Hello there,
I just tried to analyse the package apache-ant-1.7.0 with the most
excellent Java static analysis tool pmd.
A subset of the results were
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/apache-ant-1.7.0/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/DefaultLogger.java:249
Avoid appending characters as strings
. September 2008 11:16
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: apache-ant-1.7.0: 115 * Java source code bugs
Hello there,
I just tried to analyse the package apache-ant-1.7.0 with the most
excellent Java static analysis tool pmd.
A subset of the results were
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/apache-ant-1.7.0/src/main
Hi,
Bug 45194 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45194
I think I've tracked down a deadlock that happens when a custom
BuildListener class is used. If a BuildListener retrieves a project property
value inside the messageLogged() method, this can cause a deadlock when the
Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox antlibs
as a component in BZ?
Thanks,
Matt
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45135
Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed
|Added
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox antlibs
as a component in BZ?
Props Antlib is there now.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Matt Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone add either props antlib or sandbox
antlibs
as a component in BZ?
Props Antlib is there now.
Many thanks, Stefan!
-Matt
Stefan
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
it fails)
I do not see any other duplicate classes related to ant, all the classes are
coming from my apache-ant-1.7.0/lib.
Please could you advise some more, there has to be something! I am thinking of
deleting everything and starting from scratch, but I don't see how that could
help
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=43586
Summary: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /home/***/apache-ant-
1.7.0/junitvmwatcher *** .properties
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43586.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=42967
Summary: Path subclasses no longer call list() in Ant 1.7.0
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P2
Component: Core
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=42733
Summary: New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 available task with
fileset
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
/show_bug.cgi?id=42734
Summary: New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 available task with
fileset
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
/show_bug.cgi?id=42735
Summary: New behavior of Ant-1.7.0 available task with
fileset
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42733.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42735.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=42735
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 10:01 ---
Thanks for the report and especially thanks for
the build file.
Available has changed in ant 1.7.0, in ant 1.6.5 and lower
available would search all the parent directories for
a file
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42735.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: java.net.URISyntaxException: Illegal character in path at index 18: f
ile:/C:/Documents and Settings/Kev/.m2/repository/org/apache/ant/ant/1.7.0/ant-1
.7.0.jar
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41734.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41734.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=41734
Summary: ant 1.7.0 always reports an error
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: dev
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41734.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=41654
Summary: ant -version returns wrong version for Ant 1.7.0
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Core
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41654.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Just without enough knowledge about poms ...
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.ant/groupId
artifactIdant/artifactId
version[1.7.0,)/version
---^
Are you sure about the brackets?
Jan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.ant/groupId
artifactIdant/artifactId
version[1.7.0,)/version
---^
Are you sure about the brackets?
Looks weird :) - apparently this is how you state 1.7.0 or greater
than or equal to in mvn pom language.
So it should pick up the jar
,)/version
/dependency
When I use my maven plugin (which relies on these dependencies) I get
a URL error in
${user.home}/.m2/repository/org/apache/ant/ant/1.7.0/ant-1.7.0.jar
When I change the dependencies to version 1.6.5 (and the groupId to
ant mvn1 style), my plugin works fine.
I'm wondering
/show_bug.cgi?id=41587
Summary: Ant-1.7.0 available task, under JDK1.3.1_19, can't
find junit.jar in ${user.home}/.ant/lib
Product: Ant
Version: 1.7.0
Platform: PC
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41587.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,
I have checked in code to fix this. Those
experiencing the problem might want to test
against a
build from SVN HEAD to verify the problem is fixed
for
them. It wouldn't hurt to remind the Maven folks
to
set the Project instance
Hi,
I have submitted the following problem to the Maven mailing list which
redirected me to this Ant mailing list.
The problem occurs when I use the maven ant task 2.0.4 with Ant 1.7.0.
The fileset created by the maven:dependencies task raises a
NullPointerException when used in the Ant
this problem only showed
up with Ant 1.7.0.
-Matt
--- Loic Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted the following problem to the Maven
mailing list which
redirected me to this Ant mailing list.
The problem occurs when I use the maven ant task
2.0.4 with Ant 1.7.0.
The fileset
,
however, so I am confused how this problem only
showed
up with Ant 1.7.0.
-Matt
--- Loic Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted the following problem to the
Maven
mailing list which
redirected me to this Ant mailing list.
The problem occurs when I use
that the same exception would be thrown,
however, so I am confused how this problem only
showed
up with Ant 1.7.0.
-Matt
--- Loic Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have submitted the following problem to the
Maven
mailing list which
redirected me to this Ant mailing list
--- Peter Reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like it is some strange stuff with
path through the code that just avoids an NPE in
ant.1.6.5.
[SNIP]
I am not sure how to fix this in ant.
I've got it. It is indeed a case of the Maven code
not having set Project references on their
Hi Matt,
I have checked in code to fix this. Those
experiencing the problem might want to test against a
build from SVN HEAD to verify the problem is fixed for
them. It wouldn't hurt to remind the Maven folks to
set the Project instance on artifacts they create,
either.
