Please cherry-pick this commit into 4.1
Related to CLOUDSTACK-694
Cheers,
Hugo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10390/
---
(Updated April 10, 2013, 6:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip
There is an INFRA ticket filed for this already: (INFRA-6133).
Crossposting will get people cross. :)
IT issues are raised as David mentioned in INFRA tickets and through
the #asfinfra channel which has been alerted.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:08:43AM +, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Could
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10367/#review18926
---
docs/en-US/multiple-ip-nic.xml
You can always look at the PDF I have shared off list
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 12:02 PM
To: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; David Nalley; Jessica Tomechak; ilya musayev; Chip
Childers; Pranav Saxena
I see that the term cookie-licking is being used frequently in the email
thread.
We are talking about roughly 200 cookies. 55 of which nobody is willing to
touch.
150 of them are already assigned that means that these are either being
licked or being eaten.
As per the above definition if a
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:44:37PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
[Animesh] Folks I wanted to get your opinion on auto-assignment
based on the
Time to find an alternate domain for jenkins then. :(
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:40:56PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
Ack :(
On 9 April 2013 17:38, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
It was on infra-private as that was where I was told to carry the
conversation when I asked in IRC.
I
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:27:53AM +, Nitin Mehta wrote:
Agreed, but its good to inform that the ticket has been filed or the right
folks have been intimated.
Aye! I just look at too many JIRAs and IRC bot updates. Didn't file
the ticket myself :)
--
Prasanna.,
Hi Abhi,
First of all I totally agree with you on having at least our release
manager the triaging blockers.
Secondly, we need to understand the issue Noah is trying to raise. The
issue assignment way now is surely an anti-pattern. Let's not deviate from
the real issue Noah started with this
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Abhi,
First of all I totally agree with you on having at least our release
manager the triaging blockers.
Secondly, we need to understand the issue Noah is trying to raise. The
issue assignment way now is surely an
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:19:11AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
Not yet at this moment. But we are planning to provide a sample plugin
implementation for this effort. If you are looking at object_store branch,
you will see a plugin called cloud-plugin-storage-image-sample, which
will be the
If you're using new systemvm templates password for root is password.
Cheers.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
venkataswamybabu.budum...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I tried to login to our system vm with 6m1ll10n and it is failing. The
only way for me to login through
On April 10, 2013, 6:25 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
docs/en-US/multiple-ip-nic.xml, line 76
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10367/diff/1/?file=279203#file279203line76
Please add installing 'ipset' for kvm in upgrade instruction
Could you please confirm...about upgrade, Pradeep said it
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:44:31PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
If you're using new systemvm templates password for root is password.
whoa! can we switch to passwordless logins?
PasswordAuthentication no?
--
Prasanna.,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:44:31PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
If you're using new systemvm templates password for root is password.
whoa! can we switch to passwordless logins?
PasswordAuthentication no?
Yes, we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review18937
---
Hey Bharat, I tried to apply your patch, it failed. Pl. upload a new
Wiki is up now. I'm able to access:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home
~kishan
-Original Message-
From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Prasanna Santhanam
Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 12:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10392/
---
(Updated April 10, 2013, 8:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
On April 10, 2013, 9:18 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
Ship It!
Looks good. Someone with appropriate rights needs to pick up the patch and
apply it on master.
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On April 9, 2013, 6:22 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
server/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java, line 331
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10336/diff/2/?file=279173#file279173line331
This would by default allow all egress traffic right? How can these
rules applied to SRX after
Hi all,
There are many global parameters which are used to set values/limits/boolean
for various operations, but these parameters effects all
zones/clusters/accounts/storage based on the parameter.
Here I would like to discuss on granulising these parameters so that these
parameters can be
On April 10, 2013, 11:54 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
Ship It!
submitted:
commit id 5e445f9dd71233638fedeb91ba36aecaae769e8e
- Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10336/
---
(Updated April 10, 2013, 12:46 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi all,
There are many global parameters which are used to set values/limits/boolean
for various operations, but these parameters effects all
zones/clusters/accounts/storage based on the parameter.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
I don't think it was ever a part of the Jenkins build process. I used to
generate the diff locally on my machine by feeding the old and new
version commands.xml files to the script.
