Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

On 09/04/13 11:57 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> [Animesh>] Folks I wanted to get your opinion on auto-assignment >> based on the component maintainers list. We can also create shared >> issues filters based on components.

Review Request: Documentation changes for VMware dvSwitch and Nexus dvSwitch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10366/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Pranav Saxena, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, and ilya mus

Re: Review Request: Documentation changes for VMware dvSwitch and Nexus dvSwitch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10366/ --- (Updated April 9, 2013, 7:31 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > One of our graduation checklist items is to get the cloudstack.org > > domain migrated to ASF infra for registration ownership and probably > > also for name

Review Request: Documentation on Multiple IP per NIC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10367/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Jessica Tomechak, Jayapal Reddy, and venkata swam

RE: How many Private Gateways can be created to a VPC?

As mentioned in the spec: The number is limited by the hypervisor (max number of nics supported). From: Chandan Purushothama Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 4:02 AM To: Kishan Kavala; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: How many Private Gateways can be created to a VPC? Hello Kishan, I referred to th

RE: Master broken

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 3:51 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Master broken > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:44:41AM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- >

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 04:45:23PM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > Hi All, > > Currently CloudStack does not offer a flexible pluggable framework > for users to easily integrate and configure any 3rd-party object > stores for such backup services as registering templates, taking > snapshots, etc. Along w

RE: [Discuss] API name alias

Thanks everyone for your inputs. We should avoid making changes to the APIs which have only one name. So they'll continue to have the annotation: @APICommand(name="apiName1") For APIs with multiple names, we should support String[] as suggested by John. Preferred and deprecated would be requir

Re: Review Request: Improvements for French translation for Admin Web UI (for better display or better meaning). Add some missing translations.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10327/#review18840 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1 branch: commit 6d2a246807a1024d2775a3560d

RE: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

> > RPM Packaging: I believe that Hugo said we are done there, but I'd love a > confirmation! Yup, I'm considering the RPM packages done. I'm testing installation of all the rpms every four hours using Jenkins. I'm doing limited functional checks on management server (startup and zone configur

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

On 9 April 2013 14:33, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > >> >> RPM Packaging: I believe that Hugo said we are done there, but I'd love a >> confirmation! > > Yup, I'm considering the RPM packages done. I'm testing installation of all > the rpms every four hours using Jenkins. I'm doing limited functional c

Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

Updated the FS for new implementation of ACL Deny rules. Thanks, Jayapal On 01-Apr-2013, at 9:57 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Thanks for the commnets. > I will consider the ACL deny rules and update the FS. > > Thanks, > Jayapal > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chiradeep Vitta

RE: CloudStack Social Media Accounts

Hi Joe, We have two Facebook pages for CloudStack India user group : https://www.facebook.com/groups/cloudstack/ (Admins - Rajesh Battala/ Radhika) https://www.facebook.com/groups/cloudstackhyd/ (Admin - Nitin Mehta) A Podio page: https://citrix.podio.com/apache-cloudstack-india-user-group/ Re

Re: [Discuss] API name alias

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Rohit, that's like saying we won't fix a leaky faucet today because we're > moving in a couple of years anyway. It isn't a big deal to add this and it > clarifies to the end user what is the correct alias to

Re: CloudStack Social Media Accounts

Thanks Radhika. Add to this the linked in group - http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Cloudstack-User-Group-India-4421326?home=&gi d=4421326&trk=anet_ug_hm On 09/04/13 2:45 PM, "Radhika Puthiyetath" wrote: >Hi Joe, > >We have two Facebook pages for CloudStack India user group : > >https://www.faceboo

Non-Contiguous Vlan ranges TestPlan

Hi, Non-Contiguous Vlan ranges Test Plan is posted @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Non-Contiguous+Vlan+ranges. Please review the same and send me the comments or any additional cases needed to be added. Thanks and Regards, Kiran Koneti

Review Request: Cloudstack-1534 Disable/Enable-unmanage/manage cluster is setting CPU overcommit and Memory overcommit ratio to 1(default value)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10368/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Description --- Clou

FW: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.1 to 9b6ff74

Hi Chip, I had to make a small commit to 4.1 without creating a patch request for it . The fix would allow the user to see the instance UUID under the load balancer rule when it's "displayname" property is NULL since prior to this nothing was displayed which was blocking the user to know which

[ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1834: Events are not generated for registerUserKeys()

