RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for an Secure Email Solution that works with Imail Premium 2006.2 and declude 4.x

2007-06-07 Thread Howard Smith \(N.O.R.A.D.\)
PROTECTED]) Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:56 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for an Secure Email Solution that works with Imail Premium 2006.2 and declude 4.x Are you looking for a solution like the PGP plug in's for Outlook or something else? Darrell

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for an Secure Email Solution that works with Imail Premium 2006.2 and declude 4.x

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Doherty
got the message. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 97 Webster Street Worcester, MA 01603 508-425-7176 - Original Message - From: Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 5:35 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] is the list working?

2007-06-05 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Still here, just quiet. Sometimes that's a good thing :) Darrell Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-06-05 Thread J Porter
this time. BTW... I don't really mean to hijack this thread, but where is the address book now stored since it's not done with aliases.txt .. main.xml? - Original Message - From: John T (lists) To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:11 AM Subject: RE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-06-05 Thread Darin Cox
There is a conversion tool that comes with IMail 2006 to convert address books. The new address books are stored in an access database. Darin. - Original Message - From: J Porter To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 10:46 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-30 Thread Mike Hardrick
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:50 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move Sensitivity: Personal Hi, I didn't encounter any problems when I upgraded two servers from 8.x to 2006.x just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

2007-05-30 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, Does anyone have any comment on the attached email (possibly even Declude personnel)? I checked the mailing list archive - and it seems to imply as if the WinsockCleanup is specific to DNS problems and results in queues filling up. In my example, Imail and Declude didn't seem to be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

2007-05-30 Thread David Barker
Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:34 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup Sensitivity: Personal Hi, Does anyone have any comment on the attached email (possibly even Declude personnel)? I checked the mailing list archive - and it seems

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-30 Thread John Doyle
is fine with me. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:50 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move Sensitivity: Personal Hi, I didn't encounter any

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-30 Thread Dave Doherty
. It seems too simple. Which is fine with me. John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 7:50 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move Sensitivity

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

2007-05-30 Thread Andy Schmidt
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup Sensitivity: Personal Some installs of IMail had an issue where there winsock would cause problems for network functionality, this was a bug in Imail, it seemed by stopping smtp32 service of Imail resolved the issue. Declude uses the winsockcleanup

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

2007-05-30 Thread Kevin Bilbee
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 6:34 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup Sensitivity: Personal Hi, Does anyone have any comment on the attached email (possibly even Declude personnel)? I checked

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

2007-05-30 Thread David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup Sensitivity: Personal Thanks Dave. So: a) Does the scenario that I described (which was not specific to IMAIL or Declude but also effected other TCP/IP applications on that machine) still fit the bill? b

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup

2007-05-30 Thread Matt
, 2007 10:11 AM *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com *Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Winsock Cleanup *Sensitivity:* Personal Some installs of IMail had an issue where there winsock would cause problems for network functionality, this was a bug in Imail, it seemed by stopping smtp32 service

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-29 Thread John T \(lists\)
? And why do I have this file anyway? Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: Imail Admin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:01 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting Hi David, Yup, that was my

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-29 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I think the whole idea of whitelisting the address book should be an option that can be turned on/off from the config file. It is with the AUTOWHITELIST setting in the global.cfg. Darrell invURIBL - Intelligent URI

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-29 Thread Imail Admin
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting The point you have missed is that just because YOU are using Imail 2006.2 does not mean every one else is. Declude is doing exactly as it should, checking to see if an aliases.txt file exists and if so use it. As for the option

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-29 Thread Darin Cox
issue, which should have a thorough process to convert and removed the aliases.txt file, than a Declude issue. Darin. - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:16 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-29 Thread John Doyle
Sorry guys, It was a long weekend and I meant this for the Ipswitch forum. John Morning all I spent the weekend firing up a new W 2003 server and installing Imail 2006.21 on it. I think I've delt with most of the installation issues. I would like to move clients over a domain at a time