Hrm. I wonder what I'm doing wrong here, but I don't
On Apr 10, 2013, at 2:11 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Please cherry-pick this commit into 4.1
Related to CLOUDSTACK-694
Cheers,
Hugo
Ack and done
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 04/09/2013 10:58 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
I brought up some problems related to a ServerResource written in C# on
the mailing list [1].
WRT to the source location, the conclusion seemed to be to create an
Apache
On Apr 10, 2013, at 9:09 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 04/09/2013 10:58 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
I brought up some problems related to a ServerResource written in C# on
the mailing list [1].
WRT to the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 08:09 AM, David Nalley wrote:
It's build-apidocs
build-docs builds the javadoc stuff, not apidocs.
/me slaps forehead.
Thanks.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
I looked at Security groups and I am not sure how this solves my problems. Sure
it provides guest isolation but that is through the virtual router correct? The
underlying physical network --outside of cloudstack-- is still layer 2? That is
what I am concerned with. When defining what IPs my
I would like merge back the IP cleared [1] 'network services in shared
networks' [2] feature back to master. I worked out 'sharednetworkservices'
branch and kept up to date with master.
[1]
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 02:35 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
I think if you were wrongly assigned bug that you did not want to work on
just spit it in the mailing list and you will not be guilty of cookie
licking.
Given the huge number bugs lets focus on how to reduce that pile instead
of
Are there upgraded system VM templates for ACS 4.1? If so are they
available for download?
--
Thanks,
JC
On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete
VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of
VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Jason Cadmus wrote:
Are there upgraded system VM templates for ACS 4.1? If so are they
available for download?
4.1 uses the same system VM templates. 4.2.0 will have new templates,
IIRC.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete
VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of
VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please
On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete
VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of
VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please
On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete
VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of
VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please
Hi List.
Based on documentation and what I'm actually seeing now , system vms can
only failover to other hosts in the same cluster and therefore pod.
I'm guessing this is because the system vm is using a management ip
assigned to that specific pod.
Is there any HA offering that could make
On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete
VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of
VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please
Joe,
Disregard, I read your email wrong.
4.1 uses 4.0 VM templates, in 4.2 things with change.
Thanks
JC
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Jason Cadmus jdcad...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I get the 4.1 VM templates?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
Where can I get the 4.1 VM templates?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Jason Cadmus wrote:
Are there upgraded system VM templates for ACS 4.1? If so are they
available for download?
4.1 uses the same system VM
Mice thanks for taking care of this
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:57 AM
To: Animesh Chaturvedi; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Chandan Purushothama; Anthony Xu; Hari Kannan
Subject: RE:
Members present: Animesh, vogxn, chipc, Humbedooh, jzb, sangeetha, ke4qqq,
kdamage_, edison_cs, sudhap_, Chandan, serverchief, sudhap
Meeting summary:
1. Preface
2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status
3. Active Feature Release: QA Status
4. Active Feature
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:26:15PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to merge the Affinity/Anti-Affinity feature developed in
affinity_groups branch to master.
- Functional Specs for this feature can be found here:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10336/#review18961
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On April 10, 2013, 12:46 p.m.,
commit be55c5b3a58376eb2048a8add155ff09f14e65eb
Author: Marcus Sorensen mar...@betterservers.com
Date: Tue Apr 9 16:26:08 2013 -0600
VPC - new system vm doesn't bring up eth0 reliably, and we don't set
eth0 to
auto start like we should. cloud-early-config sets 'auto lo $1', but
we
Hi Marcus,
I found this 4.2 blocker bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1732 caused by your commit
to change the communication mechanism for KVM systemvm.
As I said, I am not very familiar with python, but seems \r\n would
generated ^M rather than normal unix return character.
Please take a look at
http://s.apache.org/k8w
Slides 32-39 explain the networking layout in security groups in basic
networking.
The VR (one per pod) simply dispenses DHCP and user data. It is not a
firewall.