CLOUDSTACK-1834: Events are not generated for registerUserKeys() Branch: refs/heads/master Commit: 9180bd599015ce248e894a0ef476a4604b1533e4 Parents: 47dc989 Author: Murali Reddy mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com>> Authored: Tue Apr 9 17:45:19 2013 +0530 Committer: Murali Reddy mailto:murali.re...@ci

Re: [ACS41] Outstanding work for the release

On 08/04/13 7:51 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >CLOUDSTACK-1834 Events are not generated for registerUserKeys(), Enabling >account and Editing account. Murali Reddy >Murali - In your opinion, is this blocking the release? If not, let's >change the priority to major. If so, any ETA on a fix? Su

Re: Network architecture question

We have 2 pairs of bonded 10g nics on each box. Wouldn't that require an advanced network? Is it possible to do the security groups with small L2 networks in advanced networking? Justin Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2013, at 12:38 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Have you considered using a b

how is failure detection achieved in cloudstack?

I would like to know how the process of failure detection is achieved in cloudStack (if any). I would like to know about the implementation details, i.e. if its done at physical, virtual machine or at application level. Does cloudStack use any known failure detection mechanisms? e.g. [1][2][3][4] o

Re: [BUG][ACS41][CLOUD-INIT] cloud-init 0.7.2 is not able to pull metadata from cloudstack

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 10:56:50PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > John, > > Please register with JIRA and create an issue. I will assign the issue to you. I'd need to set his role to allow issues to be assigned to him. So I need the Jira ID. > > Then we need to create a review board request, so

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:34:01PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > One of our graduation checklist items is to get the cloudstack.org > > > domai

Re: how is failure detection achieved in cloudstack?

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:45:24PM +0200, Alejandro Z. Tomsic wrote: > I would like to know how the process of failure detection is achieved in > cloudStack (if any). I would like to know about the implementation details, > i.e. if its done at physical, virtual machine or at application level. Does

Re: FW: git commit: updated refs/heads/4.1 to 9b6ff74

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:59:03AM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I had to make a small commit to 4.1 without creating a patch request for it . > The fix would allow the user to see the instance UUID under the load balancer > rule when it's "displayname" property is NULL since prior

Re: Using VMware dvSwitch in CloudStack for Review

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:42:31AM +, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi Ilya/ Sateesh > > Resending the doc . > > Here is the updated section on dvSwitch. Please see 8.3.7. Configuring a > vSphere Cluster with VMware Distributed Virtual Switch (page no. 108) > > I also have the following doub

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request] CLOUDSTACK-1834: Events are not generated for registerUserKeys()

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:19:29PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-1834: Events are not generated for registerUserKeys() > > Branch: refs/heads/master > Commit: 9180bd599015ce248e894a0ef476a4604b1533e4 > Parents: 47dc989 > Author: Murali Reddy mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com>> > Authored: T

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

Okay so apparently when i fire off cloudstack-management server it is what appears to be eating all the available memory and causing the laptop to swap so im not so sure this is viable at this moment unless i can get CS management to consume considerably less memory On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:19 P

Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

Using master branch, 6.0 XS and my system vms are not coming up. I am getting the following error but unable to find the root cause of it. Smlog, xensource log and MS log do not seem to say more than this info. I have tried to verify the sec. storage, reinstalled the XS host and restarted the x

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

I shouldn't expect so. On 9 April 2013 14:13, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:34:01PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers < > chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >

RE: Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

Did you try clearing up host tags and stale images on your primary storage . Try doing this perhaps through the xencenter or the xe command line. I installed latest master today in the afternoon and its working fine for me Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:n

cwiki.apache.org is taking too long to respond. any infra issues?

Hi, It's taking very long time for the https://cwiki.apache.org/ to respond. Saving wiki pages is taking long time and sometimes showing blank page as its not responding. Is there any know issue with cwiki.apache.org site? Thanks Rajesh Battala

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:34:01PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers >> > wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > One of our gradu

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:46:02AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:34:01PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > >> > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM,

RE: cwiki.apache.org is taking too long to respond. any infra issues?

Im also not able to access cwiki. Can someone look into it? Thanks Sent from Samsung tablet Rajesh Battala wrote: Hi, It's taking very long time for the https://cwiki.apache.org/ to respond. Saving wiki pages is taking long time and sometimes showing blank page as its not responding. Is th

Re: cwiki.apache.org is taking too long to respond. any infra issues?

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:30:58PM +, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Hi, > It's taking very long time for the https://cwiki.apache.org/ to respond. > Saving wiki pages is taking long time and sometimes showing blank page as its > not responding. > Is there any know issue with cwiki.apache.org site?

Re: cwiki.apache.org is taking too long to respond. any infra issues?

