Hi David -
Actually, I already had that line, which is what got me wondering if I was
missing something else.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: David Barker [mailto:dbar...@declude.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 5:16 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Stop processing before virus check
Hi David -
Actually, I already had that line, which is what got me wondering if I was
missing something else.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: David Barker [mailto:dbar...@declude.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 5:16
On 8/5/2011 11:13 AM, Ferrell Ard wrote:
Hi David
Â
I just upgraded from 4.10.72 to
4.10.78 and noticed a build-up of files in the
/IMail/Declude/SNF directory with
names
suggested using
the revdns, although it would be kinda funny. lol
--
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Sanford Whiteman [mailto:sa...@cypressintegrated.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight
wouldnt the spammer/attacker need to have delegated authority over
the source ip address space and control of DNS infrastructure to
forge a PTR record?
Well, either delegated authority *or* a subscriber agreement with the
ISP that allows PTRs to be requested/modified. For example,
-To: 119798468_49164...@smtp.declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address?
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:06:08 -0400
I would expect both your whitelist technique and Randy’s counter-weighting to
apply to the From line, which shows ra...@globalweb.us
82729453_49162...@smtp.declude.com 119798468_49164...@smtp.declude.com
In-Reply-To: 119798468_49164...@smtp.declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address?
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 14:06:08 -0400
I would expect both your whitelist technique
Why not use the HELO or REVDNS? REVDNS is going to be the safest
because of the difficulty in forging it
Not always... if the domain has a hard-fail SPF record that isn't
*itself* dependent on forgeable records (only uses IPs and forward DNS
entries), then the MAILFROM can't
On my declude config, I set up a GoodMailList test text file, added a negative
point value to this test, and then I add any of my customer’s email lists that
were getting flagged by declude
Sincerely,
Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
Office: 804.442.5300 option 1
Toll
Can you give me the line you used in the config file?
From: Randy A
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 12:18 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address?
On my declude config, I set up a GoodMailList test text file
!
From: IMail Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 1:32 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address?
Can you give me the line you used in the config file?
From: Randy A mailto:ra
://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
From: IMail Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 1:36 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address?
Can you
...@madriveraccess.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 2:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address?
An easy way to whitelist these in your global.cfg
WHITELISTFROM@declude.com
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com
and then if
something really bad shows up, it is likely to have a much larger weight (20+)
and my counter-weight won’t matter. I like this for individual addresses as
well.
Ben
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:09 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] white
on the To
line. It would seem your list below gives weight based on the From line? Or
perhaps from both From and To lines?
Ben
From: Randy A
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:06 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific
:
https://www.skywaves.com/content/secure/support_ticket.htm
From: Randy A ra...@globalweb.us
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 2:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] white list or positive weight for a specific To
address
Thanks, that helped.
From: Todd Richards
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 6:18 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?
Hey Ben –
If you haven’t already, you can download a trial of SmarterMail to give you a
hands on feel for how
for any comments,
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Heimir Eidskrem
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?
We dumped Imail after being with them since version 4 I think.
Moved
I have the latest versions of both; I bought SM to dump Imail but found that
some customers are simply resistant to change. So rather than risk losing them
I am keeping Imail up to date.
Privately Imail maybe receptive to price matching SM [give them a call?] - so
that is a 3rd option.
-Nick
That was a bounce or auto notify, from webjogger.net who is also subscribed to
the list.
From: IMail Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 1:28 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Do you use the Declude email notification
templates?
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Do you use the Declude email notification
templates? (and what happened to the declude.virus mailing list?)
That was a bounce or auto notify, from webjogger.net who is also subscribed to
the list.
From: IMail Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Friday, May
Was it invURIBL by any chance? If so did you find a cause?
From: Nick Hayer [mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:06 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] FROMNOMATCH returning high scores
I haven't seen it on FROMNOMATCH but have seen
I’ve seen invUribl do it on random occasions, but I don’t know a cause or
solution.