That was quick! And
Hi,
!-- But the following task throws a NullPointerException --
pathconvert property=echo.dependency.files
refid=dependency.files/
Are the maven ant task supposed to work with the last Ant 1.7.0 version ?
Any idea about what causes this problem ?
Ant 1.7 introduced
Hi,
I have seen an interesting thread of discussion on theserverside concerning
Ant 1.7.0. There are the typical discussions about whether ant should be
procedural out of the box (if, try/catch, for, foreach) and comparisons between
ant and maven.
Regards,
Antoine
http
Hi,
the Ant 1.7.0 jars are now available in the maven repository for maven2 based
builds.
Note that the groupId is org.apache.ant, not ant like for ant 1.6.5.
Checksums fail though - I do not know the reasons but the colleagues at
repository@ are aware of this.
Regards,
Antoine
On 12/20/06, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with
antunit?
Do we want to?
I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
features in
Hello Kevin,
On Dec 19, 2006, at 10:31 PM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi Antoine,
- as penance for my screwup last week,
No need for penance, this happens
I offer to do
the next release
Much appreciated.
(hopefully in a while!)
We will see ...
Kev
Antoine
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0.
Congratulations!
Thanks for being the release manager; take a rest now and let the rest
of the team handle the support calls. I'm waiting for the first 'doesnt
work on win98 with spaces
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0.
Oh, we need to put the libs up on the maven repository, along with
Ant-testutil.jar.
Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with antunit?
-steve
@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0.
Oh, we need to put the libs up on the maven repository, along with
Ant-testutil.jar.
Does this also means we can go to 1.0
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello Steve,
the libs should already be in the maven repository.
But pay attention : groupId is now org.apache.ant, not ant any more.
That's ok, I'm only moving our project to Ivy this week; we have no hard
coded commitments to the old paths.
,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:01:24 +
Von: Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [ANN] Ant 1.7.0 Released
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hello Steve,
the libs should already be in the maven
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi Steve,
actually, the org.apache.ant artifacts seem not to be available yet in the
maven repository.
I knew that :)
I have just posted something to repository@ to find out whether it is just a
delay, or whether I did something which does not follow the
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with antunit?
Do we want to?
I haven't seen anybody complain about missing features in beta2, is
AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
Stefan
--- Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this also means we can go to 1.0 with
antunit?
Do we want to?
I haven't seen anybody complain about missing
features in beta2, is
AntUnit ready for a 1.0 release?
I was
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Stefan. Rebuild the machine,
Just installed Service Pack 1 for VS2005 today, felt like rebuilding
the machine, no less. It took about 85 minutes, at least twice as
long as the initial installation of VS2005, Guidancy Automation
Extensions and Toolkit and the VS2005
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace
(below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me.
[junit] Testcase:
On 12/19/06, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace
(below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me.
[junit] Testcase:
Hi,
We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0.
Ant 1.7 introduces a resource framework. Some of the core ant tasks
such as copy/ are now able to process not only file system
resources but also zip entries, tar entries, paths, ... Resource
collections group resources
Hi Antoine,
We have the pleasure to announce the release of Apache Ant 1.7.0.
Thanks for taking the time to be release manager this time around -
much appreciated - as penance for my screwup last week, I offer to do
the next release (hopefully in a while!)
Kev
It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2.
We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support
jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is
triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1.
Have you tried using green threads? (were they still
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
+1 for releasing these builds. Everything looks good.
RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below)
looks
It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2.
We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support
jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is
triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1.
Have you tried using green threads? (were they still
On 12/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that the current ant code triggers bugs in jdk1.2.
We probally should say that ant 1.7.0 does not support
jdk1.2 due to bugs in jdk1.2, and try to find out what is
triggering the bug - hopefully to get a work-a-round for ant 1.7.1
from Ant 1.6.5 to Ant 1.7.0.
Also delete the paragraph
* On Java1.5+, Ant automatically sets the system property
java.net.useSystemProxies to true, which gives it automatic use of
the local
IE (Windows) or Gnome2 (Unix/Linux) proxy settings. This may break
any build
file
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:19:35 +0100
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done
Having a deeper look into the distros ...
Jan
Binary distro:
==
WHATSNEW-file
* concerning the WHATSNEW file : I did not have the time and
the knowledge to do an intelligent merge of the 4 sections
which were in the file (Ant 1.6.5 to Ant 1.7.0Beta1 ... to the
new section 1.6.5 to 1.7.0. I would suggest that you correct
it. The corrections will only be in 1.7.1 (unless
Hello Jan,
Yes, I did not branch Ant yet, so you can work on SVN HEAD.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:40:40 +0100
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0 - new upload done
* concerning
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace
(below) looks like a deeply confused Xerces to me.
[junit] Testcase: testIIOP(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.RmicAdvancedTest):
Caused an
ERROR
Hi,
the vote for the release of Ant 1.7.0 will close tomorrow evening.
So far I have recorded 6+1s (from Kevin, Matt, Steve Loughran,
Stefan, Martijn, Peter).
Jan Materne had done a -1 vote right after my first upload, but,
since the reasons for his -1 (I think a piece of code which
the vote for the release of Ant 1.7.0 will close tomorrow evening.
