That would be an excellent combination. Much as SPAMCOP plus
SBL would be a very, very good combination. And SPAMCOP plus
SBL plus [insert favorite DYNA/DUL test] would be practically perfect.
I dont know if it was already suggested but as I can immagine it should be
easy to implement
I understand your position, but then whitelist AOL.
How can I do this?
I've the same problem now for over 5 months here on our server.
Telecom is one of the largest italian ISP I know about. As we and most of
our customers are from Italy we receive a lot of legit messages from their
mail
, CISSP
System Engineer
Time Inc. Information Technology
[5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1]
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
: Friday, January 16, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
I understand your position, but then whitelist AOL.
How can I do this?
I've the same problem now for over 5 months here on our server.
Telecom is one of the largest italian ISP I know about. As we
:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian T
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 04:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
I recently came across
I was thinking about this whole FP thing and was wondering... can you make
like...
BYPASSip4r PTRmail.aol.com
BYPASSip4r IP 64.81.214.12/24
BYPASSfilter PTR whatever.com
Something like the above that will make the ip4r tests not apply to a
I recently came across the following tests and was wondering if anybody else
was using these tests?
What your thoughts are of these tests?
And what kind of results you have received from these tests?
The test are as follows:
AHBL-RELAYS
AHBL-PROXIES
AHBL-SOURCES
AHBL-PROVISIONAL
AHBL-FORMMAIL
.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Brian T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
I recently came across the following tests and was wondering if anybody else
was using these tests
mail server.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Brian T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
I recently came across the following tests and was wondering if anybody else
Who knows, maybe their stance is to force ISP's into active defenses
against zombies relaying through them???
Would that be a bad thing? Zombie or human, sending spam using AOL's
servers is an AUP violation. Aggregating the mail at their servers
obliges them to police their user
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:08 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
live spammers or forcing/coaching their users through the reclamation
of hijacked
lists an AOL outbound
mail server.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Brian T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
I recently came across the following tests and was wondering
AOL 9.0 SE will have a Malware / Spyware detection and removal
system included for free and by default it scans your machine every
Friday for nasties. A nice thing about the bundled app is we can
update it via TOD updates. (The thing that sometimes happens when
you sign off
Yes, that would be a bad thing. I expect SpamCop to have higher
standards than SPEWS.
If a test is 99.99% reliable, it's probably safe to hold on or at least
score high. If a test is 99% reliable, it's only safe to give a few
points to, unless FP's have a high correlation with other tests, in
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
Andrew,
This is also particularly hurtful when a zombie sends E-mail through one
of these servers. I almost never see SpamCop blocking big ISP mail
servers, but I see zombies relaying through ISP mail servers every day
SpamCop is a very important test because it tags over 50% of the
typical mail volume, however I'm not looking to support a crusade
against AOL by blocking their E-mail.
I understand your position, but then whitelist AOL. It's not SpamCop's
obligation to decide that IPs that generate
: Thursday, January 15, 2004 07:56 PM
To: Matt
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Question about Some Spam Tests
SpamCop is a very important test because it tags over 50% of the
typical mail volume, however I'm not looking to support a crusade
against AOL by blocking their E-mail.
I
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Let's keep in mind, that Spamcop is percentage based. So - a few bad apples
will not spoil the huge volume of "good" mail that AOL will see. There is a
chance that the system is self-correcting.
That's not at all the case. SpamCop is currently listing the one of
Title: Message
Hm:
"In the past 772.9 days, it has been listed 19 times for a
total of 3.1 days"
Sound's like it works as designed - because of the volume of legit mail,
it is only listed for a few hours each time. A total of THREE days out of
roughly 800?
Again
- why not use a weighting
19 matches
Mail list logo