Ben
From: Jim Comerford
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FROMNOMATCH returning high scores
Was it invURIBL by any chance? If so did you
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FROMNOMATCH returning high scores
I've seen invUribl do it on random occasions, but I don't know a cause or
solution.
Ben
From: Jim Comerford mailto:jcomerf...@sbsnet.com
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 12:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
I have not seen that.
Herb
On 5/18/2011 12:12 PM, Jim Comerford wrote:
Has anyone else seen the FROMNOMATCH test returning ridiculously high scores
(like 1027774676) event though its not configured to do so... and yet Declude
does not act on the cumulative score, so for example a message
-
From: Herb Guenther [mailto:h...@lanex.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:31 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] FROMNOMATCH returning high scores
I have not seen that.
Herb
On 5/18/2011 12:12 PM, Jim Comerford wrote:
Has anyone else seen the FROMNOMATCH test
I haven't seen it on FROMNOMATCH but have seen it elsewhere; specifically
when an external app throws an exception. Bottom line somewhere declude or
some other app threw an exception - the wacko score is the result.
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or
a comment on these products or other options, please
chime in.
Regards,
Gary
Original Message
From: Sanford Whiteman sa...@cypressintegrated.com
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 6:14 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: ramdisk using Windows Server
Gary, I think I might have spaced on a similar question you asked a
while back.
I recommend Starwind Software's RAM disk -- the one that comes with
their iSCSI initiator (you don't actually need any iSCSI SAN in
place). We use it on 2003 + 2008.
-- Sandy
---
This E-mail came from
suggestions are appreciated.
Thanks,
Ben
P.S. I wonder what would happen if I moved my software (Imail 2006.23) to a Win
7 PC or a Windows 2010 server? Just thinking out loud.
From: Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:34 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
From: IMail Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 2:24 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
HI Pete, Thanks for the links. After reading all of those, and everything
they link to, I have a better idea
On 5/5/2011 2:21 PM, IMail Admin wrote:
My business is so small any more than I could imagine using my smart
phone to run the mail server. If it’s the smtp32.exe process causing
the crash, then that would imply to me that I’ve got a lot of outbound
messages all at once. I just don’t
-virus
command line tools, and invURIBL and various other – each one chipping away at
the heap.
From: IMail Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 2:21 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
HI Pete,
Thanks
That sounds like me. What’s the cure? Drop the number of threads in
declude.cfg? I haven’t looked at it yet to see what I have.
From: Andy Schmidt
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:05 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
I had encountered
4:10 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
That sounds like me. What’s the cure? Drop the number of threads in
declude.cfg? I haven’t looked at it yet to see what I have.
From: Andy Schmidt mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com
Sent
: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
That sounds like me. What’s the cure? Drop the number of threads in
declude.cfg? I haven’t looked at it yet to see what I have.
From: Andy Schmidt mailto:andy_schm...@hm-software.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:05 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail
: donderdag 5 mei 2011 22:10
Aan: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Onderwerp: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
That sounds like me. What’s the cure? Drop the number of threads in
declude.cfg? I haven’t looked at it yet to see what I have.
From: Andy Schmidt mailto:andy_schm...@hm
On 5/5/2011 4:28 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi,
Â
Even though I am running an Imail server
for a bachelor level education with about 2500 active
mailboxes and about 15.000 mails per day, I still have
- Original Message -
From: Bonno Bloksma
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 1:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
Hi,
Even though I am running an Imail server for a bachelor level education with
about 2500 active mailboxes
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
Hi,
I just looked in my declude.cfg and found these as the only non-commented
lines:
THREADS 15
WAITFORMAIL 5000
INVITEFIXON
So it appears I've got
Message -
From: Imail Admin
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] error 0xC142 smtp.exe
Hi,
I just looked in my declude.cfg and found these as the only non-commented
lines:
THREADS 15
WAITFORMAIL 5000
On 5/4/2011 11:08 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
Hi,
Â
I recall a while back about
errors where you get Error #0xC142 (The application failed
to initialize) for smtp32.exe, somehow related to Declude. We
started
On 5/4/2011 11:08 PM, Imail Admin wrote:
Hi,
Â
I recall a while back about
errors where you get Error #0xC142
Oops... when I said "this search" I forgot to include the link:
This will do what you want, does not require any code on the pages, and its
free:
http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
You just set up a config file and run the app with Windows scheduler.