So far I have recorded 6+1s (from Kevin, Matt, Steve Loughran,
Stefan, Martijn, Peter).
Jan Materne had done a -1 vote right after my first upload,
but, since the reasons for his -1 (I think a piece of code
which
On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
I am +1 on releasing those,
we should however document that the official release does not
Antoine Levy-Lambert schreef:
On Dec 16, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
I am +1 on releasing those,
we should however document that
+1 Peter
On 12/13/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done
a new upload.
So we might want to start a new vote.
You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/
apache-ant-1.7.0/
Due
I just downloaded the latest builds from
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/
* binary distro with MD5
ac30ce5b07b0018d65203fbc680968f5 *apache-ant-1.7.0-bin.zip
* source distro with MD5
f3c9e94df5f4cc639ad8067700b3d571 *apache-ant-1.7.0-src.zip
Using Java
Classic VM (build JDK-1.2.1_004
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a third upload where the HasFreeSpace condition will be
present.
+1 for releasing these builds. Everything looks good.
RmicAdvancedTest fails for me using JDK 1.6, the stack trace (below)
looks like a deeply confused
\eclipseworkspace\ant-trunkd:\apache-ant-1.7.0\bin\ant test
Buildfile: build.xml
A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error 'chgTarg: Conditional' has
occurred
in :
'org/apache/tools/ant/Project.addReference
(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Objec
t;)V': Interpreting method.
Please report this error
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done a
new upload.
So we might want to start a new vote.
You can download it from this URL :
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/apache-ant-1.7.0/
Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Do you vote for the release of these binaries ?
Numerous changes have been made in the code since RC1, including several
new features. Do you think it would be wiser to call this build RC2 and
make that the final release after a week or so - permitting no further
I would also call it RC2.
- Alexey.
On 12/14/06, Jesse Glick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Do you vote for the release of these binaries ?
Numerous changes have been made in the code since RC1, including several
new features. Do you think it would be wiser to call
Hello Alexey, Jesse,
I am getting impatient to get the impact of a real release.
In any case, there will be bugs. Which bugs will be found and will be
deemed critical nobody knows.
We might be in search of perfection, but no matter how many RCs you
generate you will never be perfect.
Hello Antoine,
On my part I'm happy to say that we should release as final not RC2, I
agree with the fact that people will not test until it becomes a final
release (so if we do a RC2, it won't be tested by the users anyway).
yes [x]
Kev
.
[au:antunit]took 0.003 sec
Peter
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kevin Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Dezember 2006 06:30
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ant 1.7.0
My vote (so far)
[x] Yes
All good so far - thanks Antoine
On Dec 13, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Peter Reilly wrote:
On 12/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nrw.de wrote:
-1: doesnt compile on JDK-1.2.1_004:
or jdk 1.3.
src\main\org\apache\tools\ant\util\StringUtils.java:205: Method
matches(java.lang.String) not found in class java.lang.S
The code uses reflection so it should compile on jdk 1.5 and
work on jdk 1.6.
I put a conditional compile in the build.xml file so that the
hasfreespace code isn't even compiled on pre 1.6 jdks :
selector id=needs.jdk1.6+
or
filename name=${condition.package}/HasFreeSpace*/
On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code uses reflection so it should compile on jdk 1.5 and
work on jdk 1.6.
I put a conditional compile in the build.xml file so that the
hasfreespace code isn't even compiled on pre 1.6 jdks :
selector id=needs.jdk1.6+
or
Hi
eek, I did not see that.!
:(
The point of using reflection is to have the condition
in the ant distro.
For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not
compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment)
Kev
On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
eek, I did not see that.!
:(
The point of using reflection is to have the condition
in the ant distro.
For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not
compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the
For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not
compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment)
In fact unless anyone thinks I should leave this in, I'm going to pull
the util.java16 package from svn head and alter the build.xml to
remove the selector
On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the condition that's fine, but for the java16 package, it will not
compile on java5 (not that the code in there is used at the moment)
In fact unless anyone thinks I should leave this in, I'm going to pull
the util.java16 package from
Ah I see it now. oata.util.java16.
Yes, pull this, it is not used anymore!
Done and altered the build.xml to remove the selector that was no
longer needed either
/me learns valuable lesson in trying to get a new feature in close to
release (mea culpa for all the problems today) :(
Kev
Hi,
I have updated my SVN sandbox, got the new StringUtils.java, and done
a new upload.
So we might want to start a new vote.
You can download it from this URL : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/
apache-ant-1.7.0/
Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens, the effective release
On 12/13/06, Kevin Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah I see it now. oata.util.java16.
Yes, pull this, it is not used anymore!
Done and altered the build.xml to remove the selector that was no
longer needed either
/me learns valuable lesson in trying to get a new feature in close to
release
://people.apache.org/~antoine/
apache-ant-1.7.0/
Due to our bylaws, if a positive vote happens, the effective release
date (already entered in the doc) will be Dec 19, 2006.
Do you vote for the release of these binaries ?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Regards,
Antoine
On Dec 13, 2006, at 2:54 AM, [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
