That sucks some what on ibms behalf. I think we hit same issue a while back on
some queue configs also.
Is there a way to possibly add an extra jar or something or manage the XML
parse libs so theyre not dependent on jvm impl version.
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 a
+1 (binding)
Downloaded binariesChecked checksum and hashesBasic single node setup with some
smoke test client.
ThanksMike
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 7:05 AM +, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
wrote:
Here's my +1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 20/11/2019 19:02, Jean-B
Hi Chris
In general looks good.
Ive tried adding comments inline on the commit hopefully you see them.
Could an xml config example be added like there was for the upstream bits. (I
could have missed it)
Looks good though great stuff!
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Mo
Thanks will check it out.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 11:52 AM +, "Christopher Shannon"
wrote:
Michael,
I pushed up the branch I've been working on here:
https://github.com/cshannon/activemq-artemis/tree/downstreamFederationPrototype
So you can take
Hi PMC
Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +, "Krzysztof" wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
and remove the t
Do you have a branch with it at all even if not PR ready?
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 1:36 PM +, "Christopher Shannon"
wrote:
As an update I have a decent prototype now for downstream configurations
that I am still polishing and working on tests. I'm o
What ever we do we should ensure compatibility even when we add NMS 2.x api.
Just as like in JMS when going 1.x to 2.x all old methods and classes were not
removed, just simply newer. This ensured no breaking changes to any existing
code, or frameworks that had built around.
Get Outlook for
+1 binding.
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:22 PM +0200, "Timothy Bish"
wrote:
+1
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Checked the license and notice files
* Compiled using both the native and docker build scripts
* Ran the maven build and tests
Please feel free to help contribute to the current work at apache. There is an
open pr and work to support net std, but with outstanding bits to resolve. Feel
free to contribute
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 6:51 PM +0100, "NuGet Gallery"
wrote:
User ard
Hi Tim
Im assuming your -1 is for same couole of points Robbie noted. But just want to
confirm.
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
From: Timothy Bish
Sent: Thursday 3 October, 20:44
Subject: Re: [VOTE[ Release Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
-1 (b
Re version this was because there was a 1.7.x line of an attempt that didn't
complete and never released.
That older code base that was moved to a branch incase someone used it (was a
discussion on that i believe back at the time).
To avoid any issues or clashes in future it is natural an
+1
Validated checksum and signatures
Started broker from binary and ran smoke tests with core and amqp java client
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 3:10 PM +0100, "Justin Bertram"
wrote:
Looks good to me.
+1
Justin
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:26 PM Clebe
That would be same issue if consumers shared a queue and was a consumer side
filter, that by consumer would pas lots data. he would hit same issue.
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:36 PM +0100, "Andy Taylor"
wrote:
If you are dealing with subscribers not bei
How about make hasNext return three states not basic true false,
e.g. return and int where 0 and 1 == current true false, but if returns say 2
then its that more pages to read and needs to spin again. This way if a
critical issue with hasNext and processing will still be detected as would
h
So the critical check is there to avoid issues where stuff takes too long on
the critical path. It was off the back of some major production issues.
I would be hesitant to relax / remove it.
If you know in your broker things take longer you could always configure to
increase the critical
A nms specific one seems reasonable compromise here and would give some sort of
consistency
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 3:43 PM +0100, "Krzysztof" wrote:
I see what you mean but wouldn't it be a bit strange if we skipped this
stamp for this particular type
I assume you are discussing NMS .net stuff?
I see no reason why not if Apache Infra are able to provide/willing.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 2:10 PM +0100, "Krzysztof" wrote:
We have Travis enabled, but it has quite poor windows support. Can we
reque
I think youre right there. We have ability to check a .net producer and java
consumer. Will check it out quick.
Thanks for looking over
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:00 AM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I was having a look at the readme, which then le
Hi All,
There has been some real sterling work and collaboration on updating the .NET
client offering, with some of our .net community progressing the NMS AMQP
client, and is really at a great place ready for release.