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574
?
Thanks,
Ben
From: IMail Admin
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 10:23 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
HI Scott,
It looks to me like you only score the black and not the grey or red listings.
The config I have, which would
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
I added in a weight for the grey listings, but it hasn't had much
impact. A review of the log files shows only a few messages failing due to
grey and since I give it a small weight, I'm not worried about false
positives
Makes sense. Thanks.
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 10:29 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
It crashed - through an exception and either Declude was unsure of what to do
with it or that was the score
the defs are in the junkmail manual
https://www.declude.com/searchresults.asp?Cat=109
IPNOTINMX - The IPNOTINMX test is good for helping reduce false
positives. By default, Declude JunkMail will subtract several points
from the weighting system when an email does not fail this test (which
is very
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
Makes sense. Thanks.
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 10:29 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
It crashed - through an exception
to 10 on these spams).
Any suggestions welcome.
Thanks,
Ben
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 12:23 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you use NOLEGITCONTENT and IPNOTINMX
the defs are in the junkmail manual
https://www.declude.com
From: IMail Admin imailad...@bcwebhost.net
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 3:51 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you use NOLEGITCONTENT and IPNOTINMX
Thanks. Now that you've posted this I have to apologize because I
recall reading this years ago
On 4/8/2011 3:49 PM, IMail Admin wrote:
They’re true spam, but the other tests don’t confirm it and my delete
threshold is 12 (although I would be happy to get just to 10 on these
spams).
If you're not already using truncate.gbudb.net DNSBL then that might
also allow you to add some
From: Pete McNeil madscient...@microneil.com
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 5:26 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you use NOLEGITCONTENT and IPNOTINMX
On 4/8/2011 3:49 PM, IMail Admin wrote:
Theyâ?Tre true spam, but the other tests donâ?Tt confirm
to be treated as spam (my Declude threshold for
“ordinary email” is 5), but it would if combined with other failed tests.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Ben
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 5:52 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv
/ http://cognatio.hyves.nl/ Hyves /
http://www.youtube.com/user/hogeschooltio YouTube
Van: Rick Davidson [mailto:rdavid...@nat.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 april 2011 20:52
Aan: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Onderwerp: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What
happened
The 127.0.0.4 is a gray listing for the uribl. I personally don't score
the gray result because of too many false positives.
!--URI LIST 2--
add key=URIBL_List2 value=multi.uribl.com /
add key=URIBL_Weight_List2 value=0 /
!-- BitValue_2 = comes from black.uribl.org --
but I was waiting to see
response on the list such as yours.
Thanks,
Ben
From: Scott Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 6:50 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How do you read the Inv-Uribl log file?
The 127.0.0.4 is a gray listing for the uribl. I
...@tio.nl]
Sent: April-05-11 1:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What
happened to body?
Hi,
Which version of Declude are you running?
I remember chasing a wierd bug that was sometimes truncating a message to 1k,
which
Bloksma [b.blok...@tio.nl]
Sent: April-05-11 1:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What
happened to body?
Hi,
Which version of Declude are you running?
I remember chasing a wierd bug that was sometimes truncating a message to 1k
, April 05, 2011 8:05 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] email being delivered with blank body. What
happened to body?
Where did you get 4.10.59?
I do not see it available for download.
I have even turned of spam scanning for the domain yet it still occurs.
Thank
and someo...@nat.commailto:someo...@nat.com from
some...@msn.commailto:some...@msn.com instead of what was contained in the
headers
Rolled back to previous version…
--
Rick
From: Rick Davidson
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 8:37 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail
maybe it scores bitmask results and 127.0.0.4 response is not tagged?
