to: Adrian Hauri
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam assassin .exe as external filter on Wednesday
7:46:06 PM
I would also like to see how this would work. It is free and looks
like it has a big following: http://spamassassin.taint.org/index.html
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Reply to: Matthew Bramble
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign Characters and Declude on Saturday 2:01:01 PM
No, most of these are not encoded, thanks.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
M> And something else that formerly confused
TAINS Räte
SUBJECT 600 CONTAINS Evëry
SUBJECT 600 CONTAINS Herë
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>I want to enable foreign characters but filter on their
>>exact words. It sounds like these character sets are not
>>&
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Foreign Characters and Declude on Friday 7:40:45 PM
I want to enable foreign characters but filter on their
exact words. It sounds like these character sets are not
'viewed' and filtered in Declude?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL
Don't know if any one asked this, but we are seeing a flurry of
omlauted characters used in Subject fields:
RE: üS Döctor appröved RX Prëscríptíon
We are ring to filter on these, but Declude doesn't see to
recognize them?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
Activa
providers except .NL
Watch out for this one...too.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
K> One of our upstream providers is Qwest, and we have the same problem.
K> However, everyone seems to be aware of the SPAM-SUPPORT flaw because it
In Deccon I see relay IP 0.0.0.0 from time to time. What is the
best way to filter, ban, or configure for this IP showing up?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.00922031 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam
Searching the archives, I could not find out if Hijack
accepts CIDR format for ALLOW IP? Does any one here know
if it does? The documentation does not indicate this.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.00922031 Scanned for all viruses by
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list on Friday 10:25:16 AM
Thanks!
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Wait a second? When I requested this, was this format put in Declude?
>>
>
not see this indicated in any messages I have read.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
B> Attached is a list of spamdomains and their coresponding aliases that I've compiled
thus far. Anybody want to comment or expand upon this?
You are right $6500 is absolutely rediculous. Nothing like paying
thousands more for many less features...
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
D> Scott,
D> A couple of notes...
D> 1.) We started with IMail Antivirus and nex
hould be allowed to send e-mail into the enterprise."
Would be a nice feature in Declude...
This appliance costs $27,000 each.. geesh..
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>> Does Declude realize it is a store and
Reply to: Andy Schmidt
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reject Msg based on Size on Monday 8:07:22 AM
This is not in my earlier version of Imail... Does this do this
on an account basis or domain basis? It must be in later versions
unless I am missing something.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED
/2 bandwidth..
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Scott, I just had an MIT engineer/user suggest a feature to reject
>>messages based on their size. I found this fascinating personally.
>>
>>You could look at
.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.122102 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the
Congratulations, Scott. Declude is mentioned in PCMag,
latest February 25th Issue, page 95. Sniffer is also in
the same listing. Suppose we'll see price increases now.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.122102 Scanned for all virus
ock dictionary attacks. It
detects too many errors brought on by many failed logins...
[Settings]
smtp.error.count=10 ;total errors within
smtp.error.interval=120 ;this amount of time(sec)then blocked
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Messag
Reply to: John Tolmachoff
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain? on Tuesday 3:40:53 PM
Is there a URL for this. Sorry if I don't have it, but I
am on many lists and sometimes I delete something that maybe
I should not have.
Thanks again,
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROT
notification to the user of
attempted delivery mailfroms... so he or she can add these to their
addressbook if desired. This is what I was looking to accomplish so I
can tell the CNET editor this feature is working in a viable
marketable way...
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED
.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>How would this be implemented on a user or domain basis?
R> The AUTOWHITELIST option is a global option, and can not be done on a
R> per-user or per-domain basis.
>>I
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain? on Monday 6:46:34 PM
Also, I presume there is no notification system for the users
account yet with a bounce message? Forgot to ask that one.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of
7;Pro' version documentation, but could you summarize
this simply for me. I'm assuming this auto detects the right path
regardless of the drive the account resides on? This is a very
interesting feature.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Ori
thing... This would be a very
nice 'Declude Pro' feature when scaled on unique domains and users.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
C> That makes sense, a mixture of the two. In that case you would not want
C> to use CATCH
feature.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
C> One problem with held or bounced mail that notifies the intended
C> recipient that it was blocked, is, you did not elimiate the spam, only
C> change it's contents to hundreds of no
wyndows.comc:\Imail\wyndows
If you do such a feature I would need to be able to point to an exact
path for each domain...