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-29 Thread David Barker
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting I have a client that is using declude 4.3.46 with Imail premier 2006.2 with collaboration, Imail premium spam filtering , and he fails to get autowhite listing working. Does any one else have problems with auto

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-29 Thread Andy Schmidt
domain on the old server, you simply don't restart it) - but the other steps are essentially the same. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 12:39 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-29 Thread John Doyle
Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 2:51 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move Sensitivity: Personal The user and alias information is in the registry. Mailing lists, address books and mailbox content is in the \Imail\[domain name]\ folder

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move

2007-05-29 Thread Andy Schmidt
Regards, Andy -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 6:34 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Version and hardware move Sensitivity: Personal Andy If the old box is 8.22

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-28 Thread Matt
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting Hi David, Yup, that was my first check. The address book in question is the web address book, which you access from the web interface, right? I checked it and it was empty -- not surprising because I mainly use Outlook

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-28 Thread Imail Admin
, thank you very much for clearing up this mystery for me. Thanks! Ben - Original Message - From: Matt To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 8:50 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting Ben, This was covered early

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting

2007-05-28 Thread Matt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com mailto:declude.junkmail@declude.com *Sent:* Monday, May 28, 2007 8:50 PM *Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] More accidental whitelisting Ben, This was covered early in the thread. You have AUTOWHITELIST

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread David Barker
AUTOWHITELIST ON checks your user address book make sure you don’t have your own address in your address book. David Barker Director of Product Management Your Email security is our business 978.499.2933 office 978.988.1311 fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Imail Admin
files will grow while I wait for another occurrence. Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: David Barker To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 5:46 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting AUTOWHITELIST ON checks your user address

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Scott Fisher
no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.-Original Message-From: "David Barker" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 5/25/2007 7:46:29 AMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declud

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread xx-xx- --x--x
- From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 5/25/2007 7:46:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting AUTOWHITELIST ON checks your user address book make sure you don't have your own address in your address book. David Barker Director

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Darin Cox
@declude.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:19 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting Any thoughts on an option to excluding your own address from the address book whitelisting. It continually comes up here. It's definitely a spam leakage issue. This email message, including any

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Darin Cox
Anyone on the BCC line? If there's an address there that is being whitelisted, then the entire email gets whitelisted to all recipients. Darin. - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Imail Admin
. Ben - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:32 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting Anyone on the BCC line? If there's an address there that is being whitelisted, then the entire email gets

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Darin Cox
You'll need to check the logs then. Darin. - Original Message - From: Imail Admin To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting Well, it's spam from outside, so I'm not sure that I would ever see or know

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-25 Thread Scott Fisher
the use of this email or attachments. -Original Message- From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent 5/25/2007 7:46:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [ Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting AUTOWHITELIST ON checks your user address book

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP with tqmcube.com

2007-05-24 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
I suggest that you always use a different source IP and sender domain name when contacting the admin for a blacklist, because they often filter their own mail with their blacklist, so they won't see your plea. Stupid, but true. Andrew. From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP with tqmcube.com

2007-05-24 Thread Kevin Bilbee
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HELP with tqmcube.com I suggest that you always use a different source IP and sender domain name when contacting the admin for a blacklist, because they often filter their own mail with their blacklist, so they won't see your plea

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting

2007-05-24 Thread John T \(lists\)
Put the log into debug mode. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imail Admin Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] accidental whitelisting Hi All, We're in the process of tesing JM 4.x as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] fiveten-src list

2007-05-23 Thread David Barker
FIVETEN-SRC should not be used if your mail server blocks mail on a yes response from an RBL, this is what is meant from DNSStuff because Declude uses a weighting system, RBL's like this can be used, I would suggest with a very low weight however. The default for FIVETEN-SCR used to be 7 but they