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574
Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net
General and Non-Emergency support ticket:
I've seen it with lotus notes delivering to an Outlook client. The emails show
fine in imails web mail. I've never found a fix. Its related to Lotus Notes
replies - not the original email.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Davidson rdavid...@nat.com
Sent 4/4/2011 8:33:10 PM
To:
series of events that causes the above
weird things to happen.
_
From: Richard Lyon [mailto:rl...@piolaxusa.com]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 7:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RE: email being delivered with blank body.
What happened to body?
I've seen
)
It appeared to be an issue with html email only, didn’t take any time to do
detective work, I quickly rolled back since it was only day two into an upgrade
--
Rick
From: Richard Lyon [mailto:rl...@piolaxusa.com]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 7:53 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re
Hi,
Which version of Declude are you running?
I remember chasing a wierd bug that was sometimes truncating a message to 1k,
which mostly affected html mail. After declude found the cause for that issue
they released interim version Declude 4.10.59 which is what I am running now.
Met
Hi,
It’s not just limited to HiJack, it seems that Declude Virus and Declude
Junkmail are both hardcoded to use IMail1 for virus notifications, Bounce
Messages.
I can’t find any configuration option where you can either use BLAT or some
other command line mailer and/or mailer script.
PS: appears they removed it in v10 – not just v11 (or v11.03).
I went back to version 11.02 installer, and after going through the entire
activation sequence for a new/second trial install – I ended up with 11.02 –
but no Imail1.exe. I don’t have a pre-version 10 installer laying around!
We are aware of this and are looking at an alternative.
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
mailto:dbar...@declude.com dbar...@declude.com
Description: -declude Description: -dnsstuff
From: John T
Thanks David.
John T
eServices For You
-Original Message-
From: "David Barker" dbar...@declude.com
Sent 3/26/2011 9:11:50 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How to send notices about email held by HiJack
We are aware of this and a
Restore imail1.exe from a backup
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: John T johnl...@eservicesforyou.com
Sender: John T johnl...@eservicesforyou.com
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 16:09:11
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Reply-to: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
John T
I took an old copy from a backup, renamed it, and stuck it in an obscure
folder.
If I get hacked, and they get to my Declude scripts, I'm screwed, but
most likely it'll be the least of my worries.
My recollection is that the worry is that that program can be fired off
via an Ipswitch
What uribl tests are you using and are you getting hits on them - check
your logs..
I'm suggesting you may need different tests - the one you are using may
have blacklisted you or are dead even...
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International
resolve the IP.
Thanks.
From: Nick Hayer
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 11:21 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] How effective should Inv-Uribl be?
What uribl tests are you using and are you getting hits on them - check your
logs..
I'm suggesting you may need different
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How effective should Inv-Uribl be?
I'm not quite sure what you mean. In the Declude global.cfg file the
only reference to inv-uribl is
INV-URIBL external
weight D:\imail\INVURIBL\INVURIBL.exe %WEIGHT%
%REMOTEIP% 0 0
I suggest monitoring the sniffer hits and increase/decrease the scoring
accordingly depending on the false positives you see. Ideally you should
be combo'ing a sniffer hit w/other tests to maximize sniffers
effectiveness.
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482
=Name_Server_Return_Code_RBL1 value=* /
add key=Name_Server_Weight_RBL1 value=50 /
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hayer [mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 2:59 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How effective should Inv-Uribl be?
Well this all
We used a ramdisk with software called ramdisk plus.
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Chayer [mailto:scha...@intrasoft.net]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:42 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SSD vs HDD
Hello Everyone,
I think the question may have been
Dunno what you are using for a controller but if you couple these drives as
a controller cache with an adaptec 5805 for example the system will be
wicked fast almost regardless of the hdd drives used - as long as they are
enterprise class..
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
On 3/4/2011 10:42 AM, Stephan Chayer wrote:
Should we use SSD drives or regular HDD. I have heard numerous reliability
problems with SSD and I am not sure if we should do it.