I think this would be a great feature for Declude and I hope you do
it.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>
addressbook in
Imail web mail as a whitelist, and Declude used this, then the user
could manage their own whitelist. Then if a mail is turned away they
could just add this email address to their addressbook in web mail to
turn on the receiving of mails from that user in the future.
--
Roger Heath
other emails with a bounce by default but give a white list negative
counter-weights to let those through. Not sure his would work?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Is it possible to make a Declude domain or user setting tha
hanks,
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.122102 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came fro
Domain = adds REVDNS 100 ENDSWITH domain.com
Delete White-list REBDNS Domain = adds REVDNS -100 ENDSWITH domain.com
I would find all this quite useful and I am wondering what others
might think. SpamReview could be pointed at a single filter.txt file
to edit then edit it...
--
Roger He
purpose, but I have not tried
it and would be curious if any one has?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
H> Count me in!
H> Mike
H> - Original Message -
H> From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
'counterweights' look like:
MAILFROM -100 CONTAINS .classmates.com
MAILFROM -100 CONTAINS .rnc.org
MAILFROM -100 CONTAINS pcclub.com
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>> One problem I see (Sandy and others, please
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,56624,00.html
http://www.spamarchive.org/
Good place to soon begin building super Declude filters?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.082302 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti
ystem. Has any one developed
such a system? Since we manage this manually now we have not had a
spammer as we carefully screen each who signs up... but I would be
curious if such a system has been developed and is commercially
available?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheat
Reply to: John Tolmachoff
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting on Thursday 5:02:56 PM
I'd like to do this. Will negative weights work for this list?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J> One thing I am considering is
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More on: %COUNTRYCHAIN% on Tuesday 10:17:21 AM
This updated dat file fixed it, thanks.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>I have yet to see any countries shown... it is
Reply to: Kami Razvan
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More on: %COUNTRYCHAIN% on Tuesday 9:57:48 AM
I have yet to see any countries shown... it is always:
[Unknown]->[APNIC Unlisted]->[ARIN Unlisted]->destination
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Origina
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.62 (beta) released on Monday 1:16:28
PM
Not seeing %COUNTRYCHAIN% working in inheader here. Should I be using
%COUNTRIES% instead or does a line have to be added to the Global
file?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Reply to: Sanford Whiteman
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] question for all... on Saturday 3:54:30 PM
Thanks, Sandy.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>> How do you setup a domain to spool only then forward to another
>&
Reply to: Bill Beach
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] question for all... on Friday 8:44:17 AM
How do you setup a domain to spool only then forward to another
Exchange server?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Has anybody done th
Reply to: Darrell L.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All on Wednesday 7:42:30 AM
I know... This is what I do now. One click would still be nicer
and faster... been using Windows since version 1.
Thanks,
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy
layed entries
and all deleted entries in one click. Perahps the other should be
delete all then reload any new entries.. No highlighting would be
required at all.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> Roger,
T> Using standard win
is needed. This way one may inspect select
messages and manage them then delete the rest in one blow. This
will save me even more time from an already great time saving
program.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.082302 Scanned for all
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Update and "From" EMail Discussion on
Wednesday 3:00:02 PM
This feature to add to kill still fails here. In place of
X-Declude-Sender:
I put
X-Note-Real-Mail-From:
Wondering what I might be doing wrong?
--
Roger He
was in the HEADERS, it would pass the mail..
Others have suggested making whitelists into separate lists so
you can per user or per domain them. Perhaps if you do this all
these things can be 'matched up'?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy o
Reply to: John Tolmachoff
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Book Only in Declude? on Thursday 9:53:27 AM
Not to be sarcastic, but how?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J> Not to be sarcastic, but wouldn't that be d
well. The ability to
set a whole domain or individual users, like the Pro version of
Declude is what we really need.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
K> Hi;
K> The idea is a good one but I think it truly belongs at the IMail level.
K&
..or return
e-mail as rejected..
How soon can I get this, Scott?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.082302 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declud
all these tests.. would this not
speed up the whole process substantially if I put my worst tests
first.