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread John T \(lists\)
I have switched from WhatsUp to Network Monitor by Numara Software, the same company that sells Track IT. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 7:47 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread Craig Edmonds \(123marbella.com\)
May 2007 11:05 To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring I have switched from WhatsUp to Network Monitor by Numara Software, the same company that sells Track IT. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread Dave Doherty
One thing to think about... If you set up your own in-house monitoring, you probably will not get an alert if your Internet feed fails or you have a massive power problem. Outsourcing the monitoring function would eliminate these problems. -d - Original Message - From: Kevin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread Troy D. Hilton
I use ServersAlive (www.serversalive.com http://www.serversalive.com/ ). It's free for up to 10 checks. Well worth looking into. Troy D. Hilton Serveon, Inc. 302-529-8640 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread John T \(lists\)
That is also why in my monitoring server I have a modem connected to an analog phone line. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 5:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread Darin Cox
connection goes down/comes back up, which it does about twice a year. Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (lists) To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:23 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring That is also why in my monitoring server I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread Bonno Bloksma
@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:23 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring That is also why in my monitoring server I have a modem connected to an analog phone line. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-22 Thread xx-xx- --x--x
- Original Message - *From:* John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com *Sent:* Tuesday, May 22, 2007 4:23 PM *Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring That is also why in my monitoring server I have a modem connected to an analog phone line. *John T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-21 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I am doing research on purchasing/open source server monitoring and would like to know what Declude administrators recommend. I am in the midst of a two-week (so far) product survey of exactly that sort. One of the sites I manage has a need for granular SNMP and SQL monitoring and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-21 Thread Rick Baranowski
I am not sure what you are looking at monitoring but we us some of Adventnet's products and they seem to work very well. http://www.adventnet.com/products/index.html Rick _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-21 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I guess I should have given more information. Things I want to do. Monitor our web and SMTP applications and send text message notifications to a cell phone and email address concurrently. Thanks for the responses so far anyone else have any experiences. Kevin Bilbee From:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-21 Thread Dave Doherty
if the setup of this old version is a bit quirky. -Dave Doherty Skywaves, Inc. 97 Webster Street Worcester, MA 01603 508-425-7176 - Original Message - From: Kevin Bilbee To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 8:30 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server monitoring

2007-05-21 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Like everything else at ipswitch it has gone up in price. $1995 for the lowest price point. Kevin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 6:50 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: server

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread David Barker
, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 7:42 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? Hey, David. Any chance of seeing a refresh of all_list.dat ... It's been just about 4 months since the last one. Three or four times a year doesn't sound bad. Andrew 8

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, David. It's working fine here! Andrw 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? New

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, David. It's working fine here! Andrw 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? New

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, David. It's working fine here! Andrw 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? New

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Thanks, David. It's working fine here! Andrw 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:29 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? New

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread John T \(lists\)
I think we all fully understand that now Andrew. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:54 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? Thanks

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread John T \(lists\)
I think we all fully understand that now Andrew. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:54 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? Thanks

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread John T \(lists\)
I think we all fully understand that now Andrew. John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 9:54 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? Thanks

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread John T \(lists\)
OK, would some one at Declude give a good swift kick to your list server? John T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:31 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Darin Cox
This is too tempting... g Darin. - Original Message - From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:31 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? I think we all fully understand that now Andrew. John T -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Jeff Kogan
(s) and all attachments. Thank you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 4:39 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? OK, would some one at Declude give a good

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-17 Thread Matt
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (lists) Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:31 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? I think we all fully understand that now Andrew. John T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammer authenticating

2007-05-17 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Make sure you are on the latest version of your mail server, if it is Imail then you should make sure it is not a vulnerable version. Also check your OS to see if it has been compromised. Do all the normal stuff to check for a compromised box. Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user config and performance

2007-05-16 Thread Jim Comerford
I don't have specific answers for you, but when I implemented per-domain setup, I inquired with Linda at Declude Tech Support and she was very helpful and timely in assisting in the setup. There are ways to default domains (and I assume users) to use a base set of settings if you dont need a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user config and performance