As such i will be looking to start a release early next week.
If an
+1 (binding)
Validated checksum and signatures on binaries
Deployed on windows host, and ran some basic tests with openwire client
Also checked rebuild from tag
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:41 PM +0100, "Jamie G."
wrote:
+1 (non-
+1
downloaded and ran on centos. (Replicated ha setup.)
Also ran on windows (single node)
Tested core client and qpid jms client. All seems good.
No regressions seen in smoke tests run. Will try new features/improvements in
coming months, look amazing great work
Get Ou
Just a quick one have we ensured we upgraded netty?
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:07 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
It's Tagged and pushedwill send the VOTE Thread in the afternoon
after I prepare everything.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:01 AM Clebe
I would say as this isn't yet PR'd and probably will take a round of reviews.
Would be best cutting now and doing another one soon.
That said there is a major feature (paging one) i think needs to be merged. I
did ping all on it if any outstanding.
Get Outlook for Android
On Tu
Surly you keep the file open, else you will incur perf penalty of having to
open the file constantly.
Would be faster to have the reader hold the file open and have one per queue.
Avoiding constant opening and closing of a file. And all the overhead of that
at the os level
Get Outlook fo
+1 for having one per queue. Def a better idea than having to hold a cache.
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 4:37 AM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
But the real problem here will be the number of openFiles. Each Page
will have an Open File, what will keep a l
Thanks Robbie.
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:33 AM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
Only Infra can manage things like that within the foundation GitHub
org, youd raise a JIRA[1] for them to enable the Travis integration
for given GitHub repositories.
[1] h
Could a squashed PR be sent?
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:23 PM +0100, "yw yw" wrote:
Hi,
I have finished work on the new implementation(not yet tests and
configuration) as suggested by franz.
I put fileOffsetset in the PagePosition and add a new class P
Glad im not going crazy. If theyre not being used can they be removed then?
Anyone with non windows computer able to checkout and remove to help us window
people :)
I miss my mac :(
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:22 AM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
Like wise in a roadmap for our project we need to be also clear on the
direction for Artemis.
We definitely dont want to be flip flopping. We had spelt out a roadmap last
year.
The project already did one big flip flop with apollo. It erodes all end users
trust, and they have no clear d
Before any votes. I think it needs a little more discussion to see where the
tide is going. You need to engage people in that discussion.
Likewise i think a little more than just a line or two is needed for a
proposal, need to be clear who is committing to what and thoughts about
ensuring cl
Just a ping on this. Whilst i was able to make the change via github editor. I
still need to checkout so i can perform a build and produce new site content.
But the git clone issue im still struggling with.
I am on windows not mac like i used to be incase thats a known issue
Get Outloo
There was feedback i gave some on that thread.
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:43 AM +0100, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
wrote:
It's just worth to mention, there's no feedback for now.
Anyway, as a community effort, I don't see any blocker. About the releases,
it
I have provided some updates for Artemis and NMS.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:01 PM +0100,
wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Just travelling atm. Will try to add some bits later this evening. I also need
to complete the release of nms api, updating the website and se
Hi all.
I have a new machine and having difficulty doing a brand new fresh checkout or
the website git repo, that i need to do to update the site about the 1.8.0 nms
api release.
The error im getting is for a number of javadoc files in 2.7.0 and 1.3.0
folders getting a "no such file or d
I think as a project we need to be clear in direction here with one roadmap. To
avoid users confusion.
I was on the understanding that as a community and PMC a roadmap was already
agreed.
And this was for artemis to become activemq 6 was agreed and once it has all
features (and more) of
Hi Bruce,
Just travelling atm. Will try to add some bits later this evening. I also need
to complete the release of nms api, updating the website and sending an
announcement mail.