Scott, maybe you can see where I'm headed. I am always afraid of
my rules getting so long that they delay mail, especially in the
BODY filters.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROT
Reply to: Tom
Re: BLARSBL:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Kill File list update for 07/31/02 on
Wednesday 5:39:02 PM
Ah. Thanks.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>> I asked earlier about using the '.' as a lead
moveon.org ID-07312002-002
No one has shown me this works and it caused domains not to be
killed here earlier... Is there any documentation on this? Does
this actually work for you? If so, what version of Imail are you
using?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Origin
only in header
inserts. We also do not do reverse lookups for headers any more
because this slows mail delivery time. We would rather you use
the mailfrom actually, but I do not know how you would integrate
this.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original
ns of automatic white list
entries.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>Scott, I am seeing 'whitelisted automatically' ??? How does his work?
R> Do you mean that you are seeing a log file entry "Th
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.57 (beta) released on Tuesday 9:44:55
AM
Scott, I am seeing 'whitelisted automatically' ??? How does his
work?
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
Reply to: Jeff Kratka
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Sniffer on Friday 3:08:26 PM
You will like Sniffer. Not only is it great at spam detection but
it is substantially faster than text based rules.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s
pe to see fixes on the kill.lst
That is the only problem I am experiencing at this time.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
E> Roger,
E> I've come to the conclusion that the spamreview software is choking on my
E> spool files.
the menu. It
keeps putting carriage returns at the end of the file but no
addresses or domains... NT4SP6A. You are not alone.
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
E> Is anyone having a problem with the latest version (1.0.39)
Are key word filters case sensitive? We see some filters not
working on subject fields, for example, unless they match exactly
the case of the filter...
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.061902 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com
there limits to the new
filtering or blacklists. I am transforming my filters from Imail
to Declude and finding Declude substantially faster, but I am
concerned about limitations...
--
Roger Heath
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rleeheath.com
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
A> Hi Sc
in the kill.lst but it
looks like this is for the blacklist feature...
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>> Is there documentation on kill.lst and use of the proceeding '.'
>> dot? I could not find this... The Infobase says use @ in each
>> e
Reply to: Tom
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More Spam Addresses on Saturday 9:09:17 PM
Is there documentation on kill.lst and use of the proceeding '.'
dot? I could not find this... The Infobase says use @ in each
example... Is this for use in Declude blacklist or kill.lst?
--
R
if it can be done... so it can be
placed in headers even temporarily to view how well mail is being
processed.
--
Roger Heath
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.061902 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Reply to: Bill Landry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:DBSL on Thursday 11:18:07 AM
Thanks, I will try these. Actually Scott has :
#DSBLALLip4runconfirmed.dsbl.org* 4 0
Maybe this was the source of the pbm?
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message
list a weight 10 rule violation. I commented out the DBSL and
now am back to normal.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>No, but I will try it. It seems to be working good. Scott had
>>this under subscription based services in his sample global file,
>
have
a complete list of the free ones available?
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
I> Did you also uncomment DSBLALL ?
I> Kevin M. Donovan, MCSE
I> Network Support Specialist
I> IntelliWare Systems, Inc.
I> Phone (817) 277-0800 x228
I> - Original Mes
Reply to: Roger Heath
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BLARSBL:DBSL on Thursday 8:49:08 AM
Should be DSBL... and it appears to be working here after turning
it on..
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
R>
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/fixup.pl?story=http://www.infoworld.
http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/fixup.pl?story=http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/05/20/020520opestrat.xml&dctag=security
Is DBSL a free blacklist? It seems so in the above article...
If so, do I just uncomment the line in the Global.Cfg to make it
active?
--
Roger H
n IIS automatically..
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J> we put that on after having over 100,000 connections to our server in one
J> day for harvesting purposes. We noticed that it was seeing these attacks,
J> but couldn't tell if it was blocking them or not. I
week if they are persistent. It
essentially shuts off their attack for a set time period... You
can purchase this Server Firewall at www.networkice.com
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J> Can Declude Hijack help with dictionary attacks and
J> other attacks that
to find out why 1800 and all local accounts would take
this amount of time or longer. Am I missing a setting somewhere?
I have never seen it take so long to deliver local emails.
Otherwise regular emails are passing very fast.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J
Reply to: John Shacklett
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.49 list problem on Friday 8:38:25 AM
We have been witnessing this for a while... as well. It seems
like list mail just sits there forever unless is is manually
pushed.. This seems to be the only way it gets delivered.
--
Roger
f Spool files that are corrupt, or simply are not
deliverable.. This would be an invaluable tool for me here. As
far as I know, no such Spool utility exists now.
