On April 12, 2013, 8:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
test/integration/smoke/test_volumes.py, line 570
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10393/diff/1/?file=280213#file280213line570
Why would a sleep be required here? Can you add a comment for why?
removed it
On April 12, 2013, 8:33
Yes, I think if the test case requires a VM to be deployed outside of
cloudstack knowledge then it is not a valid test case.
-abhi
On 15/04/13 11:27 AM, Saksham Srivastava saksham.srivast...@citrix.com
wrote:
I believe Abhinav's plan was to test a scenario in which:
1.) User applies IP
Heya,
I just checked my qa system. Before starting the usage server I copy the
db.properties and log4j.xml from /etc/cloudstack/management to
/etc/cloudstack/usage. Without these two files the usage server will have
trouble starting. The db.properties not being present could be the cause for
Thanks Abhinav. Its looks like mistakenly I have applied permissions on source
folder.
Hugo: your work around is working fine. After copying the 2 files in
/etc/cloudstack/usage directory ,gave access permission (755) and restart the
cloud-usage service. Then issue won't see again.
Hi Kimi,
From the JIRA link, you can review features which are closed/resolved. That
list gives you complete scope that made it into 4.1. There are minor number
of open and in progress items which did not make it to 4.1 release. Release
is getting closed shortly and possibly the open / in
Its look like we require log4j-cloud_ussge.xml file for successful usage stats
collection. Right now usage server is running but not able to collect the
stats(usage job not triggered and no log generated for usage). We will raise
the bug.
Regards
Sadhu
-Original Message-
From:
For Granular params, I am proposing that we use updateConfiguration
command with two additional parameters i.e. scope_type and scope_id.
Where scope_type can be zone, account, cluster or pool and scope_id will
be the corresponding id of that scope.
We also similarly overload listConfiguration
Hi,
VMware volume snapshot improvements Test Plan is posted @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VMware+volume+snapshot+improvements
Please review the same and send me the comments or any additional cases needed
to be added.
Thanks and Regards,
Kiran Koneti
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10477/#review19186
---
Ship it!
commit e7090e6933f7fa2731c817ead10dfafd650a8e85
Author:
Yes Abhi I agree with you, this approach will eliminate the usage of multiple
APIs.
We can specify scope for each configuration parameter both in config.java file
and configuration table.
We will not set the default values during the creation of resource
(Zone/cluster/pool/account).
Whenever
Suresh,
Can you test with the latest build on master? I've updated the usage package to
fix this problem. See commit ae16f332132a5eb1e3ff85a0c435dbe25a1d6299.
If your tests are ok I can ask Chip to pull it into the 4.1 branch
Cheers,
Hugo
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:43:25AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:54:17PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
Koushik,
I think that it will require working with Prasanna to get a Marvin test
suite for the feature ready to go. I'd personally like to see that
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 01:45:51PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Please cherry pick 1f0b804dd3972f373c196799fc48929a7bc3f473 to 4.1
Fixes a bug where ips would not apply to a Nicira L3 gateway.
Cheers,
Hugo
Done:
commit dbaeda0c211a842fb3a72b5d1f433de7737a47b2
Author: Hugo Trippaers
The network orchestration component currently supports elements in a
side-by-side mode. Compatible network elements can be used in this mode to
offer various network services. There are also scenarios where an inline mode
would be desirable. For e.g. firewall followed by LB. Wanted to check out
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:05:48PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013, at 02:19 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
Any penalties for people who BLOCK documentation development ?
Are there rewards for the folks who aren't blocking documentation
development? It's not like we can
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:50:02PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Based on the community discussions of having 4 month cadence I am proposing
the following schedule:
=
4.2 detailed schedule proposal:
=
2013-05-31
Feature
Thanks everyone! I appreciate the suggestions/ reviews/ comments etc.
Let me clarify that my intention was not to penalize anyone-I am worried about
those users who end up following any incomplete / half-cooked piece of doc of
a superb feature and failing to achieve the purpose
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Documentation focused committers, and review processes
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:05:48PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hi,
as far as I know, I can specify the default network by put it at the
first when use *networkids* paramenter when deploy a vm.
but if I use iptonetworklist parameter specify the IP address,I find I
can't specify the default network.I've test put it at the first and put it
at the last.
What page on the wiki should I create my documentation so I can create a
doc task to get it ported?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On 04/10/2013 04:23 PM, Jason Cadmus wrote:
I have some documentation on how to accomplish this task and would like to
Jason,
Please point me to where you begin this effort.
For VNC and vSphere:
This is hardcoded within CS. First 64 port from 5900-5964 and if all used,
goes to higher 59000-6..
I did an analysis of all systems VMs and ports used with CS4.1 and Vsphere, I
will post the details - hopefully
Ilya, please review
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Configure+vncextras+and+nfsClient+ESXi+firewall+ports
Thanks
JC
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote:
Jason,
Please point me to where you begin this effort.
For VNC and vSphere:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 03:53:59PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Heya,
As we don't have a premium distribution anymore I would like to get rid of
the premium configuration value. At the moment it seems to be unintentionally
used to distinguish between the nonss and oss build so I think it
I would ask another VMWare person to confirm this, but from what I've seen in
past and based on the source code, CS automatically creates firewall rules and
executes them directly on VCenter - it does so repeatedly - on various
instances (add host to clusters, disable or enable host or
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10479/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena.