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:40 PM +0100, "Bruce Snyder"
wrote:
Point though is an extra index cache layer is needed. The overhead of that
means the total paged capacity will be more limited as that overhead isnt just
an extra int per reference. E.g. in the pr the current impl isnt very memory
optimised, could an int array be used or at worst an open primiti
I think some of that is down to configuration. If you think you could configure
paging to have much smaller page files but have many more held. That way the
reference sizes will be far smaller and pages dropping in and out would be
less. E.g. if you expect 100 being read make it 100 but make the
Just realised though whilst its implied as the person performing the release.
Here is my formal:
+1 (binding)
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 4:08 PM +0100, "cmorgan"
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Looks good to to me.
Adding support for netstandard 2.0 is great
Thanks Tim. Ill add my key there.
As sha issue is just me signing file from another dir, and easy to correct
shall i make another tag or just recreate rc5 with corrected sha files?
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 4:27 PM +0100, "Timothy Bish"
wrote:
-1
Hi Krzysztof.
Thanks for spotting. No worries. Let us know the pr and ill respin tomorrow or
once pr is merged
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:04 PM +0100, "Krzysztof" wrote:
Hi,
I made a mistake in power-shell script and didn't exclude no
Thanks all for the review.
Please consider the VOTE for 1.8.0 rc1 as cancelled.
I will re spin a 1.8.0 rc2 shortly hopefully addressing all feedback.
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:10 AM +0100,
wrote:
Its just a packing issue, we forgot in the pa
Its just a packing issue, we forgot in the package script to exclude those.
Good find guys
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 7:00 PM +0100, "Heiser, Derek" wrote:
I would say that source directories shouldn't have /bin or /obj at all and can
be added to .gitig
Yes it looks to just be the zipping up process. Just working through to exclude
those
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:43 AM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I didnt actually check yesterday but upon doing so the dirs/files dont
look to be in the repo
(https:/
So theyre the existing ones that were released in previous releases.
The only bit i just spotted is date needs updating.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:17 PM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
The licence and notice files present in the src archive are in
Thanks Tim for the feedback. Is that the only issue? Just to avoid too many
respins.
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 5:08 PM +0100, "Timothy Bish"
wrote:
-1
The docs and nuget package archives do not contain a proper license or
notice files
On 6/24/19 11:4
Just an update.
Getting docs built for the releae with sandcastle hit a snag, as this is no
longer maintained looking to swap it over to docfx.
This means its more likely now early next week i will have an rc ready.
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019
Thanks Tim, Robbie and Clebert.
Ill work through and try get something as a proposed release.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:11 AM +0100, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I can't speak to the binary side of things and dont know specifically
how the NMS releas
Hi Tim or Jim
Just want to nudge this so you have a chance to respond.
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:48 AM +0100,
wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking to run 1.8.0 release of the API which simply adds netstandard2.0
build.
@Jim Gomes o
Hi All,
I am looking to run 1.8.0 release of the API which simply adds netstandard2.0
build.
@Jim Gomes or @Timothy Bish, i realise you both historically have run releases.
Could i ask for some assistance in my first time releasing .net to ensure i
sign correctly and release inline w
Thanks for addressing that swiftly Emmanuel. This addresses my concerns.
Get Outlook for Android
On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM +0100, "Emmanuel Hugonnet"
wrote:
Yes, all fixed
And also i review a PR with wrong license headers
Cheers
Emmanuel
On 08/06/2019 23:30, michael.
Would that also address the other rat failures that Robbie found?
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:44 PM +0100, "Emmanuel Hugonnet"
wrote:
Hello,
I've sent the PR https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly-common/pull/46 and I'll try
to have it merged with a releas
So already it seems we have issues handling and maintaining rights for users on
the few jira projects we have.
E.g. atm whilst Christopher S, sorted my activemq rights as pmc memebrt, it
seems no one has been able to sort the others artemis amqnet and amqcpp.
As such it shows atm managin
I just want it clarified what will be the rules of adopting a new plugin or
extension. Likewise the rule for archiving/killing off dead ones.