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:49:51PM +, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: > Im also not able to access cwiki. Can someone look into it? This list isn't the ASF infrastructure list. If you run into problems like this, infra is the group to contact. You can always log a bug at https://issues.a

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

> On April 8, 2013, 9:36 p.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java, line 2377 > > > > > > Please handle the following 2 corner cases where admin user tries to > > shrink the

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/ --- (Updated April 9, 2013, 3 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Pr

Documentation How-To

I am working on installing/testing/documenting CS 4.10 on vSphere 5.1 using vDistributed Switching with CS advanced networking. Can someone please give me some insight on the proper way to contribute to CS formal documentation? -- Thanks, JC

Re: cwiki.apache.org is taking too long to respond. any infra issues?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:49:51PM +, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru wrote: >> Im also not able to access cwiki. Can someone look into it? > > This list isn't the ASF infrastructure list. If you run into problems like > this, > infra is the

RE: Documentation How-To

Hi Jason, The doc has been under review for a long time; however, I can share you the draft with you off-list. I am not sure whatever I have documented is perfect as the feature owner hasn't reviewed it yet. Regards -Radhika -Original Message- From: Jason Cadmus [mailto:jdcad...@gma

Re: Documentation How-To

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Jason Cadmus wrote: > I am working on installing/testing/documenting CS 4.10 on vSphere 5.1 > using vDistributed Switching with CS advanced networking. Can someone please > give me some insight on the proper way to contribute to CS formal > documentation? Thanks,

Re: Documentation How-To

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 10:29 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi Jason, > > The doc has been under review for a long time; however, I can share you > the draft with you off-list. Off-list? Do you have it on Review Board? I think you might be referring to this: https://reviews.apache.org/r/1

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

Do you have a link to the discussion thread, David? I can't find anything in my mail. On 9 April 2013 15:46, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 01:34:01PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:3

RE: Documentation How-To

Hi Joe, I cannot attach the PDF while replying to dev list. So I offered to send it off -list. The doc was initially checked in to the repo after completing the draft. Only Ilya, who tested it, has provided initial comments on them. I had many questions, which I posted on the ML, but none was

[REMINDER] Weekly IRC Meeting

Reminder: Our weekly IRC meeting is tomorrow (Wednesday, 10 April) at 17:00 UTC [1]. The standing agenda is here: https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/irc-meetings-logs-and-minutes.html Please join us in #cloudstack-meeting on Freenode. If you're not a regular IRC user, you can use the webchat: h

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

Not yet at this moment. But we are planning to provide a sample plugin implementation for this effort. If you are looking at object_store branch, you will see a plugin called "cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample", which will be the placeholder for a sample image store implementation. Thanks -min On

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Do you have a link to the discussion thread, David? I can't find anything > in my mail. > You'll need to use your member karma, as it's on infra-private: 097901ce30c3$c69ff210$53dfd630$@16degrees.com.au

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

Yes, I will include more api change details in FS in next few days. According to Chiradeep, it seems that we cannot simply deprecate old API in 4.2, Edison and I will discuss this and update FS with details on how to handle these old APIs. Thanks -min On 4/8/13 6:34 PM, "Sangeetha Hariharan" wro

Re: Documentation How-To

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > I cannot attach the PDF while replying to dev list. So I offered to send > it off -list. > > The doc was initially checked in to the repo after completing the draft. > Only Ilya, who tested it, has provided initial comments on them. >

[DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

HI, Do we allow deletion of users created by the admin within the admin account ? Currently if we see the UI (4.1 /master) and create a User within the admin account you won't be able to delete any user . Now when you create a user , its account type is 1 , account is Admin and domain is ROOT

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

Strange this was on infra-private, and not infra (which is also private). I only subscribe to the latter. I found your message now. Disappointing. I had not realised that this was policy. (I guess undocumented.) Wonder if there's any room for negotiation... On 9 April 2013 17:21, David Nalley wr

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

It was on infra-private as that was where I was told to carry the conversation when I asked in IRC. I don't think that there is any negotiation to be done, multiple infra contractors over a period of almost a year have echoed similar sentiments. --David On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Noah Slate

Re: Cloudstack.org domain

Ack :( On 9 April 2013 17:38, David Nalley wrote: > It was on infra-private as that was where I was told to carry the > conversation when I asked in IRC. > I don't think that there is any negotiation to be done, multiple infra > contractors over a period of almost a year have echoed similar > s

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:31:41PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > HI, > > Do we allow deletion of users created by the admin within the admin account ? > Currently if we see the UI (4.1 /master) and create a User within the admin > account you won't be able to delete any user . Now when you crea