Description
---
NetworkIds parameter has to be specify regardless of iptonetworklist
parameter presence. So you have to define both parameters, and the first
network from the networkIds list will be used as a default.
-Alena.
On 4/15/13 7:44 AM, sx chen cloudchen0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
as far as I know,
We have a feature Multiple IPs on the same NIC
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+IP+address+per+NIC
Isn't the functionality covered by this feature.
I do not see a strong use case for having both the features (Multi NIC in same
network and Multi IP per NIC).
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 09:58 AM, Jason Cadmus wrote:
What page on the wiki should I create my documentation so I can create a
doc task to get it ported?
Good question. I started a wiki page for this generally:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Docs+in+Process
And for
Thanks Joe
I have been talking Ilya and wanted to do a bit more testing prior to
posting my documentation. I did start a page at the following link although
it can be that can be deleted. My confluence permissions do not allow me
to delete the page I added.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10437/#review19193
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chiradeep Vittal
On April 12, 2013, 9:11
Do I need a patch for this in 4.1?
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 05:02:07PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10437/#review19193
Isn't this discussed here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ggjVAQ
On 4/15/13 6:51 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
The network orchestration component currently supports elements in a
side-by-side mode. Compatible network elements can be used in this mode
to offer various
On 4/15/13 8:53 AM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Heya,
As we don't have a premium distribution anymore I would like to get rid
of the premium configuration value. At the moment it seems to be
unintentionally used to distinguish between the nonss and oss build so I
think
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 09:36 AM, Milamber wrote:
Hello jzb,
A lot of description seems have lost the last characters:
Thanks. I'll try to address that... (p.s., you might want to trim
replies - no need to send the entire list!)
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Getting rid of premium
On 4/15/13 8:53 AM, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Heya,
As we
Following the discussion on bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-645 , there needs to be some
work done for enhancing VMware support for the feature Add/Remove Network on
VM.
I will be updating the FS soon and will send out for review.
Thanks,
Saksham
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10480/
---
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Description
---
Add LXC to
From the log, you seem to use a offering that directs to create volume in
local storage and there is no such storage available in your setup
Kelven
On 4/13/13 4:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
That's weird...I have three local storages (one from DevCloud2 by default,
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013, at 02:31 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
I'm just wondering how we want to handle the case where review never
happens, or not in time for a scheduled release. I agree with Joe that
there's no point reverting an entire feature just because its docs were
not reviewed, but I'd
When using iptonetworklist when deploying Vms ,first entry in the
iptonetworklist ( iptonetworklist[0].networkid) becomes the default network.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 9:32 AM
To:
++Chiradeep, as I see your name referenced in the script.
Noticed an odd behavior on ACS41 and vSphere, where each time you deploy a VM,
on router vm under /var/www/html/latest/ the .htaccess file gets duplicate set
of rewrite rules appended.
Vm_data is called each time VM is deployed, and
I think if you run
git blame ./patches/systemvm/debian/config/root/userdata.sh
There's several changes done to this particular piece of code.
The vm_data file is used for AWS-style metadata and user data
http://s.apache.org/amX
http://s.apache.org/PJH
From: Musayev, Ilya
Chiradeep,
Thanks for the feedback,
We are aware what this is for. There is an issue we found where boto, aws
component used by cloud-init looks for meta-data dir. In ACS 4.1, the rewrite
rule for meta-data dir is never added to router vm's .htaccess file - however
we do see the code for it
Support for SRX + F5 big ip is already in.
--Sheng
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Isn't this discussed here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ggjVAQ
On 4/15/13 6:51 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
The network
For Citrix Xenserver, the vm_data.sh script gets executed on dom0 every time a
vm is added to the network.
For VMWare, it executes the userdata.py script which in turn calls the
userdata.sh script.
The agent api that drives this process is VMDataCommand
From: Musayev, Ilya
I have posted a review draft at the URL below [1]. Please take a look. A
few more replies to Mice's input inline:
*From:* Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:25 PM
*To:* Jessica Tomechak; Vijayendra Bhamidipati
*Cc:* Animesh Chaturvedi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10536/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
this is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10294/
---
(Updated April 16, 2013, 2:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
On April 11, 2013, 8:55 p.m., Min Chen wrote:
In your description, you mentioned that it is not extensively tested yet.
Is this still true? If not, please revise your description to avoid
confusing people.
Not true anymore - apologies for the confusion. I'll put in details of all
Thanks for test plan. Test plan looks good to me.For the below questions
you raised in the test plan please open a bug.
1. Provide a mechanism for updating information about existing Netscaler
device that is enabled for GSLB (like change isGslbProvider from True to
False and vice versa etc..,)
The reason to choose multiple ips is there is a limit (I think it is 7) on the
hypervisor about number of nic can VM have.
For a nic you can have more than 7 ip addresses.
The multiple ips feature is supported in the basic zone also.
I think multiple nics feature is more useful when user need a
All,
Test Plan @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Change+account+membership+Test+Plan
CS Bug @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1390
Requirements @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Change+account+membership
FS UseCases @
+1
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Getting rid of premium
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
+1
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Mice Xia mice_...@tcloudcomputing.comwrote:
+1
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Getting rid of
+1 provided we test it thoroughly and get it reviewed as well to ensure
that we don't break the master.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 16/04/13 11:01 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Mice Xia
mice_...@tcloudcomputing.comwrote:
+1
-Original Message-
55 matches
Mail list logo