2007-05-16 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
For 5,000 users I wouldnt expect a major performance hit, but keep in mind if you had 5,000 files they all need to be loaded when a message is processed. However, I would only drop a user config file with actions set to WARN for the users who did not want to be spam filtered. This way the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-16 Thread Sanford Whiteman
I am looking for a script/utility to pull the header information out of every email in an Outlook/Exchange inbox. If you choose to use MAPI (one of your many choices), extract the property PR_TRANSPORT_MESSAGE_HEADERS (0x007D001E) from each message. This is a string property that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ?

2007-05-16 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:08 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] all_list.dat ? Thanks, David. The early report is that it's working for me. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-15 Thread Andy Schmidt
this, and pull the data directly. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Looks to me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-15 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 9:17 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Hi Karl: It sounds as if you are looking for a way to read messages items in your Outlook folders. You can accomplish this relatively easily by writing a small Visual Basic

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-15 Thread Andy Schmidt
AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Andy, I may take you up on that. I'll fire up my .NET environment tonight and poke around a bit. I wonder if it would be easier to attack if I dropped it all to a PST file and rummaged around

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Phishing

2007-05-15 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Without my so much as glancing at the potential false positives, this is a treasure trove or actual phishing URLs: http://www.phishtank.com/phish_archive.php A glance at which tells me that another useful PCRE would be to (pseudo code follows): IPADDRESS then (/ character) then stuff including

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:04 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Why don't you use the mail server log files instead. Much easier to parse, and tools like Grep and Sawmill can

re: [Declude.JunkMail] tqmcube.com

2007-05-14 Thread Gary Steiner
I've been using them for a while. dhcp.tqmcube.com has given good results, though I've gotten one or two false positives from spam.tqmcube.com (I still use spam.tqmcube.com, just with a lighter weight). ko.tqmcube.com flags ip's from South Korea, and prc.tqmcube.com flags ip's from China, so

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread Darin Cox
then be compiled in Excel, a database, etc. Darin. - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:13 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Because the emails I have left

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Looks to me that if you turn on Message Tracking, you get

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread Darin Cox
this, and pull the data directly. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:15 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Looks to me that if you turn

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE

2007-05-10 Thread Linda Pagillo
I'm here with you David. No need to feel alone :) If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me either by email or call Toll free 1-866-332-5833 Ext.7008 Linda Pagillo Technical Support Engineer | Declude Your Email Security is our business Office: 978.499.2933

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE

2007-05-10 Thread Darin Cox
For those on IMail, the focus right now is probably on getting a stable and fully functional mail server again. IMail 2006.21 preview 1 was just released to hopefully address most, if not all, of the problems with 2006, but it was just posted that those with virtual domains should wait for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE

2007-05-10 Thread David Barker
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:59 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE For those on IMail, the focus right now is probably on getting a stable and fully functional mail server again. IMail 2006.21 preview 1 was just

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE

2007-05-10 Thread John T \(lists\)
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE I'm here with you David. No need to feel alone :) If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me either by email or call Toll free 1-866-332-5833 Ext.7008 Linda Pagillo Technical Support Engineer | Declude

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE

2007-05-10 Thread Linda Pagillo
business Office: 978.499.2933 x7008 Toll Free: 1-866.332.5833 x7008 Fax: 978.334.0700 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: John T (lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:08 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE Linda, thanks

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE

2007-05-10 Thread Darin Cox
product soon, we'll be very happy despite the wait. Darin. - Original Message - From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 3:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] PCRE Phew! For a moment there I thought Declude was the only

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Release Tool

2007-05-10 Thread David Barker
Hi Richard, Thanks for the post. To clear the IP's you still need to stop/start the decludeproc service. David Barker VP Operations | Declude Your Email Security is our business O: 978.499.2933 x7007 F: 978.988.1311 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ?

