erting 3154708 is here:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> > >>>>>>>>
m/apache/calcite/commit/213c13776651f83f95dceb9645a15e940ec6dce1
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if I can do anything else to help and thank y'all for
> >>>>>>>>>> handling
> >>>>>>>>>>> the release!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
_
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
CALCITE-4455,
I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
t;>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:34 PM Tanner Clary
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I can re
;>>>> francischu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main branch should still be frozen as we're still
> >>>>>>>> voting
> >>
___
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
CALCITE-4455,
I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now. What do you
think?
Othe
> Hi, Benchao
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Is the main branch still frozen?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I found a new commit[1], but 1.36.0 has not been released.
>
1月1日周三 02:42写道：
5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
I expected it would be easy to get it in.
But we can leave it for later.
Mihai
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calci
3505
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Benchao Li 于2023年11月6日周一 12:46写道：
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi devs,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>&
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I performed an update on the list compiled by Jiajun.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #1.Last update (new comments or commits) within 2 days
> >>>>>>>> (a
we can leave it for later.
Mihai
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
CALCITE-4455,
I think we can move it out of 1
>>
>> > >> >>>> LakeShen 于2023年11月1日周三 12:13写道：
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
>> > >> >>>>>
>> > >> >>>>> I have revi
三 12:13写道：
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Hi Itiel,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I have reviewd the
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325,and
> > >> >> left one
> > >> >>>>> comments
> > >> >>
t; >>>>>>>>>> Hi, all:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> We're already very close to 1.36.0, all unresolved issues
> >> >> has been
> >> >>>>>> someone
> >> >>>>>>>>>&g
chao Li 于2023年11月1日周三 10:17写道：
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Mihai,
>> >>>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
>> >> 1.36.0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Itiel,
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/ap
gt;>>>> I've reviewed 5884, it looks good and I think we can have it in
> > >> 1.36.0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Itiel,
> > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
> > >
>>> Itiel,
> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3325 has been reviewed and
> >> even
> >>>>>> with an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> >> merged
> >>>>>> in
it for later.
Mihai
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Due to the inactivity of the review for CALCITE-5884 and
CALCITE-4455,
I think we can move it out of 1.36.0 for now
th an approval, I'll try to ping in the PR to try to get it
> merged
> > > > > in 1.36.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Mihai Budiu 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> &g
t; > >
> > > > Mihai Budiu 于2023年11月1日周三 02:42写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > 5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
> > > > > I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> > > > > But we can leave it for later.
> > > >
/jira/browse/CALCITE-6052
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> #3. Last update exceeded 7 days
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5884
> > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6037
> > > > > >>
> > &g
____________________
> > > From: Benchao Li
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> > >
> > > Due to the inactivity of the review for CALC
; > But we can leave it for later.
> >
> > Mihai
> >
> >
> > From: Benchao Li
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> > To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >
> > Due to the inactivity of th
mostly documentation fixes.
> I expected it would be easy to get it in.
> But we can leave it for later.
>
> Mihai
>
>
> From: Benchao Li
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
> To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DIS
5884 is mostly documentation fixes.
I expected it would be easy to get it in.
But we can leave it for later.
Mihai
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2023 6:50 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
Due
> >>>
> > >>> Mihai Budiu 于2023年10月25日周三 05:02写道：
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For the blocker issues, I have filed two PRs which should
> collectively
> > >>> fix them.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3481 fixes
> >
se/CALCITE-5990, but does not include
> >>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the tests
> >> to
> >>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> >>> https://issue
ITE-5990, but does not include
>>> tests, because the test fixture needs to be fixed as well for the tests
>> to
>>> pass. There are tests in the next PR:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-
e fixed as well for the tests
> to
> > pass. There are tests in the next PR:
> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471 fixes
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5921, but should be
> amended
> > to reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 fir
> Mihai
> >
> >
> > From: Benchao Li
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> > To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
> >
> > A quick update on the current status for i
ed to
> reenable the disabled tests if we merge 3481 first.
>
> Mihai
>
>
> From: Benchao Li
> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 5:46 AM
> To: dev@calcite.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
>
> A quick update on
AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.36.0
A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is approaching.
Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
#1. Issues
A quick update on the current status for issues targeted 1.36.0
We need more reviewers for #2 and #3 since the end of October is approaching.
Please correct me if I'm mistaken, especially for issues in #1.
#1. Issues already have reviewers, and seems promising to be merged shortly
Hi, community.
Recently I reported an issue[1] which revealed that calcite's MAP SubQuery
doesn't work,
considering this is a feature regression or bug, maybe we can fix it in
1.36.
The PR is ready. If someone has time, pls help to review it. many thanks.
[1]
Thanks Benchao for opening the discussion! I'd like to include
CALCITE-5923/CALCITE-5825/CALCITE-5826 in 1.36, and they're all in good
shape.
The first one improves test converage for `SqlOperatorTest`, and can avoid
later regressions, so it's valuable.
The last two Jiras add two useful Spark/Hive
According to the JIRA information to be fixed or supported in 1.36.0, I
compiled the PR information that currently requires the committer review or
secondary review, so that these PRs could be merged.If the committer has
time,could help review these PRs.
The PRs are:
1.
I have a fix for the regression 5990, but I have also filed an improved fix for
5921 [1] which is needed to implement the fix for 5990. Both are relatively
small so we should be able to get them in for 1.36.
Thank you for your patience.
Mihai
[1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3471
I've created the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6047 to
track the releasing staff.
Julian Hyde 于2023年10月12日周四 04:32写道：
>
> Thanks for volunteering, Benchao. Could you log a jira case for 1.36? Then
> people can cases to it. (As RM, you can remove unlink any cases you think
>
Thanks for volunteering, Benchao. Could you log a jira case for 1.36? Then
people can cases to it. (As RM, you can remove unlink any cases you think will
not be ready in time.)
> On Oct 11, 2023, at 3:29 AM, Ran Tao wrote:
>
> Thanks Benchao for opening this discussion!
>
> Maybe we can add
Thanks Benchao for opening this discussion!
Maybe we can add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5918 in
1.36.0 ?
Currently it needs additional +1 review from the committer.
And I am willing to participate in the review of the remaining PRs of
1.36.0 (in familiar modules or sections)
I will take care of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5990
However, it is the first time I notice this issue, I wonder whether I missed
some notification.
Mihai
-Original Message-
From: Benchao Li
Sent: Sunday, October 8, 2023 12:01 AM
To: dev@calcite.apache.org
Cc:
+1,thanks,benchao.
I am willing to participate in the review of the remaining PRs of 1.36.0.
Best,
LakeShen
Benchao Li 于2023年10月8日周日 11:02写道：
> It's been a bit more than 2 months since our last release [1] and
> there are currently 90+ new commits in main branch.
>
> As usual, according to our
42 matches
Mail list logo