The firewall is implemented at the hypervisor level. This is what allows
it to scale
yes, you're right, I just ran into this today. The \r\n I believed was
necessary for the socket to flush, but apparently it isn't. If the patch is
in a request you can apply it.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Marcus,
I found this 4.2 blocker bug
commit f66b9b570f2acb35acfda2d159dcde6fa62390d5
Author: Marcus Sorensen mar...@betterservers.com
Date: Wed Apr 10 13:27:10 2013 -0600
Send only \n rather than \r\n to agent socket when sending cmdline
to system VMS
BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1732
Signed-off-by: Marcus Sorensen
RE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1942
I added this feature this morning, but before I present the diff to review
board, I'd like to have some feedback on the approach. I just want to make
sure how I did it is ok from the maintainers perspective so I'm not wasting
anyones
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10378/#review18977
---
Commit d91e162225b3dc678665fadbb0210c28da21d18a in branch
On Apr 9, 2013, at 9:12 PM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
FYI, in case you missed it, I wrote a chapter in the dev guide on how to
write docs….
Sebastien,
I missed your how to write
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/
---
(Updated April 10, 2013, 9:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
I pulled the top of trunk today and had this same issue.
$ git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git
I followed the instruction here to build:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/environment.html
I am new to CloudStack if there is a more stable branch I should be
Thanks! We can continue the testing now. :)
--Sheng
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.comwrote:
commit f66b9b570f2acb35acfda2d159dcde6fa62390d5
Author: Marcus Sorensen mar...@betterservers.com
Date: Wed Apr 10 13:27:10 2013 -0600
Send only \n rather
I like the instructions here better:
http://www.cloudstack-china.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/12/cloudstack-inthebox-devcloud.pdf
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote:
I pulled the top of trunk today and had this same issue.
$ git clone
Thank you Marcus.
Test with the latest build from master.
When deploying a Vm on a IP6 network , we see the dnsmasq service running
successfully in the router .
Vms get deployed successfully and get an Ipv6 address.
I have closed the bug.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10411/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Joe Brockmeier and Sebastien Goasguen.
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: a0b5ebccb814cbb12c5f40aa0c8894ebb3b322d6
Author: Likitha Shetty likitha.she...@citrix.com
Date: Thu Apr 11 04:25:31 2013 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-1988. Attempting to register a AWS API user fails with error code
401.
Fix the code to refer to
I created a zone my host is added but system VM fails to come up, it looks
like a previous problem:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1462
Is this a known problem or a different issue:
Log:
INFO [cloud.configuration.ConfigurationManagerImpl]
(1887041580@qtp-567506852-8:) No
Have you pre-install xenserver template on
nfs://172.16.197.131/opt/storage/secondary/template/tmpl/1/1/?
-Original Message-
From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 4:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: deployDataCenter.py
I am using the devcloud appliance as my NFS Server, for now I am using a
separate XenServer 6.0.2 host, but would like to use the built in
XenServer in devcloud appliance if that works for development.
-Soheil
Here is what is on that NFS drive right now:
root@devcloud:~# find
Hi,
The following features are implemented by feature/ doc assignees for 4.1. If
reporter ( or anyone else for that matter who is interested) can take a look at
the implementation in 41 and close these, that would help to close the release
cleanly. If you can submit test plans/ Test results/
Hi all,
There was a conversation on the mailing list back in February which touched
on Chef cookbooks for CloudStack [1], but I think the links given were
mainly for Knife plugins to use CloudStack APIs.
Does anyone know of Chef cookbooks for installing CloudStack?
Thanks,
Dave.
[1]
On 10/04/13 8:57 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013, at 02:35 AM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
I think if you were wrongly assigned bug that you did not want to work
on
just spit it in the mailing list and you will not be guilty of cookie
licking.
Given the huge
On 10/04/13 6:30 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi all,
There are many global parameters which are used to set
values/limits/boolean for various operations, but these parameters
effects all
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi all,
There was a conversation on the mailing list back in February which touched
on Chef cookbooks for CloudStack [1], but I think the links given were
mainly for Knife plugins to use CloudStack APIs.
Does anyone
If we make config parameters granular to zone/cluster/account.. level, do we
have to restart mgmt server to take it effect?
And it seems this involves a lot of change in codes, is it possible to take
this chance and improve global configs so that we can change global config at
runtime ( no need
71 matches
Mail list logo