So far we have had good luck with SSD drives in applications like this.
Another solution we use on our *nix boxen is
Thanks Nick,
We are using an Intel hardware raid controller SRCS16 with 64 Mo cache.
Stephan
De : Nick Hayer [mailto:n...@madriveraccess.com]
Envoyé : 4 mars, 2011 11:57
À : Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Objet : re: [Declude.JunkMail] SSD vs HDD
Dunno what you are using for a controller
I'd second the RAM disk recommendation. You don't need to pay for
enterprise-class RAM disk anymore, as the feature is built into Starwind
Software's StarPort iSCSI initiator, which is free. We've used it for 2+ years
now.
-- Sandy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
They are good and legitimate. If an IP is listed with them that sends spam I
would suggest reporting it to them.
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
dbar...@declude.com
Description: -declude Description: -dnsstuff
.
-Original Message-
From: Kamran Razvan [mailto:kami.l...@clickandpledge.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 9:01 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
Thanks Dave,
Just to show you how it works:
[AUTOWHITE.1] external1
This product is not ready to be on the market and certainly should not be
something someone pays good money to purchase. It has promise, but its not
ready yet.
Your complaints have to do principally with SmarterMail -- certainly
when the product was published and supported I don't recall
]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:00 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
This product is not ready to be on the market and certainly should not
be something someone pays good money to purchase. It has promise, but
its not ready yet
:46:15 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
I installed autowhite.
This product is not ready to be on the market and certainly should not be
something someone pays good money to purchase. It has promise, but its not
ready yet.
Its advertised
: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:04 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
Dave, it is sad to see you take a discussion we were having via email and
turn it into an unwarranted attack on a product that has been in use as
designed since 2003 and has
Great idea Dave thanks. Question. If a user emails a recipient in what scenario
would we not want to whitelist the recipients address ?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Beckstrom [mailto:db...@atving.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 8:45 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject:
would be the
excluder so that no recipient of email from those automated systems would be
given any credit.
-Original Message-
From: David Barker [mailto:dbar...@declude.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 7:49 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea
17, 2011 7:49 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
Great idea Dave thanks. Question. If a user emails a recipient in what scenario
would we not want to whitelist the recipients address ?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Beckstrom
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
Great idea Dave thanks. Question. If a user emails a recipient in what scenario
would we not want to whitelist the recipients address ?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Beckstrom [mailto:db
they are whitelisted.
Kami
-Original Message-
From: David Barker [mailto:dbar...@declude.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 9:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
The author is John Tolmachoff of
http
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new Declude add-on
I couldn't think of any specific instances where you would not want to
whitelist a recipient's address. Obviously nobody should be emailing a
spammer.
In general, that's reasonable - but certainly not bullet-proof. Since spammers
always
AutoWhite doesn't whitelist, it counterweights. Whether you counterweight
enough to be tantamount to whitelisting is up to you and your setup.
You should read the documentation for AW (if it is still available) before
deciding that a base was not covered.
-- Sandy
---
[This E-mail was
time over the past 8 years a customer has complained about
spam, that has been the cause.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Andy Schmidt andy_schm...@hm-software.com
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 10:03 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Idea for new
For what it's worth, I still test against REVDNS and it's never been
worth a HOLD action all by itself.
I score it at 25% of my HOLD weight threshold.
Reverse DNS lookups can go through a lot of lookups; if their DNS is too
slow and doesn't respond, you will inadvertently score against them
I suppose it depends on your clients. I host mostly small to medium business
sites, bounce on reverse DNS at my gateway and only get a question once or
twice a year, where I assist some clueless Email Admin about contacting his
ISP to set up the proper reverse DNS.
I explain to them that we
: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 10:49 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking on no REV DNS?
I suppose it depends on your clients. I host mostly small to medium business
sites, bounce
HOLD
Or
REVDNS LOG
Etc.
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Beckstrom
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 2:07 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE
201 - 300 of 21924 matches
Mail list logo