And that is applied generically.
E.g.
At least one pmc member needs to sponsor (doesnt have to be the committer or
contributor)
Any third
What about the kafka plugin, or influx plugin...
All questions need to be same
Get Outlook for Android
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 2:27 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
there's also another technical issue when we create / separate these components.
They will likely depend
I think one git repo per thing maybecome a bit too scattery. Id go for one repo
with multiple modules.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:42 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:25 PM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
>
> I would put them outwith
@Andy Bentley, have you or are you sending a PR?
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:38 PM +0100, "Bentley, Andy - 0553 - MITLL"
wrote:
Upgrade the OWASP plugin from the very very olf 1.4.3 to the latest 4.0.2
From: Justin Ber
What ever the agreed place is i would want to see the same rules being applied
across the board as noted this isnt the first time this has cropped up.
That said. If we go seperate repo route. We could move other bits like docker
and operator sub modules to sub repos there so they can have pos
Have sent a small pr its a minor feature if it can make it please.
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:16 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
I would like to do a 2.7.1 release one week from now.
if you can't make it 2.7.1 on your changes.. don't worry.. we ca
This is great effort by everyone! And excellent work by Justin taking it the
last mile.
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 12:29 AM +0100, "Timothy Bish"
wrote:
On 4/4/19 7:18 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> I talked with Apache Infra today and got them to move on th
I saw thanks Robbie.
Back to +1 for me
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:39 AM +, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I have built and staged the current version, the only updated page was
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-website/components/nms/providers/amqp/
+1
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:34 AM +,
wrote:
Ive add a bit more to that holding page. I need to still build and publish the
change. But will have to wait till later once im back out of work.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019
Ive add a bit more to that holding page. I need to still build and publish the
change. But will have to wait till later once im back out of work.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:52 PM +, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I made the original change as an fix, to
As i stated i am happy to update the content though it wont be this week. So if
releasing the new site having that content (which is on current site so it is
being removed if we were to release) is a blocker for you or robbie. We have
three options to go forward as i see it.
1) Revert that
The point here is that is been discussed quite a bit on another thread where it
was clear that people wanted to keep it. It is a sub project unless its voted
to be deprecated as a projectwhich it hasnt, it should remain.
If content needs updating update it, if having the content is a blo
Changed to -1 due to recent commit removing an nms project. Will change back if
thats reverted. As flagged in seperate threads.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:21 PM +, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
wrote:
+1
Regards
JB
On 27/03/2019 21:07, Justin Bertram wr
Im happy if we think content should be updated to reflect the current version.
But i am against its removal altogether. As per the other discussion thread it
isnt dead, but seemingly active.
If we want the new site live asap it isnt the time just to be wiping projects
from the website w
Im Im referring to
https://github.com/apache/activemq-website/commit/ba463fd8144b155731f835d70949c24df48ffc58
Its removing the amqp nms that has been actively contributed to last year, code
is used by our users and has someone in the discussion actively said they are
looking to further devel
-1 sorry but this was discussed in another thread about leaving the nms and cms
stuff
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:34 PM +, "Robbie Gemmell"
wrote:
I've removed the redundant names from the menus.
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 16:46, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
Im about to be travelling. If this needs a vote here is my +1.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:39 PM +0100, "Christopher Shannon"
wrote:
Can we go ahead and get this site deployed? Our current site is broken
because Confluence was updated and our deploy pro
Another option could be that you provide your new solution and turn it on by
default but we make it possible for that other use case if it becomes an issue
to toggle back to the old?
I honestly dont see the other usecase being common. But as long as you give the
option for someone to toggle
Performance was similar. As such agreed if there is an impact for another
usecase thats genuine maybe leave it as is.
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 1:49 PM +0100, "Francesco Nigro"
wrote:
@michael
> If youre talking about the solution that you regressed ju
So Franz.