--
Roger Heath
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.030302 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam ser
This is a forwarded message
From: R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roger Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thought others here might find this interesting as I did.
--
Roger Heath
=Original message text===
>My mail server and Declude is really being t
. I do appreciate very much
the program that exists.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> Power is back and life is getting back to normal so I thought I would post
T> an update. The last update I posted the first person that downloaded it
T> found a majo
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Am I blacklisting correctly? on Thursday 2:52:03 PM
This would explain my %testsfailed% experiences.
I even tried putting the WARNs 'above' the HOLDs but this
made no difference, just so ya know.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy o
but had a blank line
as well. We are not using this variable now. I was waiting
for someone else to say something here. If you remove the
%testsfailed% perhaps you will see the blank lines disappear
too?
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
J> Good morning, all.
J> I
://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-19990624-DM02.htm
shows the requirement for kill.lst
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> I don't find in the IMail documentation that you have to recycle the SMTP
T> service. Can you confirm this please?
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.012602 Scan
cription'?
I do not know if this is required. Like in manual:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This guy was mailbombing us
--
Roger Heath
advanced internet desktop: www.activatordesk.com
antivirus antispam email : www.activatormail.com
master internet index: www.infogrid.com
- Copy of Original
log so the string could be edited
before saving to kill.lst.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> Let's talk about the IMail "kill.lst" file for just a minute.
T> Some of you suggested that you wanted to add "from" email addresses to the
T&g
Reply to: R. Scott Perry
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude v1.35 released on Wednesday 12:35:49 PM
Thanks, I keep forgetting this.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
R> If this is in the $default$.JunkMail file, are you seeing any warning
R> headers, and if so
GHT30HOLD
WEIGHT10WARNX-RBL-Warning: %TESTSFAILED%.
WEIGHT20WARNX-RBL-Warning: %TESTSFAILED%.
WEIGHT25WARNX-RBL-Warning: %TESTSFAILED%.
WEIGHT30WARNX-RBL-Warning: %TESTSFAILED%.
I know I have 1.35a verified via -diag.
--
Roger Heath
- Co
icate tests with WARN? It looks like my
error in retrospect...
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
>>I have already observed that this does not appear when
>>used in XINHEADER. I keep getting weights but no testsfailed..
>>It is blank every time.
R> I'
%
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
B> Roger.
B> Where do you ad this line?
B> Bennie
>>
>> This line gives me the 'real' sender and I'd love to kill.lst
>> some of these if they are clearly doing only spamming...:
>>
>
ee an immediate need to notify senders of bad mail.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> On some of the email I review I would like to click a button and send an
T> email back to the sender, based on a template, letting them know that they
T> have a problem.
Reply to: Tom Schwarz
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamreview Update v1.0.4 on Wednesday 9:19:03 AM
I quite agree with Andy. Let no good deed go unrewarded.
This utility is very very good for QC on spam filtering
and saves tons of time.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s
a few:
Keyboard hooks:
1. Delete key for Move to Delete in addition to button.
2. Insert key to Return to Que in addition to button.
3. F5 to Refresh key in addition to button.
Still not displaying Weight here. If you tell me what it
is looking for, maybe I can change my header to be
recognized?
--
like %TOTALWEIGHT% or something like that.
I do not see anything in the latest manuals or cfg files.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> Roger,
T> If you have upgraded Declude Junkmail recently you can find out how to use
T> this new feature in their online manua
x27;d like to get this working...
Thanks again,
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> I have received several replies. If it's ok with Declude, I will post the
T> download address on this list. If someone from Declude would reply to me I
T> would appreciate i
something you want to not delete. I hope
I get a lot of spam today.
This is very useful.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> Either will work.
T> \\myserver\imail\spool
T> or
T> c:\imail\spool
T> -Original Message-
T> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
path. I do not have VB.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
T> This program is written in VB6.0. You give it the path to your IMail spool
T> folder and it locates the spam email that is in hold by looking in the spam
T> folder under the spool folder. ex. "
east speeds up determining the overall message
setting and requests.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
C> Has anyone come up with a good procedure on scanning the spam folder for
C> legitimate email. We have just started holding the email that fails the
C> spamcop t
oncerned, because if you read SpamCop's
web site, they are soon going to be charging for this
service on a per setup or per user basis. I hope this
is not expensive.
--
Roger Heath
- Copy of Original Message(s): -
M> Hi, I'm using the 1.31 Beta of JunkMail standard and having f
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