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

-Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:18 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alena Prokharchyk Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:31:41PM +, Pranav Saxen

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

We should allow to delete any CS users except for ones that came as a part of cloudStack installation ("system" and "admin" users). The users you've created using API, should be allowed to be removed no matter of their types. The right way to distinguish between system generated users, and users c

Re: Documentation How-To

I would like to see the draft On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath < radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > The doc has been under review for a long time; however, I can share you > the draft with you off-list. > > I am not sure whatever I have documented is perf

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > We should allow to delete any CS users except for ones that came as a part > of cloudStack installation ("system" and "admin" users). The users you've > created using API, should be allowed to be removed no matter of their > types. > I

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:56:37AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > We should allow to delete any CS users except for ones that came as a part > of cloudStack installation ("system" and "admin" users). The users you've > created using API, should be allowed to be removed no matter of their > types

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

Yes , you won't be able to login to the UI since the admin credentials would no more exist in the db then . -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Pranav Saxena Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletio

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:53:38PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Is the current state of 4.1 and master a change in behaviour from 4.0.0? > [Pranav] - I didn't check 4.0 but the behavior in 4.1 and master seem to be > exactly the same . > > If it isn't a change, I'd like to propose that we set t

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

I believe this was never automated. The apidocs generation tool generates an XML document that contains all the APIs. (tools/apidoc/target/commands.xml). We can diff the 4.0 xml and the 4.1 xml using a tool such as xmldiff (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xmldiff). I tried this, but it hangs. The man

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

Dave, you need to have at least one user in order to login to the UI or execute an API call. You can't do it as a "system" user, so "admin" should be the one. -Alena. On 4/9/13 10:00 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: >> We should allow to del

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

I don't think it was ever a part of the Jenkins build process. I used to generate the diff locally on my machine by feeding the old and new version commands.xml files to the script. We can generate this automatically using 2 ways: 1) Using @Since annotation for new parameters/commands. As a part

Re: Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

Did clean up my primary as well. Master is not latest but I think there is something peculiar going on here and yeah I don't think everyone must be facing this. On 09/04/13 7:52 PM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote: > >Did you try clearing up host tags and stale images on your primary >storage . Try doing

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

If you think that the admin should not have the flexibility to delete a user within the admin account from the UI ( one has to use the API's to do such tasks then) , we can go ahead without this change for 4.1 and incorporate this change for 4.2 . Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- Fro

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

We can have alias for an existing API. See the other ML discussion. On 4/9/13 9:27 AM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Yes, I will include more api change details in FS in next few days. >According to Chiradeep, it seems that we cannot simply deprecate old API >in 4.2, Edison and I will discuss this and upda

RE: Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

Well , let us know whatever the issue is . If you are able to solve it soon , you can share what the problem was :) -Original Message- From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:42 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Error on Master - sy

Re: Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

I googled the string below and got several hits. On 4/9/13 10:16 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote: >IOError: [Errno 95] Operation not >supported, ]

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:12:58PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > If you think that the admin should not have the flexibility to delete a user > within the admin account from the UI ( one has to use the API's to do such > tasks then) , we can go ahead without this change for 4.1 and incorporate

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-704. Dedicate Public IP addresses to an account

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10377/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Summary (updated) - CLOUDSTACK-

Re: Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

My guess is that your sysvms are corrupted. On 4/9/13 10:18 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" wrote: >I googled the string below and got several hits. > >On 4/9/13 10:16 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote: > >>IOError: [Errno 95] Operation not >>supported, ] >

Re: Network architecture question

You can do bonded nics in basic zone. The limitation with basic zone is that the Vms cannot have multiple nics. Did you need multiple nics for your vms? If you need advanced network services such as static NAT and load balancing, advanced networking is probably your best bet (currently, unless you

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > I don't think it was ever a part of the Jenkins build process. I used to > generate the diff locally on my machine by feeding the old and new > version commands.xml files to the script. Sorry, which script? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I believe this was never automated. > The apidocs generation tool generates an XML document that contains all > the APIs. > (tools/apidoc/target/commands.xml). We can diff the 4.0 xml and the 4.1 > xml using a tool such as xmldiff (https:/

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

It may not be that simple to just use api name alias. For example, we currently have listS3sCmd, with new image store plugin framework, we introduced a new API "listImageStoresCmd" to cover image stores from various providers, not only S3. We also introduced a new response ImageStoreResponse for th