2007-05-04 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) wrote: Anyone else seeing a major reduction is spam the past week ? I usually see about 14-15k messages daily, but since Monday have dropped off to about 8k... Did the recent arrests and law suits have a result this early ? *Karl Drugge* *B.S.I.T.,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ?

2007-05-04 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I have see about a 12% reduction in the past week. Kevin Bilbee From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ? Anyone

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ?

2007-05-04 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
The last two weekends were noticeably quiet compared to the weekdays. Judging from the number and flavour of blowback bounce messages I see, the bad guys are concentrating on fewer campaigns but at higher volumes. The general trend is still up. Spam volumes climbed at increasing rates up to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ?

2007-05-04 Thread Gary Steiner
May 1st is a big holiday in Europe, so maybe that had some affect. Original Message From: Heimir Eidskrem [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:45 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ? IS - Systems Eng. (Karl

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adding weight by country

2007-05-02 Thread Scott Fisher
Here is my country filter. It's been recently updated to have Serbia (RS) #Check for e-mail for sending country Used in Database #Don't get much valid e-mail from these Countries so they get weighted more # SKIPIFWEIGHT 5000 Never Skip! STOPATFIRSTHIT COUNTRY 0 IS US COUNTRY

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adding weight by country

2007-05-02 Thread Bill Green dfn Systems
Thanks Guys, I've got it working. I used Scott's txt to start with, but I will probably use some of Matt's stuff as an example to customize it further. Now I just need to figure out why my google searches yesterday didn't turn up these links. (Probably end of day brain-fog on my part) One

re: [Declude.JunkMail] Adding weight by country

2007-05-01 Thread Gary Steiner
You can find it in the knowledgebase at http://support.declude.com/Customer/KBArticle.aspx?articleid=6KBSearchID=8956 To get a perspective on how it is being used by different folks represented on the mailing list, go to http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/ and do a search

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] X-Note: REVDNS: (timeout)

2007-04-30 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Harry, REVDNS timeout occurs when Declude does not get an answer from the DNS serer indicating the reverse entry does not exist. Basically this means the REVDNS could exist but Declude is not sure because it never received a response back saying it did or did not exist. Darrell

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread David Barker
You could try using a filter like this: #Remote mail hosts connecting and announcing your IP addresses HELO 10 CONTAINS 208.100.26.91 #Remote mail hosts connection and announcing your hostnames HELO 10 ENDSWITH igive.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Scott Fisher
A little more of the headers would be helpful. It's a zombie of some flavor. 71.250.241.101 = static-71-250-241-101.nwrknj.east.verizon.net. You could use a filter with HELO 10 IS IGIVE.COM - Original Message - From: Robert Grosshandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Robert, you would use a filter file for this, e.g. #First, escape this file if the source is on your own network REMOTEIP END CIDR 208.100.26.0/24 REMOTEIP END CIDR 192.168.0.0/24 #Skip this whole test if we are already above a hold weight of 20 SKIPIFWEIGHT 25 #Apply a maximum total weight

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Scott Fosseen
It looks like you have SPF setup on your DNS. I would think that enabling the SPFFail test or adjusting the action/weight would correct your problem. An email comes in, Declude looks up your SPF record from DNS and compares the IP with the list of trusted senders. It should fail the test

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Do not accept mail with your own helo setup a helo filter HELO 15 IS igive.com Set it at your hold weight. Your actual server(s) IP addresses should already be whitelisted so it will not affect your internal mail routing. Kevin Bilbee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit?

2007-04-26 Thread Robert Grosshandler
Thanks all! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 6:09 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Ever legit? Do not accept mail with your own helo setup a helo filter HELO

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible bug after upgrading to 4.3.46

2007-04-25 Thread Don Brown
with the HELO - DB this is available from the interim download location. DB DB DB From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker DB Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 10:56 AM DB To: declude.junkmail@declude.com DB Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Possible bug after

<    10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   >