I have a problem with downloading xml- and bsf-stuff via fetch.xml (SVN
head).
fetch.xml:149: The following error occurred while executing this line:
fetch.xml:100: Unable to resolve artifact
...
Caused by: C:\ant\svn-repository\ant\core\fetch.xml:100: Unable to
resolve artifact
...
Caused by:
On 10/26/06, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
you've probably seen that people.apache.org is still not up again.
For me (and anybody else who subscribed to lists using the @apache.org
address) this means I haven't received any emails from this and other
lists since Monday. But I've
I tried building Ant on JDK 1.2, but it failed because of wrong class
file version of AntUnit.
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
* org/apache/ant/antunit/AntUnit (Unsupported major.minor version
49.0)
lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.0Beta2.jar
After deleting the jar the build works
Thanks for the pointers. The mentioned files provide some good ideas
but still look like they will download optional dependencies as well.
I also realised that my questions were a bit off topic but you have
given me some useful things to think about anyway. Thanks. If I think
of any way to
On 10/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried building Ant on JDK 1.2, but it failed because of wrong class
file version of AntUnit.
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
* org/apache/ant/antunit/AntUnit (Unsupported major.minor version
49.0)
On 10/26/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have got the feeling that we are pretty close to releasing 1.7.0.
However I wonder whether we need a beta4 before, particularly due to the
change of refid handling since beta3.
I have some pending work on classpaths in script,
It is more the case that common/build.xml does not set the
source and target attributes of javac in the compile target,
and the magic properties (shudder) ant.build.javac.target and
ant.build.javac.source have not been set when the AU that is
in ANTCORE/lib/optional was built.
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
[...] You would like for instance to say : get bsf + groovy + jython but not
beanshell for instance.
Forgot to say: yes, this is what I would like to do.
You could have a look at two files written mainly by Steve Loughran, fetch.xml
and libraries.properties.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30365.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30365.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30365.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
You could have a look at two files written mainly by Steve Loughran,
fetch.xml and libraries.properties.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/lib/libraries.properties
A consequence I just realised that would be relevant to this
Author: antoine
Date: Thu Oct 26 07:28:00 2006
New Revision: 468015
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468015
Log:
groupId for jsch is com.jcraft
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
ant/core/trunk/src/etc/poms/ant-jsch/pom.xml
Modified: ant/core/trunk/fetch.xml
URL:
4)
Patching
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk/xdocs/external.xml
for the External Tools and Tasks page: I´m using Eclipse
3.1 on Windows.
I know that I can create a patch to a file that is under
versioncontrol. Is there an easy way to create a patch besides
configuring the
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi Steve,
I've just got the tomcat6 source and was planning to start looking at
it, but nope didn't know that web.xml is now optional - thanks for
teaching me something :)
I've been learning these things by reading the javee specs and engaging
in some discourse with the
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize that
using html email could be a problem. Thanks Stephan for pointing this
out.
My inquiry is in connection with TestLogic project on CodeShare.
Could you please expand a little on TestLogic for the
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I have got the feeling that we are pretty close to releasing 1.7.0.
However I wonder whether we need a beta4 before, particularly due to the
change of refid handling since beta3.
I could free a slot for a next concrete release step on Sunday, November
5th.
1.
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
* 1.7.0 Beta4 - yes, I think we should do one more, maybe call it RC1?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul King wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
[...] You would like for instance to say : get bsf + groovy + jython
but not beanshell for instance.
Forgot to say: yes, this is what I would like to do.
You could have a look at two files written mainly by Steve Loughran,
fetch.xml and
FYI, the maven-to-RDF conversion we are attempting will eventually index
every .class in every jar to look for duplicates. If I save a hash of
every class we can even do version auditing. Oh, people will fear our
auditor program. Working name: repo-man :)
-steve
Interesting. You will
-Original Message-
From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:33 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility
Vladimir Egorov wrote:
Sorry for a bit of a messy entry into the list. I did not realize
Author: stevel
Date: Thu Oct 26 16:10:10 2006
New Revision: 468180
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468180
Log:
web.xml is now optional in Java EE. I've tweaked war to warn but continue if
it is omitted, and not to say anything if there is a duplicate reference to the
same web.xml,
Author: stevel
Date: Thu Oct 26 16:11:25 2006
New Revision: 468181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468181
Log:
handle security checks on property get gracefully
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Diagnostics.java
Modified:
Author: stevel
Date: Thu Oct 26 16:15:17 2006
New Revision: 468184
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468184
Log:
update change log
Modified:
ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW
Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW
URL:
when editing a task is there any reason to set an output property using the
redirector
vs. getProject().setProperty() ??
Peter,
Your suggestions were quite helpful. The fix for me was to utilize a
post-ant1.7.0beta3 svn copy of ant. I tested my Iterator-based task, as
well as foreach using the most recent svn ant. In both cases, my builds
ran without OOME. So it would seem that the memory leak squashing is
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
COMMON/build.xml
target name=compile depends=setup
javac
srcdir=src/main
destdir=${build.classes}
debug=true
/
/target
Should we set these attributes like in CORE/build.xml?
Absolulutely. A
Author: bodewig
Date: Thu Oct 26 21:15:50 2006
New Revision: 468260
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468260
Log:
explicitly set -source and -target when compiling
Modified:
ant/antlibs/common/trunk/build.xml
Modified: ant/antlibs/common/trunk/build.xml
URL:
Author: bodewig
Date: Thu Oct 26 21:16:45 2006
New Revision: 468261
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468261
Log:
prepare for re-tag
Removed:
ant/antlibs/common/tags/antunit_10beta2/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Author: bodewig
Date: Thu Oct 26 21:17:09 2006
New Revision: 468262
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468262
Log:
new tag on common
Added:
ant/antlibs/common/tags/antunit_10beta2/
- copied from r468258, ant/antlibs/common/trunk/
Author: bodewig
Date: Thu Oct 26 21:19:07 2006
New Revision: 468263
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468263
Log:
Ouch, committed an invalid build file
Modified:
ant/antlibs/common/trunk/build.xml
Modified: ant/antlibs/common/trunk/build.xml
URL:
Author: bodewig
Date: Thu Oct 26 21:19:39 2006
New Revision: 468264
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=468264
Log:
prepare for re-tag
Removed:
ant/antlibs/common/tags/antunit_10beta2/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
I've re-built AntUnit with -source 1.2 and uploaded everything to
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/antunit/. I'd like to release
those files as 1.0Beta2.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Hi all,
in the past we have been a bit lax on releases. We've beasically been
voting on the source tree (yes, you can build a release on Sunday) and
not on the files being released. Now that we are sponsoring an
Incubator podling, we might better be a bit more strict so that the
Ivy community
34 matches
Mail list logo