RE: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

More of a modification of an existing functionality . Probably a new feature in a sense by giving flexibility to the admin to delete users from the UI within the admin account. -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:50

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

Joe, here is the file: ./server/src/com/cloud/api/doc/ApiXmlDocReader.java I used to run it this way: Java -cp com.cloud.api.doc.ApiXmlDocReader -old -new -d -Alena. On 4/9/13 10:27 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: >On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> I don't thin

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1517 - fix resource file for pt_BR (Portuguese Brazil). Remove bad encoded chars, convert into ASCII with unicode chars, sort keys

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10378/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen. Description --- CLOU

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:33:28PM +, Pranav Saxena wrote: > More of a modification of an existing functionality . Probably a new feature > in a sense by giving flexibility to the admin to delete users from the UI > within the admin account. Good clarification! OK, so I'm going to move thi

RE: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules"

Comments Inline. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Prasanna Santhanam Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 11:17 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42][QA]Test Plan for "Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules" On Mon, Apr 0

Re: [DISCUSS] - Deletion of Users within the Admin account

Chip, 1) "System" user is always identified by the cloud.user DB id=1 (hardcoded in User.java interface). This user is never exposed via API, you can't remove it - the checks are already in place for it. 2) For users of "admin" account, currently there is no direct way to tell if the user was ad

RE: Documentation How-To

I am not getting enough feedback when I shared the PDF off-list, after committing the draft files to the Master. So, I reverted the entire stuff and submitted as a patch so that the patch might get more attention from a wider audience :-) Last attempt/ trick to get the review comments... ---

Re: Error on Master - systemvms not coming up

Thanks Chiradeep. Googling didn't point at any specific directions and I had replaced the system template as well (on primary and secondary) but to no respite. Maybe I am missing something fundamental. Will sleep a while and see if tomorrow is going to be a better day :). On 09/04/13 10:50 PM, "C

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

Hi Alena, On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Joe, here is the file: > > ./server/src/com/cloud/api/doc/ApiXmlDocReader.java > > > I used to run it this way: > > Java -cp com.cloud.api.doc.ApiXmlDocReader -old old xml file> -new -d Thanks! I will give that a shot

RE: Documentation How-To

Jason, I have already sent the PDF. The patch is on the review board. Please help me with suggestions/ reviews. Many thanks, I was so worried that I am not getting much help ... -Radhika -Original Message- From: Jason Cadmus [mailto:jdcad...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

In cloudmonkey I can enable the diffing and outputting when sync is done (something like git), so when you do a sync, it can tell you stats like how many new apis were discovered (difference of set of APIs before and after) etc. Do we want such a feature? Cheers. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:14 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] pause VM

On 4/8/13 7:11 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >Perhaps. I think there are separate issues here. There is volume snapshot >and vm snapshot. If the hypervisor is capable of making volumes consistent >, but VM snapshot is more about saving running state, then the two may not >serve the same purpose

Re: [Discuss] API name alias

In Kishan's case he is adding a better, accurate name for the API. The API was misnamed in the previous version (ACL = Access Control List, but ACL was referring to an individual item within the list). Similarly, there are other poorly worded APIs (createIpForwardingRule instead of createStaticNat

Re: [DIscuss]Storage image store plugin framework refactoring

On 09/04/13 11:03 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >It may not be that simple to just use api name alias. For example, we >currently have listS3sCmd, with new image store plugin framework, we >introduced a new API "listImageStoresCmd" to cover image stores from >various providers, not only S3. We also int

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > [Animesh>] Folks I wanted to get your opinion on auto-assignment > > based on the component maintainers list. We can also create shared > > issues filters based on

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/#review18866 --- All guest vlan ranges belonging to one physical network are being up

Re: Documentation How-To

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > I am not getting enough feedback when I shared the PDF off-list, after > committing the draft files to the Master. Did you call for feedback on dev@ as well? It's fine to send the PDF separately to specific folks who request it, since

deployDataCenter.py doesn't work for me on master

Hi, Any thoughts on this? I'm trying to set up DevCloud2 by running deployDataCenter (below) and get a HTTP 530 back. I even re-installed the DevCloud2 appliance to be sure there wasn't something weird going on with its current state. This works for me on 4.1. Thanks! mtutkowski-LT:incubator-

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

When you say it's understandable that people being paid to work on CloudStack full time engage in cookie licking, do you mean to say you think it is acceptable? Or do you believe we should be working to prevent it? On 9 April 2013 19:14, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Pra

Re: Review Request: Changes for Egress firewall rules feature support in SRX

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10336/#review18867 --- server/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java

  1   2   >