If youre talking about the solution that you regressed just before we released.
Then we did test it in our real testing env. I didnt notice and negative impact
for our use cases.
Regards to code, i actually thought what you had it made code cleaner.
Im not sure what use ca
So on NMS as i replied earlier for me
API, OpenWire, AMQP are the must to keep for sure.
API Openwire both released and maintained
AMQP has been active last year using the amqplite lib, the lastest work is
working it didnt release because there was a query sent to legal because of
q
Be good if those PRs for CMS could reopen. It be great to have cms back on
track and an updated release. IMO
Get Outlook for Android
From: jgenender
Sent: Wednesday 20 March, 00:12
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Status of NMS & CMS
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Robbie Gemmell wrote >
Thanks Alan great to hear. Using .net core would be awesome! Def support that
in NMS.
Get Outlook for Android
From: alan protasio
Sent: Tuesday 19 March, 23:39
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Status of NMS & CMS
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
I'm also happy to contribute with t
+1 i agree it be a great triple whammy to have new releases and new site...
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 8:21 PM +0100, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
With ActiveMQ 5.15.9 + Artemis 2.7.0, it would be great to have the
website updated this week.. It would make it
I guessed its the shadow was added.
If its easy could you try with both active mq with drop so we can see if it
looks better or worse?
Re current committers and pmc, you can use the apache phonebook.
https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=activemq
Get Outlook for Android
Thanks for running the release Clebert.
+1 from me.
Started up broker ran a number of smoke tests. Checked qpid amqp jms client and
core clients against the broker during this.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:28 PM +, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
I agree with Jeff here.
Its very similar story with NMS as i noted, its stable api and the open wire
implementation is well used.
There has been activity even in the amqp impl last year as noted, yes it didnt
release but it shows activity and want.
Like wise there are other project
Entirely correct.
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:18 AM +, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
If there are users there is community. Think about JMS.. barely moving but
massively used and widely implemented.
NMS is an API on this case.
Correct me if I’m wrong h
Entirely correct
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:02 AM +, "Justin Bertram"
wrote:
Ultimately I'm much more concerned about the development resources
committed to the code-base than I am the number of end users. I think it's
bad for the credibility of the
Also just to avoid confusion with clustering. It is probably better avoid the
word cluster.
Probably better to refer the feature as "Broker Federation", or "Address and
Queue Federation".
Cheers
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:58 AM +, "Clebert Suc
I think the use of nms api is a little more active than you believe.
Then the open wire one has a download on nuget of the last release alone 167k
times according to stats here
https://packages.nuget.org/packages/Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ/
Like wise theres a quite active netstd (not apac
I think theres a couple of bug fixes by wy96f that are in flight in PR with
some reviews that would be good to close up and get in.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:08 PM +, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
I think we would be ready to a release in 1 week-ish (depending on a
task I'm w
I think he was wanting to make a new one that wrapping latest qpid, which
would be awesome.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:48 PM +, wrote:
So there is already an amqp nms implementation
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:08 PM
So there is already an amqp nms implementation
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:08 PM +, "Clebert Suconic"
wrote:
There was a guy at some point trying to implement AMQP on NMS. what
happened to that front? any knows about it?
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 3:04
So the point of these is they provide a clean api regardless of underlying
protocol.
Its not based on openwire so i disagree on your point there, it is providing a
higher level api abstraction. Which open wire is just one of many protocols
implementing the api.
E.g. amqp switch over fr
So atm im a -0 on this as i know of active users. So i don't think its a good
idea.
But as i personally dont contribute in this area i cant say no to it.
Get Outlook for Android
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 6:50 PM +, "Justin Bertram"
wrote:
I understand that there are use
So these are still being used by users. We have a group in my org using them.
Not everyone in .net and c++ is reactive... some prefer the jms like apis.
I think low level of development is down to stability.
Get Outlook for Android
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:37 AM +, "Christopher
90 matches
Mail list logo
